Letter to a Dead Man About the Occupation of Hope
Dear young man who died on the fourth day of this turbulent 2011, dear Mohammed Bouazizi,
I want to write you about an astonishing year -- with three months
yet to run. I want to tell you about the power of despair and the
margins of hope and the bonds of civil society.
I wish you could see the way that your small life and large death
became a catalyst for the fall of so many dictators in what is known as
the Arab Spring.
We are now in some sort of an American Fall. Civil society here has
suddenly hit the ground running, and we are all headed toward a future
no one imagined when you, a young Tunisian vegetable seller capable of
giving so much, who instead had so much taken from you, burned yourself
to death to protest your impoverished and humiliated state.
You lit yourself on fire on December 17, 2010, exactly nine months
before Occupy Wall Street began. Your death two weeks later would be
the beginning of so much. You lit yourself on fire because you were
voiceless, powerless, and evidently without hope. And yet you must have
had one small hope left: that your death would have an impact; that
you, who had so few powers, even the power to make a decent living or
protect your modest possessions or be treated fairly and decently by the
police, had the power to protest. As it turned out, you had that power
beyond your wildest dreams, and you had it because your hope, however
diminished, was the dream of the many, the dream of what we now have
started calling the 99%.
Tomgram: Rebecca Solnit, This Land Is Your (Occupied) Land
The other day in my Manhattan neighborhood, a woman passed
me in the street. She was obviously headed for a demonstration
somewhere in the big city, with a sign tucked sideways under her arm. I
could just make out the large black letters on a white background that
said: “I Want My Job Back.” And they claim the Occupy Wall Street
demonstrators have no demands!
Here are a few observations from recent trips to Zuccotti Park and
various marches I’ve been on, including last Saturday when the Occupy
movement went global with, the Washington Post
reports, rallies in “more than 900” cities in Europe, Asia, Africa, and
the United States. Having been at many demonstrations in my life,
here’s the strangest and perhaps the most striking thing I’ve noticed: I
have yet to see a single counterdemonstration, or even a single
counterdemonstrator. Not one. Nor a single sign expressing
disapproval, outrage, or upset with the Occupy Wall Street movement.
This, believe me, is not normal for protests. Talk about expressing the
will of the 99%!
And the earliest public opinion polls
reflect this. According to an Ipsos poll, a startling 82% of Americans
have heard of the movement, striking percentages are following it with
some attention, and -- according to
TIME magazine -- 54% of Americans have a favorable view of it, only 23%
an unfavorable one. Perhaps this shouldn’t be surprising in a country
in which 86% of those polled believe “Wall Street and its lobbyists
have too much influence in Washington,” or in which median household
income fell by 6.7% after the Great Recession of 2008 was officially declared over (9.8% since it began).
I was at the edge of Zuccotti Park the other day when members of SEIU 32BJ,
the building workers union, arrived, a sea of yellow T-shirts and
signs. With a new contract on the horizon, they had been demonstrating
on their own in the Wall Street area and decided “spontaneously” -- so
several told me -- to march to the park. (As one SEIU organizer put
it, “Our members really get it, the connection between this and us.”)
The energy was sky-high, the excitement palpable, the chanting and
cheering loud as they looked down on what could only be described
visually as a hippie encampment.
Had this been the 1960s,
conflict would undoubtedly have followed. I found myself with a burly
white guy wearing a red Communications Workers of America T-shirt on
one side of me and a young black woman with a yellow SEIU T-shirt on
the other. He promptly commented with indignation and accuracy: “You
know, we were saying the 1% and the 99% for like five years and nobody
paid attention because we’re unions, we’re the wallpaper!” I braced
myself for the coming diatribe against the Zuccotti Park protesters for
appropriating the slogan and grabbing the glory. Instead, he
continued with unmistakable enthusiasm, “You know, it’s great that
these kids have taken it and put it on the map!” At which point the
young woman next to me chimed in with equal enthusiasm, “It’s not just
the unions any more! It’s bigger than that!”
