Radical Sportswriter Dave Zirin
on Community, Social Justice,
and Reclaiming Sport
by Mickey Z.
Well beyond the well-coiffed personalities that inhabit
ESPN, there are socially aware voices in the world of sports. Exhibit A:
Dave Zirin. His writings about sports—and the politics of sports—can be enjoyed in venues ranging from corporate media outlets like the
Washington Post to radical websites like
Counterpunch.
WATCH VIDEO: The Physics of Baseball: Pitching
GRITtv: Dave Zirin: History is a Fight
My Conversation With Dave Zirin
Planet Green: Vonnegut once said: "We’ve got to get back to
extended families. We need more people to talk to. I pretend to be
interested in sports just to say ‘good morning’ to people." Do you
believe in the unifying potential of sports?
Dave Zirin: Well, I'm definitely not for people pretending to be
interested in sports but yes I do believe in the unifying potential of
sports. I think that sports is like a hammer and you can use a hammer to
beat someone over the head or build shelter. It's in the way that you
use it. Sports has the power to be profoundly divisive or it can bring a
community together. I'll never forget speaking with Malik Rahim, the
terrific grass roots activist in New Orleans about the mood of the city
after the Saints won the Super Bowl. I thought he would say that the
Super Bowl win was diverting attention from the very pressing and
frightening concerns in NOLA. Instead he spoke about the way
people—black, brown, and white—were speaking with each other with an
easy joy unlike anytime he had ever seen in all his decades in that
remarkable city.
PG: Obviously, you're not anything close to "typical" when it
comes to sportswriters. What can readers learn from your approach and
your perspective on sports?
DZ: I don't know if I'm teaching anything novel. But I do believe
fiercely that people who consider themselves progressives or radicals
need to engage politically with the world of sports. It's the closest
thing to a common language we have in this country. It also is an
incredibly political space. Whether you are talking about the public
financing of stadiums, or the way working class fans are priced out of
the ballpark, or the fact that there doesn't seem to be a square inch of
the sports world not branded with sponsorship, politics are everywhere.
Also, we are seeing—more and more—athletes using this hyper-exalted,
brought to you by Nike platform to speak out for issues related to
social justice. And lastly, play and joy of play is something very
elemental about just being human. We should proudly claim what we love
about sports and discuss what we dislike about sports, and challenge it
to change.
PG: How did you come to meld your sports fandom with your radical perspective?
DZ: I was inspired by history: by Muhammad Ali, Billie Jean King, Tommie Smith and John Carlos
and the way they used sports as a platform for dissent. I was also
frustrated by the thought that neither the sports world nor the left
seemed to take this history seriously. Also, I saw athletes speaking
out—like Mahmoud Abdul Rauf—and just getting crushed by the sports media
and ignored by the left. It needed to change.
PG: Is it more likely that your work can lead the ESPN crowd
to examine their political convictions or inspire Planet Green readers
to appreciate the complex world of sports? Would one please you more
than the other?
DZ: Honestly, either way is great because we need both. We need
sports fans to engage with the way politics is pumped through our play
and we need Planet Green involved in the battle to reclaim sports.
PG: How can your book, Bad Sports: How Owners Are Ruining the Games We Love, help us "reclaim sports"?
DZ: The question of sports and ownership is ripe. No, it’s over-ripe
for political agitation. Actually, I would argue that we are looking at a
perfect storm that says raising the issue of corporate greed, looting,
in context of sports, has never been more appropriate. Even if you are
not a sports fan, the financial gouging is very real often with very
serious repercussions: 30 billion dollars spent on public financing of
stadiums over the last generation. These kinds of priorities have life
or death results. When the levees broke in 2005, the only place
available was the New Orleans Superdome. When the bridge in Minnesota
collapsed a couple years back, the new Twins stadium was to break ground
that very week. When the DC metro went off the tracks, a billion dollar
stadium had just opened its doors.
PG: So, obviously, the current economic situation plays a major role.
DZ: No one in the owner's box is delighting as our cities rot. This
isn't about conspiracy. It's about logic. There are finite resources in a
given city in the best of times, and these are dark days. They are made
worse by the fact that during the economic boom of the 1990s, the
longest period of economic expansion in the history of this country,
stadiums became the substitute for anything resembling an urban policy
in this country. The stadiums were presented as a microwave-instant
solution to the problems of crumbling schools, urban decay and suburban
flight. But the FLIP SIDE OF THAT is a that we, the fan-citizen, have a
real sense of ownership of these billion-dollar institutions. We not
only have a psychological sense of ownership but also a real financial
stake in these teams because of public financing. This is about sounding
a call that owners who are abusive to their cities: who take and take
and give nothing back, should be pushed to actually have to hand over a
financial stake in their team. It's not like we haven't paid for the
privilege.
PG: How can Planet Green readers connect with you and your work online?
DZ: I invite them to visit Edgeofsports.com. They can also get my column sent to them every week if they email me at: dave@edgeofsports.com.
End Zone Linkage
A Vegan in the National Football League?
4 Ways to Start an Important Eco-Conversation With Your Neighbor in 2010