Unpacking for a Disaster: What You Need to Survive the Unexpected
The first American responses to the triple calamity in Japan were
deeply empathetic and then, as news of the Fukushima nuclear complex’s
leaking radiation spread, a lot of people began to freak out about their
own safety, and pretty soon you couldn’t find potassium iodide pills
anywhere in San Francisco.
You couldn’t even -- so a friend tells me --
find them in Brooklyn.
The catastrophes were in Japan and remain that country’s tragedy, so
we need to keep our own anxieties in check. Or harness them to make
constructive changes in preparation for our own future disasters
(without losing our compassion for those killed, orphaned, widowed,
displaced -- and contaminated -- in northeastern Japan). But last week
saw a deluge of bad information and free-floating fear in this country.
Tomgram: Rebecca Solnit, The Earthquake Kit
Somewhere, someone should write about the official
euphemisms that accompany disasters. The roiling set of problems at
the Fukushima nuclear complex seems only to grow as one unprecedented
situation after another arises, including a possible massive build-up
of salt -- 99,000
pounds are estimated to have accumulated in reactors 2 and 3 -- from
sea water pumped into the damaged reactors to cool them. Salt can
encrust uranium fuel rods and heat them up dangerously. In the meantime,
the “mox” fuel (which contains highly toxic plutonium with a half-life
of 24,000 years) in reactor 3 now seems to be leaking and venting.
The release of mox fuel into the environment represents a situation
with which the nuclear industry has little experience. Fears are
rising that there could be
"a crack or a hole in the reactor core's stainless steel chamber or in
the spent fuel pool that's contained by a massive concrete container,"
which could prove devastating. And that’s just to begin to lay out
the problems at the complex itself, which are predicted to go on for "weeks, if not months."
Meanwhile, the tap water of Tokyo, with radiation levels high enough several days ago
to be considered a danger to infants, got much attention until it
dropped back into a more normal range. Some other measurements have
been at least as eye-opening. These would include radiation levels 1,600 times higher than normal taken days ago about 12 miles from the plant and modestly elevated ones 74 miles away, as well as a recent spike
in levels of iodine to 1,850 times the legal limit in adjacent sea
waters, and water leaking into a plant turbine room registering levels 10,000 times more than normal. One thing you can undoubtedly count on: no one’s going to be eating spinach, found
not just to have traces of Iodine-131 (half-life 8 days), but of
cesium-134 (half-life 30 years), produced anywhere near Fukushima for a
while.
And as for those euphemisms, on Friday the Japanese government
widened the evacuation area around the plants from a mandatory 12 miles
to a “voluntary” 19 miles. (Previously, residents in the 12 to 19 mile
zone were simply encouraged to stay indoors.) According to the Guardian,
“The government's chief spokesman, Yukio Edano, said 130,000 residents
in the area had been encouraged to leave to improve their quality of
life, not because their health was at risk.”
Quality of life? The official explanation for such a euphemism would
undoubtedly be to “prevent panic.” But let Rebecca Solnit -- whose
book on disasters, A Paradise Built in Hell: The Extraordinary Communities that Arise in Disaster,
is already a classic -- explain who really tends to panic in
disasters. (Simple answer: governments, not citizens.) Last Sunday,
TomDispatch published “The Butterfly and the Boiling Point,”
the first part of her charting of “the winds of change” this year.
This is part two, and just imagine, 2011 isn’t three months old yet! Tom
Unpacking for a Disaster: What You Need
to Survive the Unexpected
by Rebecca Solnit
Bogus maps of radiation clouds
heading our way began circulating, along with a lot of junk science,
and all kinds of overwrought fears. Crackpots and quacks in Internet
postings, as well as a popular science writer in Newsweek magazine,
predicted imminent earthquakes in California, with no grounds
whatsoever, or with distorted scientific data. Too many of us combined a
reasonable distrust of the authorities with a poor understanding of the
science and the situation, starting with the fact that Japan is really,
really far away from California, let alone Park Slope.
The great Sendai earthquake of March 10th should, however, teach us
that the unexpected does happen, and there’s no time to prepare for it
-- except beforehand. And what you do beforehand matters immensely.
Japan was both impressively prepared and shockingly unprepared.
The country was indeed ready for a major earthquake, even a massive
not once-in-a-century but once-in-a-millennium monster. Their
earthquake drills and building codes are superb and -- as far as I can
tell (reporting has been anything but clear on this) -- the temblor
itself did remarkably little structural damage.
The country was far less prepared
for a tsunami that would breach every protective sea wall and
obliterate huge swaths of coastal habitat, even though sirens and
evacuation plans went into effect almost instantly. It was even less
prepared for the nuclear reactor disaster that quickly overshadowed
everything else.
