A Nation Stripped Bare: Fascism Has Come to America
by Chris Floyd
It is a question that has sparked much debate, at least in certain
rare quadrants where the unvarnished reality of the American imperium is
recognized. But surely now the debate is over. Question it no more; the
supposition, the fear, the heartbreaking intimation is a fact. It is
real. It is here.
Fascism has come to America.
And no, it
didn't come in jackboots. It didn't come in massed, marching ranks. It
didn't come in greasy-haired frothers ranting on a stage.
It
came with cool. It came with savvy. It came wearing the mask of past
evils redeemed by the image of a persecuted minority elevated to power.
It came spouting scripture, hugging bright children, quoting pop music,
sporting pricey leisure threads.
It came on Facebook, it came
with 269 cable channels blazing, with I-Pad apps offering Catholic
confession and YouTube porn. It came with the Super Bowl, with de la
Renta gowns on the Oscar carpet, with 36 brands of dips and chips on the
bulging shelves of your local Wal-Mart.
It came right in the
midst of your ordinary life, as you went to work -- or looked for work
-- as you partied, as you courted, as you watched TV, as you worshiped,
as you studied, as you played, as you went about the business of being
human.
As you went about the business of being human, this
inhuman thing has come. It has come in your name, wrapped in your flag,
claiming your security as its raison d'etre.
And in the guise of a young, hip, educated progressive,
it has just now declared that
anyone who reveals any hidden evil committed by the fascist state is
subject to prosecution for a capital crime. That's right. It has
revealed that
you -- you American citizen, you patriot, you
believer in goodness and justice and genuine democracy -- you can be
killed by the government if you tell the truth.
This is what the
administration of President Barack Obama has demonstrated -- indeed,
has proudly proclaimed -- in its treatment of the young man it is
avowedly, openly torturing for telling the truth about American war
crimes, Bradley Manning. There can be no mistaking the meaning,
implications and import of Barack Obama's actions.
Corporal Bradley Manning has been charged
with leaking "classified material," including a video posted on
WikiLeaks that showed American forces gleefully shooting up Iraqi
civilians with helicopter gunships. Manning is also alleged to have
obtained thousands of other files detailing crimes, corruption,
cover-ups, lies and deceit by American forces and American diplomats
around the world.
Although American officials have repeatedly
said that none of leaks attributed to Manning and to WikiLeaks have
caused any bodily harm to any agent of American imperial power around
the world, Manning is being accused of "threatening national security"
and "aiding the enemy."
And who, pray tell, is the "enemy" being aided by the expression of truth? On Thursday, the Pentagon very helpfully spelled it out to the New York Times:
The charge sheet did not explain who “the
enemy” was, leading some to speculate that it was a reference to
WikiLeaks. On Thursday, however, the military said that it instead
referred to any hostile forces that could benefit from learning about
classified military tactics and procedures.
It could not be clearer. The release of any information that the
American government declares might be of any use whatsoever to any
possible "hostile" force -- real, imagined, or possibly run by American
provocateurs -- somewhere in the world at some point in time is a crime
that can be punishable by death. Thus any person or any entity that
reveals embarrassing or criminal facts that the government wishes to
keep hidden now stands in the shadow of death.
If that is not fascism, there has never been such a thing on the face of the earth.
To
be sure, American officials say that they will seek only life
imprisonment for Manning -- who they are now subjecting to hours of
forced nakedness in front of video cameras. But the military judge who
will oversee Manning's court martial is entirely free to disregard the
prosecutor's stated intention and impose the full penalty for aiding the
"enemy."
But again, who is the "enemy"? You are the enemy
-- if you speak a truth that the government does not want you to
reveal. (Of course, if you are an approved and coddled courtier, an
eager, scurrying scribe like Bob Woodward, for example, you can reveal
all the most secret "classified material" that you like, as long as it
comes from savvy insiders "authorized" to praise their bosses and make
their rivals look bad.) If you speak this unwanted truth, the
government, the president -- the cool, savvy, modern, hip, educated
progressive president -- can throw you in jail, subject you to torture,
deprive you of sleep, and finally strip you naked in front of cameras to
break you down and humiliate you in their efforts to dehumanize you, to
grind you down into a piece of meat.
2.
Here is the New York Times report
on Manning's treatment -- a small, brief story which did not make the
front page of the print edition and within a few hours disappeared from
the dozens of stories on the front page of the on-line edition:
A lawyer for Pfc. Bradley Manning, [David
E. Coombs], the Army intelligence analyst accused of leaking secret
government files to WikiLeaks, has complained that his client was
stripped and left naked in his cell for seven hours on Wednesday. ...
The soldier’s clothing was returned to him Thursday morning, after he
was required to stand naked outside his cell during an inspection, Mr.
Coombs said in a posting on his Web site.
