"There was [allegedly] an operational relationship between al Qaeda and
Saddam Hussein -- that was dismissed in the 9/11 [Commission] report,"
said Kennedy.
"What my amendment does is it says you have to come back to the
Congress to get authorization for increasing the manpower and
increasing the resources that are going to be necessary to support that
manpower -- and it will give the Congress of the United States an
opportunity to vote yes or no on that resolution."
Christopher Dodd (D-CT), who has introduced similar legislation -- that
does not rely on cutting off funding for the "troop surge" -- agrees
entirely with Kennedy that the original war resolution is null and
void, saying Wednesday that it "is no longer relevant in my view."
And, according to Kennedy, his legislation must be acted upon quickly
because in the three months it will take to get a request for a
"supplemental" appropriation for the war effort and have the
Appropriations Committee process it, the troops will already be over
there.
"The issue then is entirely different. The issue then is are we going
to deny support for troops who have already been sent over there and
are battling over there daily?" said Kennedy, in explaining his call
for a prompt vote. "We have to try to get this resolution done
expeditiously. And we're talking within a week or the next 10 days --
prior to the time that they start to send troops over."
Meanwhile, the White House says that Kennedy's bill is moot because
they already have the money to pay for a troop escalation and thus do
not need additional funds from Congress to move the plan forward.
Whether or not that's true, Kennedy's measure combines with Dodd's initiative and a non-binding,
anti-surge resolution
that also has the strong support of Chuck Hagel (R-NE), to send a
message to Bush that a Democratic Congress officially ends the near
monarchy he has enjoyed for the last few years.
Kennedy vows to keep pushing every day, saying that he won't give up
and calling his vote against the war in 2002 "one of the best votes
that I ever cast in the Senate."
And his Democratic colleague, Chris Dodd, could not agree more that this is a real gut-check for all Senators.
"This is not a time for Senators to simply declare our individual
opposition to this plan. It is time that we accept our obligations and
offer meaningful action to stop this proposal," said Dodd. "The
president has laid down the gauntlet by just saying 'I'm going to go
forward and I don't care what you say.' And it seems to me we have an
obligation up here to respond to that. People look to us for leadership
on these issues."
"There's a time for us to speak up and be heard and that hour is now."