Home     The Writers     Search     Contact Us     Gorilla Radio     Atlantic Free Press     Empire Burlesque     Your Profile  
  You are here: 

Tue

22

Dec

2009

Canada's Iraq: Getting to Afghanistan
written by Chris Cook
Afghanistan: Canada's Iraq?
by C. L. Cook
[By way of an end of year, or end of times article, I dug deep and came out with this old potato, sprouting questions of Canada's wisdom in getting further involved in Afghanistan. From the end of Canada's beginning as an occupying force in Afghanistan. - ed]
 
former Liberal defence minister Graham
 
May 22, 2005 - Defence Minister, Bill Graham says the plan to re-deploy Canadian operations currently in and around the northern capital city of Kabul are to go ahead. He also announced, an additional 1250 troops by early next year.

Last week, in a speech to the Standing Committee on National Defence and Veterans Affairs and the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, National Defence Minister Graham reiterated how Canada will face its "new" role in global military affairs.
 
He cited the completion of a new Defence Policy Statement and its central document,  A Role of Pride and Influence in the World.
 
 
 
Afghanistan:
Canada's Iraq?
 
by C. L. Cook
May 22, 2005

According to Graham, that pride and influence will be expanded in Afghanistan first, then on to other "failed and failing states" around the globe. How those "failed and failing" will be chosen, or by whom, was left unsaid, but the minister did make it clear, Canada will move towards a "more sophisticated" operational integration with the U.S. military. Presumably, enhanced sophistication isn't necessary on the diplomatic front.

Graham informed the assembled worthies, Canada recognizes, "security at home often begins with security abroad," adding the new policy means his government will be "enhancing Canada's contribution to global security and peace building." The new direction is, in Graham's view, "informed by the rich operational experience of the Canadian Forces, both in Canada and locations ranging from Afghanistan to the Balkans, to Haiti.

That that "rich operational experience" includes the death and maiming of Canadian soldiers, as in Afghanistan; providing assistance to murderous thugs in the overthrow of a democratically elected government in Haiti; allowing the world's fastest growing human trafficking region in the Balkans; uselessly witnessing the explosion of heroin production, again in Afghanistan, and the of course, Somalia; or Rwanda. Minister Graham will excuse a lack of enthusiasm for his proudly announced new initiatives.

Never mind the more than $600 million cdn price tag for Afghanistan alone that comes with Mr. Graham's new found muscularity. Never mind that what the minister and his government recognize as splendid achievements are less charitably described in the countries where his largesse is experienced. The problem with Mr. Bill Graham's Role of Pride and Influence in the World is the precise diminishment of Canada and Canadians it will bring. Unleashing well-heeled NGO's like CIDA, in accompaniment with military logistic support, a la the U.S.A., will undoubtedly put Canada in the sights of the very terror groups he so sonoriously warns against. But, there is a more immediate problem with Graham's thinking: Afghanistan.

After four years of occupation, the coalition occupiers have little "influence" beyond the city limits of Kabul. Hamid Karzai is in Washington, D.C. at this very hour, readying to break the news to George Bush. But Bush's knows this. His pre-emptive jab at Karzai for allowing the heroin trade to flourish, designed to take some of the steam out of Karzai's "demands" that justice be brought against American soldiers involved in Afghanistan's Abu Ghraib-like abuses against prisoners at U.S. air-base/detention centre Bagram, tacitly acknowledges as much. Now, Bill Graham will preside over the relocation of the Canadians from their secure base, Camp Julien, to the south and west of the country, both areas seeing a resurgence of Taliban rebel activity; activity bearing more resemblance to Baghdad than the relatively calm Kabul.

Though Graham may like to believe all's well in Afghanistan, and Haiti for that matter, due to Canada's foreign adventurism, the fact is: things are not rosy in Afghanistan, and they're poised to get worse. Canadians are being marched into the mouth of the lion, while the pied Bill Graham pipes merrily away.