“This type of degrading
treatment is inexcusable and without justification,” Mr. Coombs wrote.
“It is an embarrassment to our military justice system and should not be
tolerated. Pfc. Manning has been told that the same thing will happen
to him again tonight. No other detainee at the brig is forced to endure
this type of isolation and humiliation.”
First Lt. Brian
Villiard, a Marine spokesman, said a brig duty supervisor had ordered
Private Manning’s clothing taken from him. He said that the step was
“not punitive” and that it was in accordance with brig rules, but he
said that he was not allowed to say more. “It would be inappropriate for
me to explain it,” Lieutenant Villiard said. “I can confirm that it did
happen, but I can’t explain it to you without violating the detainee’s
privacy.”
This is rich; this shows a devilish irony at work in the PR boiler
rooms of our fascist state. Yes, we tortured Manning, but we can't tell
you why -- because we want to protect his privacy! We are very concerned about
his sacred right to privacy! "I'm sorry," said Sgt. Heinrich Schultz,
spokesman for the Auschwitz-Birkenau detention facility. "I can confirm
that Mr Shlomo Stern, formerly of Krakow, was indeed stripped naked by
guards here, but it would be inappropriate for me to explain why,
because it would violate the detainee's privacy."
And as Glenn Greenwald reports, Manning was indeed stripped naked again the following night. Coombs himself notes:
PFC Manning was forced to strip naked in
his cell again last night. As with the previous evening, Quantico Brig
guards required him to surrender all of his clothing. PFC Manning then
walked back to his bed, and spent the next seven hours in humiliation.
The
decision to require him to be stripped of all clothing was made by the
Brig commander, Chief Warrant Officer-2 Denise Barnes. According to
First Lieutenant Brian Villard, a Marine spokesman, the decision was
"not punitive" and done in accordance with Brig rules. There can be no
conceivable justification for requiring a soldier to surrender all his
clothing, remain naked in his cell for seven hours, and then stand at
attention the subsequent morning. This treatment is even more degrading
considering that PFC Manning is being monitored -- both by direct
observation and by video -- at all times. The defense was informed by
Brig officials that the decision to strip PFC Manning of all his
clothing was made without consulting any of the Brig's mental health
providers.
What is happening here -- as Arthur Silber foretold long ago
-- is that Barack Obama is codifying the worst abuses of the Bush
Administration (and its predecessors) -- which had usually been
committed on the side, in the dark, in secret, behind many layers of
"plausible deniability" -- into the open, declared law of the land. This
too is facism in action. Indeed, rarely has there been a regime more
legalistic than Nazi Germany, where jurists, legislators and civil
servants adhered strenuously to the "law" as determined by the will of
the ruling clique. And for all those who make a fetish of the "rule of
law," here is the end result: law being used by brutal Power to
"justify" inhuman treatment of truth-tellers. As we noted here some months ago:
A conversation during Civil War. (From work-in-progress Bright, Terrible Spirit):
"But
in days past, I was a lawyer. Yes, a lawyer, can you believe it? It
seems….ridiculous now, doesn't it? An orderly system meant to govern
human society, to establish justice, to advance the progress and
enlightenment of the human race. Yet that system, that civil cosmos – to
which I was so passionately committed – embraced and protected the most
wretched evils, entrenched the powerful in their unjust privilege,
oppressed the poor and weak most relentlessly and wickedly, yet at every
step – at every step – sang hosannas to itself as some kind of
divinity. The "Law" – oh, what a hush of reverence surrounded that word,
how deeply that reverence and respect penetrated the heart. Well, my
heart, anyway. But in these last few years we have seen – in intense,
concentrated, microscopic view – the truth about the law, a truth which
too often escaped us in the slow unrolling of peacetime. The truth that
there is no law, no Platonic Form out there to which we give paltry
representation. There is only power: power in conflict with power, power
seeking to drive out power, to establish its dominance, maintain its
privilege. Power…acquiesces to law – sometimes – but it never, never
bows to it. Power goes along with the law when it is convenient to do
so, when it is not too restrictive, when it demands little more than the
occasional sacrifice – for the powerful are certainly not above
throwing one of their own to the mob when circumstances require. But
when it comes to the crisis, power shreds the law like a filthy rag and
has its own way. And then you see that the law is nothing but a rag, to
be torn and patched and fitted to power's aims. The worst atrocities I
have seen or heard of in this war have been committed wholly and
completely under the law. This thing I held in such reverence was, is,
nothing but a scrap soaked with blood and shit."
This is what the administration of President Barack Obama has brought
to open fruition in the United States of America. The debate is over.
The question is answered. Facism has come.
3.
"Good corporal, good corporal, don't you know the fate
Of all those who speak the hard truth to the State
And all who trouble the people's sweet dreams?
They're mocked into scorn and torn apart at the seams...."