Mubarak's Military Dictatorship
Expanded Crony Capitalism
by TRNN
Gilbert Achcar
grew up in Lebanon, and is currently Professor at the School of Oriental
and African Studies (SOAS) of the University of London. His books
include The Clash of Barbarisms: The Making of the New World Disorder,
published in 13 languages, Perilous Power: The Middle East and U.S.
Foreign Policy, co-authored with Noam Chomsky, and most recently the
critically acclaimed The Arabs and the Holocaust: The Arab-Israeli War
of Narratives.
Gilbert Achcar Pt5: After Sadat, Mubarak firmed
alliance with Israel and US and pushed neo-liberalism.
PAUL JAY, SENIOR
EDITOR, TRNN: Welcome back to The Real News Network. I'm Paul Jay. This
is the next in our series on the history of modern Egypt. In the last
segment, we left off with the death of Sadat. And by this point, the
Egyptian army and the Egyptian state had more or less become clients of
the United States. Now joining us again to pick up the story is Gilbert
Achcar. He's a professor of development studies and international
relations at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London,
England, and he's author of the book The Arabs and the Holocaust: The Arab-Israeli War of Narratives. Thanks for joining us again, Gilbert. PROF. GILBERT ACHCAR, SCHOOL OF ORIENTAL AND AFRICAN STUDIES: Thank you, Paul. Hello again.
JAY:
Alright. So Sadat died, and as you said in the last interview, his
funeral was rather meager next to that of Nasser. So pick us up with the
beginnings of the Mubarak era.
ACHCAR: Well, Mubarak was
Sadat's vice president, so he took over and all that. I mean, he was
probably more popular in the first years than what Sadat was, because
he, having taken the measure of the popular--if not resentment, at least
disaffection towards the regime, he played it rather, you know,
moderate. So he tried to appear as a kind of more moderate figure. And
he managed to have some more popularity than what Sadat had in his last
years. But then we are speaking of something, of a rule that started in
'81, after assassination of Sadat in October '81, and the same Mubarak
is still in power, you know, 30 years later. So that's extremely long
period. And as everybody knows now, because this has become major news
throughout the world that this man is over 80, he's, I mean, quite old
for a president. And he's sticking to power, as we can see. Now,
basically, he just continued everything Sadat had started, that is, the
so-called Infitah, which means the opening, which means,
actually, the liberalization of the economy, the implementation of the
neoliberal recipes in the private sector (and in an increasingly wide
private sector) at the expense of public services and the rest, the way
open for all sort of profiteering and the crony capitalism that
developed in the country. All that was, you know, very much fostered by
the Mubarak dictatorship as a continuation of what Sadat started, as
well, of course, as the very close relationship with United States.
JAY:
One question I have about this relationship with the United States,
both with Sadat and with Mubarak, given that Egypt had just been in a
couple of wars with Israel, given the general public opinion against
what most Egyptians, I assume, thought was an Israeli occupation,
especially post-'67, of Gaza and the West Bank, but even before that
(even the original establishment of Israel was certainly a rather very
unpopular thing amongst most Egyptians and most Arabs), how does the
Egyptian elite and the Egyptian military caste sell becoming a client of
the US, of the United States, which clearly is the reason there is an
Israel?
ACHCAR: Well, for that we have to go back to Sadat,
because--and, actually, that's in a sense the function of the war he
waged in 1973, which was a war, paradoxically, designated as a preamble
for some sort of capitulation to Israel and to US pressure; but that
came later. I mean, they were attempt, since '74, '75, rounds of
negotiations with Israel, but which were not conclusive until Sadat made
the dramatic gesture of going to Israel in 1977, after the Israeli far
right, the Likud, led by Menachem Begin, came to power. So he went
there, and that accelerated the Egyptian-Israeli so-called peace track,
and led, actually, to the treaty signed between the two countries in '79
and then implemented gradually until the early '80s, through which
Israel gave back to Egypt the Sinai, except the Gaza Strip. But most, I
mean, of the Sinai was given back to Egypt with limited Egyptian
sovereignty over the Sinai, that the Egyptian army didn't have the right
to go there, only police forces. And so this peace treaty was sold by
Sadat to the Egyptian people in the same way that the shift in relations
from the Soviet Union to the United States was sold to the Egyptian
people, with promises that this will bring, you know, a huge prosperity
to the country, everybody will get, in some way, rich or better.
JAY: So we're dumping the collapsing Soviet economy and we're going to ride the American gravy train.
ACHCAR: Absolutely.
JAY: And I guess with the Egyptian elite, at least, I guess there was some truth to that.
ACHCAR:
Well, for the Egyptian, I mean, elite, depends what we mean by "elite".
But the Egyptian rich, this crony capitalism that developed since the
years of the Infitah of Sadat to a very extensive degree, yes,
indeed. I mean, these people made a huge lot of money. And that's how
this country--I mean, gradually, this country (which was, even with
quote marks or without, anyhow, economically considered a socialist
country in the '60s) is a country where if you look at the government
just before the recent popular protests, it's a concentration of
multimillionaires, you know, of very rich people. And the head of the
party is--of the ruling party is also a major capitalist. I mean, so
this is a really rotten country. There's a lot of crony capitalists,
very rich guys, in power.
They--many of them originate in the military,
because there is a--I mean, the borders between the military and the
private sector are quite porous, and that--and a lot of military end up
in the private sector as rich capitalists or on the boards or whatever.
And this is this kind of very rotten situation that existed in a country
where 40 percent--and these are official figures--40 percent of the
population live on less than $2 per day. I mean, you have huge, massive
poverty in Egypt, absolutely huge poverty in Egypt. And at the same
time, you have, I mean, extreme wealth, extremely rich wealthy class.
And so this social gap, these social inequalities are so strident, so
sharp in that country that of course very naturally this created such a
huge mass popular resentment, especially, I mean, in the cities, in the
urban settings, when people are confronted to these social inequalities,
where, you know, they see where the rich live, they see the hotels,
they see this kind of different planet on which part of the Egyptian
society lives, you know, stories about weddings costing fortunes and
things like that, you have all sort of crazy, ostentatious spending by
this crony capitalism, and on the other side of the social divide people
starving and people living in the streets or in the cemeteries--. I
mean, this is an extremely unequal society. And really that was--I mean,
it was absolutely clear for any person who knew about Egypt or knew
Egypt that this country would sooner or later go through an explosion.
JAY:
Okay. So in the next segment of our interview let's get up to the
period of the explosion. Please join us for the next segment of our
interview with Gilbert Achcar on The Real News Network.
End of TranscriptDISCLAIMER:
Please note that transcripts for The Real News Network are typed from a
recording of the program. TRNN cannot guarantee their complete
accuracy.
|