Home     The Writers     Search     Contact Us     Gorilla Radio     Atlantic Free Press     Empire Burlesque     Your Profile  
  You are here: 

Sun

18

Feb

2007

Non-Binding, So What Does it Resolve?
written by Chris Cook
by C. L. Cook 
 
For those still clinging to the remote hope that a political solution to America's wars could be finally broached by a newly emboldened and empowered Democratic party, last week's non-binding resolution on Iraq should prove a sufficiently pointed stake to drive through the heart of any surviving naivete. That the resolution failed to garner the 60% Senate support needed to move forward is the lesser failure; what this bit of mealy-mouthed, weedling legalese illustrates is the profound depth of America's moral paucity.

Iraq, when mentioned, is culprit, the author of its own disaster. As though four years of military mayhem wrecked upon that benighted country has nothing to do with the chaos Iraqis have come to know as normal; as if the mass exodus of war refugees from the country, greater in number than any other since the end of the second world war, has nothing to do with the destruction of civil society; as though the black operatives, mercenaries, and assorted scum collected from the bottom of the empire's global barrel sent into Iraq to practice Salvadorian and other "options" is not a factor in that chaos is beyond acknowledgment. No, what is owned in this 97 word denial document is this, and other similar sentiment:
 

 
"the situation in Iraq is damaging the standing, influence, and interests of the United States in Iraq, the Middle East, and around the world"
 
 
Isn't that a kicker! Patrick Martin, writing in the World Socialist Web Site provides the post-mortem on American decency as exemplified in this recent  bit of cowardly political theatre.
 
Here below then the text of the non-binding resolution on Iraq...
 
 
Following is the text of the non-binding resolution on the Iraq war that the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved on Wednesday, January 24, 2007 by a 12-9 vote:
 
Expressing the bipartisan resolution on Iraq

 
Whereas the United States strategy and presence on the ground in Iraq can only be sustained with the support of the American people and bipartisan support from Congress;

Whereas maximizing chances of success in Iraq should be our goal, and the best chance of success requires a change in current strategy;

Whereas the situation in Iraq is damaging the standing, influence, and interests of the United States in Iraq, the Middle East, and around the world;

Whereas more than 137,000 United States military personnel are bravely and honorably serving in Iraq and deserve the support of all Americans;

Whereas more than 3,000 United States military personnel have already lost their lives in Iraq, and more than 22,500 have been wounded in Iraq;

Whereas on January 10, 2007, President George W. Bush announced his plan to deepen the United States military involvement in Iraq by deploying approximately 21,000 additional United States combat forces to Iraq;

Whereas Iraq is witnessing widening sectarian and intra-sectarian violence;

Whereas Iraqis must reach a political settlement if there is going to be a reconciliation in Iraq, and the failure of the Iraqis to achieve such a settlement has led to the increase in violence in Iraq;

Whereas Iraq Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki stated on November 27, 2006, that '(t)he crisis is political, and the ones who can stop the cycle of aggravation and bloodletting of innocents are the politicians.';

Whereas an open-ended commitment of United States forces in Iraq is unsustainable and a deterrent to the Iraqis making the political compromises and providing the personnel and resources that are needed for violence to end and for stability and security to be achieved in Iraq;

Whereas the responsibility for internal security and halting sectarian violence in Iraq must rest primarily with the Government of Iraq and Iraqi security forces;

Whereas there have been repeated promises by the Government of Iraq to assume a greater share of security responsibilities, disband militias, consider amendments to the Iraq constitution, enact laws to reconcile sectarian differences, and improve the quality of life for the Iraqi people, but those promises have not been kept;

Whereas a successful strategy in Iraq is dependent upon the Iraqi leaders fulfilling their promises;

Whereas the commander of the United States Central Command, General John Abizaid, testified to Congress on November 15, 2006, that '(i)t's easy for the Iraqis to rely upon us to do this work. I believe that more American forces prevent the Iraqis from taking more responsibility for their own future';

Whereas the Iraq Study Group suggested a comprehensive strategy to 'enable the United States to begin to move its combat forces out of Iraq responsibly' based on 'new and enhanced diplomatic and political efforts in Iraq and the region';

Whereas the United States Army and Marine Corps, including their Reserves and the Army National Guard, their personnel, and their families, are under enormous strain from multiple, extended deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan;

Whereas the majority of nondeployed Army and Marine Corps units are no longer combat ready due to a lack of equipment and insufficient time to train; and

Whereas the United States strategy in Iraq must not compromise the ability of the United States to address other vital national security priorities, in particular global terror networks, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, regional stability in the Middle East, the nuclear program of Iran, the nuclear weapons of North Korea, and stability and security in Afghanistan: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that–

(1) it is not in the national interest of the United States to deepen its military involvement in Iraq, particularly by increasing the United States military force presence in Iraq;

(2) the primary objective of United States strategy in Iraq should be to have the Iraqi political leaders make the political compromises necessary to end the violence in Iraq;

(3) greater concerted regional, and international support would assist the Iraqis in achieving a political solution and national reconciliation;

(4) main elements of the mission of United States forces in Iraq should transition to helping ensure the territorial integrity of Iraq, conduct counterterrorism activities, reduce regional interference in the internal affairs of Iraq, and accelerate training of Iraqi troops;

(5) the United States should transfer, under an appropriately expedited timeline, responsibility for internal security and halting sectarian violence in Iraq to the Government of Iraq and Iraqi security forces; and

(6) the United States should engage nations in the Middle East to develop a regional, internationally-sponsored peace and reconciliation process for Iraq.
 
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Top

Sister Sites

Atlantic Free Press

Atlantic Free Press

Pacific Free Press

Pacific Free Press

tv apps tv widgets market
appmarket.tv

agora media group
Agora Media Group

New Advertiser
BetDSI has come on for the 2012 NBA Playoffs as a platinum sponsor of Pacific Free Press.