What Not to Bring
I live in earthquake country, so I’ve been told most of my life that I
must have an earthquake kit. Almost anyone anywhere would benefit from
having an emergency kit on hand:
the usual flashlight, blanket, coins for pay phones (cell phones and
cell-phone service die quick in disaster), small bills, potable water,
and so forth. To really deal with an emergency, though, you not only
need to pack, but to unpack.
Think of your mind as your most fundamental and important emergency
kit. You have a great deal of what you’ll need to survive there already,
but if you’re not careful, a lot of junk will end up piled on top of
your excellent equipment. Lift up that big television of yours, for
example, and gently lob it out the window. It will fill your head with
hysteria, presuppositions, misinterpretations, stereotypes,
exaggerations, and racial slurs that will leave you ill-prepared for what to expect when your world is turned upside down.
Be careful with newspapers, online media, and those emails your
anxious friends forward to you. Watch out for experts who aren’t (or who
have an unspoken agenda), for authorities who lie and withhold crucial
information, for hysterics, and those who fill in the blanks of
disasters past, present, and future with invented scenarios. Be clear
that a lot of the worst-case scenarios are just that, not breaking news
(though what happened in Japan was and continues to be pretty
horrendous).
A disaster is a big foray into the unknown and into uncertainty. We
hate those things. We like to know what’s going to happen. Even in our
own quiet everyday lives, we like to fill in the blanks. The media feeds
this urge during crises with a lot of speculation and a stream of
stereotypes. After all, it’s their job to know, and yet a disaster means
a million unexpected things are going on all at once amid severely
disrupted communications networks, which often means that they don’t
know either, that no one does.
Throw These Words Out Right Away
So start this way. Open up that disaster kit in your mind and throw
out two words that cause so much unnecessary confusion and damage in a
calamity: panic and looting.
Immediately after the earthquake, I saw a video of a group of
Japanese in a wildly shaking office with a British-accented voiceover
calling what they were doing panic. They were indeed moving
rapidly and in all directions, but they were taking shelter, stabilizing
objects that were falling off shelves, and generally doing just what
people should do in such situations. The New York Daily News ran a headline several inches high that just read “Panic!” Maybe they were describing themselves.
The media likes to call any rapid movement panic, even when it’s the
wisest possible thing to do. When the World Trade Towers were collapsing
in New York, the right thing to do was run -- and most everyone did.
That’s not panic. That day, “panicked” people also carried
a quadriplegic accountant down 69 flights of stairs, slowed down to
keep pace with their co-workers, got all the kids safely out of their
nearby schools, and helped the fallen to their feet. More than 60 years
of disaster research makes it clear that, despite what you think you
know, ordinary people generally don’t panic in emergencies. So throw
that out.
After both Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans and the January 2010 earthquake in Haiti, the word “looting”
was used to justify shooting people down in the streets -- the death
penalty, that is, without benefit of trial -- for what in ordinary times
might otherwise be called “petty theft.” In extraordinary times, when
the electricity goes, and there are no functioning bank machines, credit
cards, or banks, and in many places no shopkeepers, you may need to
acquire the goods that sustain life by taking them, often from wrecked
or abandoned stores. The alternative is hunger, thirst, cold, and
misery. To me, that’s not even theft. What we saw a lot of in Japan was
people lining up to buy things in not-so-wrecked places where
shopkeepers were actually still doing business.
Lots of reverse-stereotype articles have appeared about how Japanese don’t loot. In fact, there are accounts
of Japanese citizens taking things without benefit of purchase, but
since they’re not black, no one gets all that excited about it. Also
there have been accounts of people getting really angry while waiting in
line. I also saw a photograph of a guy siphoning gas from a minivan
tipped up in some wreckage. Was it his? Who cares?
In crises, for some authorities, the media, and many outside
observers, civilization tends to consist mainly of property relations,
and so they pay more attention to whether someone’s taking crackers than
whether a grandmother is dying in the wreckage (while law enforcement
goes after the cracker-taker). Throw that out. It’s sludge in your mind.
It causes needless deaths -- both of those who get shot as “looters”
and those in dire need who get neglected while property is protected. So
far, this hasn’t happened (as far as I can tell) in Japan, but it did
happen in Port-au-Prince, New Orleans, and earthquake-wrecked San
Francisco in 1906, and it might well happen when big earthquakes hit the Bay Area, Los Angeles, and Seattle -- as they one day will.