It is bigger and could be bigger yet, 900 cities or not. It could
explode in all sorts of unknown directions in all sorts of unexpected
places. This weekend, at another spot, I listened to a group of young
people from local colleges, for instance, talking soberly about the
possibility of taking over campus buildings, only to be drowned out by
arriving marchers powered by drums chanting, “We are unstoppable!
Another world is possible!” In that same crowd, amid varied signs
(“Arab Spring, European Summer, American Fall, Chinese Winter,” “Mink
Coats Don’t Trickle Down”) was one that said, “My dad works for Wall
Street and I’m taking a stand” -- and she was.
Whatever other worlds are possible, no one at TomDispatch has pointed longer or more vigorously
to the remarkable possibilities that lurk in our present world, in our
moment, in ourselves than Rebecca Solnit, who long ago saw the hope
that lay “in the dark” and whose moment this has to be. Tom
Letter to a Dead Man About the Occupation of Hope
And so Tunisia erupted and overthrew its government, and Egypt caught
fire, as did Bahrain, Syria, Yemen, and Libya, where the nonviolent
protests elsewhere turned into a civil war the rebels have almost won
after several bloody months. Who could have imagined a Middle East
without Ben Ali of Tunisia, without Mubarak, without Gaddafi? And yet
here we are, in the unimaginable world. Again. And almost everywhere.
Japan was literally shaken loose from its plans and arrangements by
the March 11th earthquake and tsunami, and that country has undergone profound soul-searching
about values and priorities. China is turbulent, and no one knows how
much longer the discontent of the repressed middle class and the hungry
poor there will remain containable. India: who knows? The Saudi
government is so frightened it even gave women a few new rights.
Syrians wouldn’t go home even when their army began to shoot them
down. Crowds of up to a million Italians have been protesting austerity
measures in recent months. The Greeks, well, if you’ve been following
events, you know about the Greeks. Have I forgotten Israel? Huge demonstrations against the economic status quo there lasted all summer and into this fall.
As you knew at the outset, it’s all about economics. This wild year,
Greece boiled over again into crisis with colossal protests,
demonstrations, blockades, and outright street warfare. Icelanders
continued their fight against bailing out the banks that sank their
country’s economy in 2008 and continue pelting politicians with eggs.
Their former prime minister may become
the first head of state to face legal charges in connection with the
global financial collapse. Spanish youth began to rise up on May 15th.
Distinctively, in so many of these uprisings the participants were
not advocating for one party or a simple position, but for a better
world, for dignity, for respect, for real democracy, for belonging, for
hope and possibility -- and their economic underpinnings. The Spanish
young whose future had been sold out to benefit corporations and their
1% were nicknamed the Indignados, and they lived in the plazas of Spain this summer. Occupied Madrid, like Occupied Tahrir Square, preceded Occupy Wall Street.
In Chile, students outraged
by the cost of an education and the profound inequities of their
society have been demonstrating since May -- with everything from kiss-ins to school occupations to marches of 150,000 or more. Forty thousand students marched against “education reform” in Colombia last week. And in August in Britain the young went on a rampage
that tore up London, Birmingham, and dozens of other communities, an
event that began when the police shot Mark Duggan, a dark-skinned
29-year-old Londoner. Young Britons had risen up more peaceably over tuition hikes
the winter before. There, too, things are bleak and volatile --
something I know you would understand. In Mexico, a beautiful movement
involving mass demonstrations against the drug war has arisen, triggered
by the death of another young man, and by the grief and vision of his
father, leftwing poet Javier Cicilia.
The United States had one great eruption in Wisconsin
this winter, when the citizenry occupied their state capitol building
in Madison for weeks. Egyptians and others elsewhere on the planet called
a local pizza parlor and sent pies to the occupiers. We all know the
links. We’re all watching. So the Occupy movement has spilled over from
Wall Street. Hundreds of occupations are happening all over the North America: in Oklahoma City and Tijuana, in Victoria and Fort Lauderdale.