Chris Cook hosts Gorilla Radio, a weekly public affairs program, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. He also serves as a contributing editor to PEJ.org. You can check out his blog here.



Addendum: M25-- Now too, I hear, the Israeli Defense Force will send pilots to "train" Canada's pilots to better bomb cities.--Proud and Influentionally yours - ape  
 
 
 
Into the Mouth of the Lion: More Canadian Troops for Afghanistan

PEJ News
- C. L. Cook - Overshadowed in the media by events in Iraq, the situation in Afghanistan worsens by the day. Yesterday, a U.S. helicopter ferrying in Navy SEALs reinforcements was downed, with all 17 aboard missing and feared dead. Also yesterday, Canada began sending a new contingent made up of soldiers, RCMP, and Foreign Affairs officials to establish a base near Kandahar.


http://gorillaradioblog.blogspot.com


Into the Mouth of the Lion
C. L. Cook

PEJ News


June 29, 2005 - In mid-May, Canada's Defence Minister, Bill Graham announced a historic new foreign policy direction and the role to be played by Canadian Forces to implement it. Speaking to the Standing Committee on National Defence and Veterans Affairs and the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Minister Graham reiterated how Canada will face its "new" role in global military affairs. He cited the completion of a new Defence Policy Statement and its central document,  A Role of Pride and Influence in the World. What this pride means in essence is Canada becoming more "muscular" in its prosecution of the 'War on Terror.'

It's a new direction George Bush and America's stretched military must appreciate, even if most Canadians don't. It means the freeing up of U.S. military resources for deployment in Iraq, or elsewhere in the Middle East, possibly leading to the U.S. Army's eventual departure from Afghanistan. At a time when attacks are increasing sharply and ISAF casualties following suit, the prospect of another force sharing garrison duties, and the more perilous search and destroy missions, is the only good news the U.S. military in Afghanistan has received lately.

Just yesterday, 17 more Americans, most from the elite Navy SEALs, were downed, purportedly by a Taliban rocket. The 17 are currently listed as "missing in action."  

Though Canadian troops have been in Afghanistan for years, unitl now they have been operating out of Camp Julien, near Kabul in the north of the country. According to David Rudd, of the Canadian Institute of Strategic Studies, deploying to Kunar province is "significantly" more dangerous for troops. He says, "The potential for casualties is much more in the south than in Kabul." Adding: "Kandahar is the wild west compared to Kabul." 

The redeployment of Canadians from the relative safety and stability of Kabul to Kandahar, seat of power for the former Taliban rulers of Afghanistan and reputed locus of al Qaida, is just one part of Canada's new role in the world, as elucidated by Mr. Graham in his speech to the Standing Committees.

On the occasion of his address, Graham informed the assembled worthies, Canada recognizes, "security at home often begins with security abroad," adding the new policy means his government will be "enhancing Canada's contribution to global security and peace building." 

This new direction is, in Graham's view, "informed by the rich operational experience of the Canadian Forces, both in Canada and locations ranging from Afghanistan to the Balkans, to Haiti. The irony of this statement seems entirely lost on Graham.

It's an irony apparently lost for the Canadian public too, that while America's citizens are increasingly turning away from the war and the attitudes that spawned it, Canada, who refused overt involvement in the war in Iraq, is now moving in the opposite direction.

In an echo of expectations expressed by Rumsfeld prior to Iraq, Graham and Foreign Affairs seem convinced the so-called Provincial Reconstruction Teams mission will be well received by a local population in the south currently schooling themselves on Iraq's "Occupation for Dummies.' 


So far, Canadian troops have been lucky, the only deaths reported being those killed in 'friendly fire' by an American Reserve pilot, and two others killed by a suicide bomber, but now Minister Graham is commiting to a greater, and more dangerous role for Canada that seems bound to see further Canadians coming home in 'transit tubes.' 




