For years, the American Right and neocons have
been quick to accuse critics of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars of
endangering American troops – by causing disunity, exposing
counter-terror techniques, etc. – but these war enthusiasts are now the
ones putting the lives of U.S. soldiers in jeopardy.
Indeed, the Right and the neocons may have
American blood on their hands because of the ugly histrionics over a
plan to build a mosque and Islamic center two blocks from 9/11’s Ground
Zero.
As American troops are undertaking
dangerous operations to win the “hearts and minds” of Muslims – now
including flying helicopter missions in flood-ravaged Pakistan –
Republican politicians and right-wing media outlets are fueling
hysteria over the planned mosque. So, instead of the United States appearing
to be a nation tolerant of Islam and all other religions, the world is
seeing red-faced Americans screaming at New York City officials who
allowed the building plans to go forward.
Sensing another useful wedge issue,
prominent Republicans, including potential presidential candidates Newt
Gingrich and Sarah Palin, then jumped into the fray, escalating the
rhetoric ever further.
Gingrich told Fox News that “Nazis don’t
have the right to put up a sign next to the Holocaust Museum in
Washington,” thus likening Islam, even the sort practiced by the
moderate Muslims involved in the so-called Cordoba House in Lower
Manhattan, to Nazism. Gingrich’s metaphor also connected Muslims,
subliminally at least, to one of history’s great crimes, the Holocaust,
which incidentally was carried out primarily by European Christians.
Gingrich, who is portrayed by the
mainstream U.S. news media as a deep-thinking intellectual, also played
the victim card by casting the mosque as a symbol of Muslim
“triumphalism.”
Not to be upstaged, Palin, in a Twitter message, called the mosque an "unnecessary provocation" and a “stab … in the heart.”
So, the construction of a mosque on
privately owned land is not simply an American Muslim group exercising
its constitutional and property rights. It is a case of al-Qaeda
sympathizers doing something of a victory dance near Ground Zero and
further twisting the knife into the American people.
After the Right made the mosque an
emotional national issue, a poll showed about two-thirds of Americans
objecting to the mosque’s construction.
The message to the Islamic world couldn’t be clearer:
Despite soothing words from Gen. David
Petraeus and President Barack Obama (and even from former President
George W. Bush), Americans do see the “war on terror” as a war against
Islam, not just against a few violent extremists but against all
Muslims including moderates who have risked their own lives to condemn
Islamic radicalism.
Military Concerns
While the U.S. press corps has focused on
the political implications of the furor – mostly, how it should help
the Republicans in November – and, secondarily, on the constitutional
issues regarding freedom of religion, there has been little attention
given to the military implications of the controversy.
Just as Bush’s clumsy remark calling the
“war on terror” a “crusade” was a propaganda boon to al-Qaeda, so too
is this grotesque demonstration of anti-Islamic bigotry. It makes the
work of American troops -- conducting a delicate withdrawal from Iraq
and mounting counterinsurgency operations in Afghanistan -- all the
more hazardous.
The nasty mosque debate also undercuts the
humanitarian message conveyed by dispatching U.S. military helicopters
to flood-ravaged Pakistan and, indeed, the controversy escalates the
dangers facing those crews.
Further, there is an important strategic
factor. In nuclear-armed Pakistan, where the civilian government is
fragile and viewed as out-of-touch with the suffering of average
citizens, the last thing that pro-U.S. elements need is to be tainted
by the anti-mosque Islamophobia being stirred up by right-wing and
neocon activists in the United States.
Think for a minute about how differently
this controversy could have played out: The proximity between Ground
Zero and a mosque could have been held out as proof that American
leaders mean what they say about welcoming moderate Muslims. The
message at home would have reinforced – not contradicted – the message
carried by U.S. soldiers and diplomats abroad.
The United States would have stood up
before the world as a confident nation that lives – not just talks –
its principles. The American welcoming of a mosque near the 9/11 site
could have represented a propaganda blow to al-Qaeda and other
extremists.
Instead, the opposite has occurred. The
world has seen the United States appearing as a weak, prejudiced and
vengeful nation, blaming an entire religion for the actions of a few
adherents.
Even worse, the Americans most likely to
pay for this political posturing are the U.S. troops on the front
lines. The Right and the neocons may profit at the polls but the price
will be paid in blood, mostly by American soldiers and U.S. allies in
faraway places like Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq.
Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Neck Deep: The Disastrous Presidency of George W. Bush, was written with two of his sons, Sam and Nat, and can be ordered at neckdeepbook.com. His two previous books, Secrecy & Privilege: The Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq and Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth' are also available there. Or go to Amazon.com.
To comment at Consortiumblog, click here.
(To make a blog comment about this or other stories, you can use your
normal e-mail address and password. Ignore the prompt for a Google
account.) To comment to us by e-mail, click here. To donate so we can continue reporting and publishing stories like the one you just read, click here.
Back to Home Page