The mystery surrounding Raymond A. Davis

, the American former Special
Forces operative jailed in Lahore, Pakistan for the murder of two young
motorcyclists, and his funky “security” company, Hyperion-Protective
Consultants LLC, in the US continues to grow.
Just a security guy? Guns, shells, clips, multiple cell phones and batteries all found in Davis's possession by police
When Davis was arrested in the immediate aftermath of the double
slaying in a busy business section of Lahore, after he had fatally shot
two men in the back, claiming that he feared they might be threatening
to rob him, police found business cards on him for a security company
called Hyperion-Protective Consultants LLC, which listed as its address
5100 North Lane, Orlando, Florida.
A website for the company gave the same address, and listed the manager as a Gerald Richardson.
An investigation into the company done for Counterpunch Magazine
that was published on Tuesday, disclosed that the address was actually
for a vacant storefront in a run-down and almost completely empty strip
mall in Orlando called North Lane Plaza. The 5100 shop was completely
empty and barren, save for an empty Coke glass on a vacant counter.
Now Tom Johnson, executive of a property company called IB Green,
owner of the strip mall property, says that the 5100 address was rented
by a man named Gerald Richardson, who used it to sell clothing. “We made
him move out in December 2009 for nonpayment of rent,” he says.
Johnson recalls that at one point when Richardson was leasing the space
for his clothing store, he told him, “Oh, I have another company called
Hyperion which might get mail there.”
Hyperion-Protective Consultants LLC, as reported in the Counterpunch
article, is not registered with the Florida Secretary of State’s
office, although it still lists the vacant 5100 North Lane, Orlando
address as its headquarters on the company website, which also provides
an email address for Richardson, who is described as the company’s
“manager and chief researcher.” (Efforts to reach Richardson via his
email and by leaving a message on the one functioning number listed on
the website have gone unanswered.)
But there are other mysteries here, too, regarding Davis (whose name
does not appear on the Hyperion-Protective website), and regarding
Hyperion.
As
reported today in the New York Times
in an article by Jane Perlez, there is also a company in Las Vegas
Nevada called Hyperion Protective Services. That firm’s 2006
registration information lists as its owners Raymond A Davis and his
wife Rebecca J. Davis of 9811 W. Charleston St., Las Vegas, Nevada,
89117. It lists the company’s address as 9345 Boulder Opal Ave., Las
Vegas. A registration in Nevada of that name says that Gerald Richardson
“founded the firm” in 1999.
This company, which Perlez says claims it at least hoped to
win government contracts, advertises its services (basically providing
due diligence for companies making property purchases, and running
background checks on employees), on a website called LasVegasComplete.com. On that site, it lists its website, which is the same original site for Hyperion-Protective Consultants,
LLC, the apparently virtual company that was run out of Gerald
Richardson’s clothing shop at 5100 North Lane, Orlando until he couldn’t
pay the rent and got evicted, and that doesn’t have a listed number, or
a person to answer the phone.
Meanwhile, the phone number listed for the Nevada incarnation of
Hyperion-Protective is a cell phone with a Tucson, Arizona area code,
which is registered to Raymond A. Davis. A call to that phone reached a
recording of a male voice, with no mention of Hyperion-Protective, and
no name offered, asking for call-back information. The call was not
returned.
Perlez in her article, datelined Lahore, Pakistan, at least for the
first time mentions the forensic evidence that both of Davis’s victims
were shot in the back, and quotes police as saying that Davis had told
them he shot the men not because they had menaced him with guns, as has
earlier been asserted in the US media, based on statements from the
State Department, but because “he believed that the men were armed.”
If that was the accepted standard for shooting someone in Texas or
Arizona, half the residents of the state would be shooting the other
half. It’s also a pretty lame justification for shooting two people in
the back!
Perlez also confirms another point--the suspicious array of items
that police found in Davis’s rented Honda Civic when they arrested
him--though she diminishes their significance by offering the snide
comment that the local Pakistani press has been “dwelling” on the items,
as well as on his various, and mutually exclusive array of business
cards, which included one listing him as working out of the Peshawar
Consulate, on the edge of the Pashtun Tribal area, one listing him as a
Defense Department contractor, and one listing him as an employee of the
seemingly non-existent Hyperion-Protective Consultants LLC in Orlando.