Chris Cook hosts Gorilla Radio, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. He also serves as a contributing editor at PEJ.org. You can check out the GR Blog here.

[Update: Today (June 30) 16 bodies were recovered from the crash site in Kunar province. The U.S. military had originally said there were 17 on board the ill-fated flight, but later revised that figure. Among the dead are reported 8 Navy SEALs and 8 flight crew. It's still unclear how the helicopter was brought down, with Taliban press releases claiming a "new weapon" was used, and the U.S. military speculating a "lucky" shot by a Rocket Propelled Grenade.]

[Further developments: The violence in Afghanistan continues to escalate, promising a second front for America's War on Terror.] 


 

As Canada Prepares for Battle

PEJ News - C. L. Cook - In recent months, the Canadian government has rejigged foreign policy; foreign policies that have stood since the end of the Second War, more than sixty years ago. "Integration" is the catchword here, and whether through NATO, or directly with the U.S. as in the Northern Command and Missile Defense, it means suborning both our soldiers and diplomats to the dictats of the United States and its "national interests."



http://www.waramps.ca/military/
memorials/images/soldiers.jpg


www.PEJ.org


As Canada again prepares to do battle as a proxy force for its Imperial masters, perhaps it's wise we know exactly what we're in for .



As Canada Prepares for Battle

C. L. Cook

PEJ News
July 21, 2005


This new direction for Canada is most perfectly illustrated by both the redefining of Canada's mission in Afghanistan, seeing thousands of reinforcements beginning to be shipped out this week (JUL 21), and the redeployment of the current force in-country from the relative stablity of the Kabul area to the volatile west and southern reaches, (where a resurgence in Taliban resistance to the occupation makes Afghanistan look more like Iraq every day). It's also made apparent through the public displays of our new number one military man, General Rick Hillier. Hiller held forth recently before the press, veritably foaming at the mouth with his anxiousness to go get the Afghani "scumbags." By that of course, he means "send someone's sons and daughters to "Go Gittim!" Hillier will be directing the charge from his comfortable rear position in "Ottawashington."

"Peacekeep THIS mo' fo!"  

Up 'til now, Canadian soldiers serving in Afghanistan have been fortunate, not in small part due to the nature of their mission, locale, and perhaps because Canadians have so far taken a different approach to rapproachement with the people; different that is from the generally witnessed "shoot 'em all and let God sort 'em out!" American philosophy.

There have been Canadians killed, most tragically when bombed accidentally by a speed-crazed reservist pilot just couldn't say "Yessir" to orders not to drop his bombs on a field-training exercise. But, our government's mission redefinition promises to change that luck.

If we are to become our southern cousin's little emulator, perhaps we can first learn from their myriad missteps. You know, do a little homework on our enemy-to-be, BEFORE we make one of them. 

There has been a marked upsurge in violent, "Iraq-style" attacks in Afghanistan over the last few months. As ever, our "public" broadcaster has been loath to bring bad news into your living room, (try a CBC.ca search on Canada-Afghanistan) nervertheless, the fact is: We are marching our young men and women into a fully blossoming Iraq sequel,  best described by one of the men leading it.

Mullah Dadullah, the Taliban "military coordinator," talking to Al-Jazeera a couple days back, had some interesting things to say. His comments were not available on Canadian airwaves, the CRTC having ruled already our collective ears too sensitive for the likes of foreign sourced news. Pity, because Ottawa's nabobs may have found it instructive.

When asked, "What is the rational behind the sudden escalation of Taliban operations in Afghanistan?" Dadullah said;

"Mullah Omar and other Taliban leaders have already stated that attacks against the infidels and the apostate government of Afghanistan would escalate as soon as the harsh winter weather gives way to warmer one. There have also been significant changes in tactics, types of weapons, financial support, and support of the Afghan people."

