"The Dayton Peace Accords were presented as a heroic victory
for peace extracted by the brilliant Holbrooke from a reluctant
Milosevic, who had to be "bombed to the negotiating table" by the United
States. In reality, the U.S. government was fully aware that Milosevic
was eager for peace in Bosnia to free Serbia from crippling economic
sanctions. It was the Bosnian Muslim leader Alija Izetbegovic who wanted
to keep the war going, with U.S. military help.
In reality, the U.S. bombed the Serbs in order to get Izetbegovic to
the negotiating table. And the agreement reached in the autumn of 1995
was not very different from the agreement reached in March 1992 by the
three ethnic groups under European Community auspices, which could have
prevented the entire civil war, if it had not been sabotaged by
Izetbegovic, who withdrew his agreement with the encouragement of the
then U.S. ambassador Warren Zimmermann. In short, far from being the
great peacemaker in the Balkans, the United States first encouraged the
Muslim side to fight for its goal of a centralized Bosnia, and then
sponsored a weakened federated Bosnia – after nearly four years of
bloodshed which left the populations bereft and embittered.
The real purpose of all this, as Holbrooke made quite clear in To
End a War, was to demonstrate that Europeans could not manage their own
vital affairs and that the United States remained the "indispensable
nation". ... His victory was a defeat for diplomacy. The spectacle of
bombing plus Dayton was designed to show that only the threat or
application of U.S. military might could end conflicts."
Holbrooke's death this week was capped by sinister, cynical comedy from
the White House, which sought to turn his dying refutation of the
murderous Af-Pak policy he pushed so assiduously into a bit of manly
joshing with doctors before going under the knife.
Well, maybe that's
how it was; maybe he stayed in character, the eager, hearty, shallow
courtier, even as death was staring him in the face. In any case,
whether Holbrooke saw the light -- or rather, saw the darkness he had
served his whole life -- before he died or not, his demise brings to
mind a point
we were making here just a few days ago.
1. John Caruso is excellent in this piece on how the Republicans are trying to save universal health care. An excerpt:
What I like best about the the health care drama in the US
right now is how nearly everyone is fighting on the other side,
unwittingly or otherwise. We've got Democrats working to save Obama's
nationalized version of Romneycare, while Republicans are doing
everything possible to defeat insurance-purchasing mandates that would
give even greater power and wealth to their corporate patrons in the
health insurance industry. I haven't had this much fun (politically,
anyway) since the waning days of the Clinton administration, when
give-peace-a-chance Republicans were trying to undermine Clinton's
determined efforts to kill Yugoslavs and Iraqis, and Democrats and their
"progressive" enablers were clamoring for more more more smart bombs.
Will Republicans be able to rescue universal health care in the US
from the seemingly mortal blow it took from Obama and the Democrats?
Time will tell.
2. Robert Scheer is excellent in this piece on the true implications of Bill Clinton's recent appearance at the White House:
a spectacle that revealed the utter political bankruptcy of the Obama
regime; its moral bankruptcy has been evident from the beginning;
indeed, from before the beginning. As Scheer puts it: the "sight of Bill
Clinton back on the White House podium defending tax cuts for the
super-rich was more a sick joke than a serious amplification of economic
policy."
3. Speaking of moral bankruptcy, Glenn Greenwald outlines, in copious detail, the torture that Obama is inflicting on Bradley Manning in his endless months of captivity without trial. It is harrowing stuff.
4. Professor Michael Brenner is excellent in this description of the utter sham, the empty suit of clothes who may soon be ruling over us: the murderous Pentagon bureaucrat, David Petraeus.
5. Speaking of utter shams, Patrick Cockburn follows billions of dollars down the war profiteering hole in Afghanistan, where millions face "food insecurity" this winter -- a full nine years after their "liberation."