The items that the Pakistani press are “dwelling” on though, as
listed by Perlez, include a Glock handgun, a flashlight that attaches to
a headband, and a pocket telescope. Unmentioned by Perlez, but also
found by police in Davis’s car, were a large number of cellphones,
including at least one satellite phone, a collection of batteries,
bucketloads of bullets, both for the Glock and a Beretta allegedly used
by Davis to kill the two motorcyclists in his pinpoint shots through his
front windshield, and a load of M-16 shells. Police report that the
bullets were high-powered killer projectiles not allowed in many
countries. There were military-grade knives, wires, and a surprising
array of high-capacity magazines for the handguns, too (like the one
used to such devastating effect in the recent Tucson massacre that
killed several people and left Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords with a
serious brain injury).
There was also something else police found that is profoundly
puzzling and disturbing: a camera loaded with pictures of dozens of
madrassas (religious schools) and other buildings around Lahore.
This was not the run-of-the-mill armament for an embassy security
guard (one of the various titles (covers?) that the State Department has
claimed for Davis at the Lahore Consulate).
The US, which seems to really want this guy out of Pakistani hands,
is reportedly threatening to cut off financial assistance to Pakistan
and to cancel a planned visit by President Obama if Davis is not
released--pretty heavy pressure for a low-ranking consular
contractor--especially one who has admitted he shot two locals to death
while apparently not working in any official capacity.
Perlez also uncritically parrots the US government’s line that Davis
is “protected by diplomatic immunity under the Vienna Conventions and
that he must be released from custody.”
The problem, as I reported in my earlier Counterpunch article, is
that Vienna Convention that Perez and the US government are relying on
to demand his release states very clearly that any immunity for
diplomats or consular staff does not apply to “serious crimes,” and it
would be hard to imagine a more serious crime than a double murder,
which is what Davis is currently being charged with.
What seems clear at this point is that Davis, 36, is not what the US
government is now claiming he is: a “technical advisor” to the
consulate. That geeky description is belied by the eight or more perfect
shots that he put, rapid-fire, into the two motorcyclists, shooting
through the front windshield of his car.
His record --10 years in US Special Forces, supposedly ending in
2003--and his shell “security” company in the US, with its faked
addresses, suggest strongly that he is working for the US, either in
some intelligence branch, or more likely as an employee of some
mercenary-for-hire company like Xe (Blackwater). In fact, a former
long-time Army Special Forces veteran familiar with black-ops,
speculates that Davis may still be in the Special Forces. He says,
"Consider the strong possibility of our man being active-duty military,
notagency, not contract. Military people from special units have more
and more taken responsibility for covert ops, especially those that
involve shooting."
This veteran adds, "Military folks are sometimes given an "official" cover, ie, a diplomatic
passport and some BS story about what they do (consular section, eg).
This is a problem, because it violates agreements with the host nations
about reporting how many military are in country, and covers some
sensitive operations. Thus the panic of the Department of State et al
right now."
What Davis was actually doing on his ill-fated drive into the commercial heart of Lahore when things went wrong is up for grabs.
There have been several reports in the Pakistani press, unmentioned
by Perlez, that the two men he killed were not, as initially reported by
the US, petty thieves, but were actually agents working for Pakistan’s
intelligence service, the ISI. Today, ABC’s Nick Schifrin, who has been
the best reporter on this story in the US corporate media, reports
that while the State Department “adamantly denies” the claim (big
surprise, that!), four Pakistani officials, off the record, have told
ABC that the two men Davis killed were ISI agents assigned to tail Davis
because he was a spy who had “crossed a red line.”
What “red line" might that be? Again there is further speculation in
Pakistan’s media that Davis may have been involved in some kind of
covert US program to actually finance or orchestrate some of the
bombings that have been rocking, and destabilizing Pakistan. (Certainly
that could be an explanation for the stop at the ATM for a bundle of
cash, and for all of those cell phones recovered from Davis’s car, which
could serve nicely as bomb detonators--a popular method adopted by
terrorists everywhere-- though of course they could also have been
dedicated lines or throwaways for “cutouts,” as one veteran of such
black-ops notes.)
The suicide by rat poison of the 18-year-old bride of one of the two
slain men would seem to point to the victim’s being more than just a
petty street thief, too. The young woman, from her hospital bed, before
dying, said that she was killing herself because she despaired of seeing
justice done for the murder of her husband.