The
idea that all Japanese are selflessly dutiful might be undermined by
the story of the hospital near the Fukushima reactors where 128 elderly
people were simply abandoned. “Most of them were comatose and 14 died
shortly afterwards,” the Guardian reported. Of course, six miles from that hospital were the “Fukushima 50” -- the nuclear workers risking their lives
to try to keep conditions at the plant from getting worse. What they
are undergoing and what it will do to them we don’t know yet. There is
so much we don’t know yet.
Other racial stereotypes suggested that Japanese are quiet and
obedient and that this is a good thing -- though one must now hope that
they will be neither and demand a major transformation of the private
corporations and public institutions that allowed their nuclear
nightmare to unfold as it did. Which is to say that, like human beings
everywhere, the Japanese vary, and no blanket statements fully cover
them. For your future emergency, pack a real blanket or sleeping bag,
but don’t pack the usual set of clichés.
The Human Nature Business
In a disaster, you will want to bring your identity, so we are often
instructed, meaning some government-issued form of identification. But
you will also want to bring a deeper identity, a sense of who you are
and who we are. This matters greatly, because disaster tests our nature,
even as it requires us to cooperate with those who are in it with us.
The usual emphasis on “panic” in disasters implies that, in a crisis,
we’re all sheep wheeling around idiotically, incapable of making good
decisions, and selfishly trampling those around us. The emphasis on
looting implies that, in a crisis, we’re all wolves, taking ruthless
advantage of and preying on each other. Both presume that during a
disaster social bonds will break. In fact, as the records of disaster
after disaster show, mostly they don’t. In fact, those who study the
subject (and reams of testimony by those who have lived through it)
confirm that, in catastrophe, most of us behave remarkably beautifully,
exhibiting presence of mind, altruism, generosity, bravery, and
creativity.
Most of us.
Who, then, does it serve to imagine that we are wolves and sheep,
fools and savages? Lee Clarke, a disaster sociologist and professor at
Rutgers, wrote
after Hurricane Katrina, “Disaster myths are not politically neutral,
but rather work systematically to the advantage of elites. Elites cling
to the panic myth because to acknowledge the truth of the situation
would lead to very different policy prescriptions than the ones
currently in vogue.” That is to say, if we are wolves and sheep, and so
not to be trusted, then they are the shepherds and the wolf-killers.
They want the right to police us, to boss us around, and to lie to us
in a disaster (and the rest of the time, too, actually). They lie to us
on the grounds that we will panic if we know the truth -- and so they
withheld critical information when Three Mile Island nearly melted down
in 1979, when Chernobyl did melt down in 1985, when the pit where the
World Trade Towers had been spewed toxic smoke for months in 2001, when a mass murderer was loose
on the Virginia Tech campus in 2007, when the reactors in Fukushima
started venting radiation into the surrounding environment. The media
often repeats these lies and regularly fails to question authority even
though the track record of lying in disasters is clear.
Officials in the U.S. lied in this disaster, too. The amounts of
radiation that have reached these shores apparently are, as they have
claimed, so minor as to be insignificant in a world already full of
toxins and carcinogens, but they also suggested that much higher levels
would be safe. Which is a lie. As is the idea that nuclear power is safe.
Authoritarian Technology
In some respects the authorities here and in Japan have been
completely crazy, not just in the aftermath of this disaster but every
day since the dawn of the “peaceful atom”
era of the nuclear age. Nuclear power is essentially an elaborate and
unlikely way to boil water to turn turbines to create electricity. Its
makers must mine, refine, and consolidate huge amounts of one of the
deadliest materials on earth, uranium-235 (the less than 1% of naturally
occurring uranium with 235 electrons; the leftover 99%, the less
radioactive but nevertheless deadly U-238, becomes nuclear waste in the
process). That U-235 and the plutonium created from it are dangerous at
every stage of the process. In addition, constructing a power plant
requires a huge amount of carbon-spewing conventional energy, so there’s
never been a lot of logic to building them to bridge our move to
renewable energy.
The delusional premise behind nuclear energy is that we can create
this material and then contain it for the duration of its dangerous
phase. For plutonium, that’s 24,000 years, or about 15 times as long as something called civilization has existed. For uranium-235, that’s 700 million years, a time so vast it’s basically forever.
Fifty years into the nuclear age, we’ve had four major reactor
accidents, along with a host of minor ones and leaks and ventings, and
we still don’t know what to do with the nuclear waste that plants like
the ones at Fukushima produce even when no accidents occur. This is the
“spent fuel” that the U-235 quickly becomes. It’s still intensely
radioactive and toxic; it’s only “spent” in the sense that it’s no
longer useful for boiling water in reactors. It’s still useful for
bombs, dirty or otherwise.
