
Sites of Interest
(courtesy Empire Burlesque)
Arthur Silber
Angry Arab
Antiwar.com
A Tiny Revolution
Gore Vidal
William Blum/Killing Hope
Baltimore Chronicle
Buzzflash
Magnificent Valor
The Distant Ocean
Glenn Greenwald
Horton/Harper's
Informed Comment
Vast Left
TomDispatch
Truthdig
Welcome to the Sideshow
Winter Patriot
Andy Worthington
Alicublog
Counterpunch
Mark Crispin Miller
Dennis Perrin
Booman Tribune
Crooks and Liars
ConsortiumNews
Eschaton
Black Agenda Report
LRB Blog
The Raw Story
Sadly, No!
James Wolcott
William Bowles
European Tribune
Iraq Vets Against the War
Blues and Dreams
Bright Terrible Spirit
The short version is we want you to consider doing something hard:
coming to Washington in the hottest and stickiest weeks of the summer
and engaging in civil disobedience that will likely get you arrested.
The full version goes like this: As you know, the planet is steadily warming: 2010 was the warmest year
on record, and we’ve seen the resulting chaos in almost every corner of
the earth. And as you also know, our democracy is increasingly controlled by special interests interested only in their short-term profit.
How much carbon lies in the recoverable tar sands of Alberta? A recent
calculation from some of our foremost scientists puts the figure at
about 200 parts per million. Even with the new pipeline they won’t be
able to burn that much overnight—but each development like this makes it
easier to get more oil out. As the climatologist Jim Hansen (one of
the signatories to this letter) explained, if we have any chance of
getting back to a stable climate “the principal requirement is that coal
emissions must be phased out by 2030 and unconventional fossil fuels,
such as tar sands, must be left in the ground.” In other words, he
added, “if the tar sands are thrown into the mix it is essentially game
over.” The Keystone pipeline is an essential part of the game. "Unless
we get increased market access, like with Keystone XL, we're going to be
stuck," said Ralph Glass, an economist and vice-president at AJM
Petroleum Consultants in Calgary, told a Canadian newspaper last week.
Given all that, you’d suspect that there’s no way the Obama
administration would ever permit this pipeline. But in the last few
months the president has signed pieces of paper opening much of Alaska
to oil drilling, and permitting coal-mining on federal land in Wyoming
that will produce as much CO2 as 300 power plants operating at full
bore.
And Secretary of State Clinton has already said she’s ‘inclined’ to
recommend the pipeline go forward. Partly it’s because of the political
commotion over high gas prices, though more tar sands oil would do
nothing to change that picture. But it’s also because of intense
pressure from industry. TransCanada Pipeline, the company behind
Keystone, has hired as its chief lobbyist for the project a man named
Paul Elliott, who served as deputy national director of Clinton’s
presidential campaign. Meanwhile, the US Chamber of Commerce—a bigger
funder of political campaigns than the RNC and DNC combined—has demanded
that the administration “move quickly to approve the Keystone XL
pipeline,” which is not so surprising—they’ve also told the U.S. EPA
that if the planet warms that will be okay because humans can ‘adapt
their physiology’ to cope. The Koch Brothers, needless to say, are also
backing the plan, and may reap huge profits from it.
So we’re pretty sure that without serious pressure the Keystone Pipeline
will get its permit from Washington. A wonderful coalition of
environmental groups has built a strong campaign across the
continent—from Cree and Dene indigenous leaders to Nebraska farmers,
they’ve spoken out strongly against the destruction of their land. We
need to join them, and to say even if our own homes won’t be crossed by
this pipeline, our joint home—the earth—will be wrecked by the carbon
that pours down it.
And we need to say something else, too: it’s time to stop letting
corporate power make the most important decisions our planet faces.
We don’t have the money to compete with those corporations, but we do
have our bodies, and beginning in mid August many of us will use them.
We will, each day through Labor Day, march on the White House, risking
arrest with our trespass. We will do it in dignified fashion,
demonstrating that in this case we are the conservatives, and that our
foes—who would change the composition of the atmosphere are dangerous
radicals. Come dressed as if for a business meeting—this is, in fact,
serious business. And another sartorial tip—if you wore an Obama button
during the 2008 campaign, why not wear it again? We very much still want
to believe in the promise of that young Senator who told us that with
his election the ‘rise of the oceans would begin to slow and the planet
start to heal.’ We don’t understand what combination of bureaucratic
obstinacy and insider dealing has derailed those efforts, but we
remember his request that his supporters continue on after the election
to pressure the government for change. We’ll do what we can.
And one more thing: we don’t want college kids to be the only cannon
fodder in this fight. They’ve led the way so far on climate
change—10,000 came to DC for the Powershift gathering earlier this
spring. They’ve marched this month in West Virginia to protest
mountaintop removal; Tim DeChristopher faces sentencing this summer in
Utah for his creative protest. Now it’s time for people who’ve spent
their lives pouring carbon into the atmosphere (and whose careers won’t
be as damaged by an arrest record) to step up too. Most of us signing
this letter are veterans of this work, and we think it’s past time for
elders to behave like elders. One thing we don’t want is a smash up: if
you can’t control your passions, this action is not for you.
This won’t be a one-shot day of action. We plan for it to continue for
several weeks, to the date in September when by law the administration
can either grant or deny the permit for the pipeline. Not all of us can
actually get arrested—half the signatories to this letter live in
Canada, and might well find our entry into the U.S. barred. But we will
be making plans for sympathy demonstrations outside Canadian consulates
in the U.S., and U.S. consulates in Canada—the decision-makers need to
know they’re being watched.
Winning this battle won’t save the climate. But losing it will mean the
chances of runaway climate change go way up—that we’ll endure an endless
future of the floods and droughts we’ve seen this year. And we’re
fighting for the political future too—for the premise that we should
make decisions based on science and reason, not political connection.
You have to start somewhere, and this is where we choose to begin.
If you think you might want to be a part of this action, we need you to sign up here.
As plans solidify in the next few weeks we’ll be in touch with you to
arrange nonviolence training; our colleagues at a variety of
environmental and democracy campaigns will be coordinating the actual
arrangements.
We know we’re asking a lot. You should think long and hard on it, and
pray if you’re the praying type. But to us, it’s as much privilege as
burden to get to join this fight in the most serious possible way. We
hope you’ll join us.
Maude Barlow
Wendell Berry
Tom Goldtooth
Danny Glover
James Hansen
Wes Jackson
Naomi Klein
Bill McKibben
George Poitras
David Suzuki
Gus Speth
p.s.—Please pass this letter on to anyone else you think might be
interested. We realize that what we’re asking isn’t easy, and we’re very
grateful that you’re willing even to consider it.