The 99%
We are the 99% is the cry of the Occupy movement. This
summer one of the flyers that helped launch the Occupy Wall Street
protest read: “We, the 99%, call for an open general assembly Aug. 9,
7:30 pm at the Potato Famine Memorial NYC.” It was an assembly to
discuss the September 17th occupation-to-come.
The Irish Hunger Memorial,
so close to Wall Street, commemorates the million Irish peasants who
starved in the 1840s, while Ireland remained a food-exporting country
and the landed gentry continued to profit. It’s a
monument to the exploitation of the many by the few, to the forces that
turned some of our ancestors -- including my mother’s four Irish
grandparents -- into immigrants, forces that are still pushing people
out of farms, homes, nations, regions.
The Irish famine was one of the great examples of those disasters of
the modern era that are not crises of scarcity, but of distribution. The
United States is now the wealthiest country the world has ever known,
and has an abundance of natural resources, as well as of nurses,
doctors, universities, teachers, housing, and food -- so ours, too, is a
crisis of distribution. Everyone could have everything they need and
the rich would still be rich enough, but you know that enough
isn’t a concept for them. They’re greedy, and their 30-year grab for
yet more has carved away at what’s minimally necessary for the survival
and dignity of the rest of us. So the Famine Memorial couldn’t have been
a more appropriate place for Occupy Wall Street to begin.
The 99%, those who starve during famines and lose their livelihoods
and homes during crashes, were going to respond to the 1% who had been
served so well by the Bush administration and by the era of extreme
privatization it ushered in. As my friend Andy Kroll reported
at TomDispatch, “The top 1% of earners enjoyed 65% of all income growth
in America for much of the decade” just passed. “In 2010,” he added,
“20.5 million people, or 6.7% of all Americans, scraped by with less
than $11,157 for a family of four -- that is, less than half of the
poverty line.” You can’t get by on less than $1,000 a month in this
country where a single visit to an emergency room can cost your annual
income, a car twice that, and a year at a private college more than four
times that.
Later in August came the website started by a 28-year-old New York City activist, we are the 99 percent,
to which hundreds daily now submit photographs of themselves. Each of
them also testifies to the bleak conditions they find themselves in,
despite their hard work and educations which often left them in debt,
despite the promises dangled before them that (if they played the game
right) they’d be safe, housed, and living a part of that oversold dream.
It’s
a website of unremitting waking nightmares, economic bad dreams that a
little wealth redistribution would eliminate (even without eliminating
the wealthy). The people contributing aren’t asking for luxuries. They
would simply prefer not to be worked to death like so many
nineteenth-century millworkers, nor to have their whole world come
crashing down if they get sick. They want to survive with dignity, and
their testimony will break your heart.
Mohammed Bouazizi, dead at 26, you to whom I’m writing, here is one of the recent posts at that site:
“I am 26 years old. I am $134,000 in debt. I started working at 14
years old, and have worked Full-Time since I turned 20. I work in I.T.
and got laid off in July 2011. I was LUCKY, and found a job RIGHT AWAY:
with a Pay Cut and MORE HOURS.
 Now, I just found out that my Dad got
laid off last week - after 18 YEARS with the same employer. I have
debilitating (SP! Sorry!) O.C.D. and can’t take time away from work to
get treatment because I can’t afford my mortgage payments if I don’t go
to work, and I’m afraid I’ll lose my NEW job if I take time off!!! WE
ARE THE 99%.”
Some of the people at we are the 99% offer at least partial
views of their faces, but the young IT worker quoted above holds a
handwritten letter so long that it obscures his face. Poverty obscures
your face too. It obscures your talents, potential, even your
distinctive voice, and if it goes deep enough, it eradicates you by
degrees of hunger and degradation. Poverty is a creation of the systems
against which people all over the planet are revolting this wild year of
2011. The Arab Spring, after all, was an economic revolt. What were
all those dictatorships and autocracies for, if not to squeeze as much
profit as possible out of subjugated populations -- profit for rulers,
profit for multinational corporations, profit for that 1%.
