Author Edward Herman once defined the "Soviet threat" as "a
large and formidable beast of prey, the size of whose claws and fangs
varied with the demands of the Military-Industrial Complex."
As
journalist Ken Silverstein explains: "It’s now virtually undisputed that
the menace once attributed to the Red Army was greatly overrated."
On the topic of overrated, I'm reminded of another America delusion:
the protein myth.
"Everything in excess is opposed to nature."
- Hippocrates
In the US, the typical adult ingests 100 grams of
protein every day—roughly four to five times the amount recommended by
scientists not affiliated with meat and dairy corporations. The average
American, in his/her lifetime will consume 12 sheep, 15 cows, 24 hogs,
900 chickens, and 1000 lbs. of assorted animals (like fish). How did we
ever develop this idea that more is better when it comes to protein,
especially animal protein?
Part of that answer is profit-related, of course, but another part of
it is the result of a third popular American pastime: The irrational
quest for size. While waif-like models inspire shame, anxiety, guilt,
and eating disorders among the female population, those
artificially-tanned, oiled-from-head-to-toe, chemically-enhanced
bodybuilders smiling at you from the pages of your favorite magazine
have the power to wield considerable influence. This is what a real man
looks like, they seem to be saying. Envy me. I am a powerful man who
commands the sexual attention of others.
“The gyms you go to are crowded with guys trying to look like men,”
writes author Chuck Palahniuk in his novel, Fight Club, “as if being a
man means looking the way a sculptor or an art director says.” In order
to reach that sculpted ideal, the men (and women) Palahniuk refers to
are usually doing too many reps using far too much weight while taking
way too long of a break in-between sets as they walk around in a
permanent lat pose. Add in the wallet-draining habit of downing powders,
pills, and potions, and you have yourself an industry founded on the
illogical pursuit of mass.
Much like the Military-Industrial Complex…
"Military history is full of trumped-up threats," Business Week
columnist Stan Crock wrote in late 2002. "Time and again in military
preparations, fears are raised that later prove unfounded." Crock calls
this gap-ology. A gap, according to Herman, is "a frightening but
mythical deficiency relative to some foreign power."
First there was the 1955 bomber gap. "The Soviets flew Bison bombers
repeatedly in a loop over visitors at an air show, giving an exaggerated
notion of their numbers," says Crock. "A worried US military proceeded
to build up its air-defense system."
Another example of taking action based on a wholly manufactured basis
is the hyper-ingestion of protein due to the scientifically useless and
morally indefensible institution of animal experimentation. Since
trying to discern biological trends from human to human is often
impossible, what makes us think testing done on a rat will lead to any
knowledge about our anatomy and physiology? The breast milk of rats, for
example, derives nearly half of its calories from protein. Human breast
milk is 5.9 percent protein. Obviously, there's little useful
information to be gained from monitoring the protein needs of rodents.
However, many of today's "experts" are still relying on protein
requirement studies done on rats...in 1914.
What about those who believe we need extra protein because we want to
run faster, jump higher, or grow bigger and prettier muscles? "Although
in the past it was thought that vegetarian and vegan diets might impair
athletic performance," explains Natalie Digate Muth, MPH, RD,
"scientists, coaches, and athletes alike now agree that with proper
planning a diet without animal products can effectively fuel peak
performance." In addition, the decidedly mainstream National Academy of
Sciences has declared, "There is little evidence that muscular activity
increases the need for protein."
But evidence is rarely the primary guiding factor inside a gym. After
all, when was it decided that muscular hypertrophy was the ideal and is
there even a shred a proof that such over-development has any
correlation to health and fitness? The human body has evolved over
millions of years to support muscle mass similar to that of, say, a
swimmer. Until the Industrial Revolution, humans had little time to use
solely for the sake of gaining size. Today, however, we are surrounded
by men and women who have piled up enormous muscles on bodies not
designed to bear such a burden. Also, the type of training needed to
promote and maintain such unnatural mass is not exactly conducive to
joint health.
Look around the gym. How many people do you see lifting more weight
than they can handle? You know the type: usually men, big arms and
chest, equally big gut, thin legs, and not a shred of muscular
definition. Not to mention, the aching shoulders, elbows, knees all
covered in an assortment of Ace bandages. All of them chasing what
cannot be caught because it doesn't exist…like the missile gap.
In 1960, John F. Kennedy gave America the infamous "missile gap" when
he claimed the U.S. nuclear arsenal had fallen behind the Soviet
stockpile. Upon his election, JFK revealed that a gap indeed existed but
it turned out that it was the U.S. that had the advantage. "That didn't
stop Kennedy from launching a nuclear-arms buildup," adds Crock.
Presidents Carter and Reagan combined to make a late 70s/early 80s
contribution to the Soviet threat: the "window of vulnerability." Based
on the faulty assessment of a group of conservative defense analysts,
Reagan announced that the Soviets had the ability to knock out America's
land-based nukes in a first strike. "The claims were based on faulty
assessments of the Soviet weapons' power and accuracy—to say nothing of
Moscow's intentions," Crock explains.
If we chose, we wouldn't have to rely on "faulty assessments" to
figure out how much protein we actually need. The American Journal of
Clinical Nutrition says 2.5 percent of our daily calories should come
from protein. According to the World Health Organization, it's about 5
percent. How does that work out in grams? A lot lower than the US
average of 100 grams a day, that's for sure.
"An adult male on a fast only puts out 4.32 grams of urinary nitrogen
per day," says William Harris, M.D. author of The Scientific Basis for
Vegetarianism. "Each gram represents 6.25 grams of broken down protein,
so under conditions in which some protein is actually being catabolized
and used for fuel, only about 4.32 x 6.25 = 27 grams/day are actually
needed." Twenty-seven grams.
Which brings us back to human breast milk. Humans undergo their most
rapid growth during infancy and human breast milk has evolved over
hundreds of thousands of years to become the perfect food to facilitate
that growth. As stated earlier, it derives only 5.9 percent of its
calories from protein. So, here's a question for everyone working two
jobs just to afford their expensive protein supplements: If we need less
than 6 percent of our calories from protein during a time of intense
growth, why are we consuming so much protein as full-grown adults?
That's naturally fully-grown adults…not juiced-up bodybuilding
freaks. We look back now and laugh at what once passed for
entertainment. Stuff like gladiator contests or even Vaudeville. What
will future generations have to say about the artificially-inflated,
tanned, and oiled bodies of men and women trying to impress us with
their flexing in tiny outfits under the glare of klieg lights—all
pretending to represent health? It’s not natural. It's overkill…just ask
that unrepentant Cold Warrior, Caspar Weinberger.
US Secretary of Defense from 1981 to 1987, Weinberger remained
unfazed by any evidence of US deception. "In the end, we won the Cold
War," he declared, "and if we won by too much, if it was overkill, so be
it."
A slice of life on Planet Overkill…
-###-
You can find Mickey Z. at The Personal Trainer Diaries http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Personal-Trainer-Diaries-with-Mickey-Z/178344025527509?ref=ts on Facebook.