The "significant" change in "types of weapons" may be a point to stress to the troops before their Private Lyin' landing on the beaches of Afghanistan. At least two U.S. helicopters have "crashed" in recent weeks. The Taliban press pool bragged of "new weapons" after a Chinook carrying a near-platoon of special force types was shot down a few weeks back, but the U.S. flacks decided it was likely a Rocket Propelled Grenade's "lucky" shot that brought down the chopper. Another Chinook "crashed" last week. Luckily, Canada doesn't have many helicopters capable of sustained flight, so that may not be a worry; unless those freakishly-fortunate "RPG's" get pointed at other stuff.

But, you may say; "The States are an ally. They wouldn't lie to us about the nature of the commitment we're signing onto. Would they?"

The Mullah thinks so. He informed Al-Jazeera;

"Americans have lied from the beginning and continue to lie, especially about their casualties. The number of Americans killed by Mujahideen in Afghanistan is much greater than what the American media disclose."

One unfortunate American scout captured by the "Mujahideen," (remember Sly Stallone's Rambo Does Afghanistan? The Mujahideen are the guys that toppled the other evil empire.) and rumoured by the Pentagon as having been rescued brought this response from the dubious Dadullah;

"The Americans did not ask for his release and we knew that they would not because they do not want to admit to the fact that we captured one of their own and they are not able to free him. It is part of hiding their casualties and part of their false propaganda about winning the war in Afghanistan.

Propaganda galore; enough for all sides. Which side do you want to believe? The Bush administration's credibility is certainly no greater than Mullah Dadullah's: We know they've lied about... Everythng! Knowing your enemy is always a good idea, but knowing your allies is even more vital. 

The real tragedy of all this is not that it never need have happened, but now that it has, the best we can come up with after two generations of knife-edged Cold War diplomacy and third world despotism is Rick Hillier's mad dog antics for the camera, and Mullah Dadullah. Quite a pair. They should take their act on the road.

A question for General Hillier, the one displalying the veritably Pattonesque enthusiasm for the coming carnage: Who will the "scumbags" be that Canadians bomb, bag, and bugger for Uncle Sam?

Mullah Dadullah explains;

"All Afghan people are Muslims; they all have weapons and know how to use their weapons. The majority of them are supporter of Taliban and their Jihad against the enemies of Islam. Few have been drawn to the dollars. There are also Arab Mujahideen in Afghanistan. Faithful Muslims will always join the fight to eradicate the enemies of Allah."

Great.

There are solutions to the problems dividing the peoples of the world; solutions that allow we all live and thrive in peace, but are there the people to pick them up and employ them? Obviously not in Canada, where a country once known for peacekeeping, has redesigned and redeployed its military for warmaking instead.

 

Chris Cook hosts Gorilla Radio, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. He also serves as contributing editor to PEJ.org. You can check out the GR Blog here.
 
 
 
Afghanistan Fatalities: "We Didn't Want Canadians to be Aware"

PEJ News - C. L. Cook - Brigadier-General Mike Ward, the head of Canadian Forces operations summed up Canada's continued involvement with American wars in the Near East yesterday, telling reporters Joint Task Force 2 (JTF2), a secretive commando unit, had killed and captured Afghani "insurgents."

www.pej.org 

Canadians Made Ready for Afghanistan Death Toll

PEJ News - C. L. Cook - Defence Minister, Bill Graham has again warned Canadians they should expect soldiers serving in Afghanistan to be killed and wounded. Speaking from Germany, following this week's NATO meetings, Graham says he's about to embark on an extensive tour in Canada to "explain the nature of the mission" to Canadians.


www.pej.org


http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/Graham.jpg



Canadians Made Ready for Afghanistan Death Toll
C. L. Cook


PEJ News
September 15, 2005


The nature of the Afghanistan mission has transformed somewhat in the past few months, as has the nature of Canada's military. No longer focused primarily on "peacekeeping," Canada's forces are being restructured to more resemble the American model.