“We are not goods in the hands of politicians and bankers,” was the slogan
of the first student protest called in Spain this year. Your beautiful
generation, Mohammed Bouazizi, has arisen and is bringing the rest of us
along, even here in the United States.
The People’s Microphone
Its earliest critics seemed to think that Occupy Wall Street was a
lobbying group whose chosen task on this planet should be to create a
package of realistic demands. In other words, they were convinced that
the occupiers should become supplicants, asking the powerful for some
kind of handout like college debt forgiveness. They were suggesting that
a dream as wide as the sky be stuffed into little bottles and put up
for sale. Or simply smashed.
In the same way, they wanted this movement to hurry up and appoint
leaders, so that there would be someone to single out and investigate,
pick off, or corrupt. At heart, however, this is a leaderless movement,
an anarchist movement, catalyzed by the grace of civil society and the
hard work of the collective. The Occupy movement -- like so many
movements around the world now -- is using general assemblies as its
form of protest and process. Its members are not facing the authorities,
but each other, coming to know themselves, trying to give rise to the
democracy they desire on a small scale rather than merely railing
against its absence on a large scale.
These are the famous Occupy general assemblies in which decisions are
made by consensus and, in the absence of amplification (by order of the
New York City police), the people’s mike is used: those assembled
repeat what is said as it’s said, creating a human megaphone effect.
This is accompanied by a small vocabulary of hand gestures, which help
people participate in the complex process of a huge group having a
conversation.
In other words, the process is also the goal: direct democracy. No
one can hand that down to you. You live direct democracy in that moment
when you find yourself participating in civil society as a citizen with
an equal voice. Put another way, the Occupiers are not demanding that
something be given to them but formulating something new. That it
involves no technology, not even bullhorns, is itself remarkable in this
wired era. It’s just passionate people together -- and then Facebook,
YouTube, Twitter, text messages, emails, and online sites like this one
spread the word, along with some print media, notably the Occupied Wall Street Journal.
The beauty and the genius of this movement in this moment is that it
has found a way to define its needs and desires without putting limits
on them that would automatically exclude so many. In doing so, it has
spoken to nearly all of us.
There is the terrible rage at economic injustice that is shared by
college students looking at a future of debt and overwork, as well as
those who couldn’t afford college in the first place, by working people
struggling ever harder for less, by the many who have no jobs and few
prospects, by people forced out of their homes by the games banks play
with mortgages and profits, and by everyone the catastrophe that is
healthcare in this country has affected. And by the rest of us, furious
on their behalf (and on our own).
And then there is the joyous hope that things could actually be
different. That hope has been fulfilled a little in the way that an
open-ended occupation has survived four weeks and more and turned into
hundreds of Occupy actions around the country and marches in almost
1,000 cities around the world last Sunday, from Sydney to Tokyo to Santa
Rosa. It speaks for so many; it speaks for the 99%; and it speaks
clearly, so clearly that an ex-Marine showed up with a hand-lettered
sign that said, "2nd time I've fought for my country, 1st time I've
known my enemy."
The climate change movement showed up at Occupy Wall Street, too.
What’s blocking action on climate change is what’s blocking action on
all the other issues that matter: it would cut into profits. Never mind
the deep future, not when what’s at stake is quarterly earnings.
A dozen years ago, after the wildly successful revolt against neoliberal economic policy in Seattle, the slogan that stuck around was: “Another World Is Possible.” I was never sure
about that one because in crucial places and ways that other world is
already here. In a YouTube video of the New York occupation, however, I
watched an old woman in a straw hat say,
“We’re fighting for a society in which everyone is important.” What a
beautiful summation! Could any demand be clearer than that? And could
the ways in which people have no value under our current economic regime
be more obvious?
