His most recent missive is a rehash of the things he’s written
over the years, with a “Did You Know?†headline and tagged
with:
“OF COURSE WE DIDN'T KNOW! WHY DIDN'T WE KNOW? OUR MEDIA
WOULDN'T TELL US!
“Instead of reflecting our love for our country, we get photos of
flag-burning incidents at Abu Ghraib and people throwing snowballs at the
presidential motorcades."
“Tragically, the lack of accentuating the positive in Iraq serves two
purposes: it is intended to undermine the world's perception of the United
States, thus minimizing consequent support, and it is intended to
discourage American citizens."
“Above facts are verifiable on the Department of Defense Web site.â€
I couldn’t overcome the urge to send Jack my own “Did You Know?†list that
went as follows:
Did you know that 58 percent of the American public wishes the Bush
presidency was over?
Did you know that only 30 percent of Americans give Bush a
favorable rating as president?
Did you know that Dick Cheney’s approval numbers are
less than that?
Did you know that one of the biggest worries of the current military
experts from the Pentagon is that the Iraqi military and police force will
turn on the Americans?
Did you know that the electricity is on in Iraq less than when
Saddam Hussein was in power?
Did you know that the Iraq War has cost more Iraqi
civilian lives than all of those lost during the Saddam Hussein reign?
Did you know that the American public holds very little stock in the 'facts' coming
from the Department of Defense and the White House these days?
Of course, his feathers were ruffled, his back went up and he
began his defense with,
“I’m glad I’m one of the 30 percent
who support the president†and ended with “The evidence you
talk about is mostly lies the left-wing press has generated
while not giving them (the administration) credit for what has
NOT happened. We will be a sorry mess if they (the Iraqis, I
presume) succeed in carrying out what they intended to do to
us.â€
In essence, what Jack would like, I guess, is a lapdog media
with a love-it-or-leave it attitude when it comes to this
country. What he wants is a media that puts a White House spin
on every story. What he wants is a media that manipulates the
news so the American public can go about life guilt-free for
the sins of its leaders.
Ain’t gonna' happen, Jack, at least not on my watch.
I was raised on Cronkite and Breslin. I inhaled every word
written by Hunter S. Thompson and a fan of every newsperson
who had/has the courage to grab the American public by the
throat, yank them off their couch and spit the truth into
their blind eye.
If not for a credible press, we’d still be marching in Selma,
Ala. for civil rights; we’d never have learned about the Nixon
scandal; we’d still be in Vietnam, and that’s a fact, Jack.
I don’t do what I do for fear or favor and I make it a rule
that as far as politicians are concerned, no matter what their
party affiliation, I don’t trust them until I have reason to
trust them.
So far, that number’s embarrassingly low.
I’ve had a friend in the administration ask me to “take it
easy on his boss.†I’ve looked a couple of the most familiar
faces in Washington, D.C. in the eye and asked hard questions
without flinching.
I view this country’s current situation as appalling, an
embarrassment and dangerous, perhaps more dangerous than any
other time in our history.
A young co-worker recently asked me if I am still “a
believer,†if I thought this noble profession was still valid,
if we could make a difference.
I told her that if I didn’t, I’d be better off flipping
burgers at the local McDonald’s than agonizing over which word
should follow the last.
No, Jack, there are loyal, honorable, decent people in this
country who are outraged, who ache for those who have lost
their lives behind a pack of lies, whose hearts have been
plundered by an unreality that has become our reality.
And, we’re reaching out, Jack, to shake you from the stupor
that has glazed over far too many eyes in this once honorable
republic.