There are better ways to boil water.
The Guardian reports:
“The power plant at the center of the biggest civilian nuclear crisis
in Japan's history contained far more spent fuel rods than it was
designed to store, while its technicians repeatedly failed to carry out
mandatory safety checks, according to documents from the reactor's
operator.”
This news suggests incompetence and untrustworthiness, but most U.S.
nuclear power plants also have an overabundance of spent fuel rods in
cooling ponds onsite. That’s because the only plans for long-term
storage of some of the more than 70,000 tons of high-level nuclear waste
American nuclear reactors have produced, now heating those ponds, were
also crazy. If there’s one good, long-term reason to love Senate
Majority Leader Harry Reid and President Barack Obama, it’s that they
put a stop to a plan to dump some of the stuff in seismically,
hydrologically, and volcanically active Yucca Mountain, Nevada, a couple
of years ago. Of course if the Republicans have their way, the dump
will lurch back from the dead.
Further Preparations
So in a disaster, unload the usual clichés and stereotypes. Do your
best not to fill up the unknown with fantasy or fear. Don’t assume the
worst or the best, but keep an alert mind on the actual as it unfolds.
Don’t take scenarios for realities. Be prepared to reevaluate and change
your plans again and again.
Which is to say that disaster is like everyday life, only more so.
Don’t bring a lot of fear of the neighbors: if you’re not rescuing
them, they might be rescuing you, and afterward you may very well be
building a community kitchen together in the ruins. In San Francisco, we
have a website called 72hours.org,
which acknowledges that you’re likely to be on your own in a major
disaster. There just aren’t enough rescue personnel, firefighters, and
so forth to respond on the scale such a disaster requires. So help
yourself and the people around you.
In preparation, investigate local dangers, whether a refinery, a
freight rail line on which toxics roll by, that big earthquake slated to
hit New York, a floodplain, or a forest fire, and figure out what to do
if the worst happens, since Japan reminds us that sometimes it does.
And maybe you can even train your authorities not to panic in disaster
and not to treat the rest of us like so many sheep and wolves. Try to
ensure that they won’t regard a major disaster as a major occasion for
law enforcement rather than a time when civil society should pull
together. Make sure they won’t demonize or victimize the most needy in a
crisis, as nonwhite people, undocumented immigrants, the poor, and the
left-behind have been many times before.
Get a battery-powered, or better yet, hand-cranked radio and decide
which media outlets you trust. Then sift through the news with care,
because ordinarily useful news sources, too, fall prey to
fear-amplifying rumor and government cover-ups and lies in a crisis. The
left-wing media is no exception: I heard a fair amount of nutty nuclear
stuff last week.
Learn some science about radiation, especially if you live near a
nuclear power plant. And keep in mind that it’s better to evacuate
unnecessarily than undergo contamination unnecessarily. Don’t forget to
take Great-Aunt Helen. The triple disaster in Japan has offered
countless reminders of just how vulnerable the elderly can be in an
emergency.
If you want to do more, look into hazard reduction. This can mean
learning how to turn off the gas lines in your home, or preventing a new
nuclear power plant from being built in your neighborhood or on your
planet. It can mean acknowledging that climate change is bringing us a
superabundance of disasters -- droughts, floods, heat waves, fires,
rising seas, and more -- and that we need to be better prepared than
ever for calamity, even as we work to minimize the causes of climate
change and its impacts.
And keep in mind that disasters start suddenly and end slowly. Some
predict it will be five years before Japan recovers from the Sendai
quake followed by tsunami followed by nuclear crisis. Remember as well
that disasters often lead to permanent change. In that sense they’re
never over.
The U.S. was permanently changed by 9/11 and Katrina; Ukraine by
Chernobyl -- or maybe it would be more accurate to say the whole world
by Chernobyl. In 2006, former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev himself
said, “The nuclear meltdown at Chernobyl 20 years ago this month… was
perhaps the real cause of the collapse of the Soviet Union five years
later.”
In the wake of its present disaster, Japan may already be changing,
and that may not be a bad thing. In its wake, the future of nuclear
power
may change, and that might be a very good thing. One thing we know now: we don’t know yet.
Writer Rebecca Solnit lives in San Francisco, a city that has
never had a major flood, heat wave, blizzard, or terrorist attack,
though the panicky U.S. Army did burn down about half the city in the
aftermath of the 1906 earthquake. From 1988 to 2002 she was an
antinuclear activist, and her book Savage Dreams is in part about that movement, while her 2009 book A Paradise Built in Hell: The Extraordinary Communities that Arise in Disaster deals with major urban calamities.
Copyright 2011 Rebecca Solnit