Such is the Peace Process:
Obama as a Salesman
by Ramzy Baroud
It
wouldn’t be an exaggeration to claim that the resumption of peace talks
between the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority have thus
far yielded nothing of value, at least not as far as settling the
decades-long struggle.
For
one, the media has paid the talks little attention, aside from the
ceremonial coverage of the first round of talks in Washington on
September 2. It barely noticed the following round in the Middle East
nearly two weeks later. What did capture the media’s attention was US
President Barack Obama’s attempt to minimize the damage he invited upon
himself for merely pressing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to
issue a partial moratorium on settlement building (about 11 months
ago), and then to extend the settlement freeze.
The
President of the United States has, as expected, failed to persuade
Israeli leaders to uphold such a basic prerequisite to ensuring a smooth
sailing peace process. Its resumption signaled the return of American
diplomacy to the Middle East. Its current problems and expected failure,
unlike previous rounds of talks, could very much usher the end of
American political adventurism in the region.
If a president like Obama –
who once enjoyed such a massive national and international mandate -
could weaken before a rightwing Israeli prime minister, then why should
others even try?
To
save face - and postpone failure - Obama has reportedly promised Israel
broad security and diplomatic guarantees. All he has asked for in
return is the mere extension of the settlement moratorium of 60 days -
enough to push his party through the November elections.
According
to an article by David Makovsky, of the Washington Institute for Near
East Policy, the leaked letter from Obama to Netanyahu positions US
foreign policy as a hostage to Israeli diktats, whereby the US makes no
such future requests of settlement freeze, guarantees a US veto of any
UN Security Council Resolution related to the peace talks for a year,
agrees to increase pressure on Iran as per Israeli demands, and so on.
Among the many disturbing pledges made by the Obama administration, one
seems particularly generous. According to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency,
the US will “‘accept the legitimacy’ of Israel's security needs as
defined by the Netanyahu government, referring apparently to the Israeli
leader's demand for a long-term Israeli military presence in the
eastern West Bank, along the border with Jordan”.
For
Obama to lease his country’s political influence to a foreign state for
cheap political gain is bad enough. To achieve personal and party
political goals at the expense of the national interest of the country
is equally disturbing. But to promise a lasting military presence of an
occupying power in another people’s land for a mere 60-day settlement
freeze is completely unethical and illogical. Furthermore, it violates
international law. This letter will someday be analyzed in the same
category as the Balfour Declaration of 1917, when a Jewish Homeland was
promised by Britain to a group of European Zionists in historic
Palestine – even when neither group had ownership rights or any
political mandate.
Obama’s
passionate speech in Cairo, in June 2009, was entitled ‘A New
Beginning’. But a year and few months later, Obama has learned the
limits of the political overreach of his country when it comes to Israel
– as much as the Iraq war has demonstrated the limits of military
power.
With
this new wisdom, Obama and his advisors are acting like desperate
salesmen before a conceited, dispassionate tourist. All Obama needs is a
bit of time and Netanyahu is haggling over every detail to ensure
maximum value for his dollar before November 2 arrives. Then, Israel
will find other ways to use whatever leverage it has to advance its
interests.
Because
Israeli leaders also understand that in times like this Washington is
absolutely mute and meek, Tel Aviv is sparing no efforts to exploit the
situation. At home, Netanyahu is flexing his muscles to impress his
influential rightwing constituency by approving hundreds of new housing
units in illegally occupied Arab East Jerusalem. Netanyahu has humbled
the president of the Free World, and is enjoying every moment of it.
More,
racist new laws are either passing or are scheduled for vote at the
Israeli Knesset. One of these demands allegiance to Israel as “a Jewish
and democratic state.” Many will have to take that oath or lose their
citizenry rights in the country. It is an undemocratic law by every
account, and is aimed largely at the Palestinian Christian and Muslim
population, the natives of that land. The timings of these legislations
are also meant to underscore Israel’s determination to do whatever it
deems necessary. This will serve the rightwing parties in Israel very
well in future elections.
As
for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, there is little to be said. He
has no political power, leverage or influence. He can only do as he is
told. He might send out the occasional threat of quitting political
life, but frankly few are paying attention or worried about that
possibility.
However,
Abbas has, perhaps inadvertently, helped Netanyahu by providing him
with a political platform whereby the Israeli leader can claim to be
engaged in a legitimate peace process with a Palestinian partner. This
alone was enough to bring Netanyahu and his country from back political
oblivion into the center stage of international diplomacy. The bloodbath
that Israel unleashed on Gaza from 2008 to 2009, the ongoing siege, the
killing of activists abroad the Freedom Flotilla have all been cast
aside for now. Instead we listen to Netanyahu speak of peace, prosperity
and security for all, amid hearty clapping and standing ovations.
Hundreds
of Israeli speakers, politicians, diplomats and scholars have been
circling the globe in recent months, talking about Israel’s undying
commitment to peace. While this goes on, Israeli bulldozers are back in
full gear, tearing down homes, businesses and olive groves. Israel
continues to expand settlements and build what is rightly termed the
Apartheid Wall, all with little, if any criticism from the US, the
self-declared honest peace broker. Worse, as much as the political
theater is organized and financed by US dollars, the full-scale
destruction taking place in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is also
courtesy of US coffers. Such is the self-defeating policy of the United
States. Such is the peace process.
-
Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net) is an internationally-syndicated
columnist and the editor of PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is
My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza's Untold Story (Pluto Press,
London), now available on Amazon.com.