What Is Your Occupation?
Occupy Wall Street. Occupy together. Occupy New Orleans, Portland, Stockton, Boston, Las Cruces, Minneapolis. Occupy.
The very word is a manifesto, a position statement, and a position as
well. For so many people, particularly men, their occupation is their
identity, and when a job is lost, they become not just unemployed, but
no one. The Occupy movement offers them a new occupation, work that
won’t pay the bills, but a job worth doing. “Lost my job, found an
occupation,” said one sign in the crowd of witty signs.
There is, of course, a bleaker meaning for the word occupation, as in
"the U.S. is occupying Iraq." Even National Public Radio gives the Dow
Jones report several times a day, as though the rise and fall of the
stock market had not long ago been decoupled from the rise and fall of
genuine measures of wellbeing for the 99%. A small part of Wall Street,
which has long occupied us as if it were a foreign power, is now
occupied as though it were a foreign country.
Wall Street is a foreign country -- and maybe an enemy
country as well. And now it’s occupied. The way that Native Americans
occupied Alcatraz Island in San Francisco Bay for 18 months four decades
ago and galvanized a national Native American rights movement. You pick
some place to stand, and when you stand there, you find your other
occupation, as a member of civil society.
This May in Ohio, a group of Robin Hoods literally lowered a drawbridge
they made so they could cross a “moat” around Chase Bank’s headquarters
and invade its shareholders’ meeting. Forty Robin Hoods also showed up
en masse last week in kayaks for a national mortgage bankers' meeting in
Chicago. Houses facing foreclosure are being occupied. Foreclosure is, of course, a way of turning people into non-occupants.
At this moment in history, occupation should be everyone’s occupation.
Baby Pictures of a Revolt
Young man whose despair gave birth to hope, no one knows what the
future holds. When you set yourself afire almost ten months ago, you
certainly didn’t know, nor do any of us know now, what the long-term
outcome of the Arab Spring will be, let alone this American Fall. Such a
movement arrives in the world like a newborn. Who knows its fate, or
even whether it will survive to grow up?
It may be suppressed like the Prague Spring of 1968. It may go
through a crazy adolescence like the French Revolution of 1789 and yet
grow beyond its parents’ dreams. Radiant at birth, wreathed in smiles,
it may become a stolid bourgeois citizen as did such movements in
Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and the reunited Germany after civil society
freed those countries from totalitarianism.
It may grow up into turbulence as has the Philippines since its 1986
revolution ousted the kleptocracy of the Marcos family. Revolution may
be assassinated young, the way the democratic government of Mohammed
Mossadegh was in Iran in 1953, that of President Jacobo Arbenz in
Guatemala in 1954, and President Salvador Allende’s Chilean experiment
on September 11, 1973, all three in CIA-backed military coups. On behalf
of the 1%.
Whether a human child or a child of history, we can’t know who or
what it will become, but it’s still possible to grasp something about it
by asking who or what it resembles. What does Occupy Wall Street look
like? Well, its siblings born around the world this year, of course, and
perhaps in some way the American civil rights movement that began in
the 1950s.
There was a national uprising in the United States no less
spontaneous in its formation during the great depression of the 1870s,
but the Great Railroad Strike of 1877
was violent, while the Occupy movement is deeply imbued with the spirit
and tactics of nonviolence. The last Great Depression, the one that
began in 1929, created a host of radical movements, as well as the Hoovervilles
of homeless people. There are family resemblances. The marches and
actions against the coming invasion of Iraq on February 15, 2003, on all
seven continents (yes, including Antarctica) are clearly kin. And the
anti-corporate globalization movement is a godmother. And then there’s a
sibling just a decade older.
