to the sinister world of "Precrime" where capitalist grifters, drug-
and torture-tainted spy shops are all laboring mightily to stamp out
every last vestige of free thought here in the heimat.
The CIA Enters the Frame
In July, security journalist Noah Shachtman revealed in Wired
that "the investment arms of the CIA and Google are both backing a
company that monitors the web in real time--and says it uses that
information to predict the future."
Shachtman reported that the CIA's semi-private investment company, In-Q-Tel
, and Google Ventures
, the search giant's business division had partnered-up with a dodgy outfit called Recorded Future
pouring, according to some estimates, $20 million dollars into the fledgling firm.
on In-Q-Tel's web site informs us that "Recorded Future extracts time
and event information from the web. The company offers users new ways to
analyze the past, present, and the predicted future."
ubiquitous though nameless "users" are or what they might do with that
information once they "extract" it from the web is left unsaid. However,
judging from the interest that a CIA-connected entity has expressed in
funding the company, privacy will not figure prominently in the "new
ways" such tools will be used.
reported that the company, founded by former Swedish Army Ranger
Christopher Ahlberg, "scours tens of thousands of websites, blogs and
Twitter accounts to find the relationships between people,
organizations, actions and incidents--both present and still-to-come."
"The cool thing is" Ahlberg said, "you can actually predict the curve, in many cases."
as for the search giant's interest in "predicting the future" for the
secret state, it wouldn't be the first time that Google Ventures sold
equipment and expertise to America's shadow warriors.
firm may pride itself on the corporate slogan, "don't be evil," data is a
valuable commodity. And where's there value, there's money to be made.
Whether it comes in the form of "increasing share value" through the
sale of private information to marketeers or state intelligence agencies
eager to increase "situational awareness" of the "battlespace" is a
matter of complete indifference to corporate bean counters.
After all, as Google CEO Eric Schmidt told CNBC
last year, "if you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place."
that standard, "only bad people have something to hide," is infinitely
mutable and can be stretched--or manipulated as has so often been the
case in the United States--to encompass everything from "Papist"
conspiracies, "illegal" migrants, homosexuality, communism, drug use, or
America's latest bête noire: the "Muslim threat."
went on to say that "the reality is that search engines, including
Google, do retain this information for some time. And we're all subject,
in the U.S., to the Patriot Act, and it is possible that that
information could be made available to the authorities."
In February, The Washington Post
reported that "the world's largest Internet search company and the
world's most powerful electronic surveillance organization are teaming
up in the name of cybersecurity."
"The alliance" between Google
and NSA "is being designed to allow the two organizations to share
critical information without violating Google's policies or laws that
protect the privacy of Americans' online communications," the Post alleged.
An anonymous source told the Post
that "the deal does not mean the NSA will be viewing users' searches or
e-mail accounts or that Google will be sharing proprietary data."
Last spring it was revealed that Google's Street View cars had been secretly vacuuming up terabytes of private wi-fi data for more than three years across Europe and the United States.
The Sunday Times
reported that the firm had "been scooping up snippets of people's
online activities broadcast over unprotected home and business wi-fi
In July, The Washington Post's
"Top Secret America" investigation disclosed that Google supplies
mapping and search products to the U.S. secret state and that their
employees, outsourced intelligence contractors for the Defense
Department, may have filched their customers' wi-fi data as part of an
NSA surveillance project.
And what about email and web searches? Last year, The New York Times
revealed that NSA intercepts of "private telephone calls and e-mail
messages of Americans are broader than previously acknowledged." In
fact, a former NSA analyst described how he was trained-up fierce in
2005 "for a program in which the agency routinely examined large volumes
of Americans' e-mail messages without court warrants."
That program, code-named PINWALE, and the NSA's meta-data-mining spy op STELLAR WIND, continue under Obama. Indeed, The Atlantic
told us at the time that PINWALE "is actually an unclassified
proprietary term used to refer to advanced data-mining software that the
But the seamless relationships amongst communications' giants such as Google and the secret state doesn't stop there.
before Google sought an assist from the National Security Agency to
secure its networks after an alleged breech by China last year, in 2004
the firm had acquired Keyhole, Inc., an In-Q-Tel funded start-up that
developed 3-D-spy-in-the-sky images; Keyhole became the backbone for
what later evolved into Google Earth.
At the time of their initial investment, In-Q-Tel said
that Keyhole's "strategic relationship ... means that the Intelligence
Community can now benefit from the massive scalability and high
performance of the Keyhole enterprise solution."
then-CEO, Gilman Louie, said that spy shop venture capitalists invested
in the firm "because it offers government and commercial users a new
capability to radically enhance critical decision making. Through its
ability to stream very large geospatial datasets over the Internet and
private networks, Keyhole has created an entirely new way to interact
with earth imagery and feature data."
Or, as seen on a daily basis in the AfPak "theatre" deliver exciting new ways to kill people. Now that's innovation!
was then, now the search giant and the CIA's investment arm are banking
on products that will take privacy intrusions to a whole new level.
A promotional offering by the up-and-comers in the predictive behavior marketplace, Recorded Future--A White Paper on Temporal Analytics
asserts that "unlike traditional search engines which focus on text
retrieval and leaves the analysis to the user, we strive to provide
tools which assist in identifying and understanding historical
developments, and which can also help formulate hypotheses about and
give clues to likely future events. We have decided on the term
'temporal analytics' to describe the time oriented analysis tasks
supported by our systems."
Big in the hyperbole department, Recorded Future claims to have developed an "analytics
engine, which goes beyond search, explicit link analysis and adds
implicit link analysis, by looking at the 'invisible links' between
documents that talk about the same, or related, entities and events. We
do this by separating the documents and their content from what they
According to the would-be Big Brother enablers,
"Recorded Future also analyzes the 'time and space dimension' of
documents--references to when and where an event has taken place, or
even when and where it will take place--since many documents actually
refer to events expected to take place in the future."
