Circle Jerks: Delaware Distraction
Obscures Oval Office Atrocities
by Chris Floyd
The political-media-blogospherical establishment is currently working
itself into a lather over the elevation of a "nutty" Tea Party woman to
the Republican nomination for a Senate seat in Delaware.
Keep your hands off yourself Christine O'Donnell senate run warns
The selection
of Christine O'Donnell by a tiny sliver of voters in a closed primary in
a tiny state whose main claim to fame is its decades of whorish service
as a protective front for rapacious corporations is, we are told, an
event of world-shaking proportions fit for endless analysis and scary
headlines
all over the world.
It's true that O'Donnell has taken the politically risky step of
denouncing America's national pastime -- masturbation -- and has, over
the years, supported any number of positions that put her on the far
side of common sense. But one struggles in vain to find that she has
advanced anything remotely as radical -- or lunatic -- as the idea that
the President of the United States is some kind of intergalactic emperor
who holds the power of life and death over every living being on earth
in his autocratic hands.
Yet this is precisely the position proclaimed
-- openly, before Congress, God and everybody -- by the highly educated,
intellectually sophisticated, super-savvy Laureate of Peace currently
residing in the White House.
This same president has also fought tooth and nail -- often in open
court -- to shield torturers, escalate pointless wars of aggression,
relentlessly expand a liberty-stripping Stasi-style security apparatus,
give trillions of tax dollars to rapacious financiers, health-care
corporations, insurance companies and bloodstained war profiteers, while
launching cowardly drone missile attacks on the sovereign territory of
close ally, killing hundreds of civilians in the process - and has just
signed off on the biggest arms deal in history with one of the most
viciously repressive tyrannies on earth.
So I'm sorry, but I just don't see how a putzy, klutzy, wilfully
ignorant Tea Partier from perhaps the most corrupt state in the Union is
somehow more dangerous than the people we have in power now --
including a Vice-President who for decades was the senator (and
corporate bagman) from this very same most corrupt state in the Union,
and used his power to advance a "Bankruptcy Bill" that was one of the
most savage class-war attacks on working people -- and the poor, and the
sick, and the vulnerable -- that we have seen in many a year. Then
again, as far as I know, Joe "Bankruptcy Bill" Biden has never publicly
condemned the practice of masturbation.
Do I want to see Christine O'Donnell in the Senate? No, of course
not. Not only because in her freely chosen ignorance she has embraced
the most primitive, bleakly reductive understandings of religion,
politics, power, sexuality and human reality in general, but also -- and
mainly -- because she will support all of the policies delineated
above: the imperial wars for loot and domination, the presidential power
to kill and incarcerate at will, the slavish support for Big Money in
all of its destructive manifestations, the perversion of every single
public program into an engine of private profit for the elite, and so on
down the line. But as her Democratic opponent will do the same thing if
he is elected, I don't see why we should be all het up about
O'Donnell's corporate-funded victory in the teeny-tiny Republican
primary in little bitty Delaware.
But hey, it's all good fun, right? The tribal partisans get to jerk
their knees in orgiastic spasms, drawing oceans of newsprint and TV
airtime, while the real business of empire -- slaughtering, torturing
and repressing human beings -- goes on unnoticed and unabated.
II.
But a hardy few out there are still trying to draw attention to the
actual crimes and moral atrocities being committed by the actual holders
of actual power. One of these is Andy Worthington, who is beginning an eight-part series on
the remaining prisoners still being held in the still-unclosed American
concentration camp at Guantanamo Bay. As Worthington says, the series
will
help explain how few of the remaining
prisoners have any connection to terrorism, how some are civilians, and
how others were foot soldiers for the Taliban, in an inter-Muslim civil
war in Afghanistan that had nothing to do with 9/11, and very little to
do with al-Qaeda. I also hope that it may contribute to the almost
non-existent debate regarding the Authorization for Use of Military
Force, and the administration's misplaced use of it to hold foot
soldiers in Guantanamo, as well as highlighting other aspects of the
habeas litigation, the military commissions, the moratorium on releasing
Yemenis, and the decision to hold 48 of the prisoners indefinitely
without charge or trial.
