This second round of paycheck theft has come in the form of stolen productivity gains.
Historically, the relatively high and rising standard of living of
American workers--both blue and white-collar--which once gave the US one
of the highest standards of living in the world, has come courtesy of
rising productivity, which has allowed US companies to produce more
goods with less labor, and to then pass some of the enhanced profits on
to workers in the form of higher wages, without having to raise prices.
That has been important because, when higher wages are financed by
higher prices, it tends to be a kind of zero-sum game: higher wages
cancelled out by inflation.
But beginning in 2000, the old system already creaky, broke down.
(It must be noted that this system was never the result of the
capitalists' largesse, but rather was because of a tighter labor market
and, critically, a powerful labor movement.)
The corporate onslaught against trade unions and against the minimum
wage, which began with the Nixon administration in 1968, combined with
so-called “free-trade” deals that allowed US companies to shift
production overseas and then to freely import the products of their
overseas production facilities back for sale to Americans at home, by
weakening the power of workers to demand higher wages, has led to a
situation where companies can just pocket all the profits from
productivity gains, leaving wages stagnant, or even driving them down.
The recession that began in late 2007 has only made
matters worse, giving owners and managers to opportunity to really
hammer employees. With real unemployment and underemployment now running
at close to 20%, employees are in no position to press for higher
wages, even as those who are still working are putting in extra effort
to keep their jobs, thus pushing productivity gains even higher.
Serfing USA
The figures speak for themselves.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, productivity gains
during the 1990-1999 decade averaged just 2.1% per year. The prior
decade, from 1980-1989, the average productivity gain was 1.5% per year.
But between 2000 and 2009, when the economy suffered two recessions,
the average annual productivity gain has been 2.9%, almost 50% higher
than the prior decade, and almost double the rate in the 1980s.
During this same period, however, wages have actually
declined. According to the BLS, wages in 2010 rose 0.1%, but inflation,
running at an official (and grossly under-measured) 1%, more than ate
that up. According to the Economic Policy Institute, a Washington think
tank, for the whole decade from 2000 through 2009, wages actually sank
for most people. In 2000, the median weekly wage for a high school
graduate was $629. By the end of 2009, high school graduates were
earning a median weekly wage, in inflation-adjusted dollars, of just
$626--three dollars a week less than a decade earlier. A
college degree didn’t change things, either. In 2000, the median weekly
wage for a college grad was $1030, but that had fallen to $1025 by the
end of 2009.
Remember, all during that decade, companies were seeing productivity
gains averaging almost 3% per year. If 50% of that gain in
productivity annually had gone to workers, as might have been typical
back 30 years ago when unions were stronger and before Congress gave
away the store by signing onto the World Trade Organization and the
North American Free Trade Act and similar trade agreements, that high
school grad would have been earning $729 a week in inflation-adjusted
dollars by 2009, while the college grad would have been earning $1,195.
Of course as a whole, Americans have been doing even worse, because
these are just the mean wages of people who are working full weeks. In
fact, many companies have been laying off workers, and making the
remaining workers, desperate to hang on to their jobs, work harder to
produce the same amount of product, meaning that besides not getting any
pay increase, they are producing much more profit for the boss. Many
workers who are still hanging onto their jobs are actually working fewer
hours, and thus are taking home smaller paychecks, all of which goes
into that higher productivity figure for output per worker the
government is reporting.
Indeed, the Wall Street Journal today reported
glowingly that US production of goods and services had returned to its
2007 pre-recession level, but this is with unemployment running at an
official rate of 9.8 percent, and an actual rate of about 19 percent.
What we’re witnessing is a massive national “speed-up” which is
enriching the owners of capital, while the workers are getting stiffed.
It is the payoff to the ruling class for decades of hammering of trade
unions, and also of trade unions cutting deals with the Democratic
Party, which in turn has refused to defend workers’ interests. Look at
the sell-out of Labor during the first two years of the Obama
administration. The union movement’s one big issue--restoring some
measure of fairness to the Labor Relations Act, so that it would be at
least possible to organize unions and to win contracts and improved
wages and working conditions--was dropped without even a fight by the
Obama administration and the leadership of the House and Senate. The
government, fully in the hands of Democrats, has also continued to sign
trade agreements, most recently with Korea, that further shift jobs
overseas, thus further weakening the position of workers here at home.
A cynic might speculate that this is also why the Democrats
have refused for over three years now to come up with any real public
jobs program despite the desperate straits of tens of millions of
jobless people who have been without work for more than a year. The
Democrats, in thrall to corporate interests, would on the evidence much
rather spend $50 billion on a program of extended unemployment benefits
that leaves those millions of people hungry for any real job, than spend
that same sum on providing them with government jobs, as that would
actually reduce unemployment and increase the bargaining power of all
workers vis-a-vis employers.
Meanwhile, the national corporate media, itself viciously
anti-union, continue to skew news coverage to portray unions as corrupt
and greedy, so that the 90 percent of American workers who are not in a
union don’t even realize that any pay gains or benefits they get are
because employers are trying to avoid unionization of their workforce.
Unless Americans wake up soon to how this process is impoverishing
us all, we will see this shifting income and wealth to the top strata of
the population continue until most of us are little more than
modern-day serfs.
A start would be for people to at least recognize that this
stagnation and decline in incomes we’re witnessing is not some natural
phenomenon. It is, no less than the fat salaries, perks and bonuses paid
by corporate managers to themselves, simply another manifestation of
corporate greed gone wild.