First Bad Deal Gone Down: Origins
of the Current Democratic Debacle
by Chris Floyd
The last, wan hope for real change in the
American system was not lost through the imperial dithering of Barack
Obama's "Bush-Clinton Terror War Continuity" administration during the
past two years. No; those last wan hopes went down the drain in 2006 --
the year that the Democratic Party regained control of Congress ... and
promptly made a screeching U-turn on virtually every anti-war,
anti-imperialist, pro-liberty, pro-people position it had taken against
George W. Bush.
The sell-out -- or rather, the pay-off to the
corporatist-militarist power factions who actually control the Democrats
-- was immediate, brazen and deeply destructive. It helped entrench the
vast abuses of power of the Bush Regime (and its bipartisan
predecessors), it guaranteed the deaths of thousands of innocent people
in the continuation and expansion of the Terror Wars, and it laid the
groundwork for Obama's "Third Bush Administration" of presidential death
squads, pointless "surges" in bloody quagmires, remote control
slaughter by drone, bristling defenses and relentless expansions of
authoritarian power, and cringing, servile capitulation to Big Money on
every possible front.
As Bruce Dixon points out in a timely and important piece
at Black Agenda Report, the instant the Democrats regained
Congressional power in 2006, they immediately jettisoned all talk of
impeachment, all investigations of war crimes and the handling of
Hurricane Katrina, all impetus for real health care reform, all their
previously vociferous opposition to Bush's tax cuts for the rich, and a
host of other "dissenting" positions that they had cynically trumpeted
in order to manipulate the public's genuine anger and thirst for change.
(Ironically, the Democrats are now being hoisted on their own petard,
as the corporate-run "Tea Party" Republicans are about to oust them from
Congress with their own cynical manipulations of genuine anger and
thirst for change.)
Dixon nails it well:
Four years ago it was the eve of the
November 2006 election, Bush's last midterm ... After 12 years of
spectacularly corrupt and aggressively pro-corporate Republican
domination, the House and likely the Senate too, would be ruled by
Democrats. Expectations were high.
Four years ago a hundred members of the House
of Representatives had signed on as co-sponsors of one or more bills to
impeach Dick Cheney and George Bush. One of them was Detroit's John
Conyers, dean of the Congressional Black Caucus, who would chair the
House Judiciary Committee beginning in January 2007, and thus have the
unquestioned legal power to begin hearings on the question of
impeachment. Authoritative polls repeatedly showed that a a narrow
majority of the American people, and an overwhelming majority of
Democratic voters favored impeachment and criminal investigation of the
Bush-Cheney regime on a broad front, from waging illegal wars to
torture, lying to Congress, international kidnapping, secret
imprisonment without trial and tapping the phone and email of millions
of Americans. Rep. Conyers was also a perennial sponsor of reparations,
antiwar and single payer health care measures, causes which could surely
be advanced by his long awaited ascension to power.
Democrats had always massively opposed the Iraq
war, and millions were perfectly aware that a Democratic majority in
the House of Representatives could bring this unjust war to a halt over
any presidential objection by simply refusing to fund it.
The fall of 2006 was only a year after Katrina.
The Republican congress had refused to investigate the federal role in
the deaths of uncounted thousands, while the White House and military
authorities barred journalists from photographing or observing the
recovery of bodies. Federal, state and local authorities were making
return of hundreds of thousands of residents, mostly black, impossible. A
Democratic congress, some imagined, might turn this around too.
Under Democratic rule Rep. Bennie Thompson (D
MS) of the Congressional Black Caucus would chair the new House
Committee on Homeland Security. With his committee's subpoena power
Thompson could, if he chose, investigate the role of Blackwater and
other US mercenary companies in New Orleans and around the world and
make people tell the truth under penalty of prison. Harlem's Charlie
Rangel, another senior member of the Congressional Black Caucus would
chair the House Ways and Means Committee, a position from which he could
begin rolling back the regressive Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.
Of course, none of this happened. It's no
exaggeration to say that every single progressive expectation of the
Democratic majority in the House over the last four years has been
disappointed or betrayed.