Hey, but you know what's more important than that, Andy? The fact that
someone who won the votes of a sliver of the electorate in a tiny state
doesn't think people should masturbate! Let's get our priorities
straight here.
Another campaign now underway is a major effort to free Bradley
Manning, the young soldier who committed the cardinal sin of trying to
unearth a few nuggets of truth about the murderous reality of the
American Terror War, now being prosecuted and expanded so assiduously by
the Continuer-in-Chief. On Thursday, filmmaker Michael Moore and
Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg launched "The Campaign to
Free Manning" in Oakland. The Guardian reports:
Demonstrations are planned in the US,
Canada and Australia over the next three days in support of Manning, an
army intelligence analyst who is being held at a military prison in
Virginia ...Manning, 23, is also accused of involvement in WikiLeaks'
exposure of a video of a US helicopter attack on apparently unarmed
Iraqis in a Baghdad street. Two Reuters employees were among those
killed.
Ellsberg, who leaked the Pentagon papers to the
New York Times that laid bare the extent of US government duplicity in
its claims to be winning the Vietnam War, said Manning was defending the
constitution in revealing the truth about the conflicts in Iraq and
Afghanistan.
"Soldiers' sworn oath is to defend and support
the constitution. Bradley Manning has been defending and supporting our
constitution," he said.
Moore ... said the US military was being
hypocritical in its attempts to discredit Manning and accuse WikiLeaks
by asserting that making the secret documents public endangered the
lives of Afghans collaborating with coalition forces.
"To suggest that lives were put in danger by
the release of the WikiLeaks documents is the most cynical of
statements," Moore said. "Lives were put in danger the night we invaded
the sovereign nation of Iraq, an act that had nothing to do with what
the Bradley Mannings of this country signed up for: to defend our people
from attack. It was a war based on a complete lie and lives were not
only put in danger, hundreds of thousands of them were exterminated. For
those who organised this massacre to point a finger at Bradley Manning
is the ultimate example of Orwellian hypocrisy."
Below is a quick roundup of a few other recent stories that aren't
nearly as important as the selection by a minority party of a candidate
who doesn't approve of masturbation.
1. Seven Civilians Killed in US-Iraqi Raid
That was the original headline for the New York Times story
about the raid in Fallujah; within a few hours, however, the Pentagon
PR units had rolled into action, and the seven civilians killed at the
site of perhaps the most savage American campaign of the war had
suddenly morphed into figures of vague menace. The story did note that
of the dead, four were brothers "between the ages of 10 and 18." So
America's non-combat soldiers killed a 10-year-old boy in a non-combat
raid in the brave new era of non-combat service that has opened for the
50,000 U.S. troops still in Iraq.
But what is the life of that boy compared to the sliver of voters in
a tiny state who voted in a closed, partisan primary for some gushing
goober who doesn't like masturbation?
2. US Drone Strikes Kill 15 in N. Waziristan
Juan Cole reports:
The Associated Press does an important
story about an intensive drone strike campaign by the US military since
September 2 in southern Afghanistan and in Pakistan’s North Waziristan
that has left 60 persons dead, among them innocent civilians.
On Tuesday alone, US drone attacks targeted
suspected militants killed some 15 persons in the village of Dargah
Mandi village on the outskirts of Miranshah, N. Waziristan’s main city.
The drone strikes have targeted fighters of the
Haqqani network, one of five or so major insurgent groups fighting
against the US & NATO presence in Afghanistan and against the Karzai
government. Jalaluddin Haqqani is one of Ronald Reagan’s “Freedom
Fighters,” who battled the Soviet occupiers of Afghanistan in the 1980s
with American aid. He could not accept the US invasion and occupation of
his country, either, and organized an insurgency now mainly led by his
son Siraj. The Haqqani group is not Taliban but rather Mujahidin and has
only a vague tactical alliance with Mulla Omar’s Taliban and similar
groups.
Cole also notes that protests against these continuing deadly incursions
into Pakistan have been muted -- because the Pakistanis are still dying
in floodwaters, and in the water's pestiferous wake. Millions are
living in deadly deprivation. But look over there -- somebody's
masturbating, or not masturbating, or something! Who cares about the
drowned and drone-bombed dead?
