Canadian Court Bans G20
Defendant from Speaking
by TRNN
Alex Hundert's G20 nightmare began on June 26th when Toronto Police raided his home at 4am, arresting he and his partner Leah Henderson at gunpoint. One month later they were released from prison on $100,000 bail each, with 20 stringent conditions, including conditional house arrest, non-associations with some of their best friends, and a ban on posting to the internet and attending or planning any public demonstrations.
Upon his release, Hundert gave a handful of interviews to the media, and the police tried to return him to prison for breaking his 'no demonstration' condition. A judge ruled in September that speaking to the media was protected and didn't break the condition. Four days later Hundert was arrested again immediately after participating as an invited speaker on a university panel. This time, after spending an additional four weeks in prison, a judge sided with the police that Hundert did break the 'no demonstration' condition. Hundert's bail was amended to include a total ban on voicing any political view, specifically mentioning that he not speak with the media.
From our research this represents a modern first in Canada, and many are gearing up to fight it. This also includes a sit-down interview with Hundert that was filmed in September, before the new conditions were added.
Organizer Alex Hundert coerced into 'unprecedented' gag clause
JESSE FREESTON, PRODUCER, TRNN: On Friday, The Toronto Star's
Dan Robson wrote, "Alex Hundert's words will not appear in this story.
Unlike other Canadians, he's not allowed to speak to the press." That's
because on Tuesday, social justice activist and G-20 defendant Alex
Hundert of Toronto was judged to have breached his bail conditions by
participating in a university panel discussion. His newest bail
conditions were then amended to include a ban on all public political
expression. Hundert is one of 20 organizers facing serious conspiracy
charges stemming from June's G-20 protests, and his case has served as a
litmus test for civil liberties in Canada. ~~~When I say "Free Alex," you say "Now." Free Alex!CROWD: Now!Free Alex!CROWD: Now!~~~FREESTON:
Hundert's battle with the law began in June when he was arrested at
gunpoint, along with his partner Leah Henderson, in a 4 a.m. pre-summit
raid on their Toronto home. After spending a month in prison, Hundert
and Henderson were released on $100,000 bail apiece, with 20 stringent
conditions, which included conditional house arrest and a promise not to
participate in public demonstrations.
After Hundert gave a handful of
interviews to the press, the police tried to have him thrown back in
jail for breach of the no public demonstration condition, but the
courts ruled that talking to the media isn't a public demonstration.
Soon after, Hundert appeared as an invited guest on a panel at Ryerson
University.ALEX HUNDERT, ORGANIZER AND G-20 DEFENDANT: —a
year-and-a-half-long police operation where undercover police
infiltrated our organizations, partially because we're just not as smart
as we think we are. And as a result, people are facing potential
serious jail time.
FREESTON: The panel was called
"Strengthening Our Resolve" and stressed a need for unity across issues
and tactics. It included organizers fighting for queer and transgender
rights, indigenous sovereignty, poverty eradication, migrant justice,
and other objectives.
HUNDERT: And it's really important
also for people to never give up, never stop fighting, and never
surrender. And that's part of why we put this event together and why I'm
speaking here. And I hope that the cops in the audience don't try to
arrest me later. Thank you.
FREESTON: When Hundert arrived
at his dad's home that night, the police did just that, arguing that the
panel was a breach of his no demonstration condition.This is typically what a panel or an indoor meeting looks like. Now, this is what a demonstration looks like.
FREESTON: Hundert was jailed for another four weeks before being given the new condition of a ban on expressing political views.~~~CROWD: We will not give up the fight!Free speech is a right!CROWD: We will not give up the fight!~~~FREESTON:
The Real News spoke to Yogi Acharya, a member of both the Toronto
Community Solidarity Network and the migrant justice group No One Is
Illegal.
YOGI ACHARYA, TORONTO COMMUNITY MOBILIZATION
NETWORK: —blatant attacks on community organizers is clearly meant to
set a precedent and to send a warning sign to the broader activists
[inaudible] and to communities in general, I think, to not resist and to
not sort of voice opposition to [inaudible] So I think the intent is
clear: it's to criminalize dissent and to use any kind of means to do
so, even if that means making examples out of people who are, who have
been vocal and who have been public.
FREESTON: Hundert
spend an additional four weeks in jail before the courts agreed with the
police that the panel appearance represented a breach of his bail, and
they conditioned his re-release upon accepting a full-out ban on
political expression. Hundert told the court that he would rather remain
in jail than consent to his own gagging. But less than 24 hours later,
Hundert was free on bail.