It is indeed no exaggeration. The post-2006 turnaround was also a
virtual replay of what happened in 1992, when Bill Clinton won the
presidency -- then promptly shut down all investigation of the rampant
criminality of the Reagan-Bush administrations. But then, as both Georgie Herbert and Ole Bill shared the same top donor,
it was never very likely that Clinton would dish the dirt on his
partner in patronship. And of course today, the elder Bush and Clinton
are so close that the former calls the latter his "honorary son." Ain't
life grand at the top of the heap?
Dixon goes on to describe how Nancy Pelosi -- yes, poor old Nancy,
whom all good progessives are now being urged to rally around, in order
to save her marvelous leadership of the House -- put the kibosh on any
action that might upset the imperialist apple-cart ... even before the Democrats re-took power:
In the final year of Republican House
rule, Democratic minority leader Nancy Pelosi ordered the Congressional
Black Caucus NOT to hold its own hearings on Katrina, and refused to
call them herself, for fear that voters might see Democrats as the party
of those undeserving colored people. Only Georgia's Rep. Cynthia
McKinney defied Pelosi and House Democratic leaders to hold her own
hearings, which were boycotted by all but one of the Congressional Black
Caucus.
Pelosi was not alone. As soon as juicy Chairmanships and other perks of
partisan dominance were assured, other top Dem "dissidents" began
changing their spots pronto:
Between the November 2006 election and
the beginning of the new Democratic party controlled Congress in January
2007, John Conyers walked back from his pro-impeachment stand, even
having demonstrators and former staffers arrested outside his office
when they tried to meet with him. Among the pitiful excuses Conyers
offered for not convening impeachment hearings was that “Fox News would
have a field day,” the votes to convict them in the Senate weren't
there, (How Conyers knew that in advance of evidence or even hearings
remains a mystery!) and that Bush-Cheney would be history in two more
years anyhow.
But as David Swanson has pointed out, even if
impeachment could not be won, calling the hearings would have set an
invaluable precedent limiting presidential power. It would have drawn a
historic line in the sand against further illegalities by that and
future presidents. When John Conyers repaid the trust of forty years
worth of re-elections by excusing the Bush-Cheney crimes without even an
investigation, he empowered all of Bush-Cheney's successors to build
upon that loathsome foundation. President Obama has done just that,
introducing measures to “legalize” the flagrant atrocities of
Bush-Cheney. Now torture, international kidnapping and secret
imprisonment without recourse to a lawyer or a day in court are “legal.”
The Democratic congress of 2006 enabled this, and the Democratic
congress of 2008 ratified it.
Dixon also nails another important point often lost in the blithering blather of this deeply degraded campaign season:
The Democratic Congressional Campaign
Committee, the body responsible for recruiting Democrats candidates,
collecting corporate donations and distributing these to its favorites,
was headed by Chicago's Rahm Emanuel. The DCCC threw millions of dollars
behind dozens of pro-war Democrats opposing antiwar Democrats in 2006
primary elections. The continued existence of the so-called “blue dog
Democrats,” hypocritically accused by House Democratic leaders like
South Carolina's Jim Clyburn of “gumming up the works,” hamstringing the
president and “real Democrats” is largely the work of Congressional
Democratic leader Rahm Emanuel, who went on to become chief of staff in a
Democratic White House.
Exactly. Our Fightin' Progressives are continually exhorting us to help
kick out them mean old Blue Dawgs who have done so much to hamper the
super-progressive agenda of Barack Obama -- when it was Obama's chief
minister and fixer, Rahm Emanuel, who financed and empowered these
hardshell throwbacks in the first place. They were put in place by Rahm
and Obama to do exactly what they have done: block any attempt at
genuine reform of the system.
There is much, much more in Dixon's piece. Do yourself a favor and read it in full, as soon as you can.
**
On a personal note, I was pleased to see a commenter on Dixon's essay singling out some pieces that I had written, and some by Arthur Silber as well,
about Obama's very public rejection of his longtime friend, mentor and
pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. This episode was one of the most
gutless and shameful things I've seen in national politics in a long
time (even though it was praised to high heaven by our Fightin'
Progressives as some kind of high-water mark in the history of human
morality). It showed very clearly the true measure of the man fronting
those same sell-out Democrats: they would throw anybody and anything
aside -- friends, allies, supporters, the public good, the peace of the
world -- in their frantic scramble up the greasy pole of power.
|