3. Obama's Thatcherite Gift to the Banks
OK, the Terror War goes on -- but at least Obama's finally waking up to
the need for more FDR-like stimulus for the economy -- and more
FDR-style war on the fat cats who are strangling us, right? What about
that big $50 billion infrastructure plan he announced on Labor Day?
Well, as Michael Hudson explains, the plan is yet another giveaway of billions of tax dollars to rapacious financial interests:
The Obama transport plan is like a
Fannie Mae for bankers, based on the President’s guiding mantra: “Let’s
help Wall Street put Americans back to work.” The theory is that giving
public guarantees and bailouts will enable financial managers to use
some of the money to fund some projects that employ people – with newly
created, non-unionized companies, presumably.
Here’s the problem. Transportation projects
will make real estate speculators, the construction industry and their
bankers very rich unless the government recovers its public spending
through windfall site-value gains on property along the right-of-way
... But Obama’s infrastructure plan is for Wall Street investors to get
the windfall – as property owners or as mortgage lenders making much
larger loans against the enhanced site value.
The plan would not add to the government
deficit, Obama promised. Unfortunately, in place of government taking
more revenue, it will be the finance, insurance and real estate (FIRE)
sector that does the taking. The banking system will now do what
government was supposed to do back in the Progressive Era: finance
infrastructure. The difference today is that instead of funding
transportation out of tax proceeds (levied progressively on the wealthy)
or by the central bank monetizing public debt, the Obama plan calls for
borrowing $50 billion at interest from banks.
The problem is that this will build in high
interest charges, high private management charges, underwriting fees –
and government guarantees. User fees will need to cover these financial
and other privatization costs “freed” from the government budget. This
will build about $2 billion a year into the cost of providing the
transport services.
This threatens to be the kind of tollbooth
program that the World Bank and IMF have been foisting on hapless Third
World populations for the past half-century. ... It looks like President
Obama sat down with Larry Summers, Tim Geithner and his other
Rubinomics holdovers from the Clinton/Goldman-Sachs Administration and
asked what policies can be funded without taxing the wealthy, but by
borrowing via a separate entity – with a government guarantee like the
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac gravy train for Wall Street.
Well, yeah, but at least you don't hear him talking trash about
masturbation, do you? That's why we must support him. If we don't, a
bunch of kooks who just want serve corporate interests will get into
power! Then what will happen?
4. State Secrecy and Official Criminality
Scott Horton at Harper's tells
us how Barack Obama -- whom we have every reason to believe is a
modern, rational man who has no problem with masturbation -- is
diligently, doggedly working to protect not only the torturers of the
Bush Administration (and his own) from the legal process, but also any
and every kind of state criminality.
Obama has just won a great court victory for state torturers, state
murderers, state terrorists -- and good old-fashioned grafters pigging
out in the public trough -- when an appeals court voted narrowly to
uphold Obama's contention that the government can shield any criminality
from justice by crying "state secrets."
Horton quotes the LA Times' description of just what Obama wanted to
cover up by killing a civil suit filed by an innocent victim of
America's gulag. The victim was suing the CIA agent who had "rendered"
him over to America's terror war allies, knowing he would be tortured:
The decision to short-circuit the trial
process is more than a misreading of the law; it’s an egregious
miscarriage of justice. That’s obvious from a perusal of the plaintiffs’
complaint. One said that while he was imprisoned in Egypt, electrodes
were attached to his earlobes, nipples and genitals. A second, held in
Morocco, said he was beaten, denied food and threatened with sexual
torture and castration. A third claimed that his Moroccan captors broke
his bones and cut him with a scalpel all over his body, and poured hot,
stinging liquid into his open wounds.
There were no "state secrets," real or otherwise, involved in the case.
The details were already known, around the world, from legal proceeding
in the UK and elsewhere. But for Obama -- imperial militarist to the
core -- there was a matter of principle at stake; i.e., the principle
that the imperial court can shield the minions who carry out its ordered
atrocities behind the unpassable gates of "state secrets."
Truth? No. Justice? Out. Compassion? Nix. Peace? Never. But
masturbation -- sure, why not? We're not kooks like that Christine
O'Donnell!
Now
that's "progressivism."