Atrocity Now: Wikileaks Release Puts Spotlight
Back on Continuing War Crime in Iraq
by Chris Floyd
Many, many years ago, I noted in the Moscow
Times that shortly after the 2003 invasion, the United States had begun
hiring some of Saddam's old torturers as the invaders sought to quell
the then-nascent "insurgency" -- i.e., the opposition to foreign
occupation that when carried out by white men, such as the French during
World War II, goes by the more ringing name of "resistance."
Here's
part of that report, from August 29, 2003:
"Here's a headline you don't see every day: "War Criminals Hire War Criminals to Hunt Down War Criminals."
"Perhaps that's not the precise wording used by
the Washington Post this week, but it is the absolute essence of its
story about the Bush Regime's new campaign to put Saddam's murderous
security forces on America's payroll.
"Yes, the sahibs in Bush's Iraqi Raj are now
doling out American tax dollars to hire the murderers of the infamous
Mukhabarat and other agents of the Baathist Gestapo – perhaps hundreds
of them. The logic, if that's the word, seems to be that these
bloodstained "insiders" will lead their new imperial masters to other
bloodstained "insiders" responsible for bombing the UN headquarters in
Baghdad – and killing another dozen American soldiers while Little
George was playing with his putts during his month-long Texas siesta.
"Naturally, the Iraqi people – even the
Bush-appointed leaders of the Potemkin "Governing Council" – aren't
exactly overjoyed at seeing Saddam's goons return, flush with American
money and firepower. And they're certainly not reassured by the fact
that the Bushists have also re-opened Saddam's most notorious prison,
the dread Abu Ghraib, and are now, Mukhabarat-like, filling it with
Iraqis – men, women and children as young as 11 – seized from their
homes or plucked off the street to be held incommunicado, indefinitely,
without due process, just like the old days. As The Times reports,
weeping relatives who dare approach the gleaming American razor-wire in
search of their "disappeared" loved ones are referred to a crude,
hand-written sign pinned to a spike: "No visits are allowed, no
information will be given and you must leave." Perhaps an Iraqi
Akhmatova will do justice to these scenes one day."
One of the first stories out of the gate from
the gigantic new release of classified documents on the Iraq War by
Wikileaks details the willing connivance and cooperation between the
American invaders and their Iraqi collaborators in perpetrating heinous
tortures against Iraqis. As we know, the Americans themselves were not
exactly averse to atrocious maltreatment of the hundreds of thousands of
Iraqis they have rounded up, overwhelmingly without charges or
evidience, over the long, long years of this godforaken enterprise. (As
we've often noted here before, at one point early in the Iraq War, the
Red Cross estimated that 70-90 percent of the more than 20,000 Iraqis
then being held by the Americans as "suspected terrorists" were not
guilty of any crime whatsoever. And of course many thousands more have
been "churned" through the system since then. Which is doubtless one of
the main reasons why there is still an active "insurgency" in Iraq after
so many years of continuous "counter-insurgency." And yes, even after
the "victorious" surge led by St. David Petraeus, and after the bogus
"end of combat operations" declared by the Peace Laureate himself.)
But the Guardian story focuses on another key feature of the entire
American Terror War -- indeed, of American foreign policy for a great
many bipartisan decades: using proxies to do your dirty work. The
Wikileaks documents spell out case after case of torture by the
American-installed Iraqi lackeys -- often under the watchful eyes of
American forces ... and countenanced, officially and formally, by the
invaders. The Guardian reports:
This is the impact of Frago 242. A
frago is a "fragmentary order" which summarises a complex requirement.
This one, issued in June 2004, about a year after the invasion of Iraq,
orders coalition troops not to investigate any breach of the laws of
armed conflict, such as the abuse of detainees, unless it directly
involves members of the coalition. Where the alleged abuse is committed
by Iraqi on Iraqi, "only an initial report will be made … No further
investigation will be required unless directed by HQ".