Cousin 9/11
Zuccotti Park is just two blocks from Wall Street, and also just a
block from Ground Zero, the site of the 9/11 attack. On that day, it was
badly damaged. This September 21st, my dear friend Marina Sitrin wrote
me from Occupy Wall Street: “There are people from more diverse
backgrounds racially, more diverse age groups, including not just a few
children here with their parents, and a number of working people from
the area. In particular, some of the security guards from the 9.11
memorial, a block away have been coming by for lunch and chatting with
people, as has a local group of construction workers.”
If the Arab Spring was the decade-later antithesis of 9/11, a largely
nonviolent, publicly inclusive revolt that forced the Western world to
get over its fearful fantasy that all young Muslims are terrorists, jihadis,
and suicide bombers, then Occupy Wall Street, which began six days
after the 10th anniversary of that nightmarish day in September, is the
other half of 9/11 in New York. What was remarkable about that day 10
years ago is how calmly and beautifully everyone behaved. New Yorkers
helped each other down those dozens of floors of stairs in the Twin
Towers and away from the catastrophe, while others lined up to give
blood, desperate to do something, anything, to participate, to be part
of a newfound sense of community that arose in the city that day.
There was, for example, a huge commissary organized on Chelsea Piers
that provided free food, medical supplies, and work equipment for the
people at Ground Zero and also helped find housing for the displaced. It
was not an official effort, but one that arose even more spontaneously
than Occupy Wall Street, without leaders or institutions -- and it was
forcibly disbanded when the official organizations got their act
together a few days later. Those who participated experienced a sense of
democracy amid all the distress and sorrow, a tremendous joy in finding
meaningful work and deep social connections, and a little temporary
joy, as they often do in disaster.
When I began to study the history of urban disaster years ago, I
found such unexpected exhibitions of that kind of joy again and again,
uniting the generative moments of protests, demonstrations, revolts, and
revolutions with the aftermath of some disasters. Even when the losses
were terrible, the ways that people came together to meet the occasion
were almost always inspiring.
Since I wrote A Paradise Built in Hell: The Extraordinary Communities That Arise in Disaster,
I have been asked again and again whether economic crisis begets the
same kind of community as sudden disasters. It did in Argentina in 2001,
when the economy crashed there. And it has now, in the streets of New
York and many other cities, in 2011. A sign at Occupy San Francisco
said, “IT’S TIME.” It is. It’s been time for a long time.
No Hope But in Ourselves
The birth of this moment was delayed three years. Argentinians reacted immediately
to the 2001 crisis and to long-simmering grievances with an economy
that had ground so many of them down even before the government froze
all bank accounts and the economy crashed. On the other hand, our
economy collapsed three years ago this month to headlines like
“Capitalism is dead” in the business press. There was certainly some
fury and outrage at the time, but the real reaction was delayed, or
decoyed.
The outrage of the moment did, in fact, result in a powerful grassroots movement
that focused on a single political candidate to fix it all for us, as
he promised he would. It was a beautiful movement, a hopeful movement,
much more so than its candidate. The movement got its lone candidate
into the highest office in the land, where he remains today, and then
walked away as though the job was done. It had just begun.
That movement could have fought the corporations, given us a real
climate-change policy, and more, but it allowed itself to be disbanded
as though one elected politician were the equivalent of ten million
citizens, of civil society itself. It was a broad-based movement, of all
ages and races, and I think it’s back, disillusioned with politicians
and electoral politics, determined this time to do it for itself, beyond
and outside the corroded arenas of institutional power.
I don’t know exactly who this baby looks like, but I know that who
you look like is not who you will become. This unanticipated baby has a
month behind it and a future ahead of it that none of us can see, but
its birth should give you hope.
Love,
Rebecca
TomDispatch regularRebecca Solnit hopes to visit Occupy Wall Street soon. A product of the
California public educational system back when the public schools were
functional and universities affordable, she is the author of 13 books, including A Paradise Built in Hell: The Extraordinary Communities That Arise in Disaster and Hope in the Dark: Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities.
Copyright 2011 Rebecca Solnit