Adding to the unadulterated creep factor, the technocratic grifters aver they're "adding more components, e.g. sentiment analyses,
which determine what attitude an author has towards his/her topic, and
how strong that attitude is--the affective state of the author."
oppose America's imperial project to steal other people's resources in
Afghanistan and Iraq, or, crime of crimes, have the temerity to write or
organize against it? Step right this way, Recorded Future has their eye
on you and will sell that information to the highest bidder!
After all, as Mike Van Winkle, a California Anti-Terrorism Information Center shill infamously told the Oakland Tribune
back in 2003 after Oakland cops wounded scores of peacenik longshoremen
at an antiwar rally at the port: "You can make an easy kind of a link
that, if you have a protest group protesting a war where the cause
that's being fought against is international terrorism, you might have
terrorism at that (protest). You can almost argue that a protest against
that is a terrorist act."
And with Recorded Future's "sentiment analyses" such "links" will be even easier to fabricate.
Never mind that the prestigious National Academy of Science's National Research Council issued a scathing 2008 report, Protecting Individual Privacy in the Struggle Against Terrorists: A Framework for Assessment
, that debunked the utility of data-ming and link analysis as effective counterterrorism tools.
more problematic," the NRC informs us, "are automated data-mining
techniques that search databases for unusual patterns of activity not
already known to be associated with terrorists." Since "so little is
known about what patterns indicate terrorist activity" the report avers,
dodgy techniques such as link analysis "are likely to generate huge
numbers of false leads."
As for Recorded Future's over-hyped
"sentiment analyses," the NRC debunked, one might even say preemptively,
the dodgy claims of our would-be precrime mavens. "The committee also
examined behavioral surveillance techniques, which try to identify
terrorists by observing behavior or measuring physiological states."
conclusion? "There is no scientific consensus on whether these
techniques are ready for use at all in counterterrorism." Damningly, the
NRC asserted that such techniques "have enormous potential for privacy
violations because they will inevitably force targeted individuals to
explain and justify their mental and emotional states."
such inconvenient facts matter to Recorded Future or their paymasters in
the so-called intelligence community who after all, are in the driver's
seat when the firm's knowledge products "make predictions about the
After all, as Ahlberg and his merry band of privacy
invaders inform us: "Our mission is not to help our customers find
documents, but to enable them to understand what is happening in the
The better to get a leg up on the competition or know who to target.
The "Real You"
to be outdone by black world spy agencies, their outsourced corporate
partners or the futurist gurus who do their bidding, the high-tech
told us last month that the precrime concept "is coming very soon to
the world of Human Resources (HR) and employee management."
Reporter Mike Elgan revealed that a "Santa Barbara, Calif., startup called Social Intelligence
data-mines the social networks to help companies decide if they really want to hire you."
averred that while background checks have historically searched for
evidence of criminal behavior on the part of prospective employees,
"Social Intelligence is the first company that I'm aware of that
systematically trolls social networks for evidence of bad character."
Similar to Recorded Future and dozens of other "predictive behavior" companies such as Attensity
and Visible Technologies
Social Intelligence deploys "automation software that slogs through
Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, YouTube, LinkedIn, blogs, and 'thousands of
other sources,' the company develops a report on the 'real you'--not the
carefully crafted you in your resume."
According to Datamation,
"the company also offers a separate Social Intelligence Monitoring
service to watch the personal activity of existing employees on an
ongoing basis." Such intrusive monitoring transforms the "workplace"
into a 24/7 Orwellian panopticon from which there is no hope of escape.
service is sold as an exemplary means to "enforce company social media
policies." However, since "criteria are company-defined, it's not clear
whether it's possible to monitor personal activity." Fear not, it is.
Intelligence, according to Elgan, "provides reporting that deemphasizes
specific actions and emphasizes character. It's less about 'what did
the employee do' and more about 'what kind of person is this employee?'"
other words, it's all about the future; specifically, the grim world
order that fear-mongering corporations are rapidly bringing to fruition.
reports that "following the current trend lines," rooted in the flawed
logic of information derived from data-mining and link analysis, "social
networking spiders and predictive analytics engines will be working
night and day scanning the Internet and using that data to predict what
every employee is likely to do in the future. This capability will
simply be baked right in to HR software suites."
As with other
aspects of daily life in post-constitutional America, executive
decisions, ranging from whether or not to hire or fire someone, cast
them into a lawless gulag without trial, or even kill them solely on the
say-so of our War-Criminal-in-Chief, are the new house rules.
our faux progressive president, some HR bureaucrat will act as judge,
jury and executioner, making decisions that can--and have--wrecked
Elgan tells us that unlike a criminal proceeding where you
stand before the law accused of wrongdoing and get to face your
accuser, "you can't legally be thrown in jail for bad character, poor
judgment, or expectations of what you might do in the future. You have
to actually break the law, and they have to prove it."
actions aren't anything like this." You aren't afforded the means to
"face your accuser." In fact, based on whether or not you sucked-up to
the boss, pissed-off some corporate toady, or moved into the "suspect"
category based on an algorithm, you don't have to actually violate
comapny rules in order to be fired "and they don't have to prove it."
tells us, "if the social network scanning, predictive analytics
software of the future decides that you are going to do something in
future that's inconsistent with the company's interests, you're fired."
Elgan avers, now that "the tools are becoming monstrously
sophisticated, efficient, powerful, far-reaching and invasive," the
precrime "concept is coming to HR."
Big Brother is only a "ping" or mouse click away...