...Hundreds of the leaked war logs reflect the
fertile imagination of the torturer faced with the entirely helpless
victim – bound, gagged, blindfolded and isolated – who is whipped by men
in uniforms using wire cables, metal rods, rubber hoses, wooden stakes,
TV antennae, plastic water pipes, engine fan belts or chains. At the
torturer's whim, the logs reveal, the victim can be hung by his wrists
or by his ankles; knotted up in stress positions; sexually molested or
raped; tormented with hot peppers, cigarettes, acid, pliers or boiling
water – and always with little fear of retribution since, far more often
than not, if the Iraqi official is assaulting an Iraqi civilian, no
further investigation will be required.
Most of the victims are young men, but there
are also logs which record serious and sexual assaults on women; on
young people, including a boy of 16 who was hung from the ceiling and
beaten; the old and vulnerable, including a disabled man whose damaged
leg was deliberately attacked. The logs identify perpetrators from every
corner of the Iraqi security apparatus – soldiers, police officers,
prison guards, border enforcement patrols.
As the Guardian notes, the Americans were fully aware of what their charges were doing:
....There is no question of the
coalition forces not knowing that their Iraqi comrades are doing this:
the leaked war logs are the internal records of those forces. There is
no question of the allegations all being false. Some clearly are, but
most are supported by medical evidence and some involve incidents that
were witnessed directly by coalition forces.
It should also be ntoed that many of the Iraqi
"interrogation techniques" noted above have also featured systematically
in the American gulag during the Bush-Obama years. In fact, we know
that there is a trove of photographic evidence of rapes and tortures
that have been seen by top American elected officials, including members
of Congress, who talked openly of how sickening these documented
atrocities were. Yet this evidence is still being withheld from the
American people -- at the express order of Barack Obama, and the connivance of his fellow militarists in Congress.
Speaking of the Peace Laureate, the Wikileaks document show that
these countenanced and/or winked-at atrocities by the American-installed
structure in Iraq are still going on today. They are not just relics of
the bad old Bush years:
And it does continue. With no effective
constraint, the logs show, the use of violence has remained embedded in
the everyday practice of Iraqi security, with recurrent incidents up to
last December. Most often, the abuse is a standard operating procedure
in search of a confession, whether true or false. One of the leaked logs
has a detainee being beaten with chains, cables and fists and then
confessing to involvement in killing six people because "the torture was
too much for him to handle".
These are the direct fruits of the staggering
act of evil that was -- and is -- the illegal, immoral invasion and
occupation of Iraq. No, let's go further than that. These acts are just
the latest fruits in an astonishingly brutal and coldly
deliberate 20-year effort to destroy the Iraqi people: an effort carried
out through four presidential administrations -- two Republicans, two
Democrats -- with the complicity of successive British governments. It
is a crusade that has involved two massively destructive major military
campaigns and more than a decade of draconian sanctions, all of which
have led to the needless deaths of more than one and a half million
innocent people.
The Bush-Clinton sanction regime -- which also included a continual
military component of bombing attacks -- is part and parcel of what has
happened in Iraq during the past hellish decade ... and what is still
happening there. As Joy Gordon notes in her landmark study of this
cold-blooded berserkery, Invisible War, the sanctions regime:
caused hundreds of thousands of deaths;
decimated the health of several million children; destroyed a whole
economy; reduced a sophisticated country, in which much of the
population lived as the middle class in a First World country, to the
status of Fourth World countries -- the poorest of the poor, such as
Rwanda, Somalia, Haiti; and in a society notable for its scientists,
engineers and doctors, established an economy dominated by beggars,
criminals and black marketeers.
Gordon's detailed, richly sourced and morally
horrifying account of the sanctions era must be read to be believed.
However bad you thought it was, the reality was much worse. I hope to be
writing much more on this seminal work in the weeks to come. I strongly
urge you to read it. But suffice to say for now that the manner in
which Bush and Clinton officials used that dead hand of bureaucracy and
cool, convoluted legalistic jargon to hide a crazed policy of murderous
intent reminded me of nothing so much as the dealings of Nazi officials
with the Jewish ghettos of Warsaw and Lodz before their final
destruction.
We''ll have much more here on the Wikileaks release as people begin
combing through the 400,000 documents. Wikileaks has done us all a great
service by putting this vast war atrocity -- which is still going on --
back on the front pages, forcing the murderers and their accomplices
and "continuers" in the halls of power to scurry around like rats caught
in the light, twisting and squealing, trying to find some way to
obscure the gobs of blood dripping from their hands and lips.
|