His brother Jonah Hundert told The Real News
that prison officials threatened to keep Alex in solitary confinement
indefinitely without access to a phone call, lawyer, or any of his
property unless he immediately signed the bail conditions. Jonah added
in a press release that, quote, "Forcing Alex to sign these egregiously
unjust bail conditions under duress is absolutely unacceptable."
Osgoode
law professor Alan Young was quoted in the Toronto Star as saying,
quote, "It's basically putting a gag order on a citizen of Canada, when
it's not clear that the gag order is at all necessary to protect public
order."
He added that the conditions were unheard of in modern-day
Canada. The Real News spoke to Hundert in September, between jail stints
and before he was banned from speaking, in order to find out more about
this long-time activist that the government was intent on silencing.
HUNDERT:
And the fear of imprisonment and the fear of the abuses that happen in
prison, you know, are—that is explicitly there to try and dissuade
people from resistance. And while that was something I was aware of
before I went in, it is a lot clearer to me now.
FREESTON:
Hundert is a well-known organizer around various issues, and throughout
our interview he pleaded that people not lose sight of those issues. He
highlighted his opposition to the Canadian government's imprisonment of
Tamil migrants seeking refuge from persecution in Sri Lanka.HUNDERT: They've been totally criminalized and demonized as terrorists or potential terrorists or threats to national security
VIC
TOEWS, CANADIAN PUBLIC SAFETY MINISTER: —approximately 490 individuals
on board, including suspected human smugglers and terrorists, did not
come to Canada's shores by accident.HUNDERT: Which is the
same discourse they're putting out about us. You know, there was this
huge mass arrest in Toronto of 1,000-plus people, the largest in
Canadian history. Several weeks later, 492 Tamil migrants were mass
arrested and are all still in detention, including women and children.
FREESTON:
Some campaigns Hundert has helped organize include opposition to the
war in Afghanistan, land defense from development, and dependence on
oil. But perhaps most important to him is supporting struggles for
indigenous sovereignty, opposing what he sees as the Canadian
government's ongoing colonization of the land's indigenous nations. He
points to the Two Row Wampum agreement as an alternative model. The 1613
agreement was the first between the Haudenosaunee Confederacy—or
Iroquois—and the European settlers.
HUNDERT: It represents
two separate vessels containing the cultures and the politics of
separate nations that travel down the same river, and each vessel
carries down on its own path in a way that does not impede the other's
ability to make its own decisions. The fact that it's a single river
reflects the inherent need for people to recognize that we all share
common land bases and that there needs to be room for autonomous
decisions to be made by autonomous and sovereign communities and nations
that share a single land base. And I think our culture is so off from
that model. I mean, we are inherently making decisions that destroy not
just other people's ability to have a future, but even our own ability
to have a future. And in order to secure profit for the privileged now,
this culture seems quite willing to destroy all other paths. In
indigenous communities where sovereignty is on the table or where land
defense is something that communities are engaged in, those communities
are also targeted and criminalized. It seems to be our model, contrary
to this model, is one that says there is only one path and anyone who
challenges that path will be targeted for destruction.
FREESTON:
While appreciative of the support people are showing for him, Hundert
has expressed his desire that people not lose sight of the larger issues
while standing up for his civil liberties. He explained why during our
interview in September.
HUNDERT: It is almost a waste of
time to spend our time fighting for the right to fight. By fighting for
the things we believe in, we assert our right to fight, to fight back
against an exploitative, destructive system. And that's a right that
can't be won; it has to be asserted. Fighting back against the so-called
austerity agenda, you know, fighting back against repeal of social
services, of access to health services and education, fighting back
against those has tremendous value, because those are the day-to-day
circumstances of the people most fucked over by the system.
But for
people to fight just for their right to fight so that they feel better
about, you know, the farce of this democracy because, oh, well, I could
take the streets if I wanted to, I think that's totally worthless. I
think the way to continue to have the right to protest is to protest.
The way to continue to have space for resistance is to resist, to
actually build those spaces and to defend them.
FREESTON:
Hundert will have to wait at least one month to appeal his gag
condition. Nathalie Des Rosiers, head of the Canadian Civil Liberties
Association, has already promised to intervene in Hundert's defense,
saying that "Speaking to the media does not threaten public safety.
These bail conditions are only aimed at silencing speech." As for
Hundert's conspiracy trial, the details of which are under a court order
publication ban, it is expected to drag out for years to come.
Meanwhile, to the south, people are also mobilizing against the policing
of dissent. In part two, we meet up with a group putting forth a
creative response to recent FBI raids in the United States.
End of TranscriptDISCLAIMER:
Please note that transcripts for The Real News Network are typed from a
recording of the program. TRNN cannot guarantee their complete
accuracy.
|