Graham recently ordered Canadians out of the north of Afghanistan, where they've operated out of Camp Julien for several years, patrolling the streets and near environs of the capital, Kabul. The bulk of the Canadian contingent, one of more than a dozen international military forces in the country, is to be redeployed to the more volatile south and west of the country.

Military insiders, report Mike Blanchfield and David Pugliese of CanWest News Service, refer to Mr. Graham's travel plans as a "pre-body-bag speaking tour." Though, Mr. Graham would certainly disagree: Nobody calls them "body-bags" anymore; the au courant term in the United States is "Transit Tube." And, Mr. Graham wants nothing more than the complete integration of Canadian and American military terminology, and more.

Seven Canadians have so far officially returned home via transit tubes since the 2002 launch of 'Operation Enduring Freedom.' Four of those perished when bombed by an American warplane that mistook a live-fire practice range exercise for enemy hostility. That pilot was charged, tried, and found guilty of negligence causing death. It was later discovered he was "high" on amphetamines, or "Go Pills" at the time of the bombing. The drug, known on the street as "speed," is routinely issued to U.S. pilots undergoing long missions.

There are reportedly 250 Canadian soldiers, and an unknown number of the secretive JTF2 commandos unit in and around Kandahar presently, but that number will increase to more than 1300 when deployments begin in earnest. Camp Julien is scheduled to be evacuated after this week's general election in Afghanistan.

The Canadian mission shift has not gone unnoticed by Taliban and reputed Al Qaida elements in the country. Just today, a Canadian patrol in the relatively calm capital city, Kabul, came under attack. Two soldiers were reported as being "lightly wounded" when a remote control road-side bomb was detonated as they passed by.

The Defence Minister brushed off growing political pressure to bring troops home, saying "they're well-trained, they're well-equipped, they're ready for this mission, and I think the Canadian public is supporting it on that basis."
 
How far that imagined support will go when the transit tubes start rolling home is something the minister would rather not discuss, for fear of damaging morale.



Chris Cook host Gorilla Radio, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. He also serves as a contributing editor at PEJ News. You can check out the GR Blog here.


We Didn't Want Canadians to be Aware
C. L. Cook


PEJ News
September 21, 2005


http://www.norad.
mil/images/image_home.jpg


"We didn't specifically want Canadians to be aware that special operations were operating abroad." - Brigadier-General Mike Ward on Canadian involvement in Afghanistan. (Sept. 20, 2005)

In a rare moment of candidness, the Canadian government disclosed just what they are doing with the people's "Defense" ministry in Afghanistan. Brigadier-General Mike Ward, describing details untold to Canadians, said: "We have to engage in combat operations that take the offensive into the mountains, into the remote regions where they have their bases and their sanctuary, and keep them off guard." 

Hardly headline news, but that's been the government's strategy all along.

A concentrated and complicit corporate media in this country has all but canned news and analysis of Canada's changing military. Imagine if the U.S. corporate media failed also to provide news from the war, save a brief and terse appearance before a select press conference, and you've got the picture of just how much Canadians don't know about what is being done with their tax dollars, and pronouncedly in their names.

Canada's new (sic) self-definition, is a redesigned military command and control, to better "assimilate" with the U.S. This assimilation, though sold to the country as merely an extension of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), the Cold War remnant of continental cooperation to deal with threats thought likely to emanate from the former USSR, is actually a profound redefinition of both the make-up of Canada's Forces, and the nature of future deployments. 

Needless to say, from the government's position, ethical consideration is ceded to legal arcanum, morality reduced to a question of what best serves Canada's "share holders." In the media, this extreme makeover is presented solely in strategic and financial terms. What Canadians think about this sea-change in foreign policy, or if they're even aware of it, goes unreported.

And now those changes are set to bear the bitter fruit of Canadian blood spilt far from home and in the service of dubious masters. 

Defense Minister, Bill Graham has been talking up Canadian casualties for months, and is now set to take his mortician's dog and pony show nation-wide. This as the new "Canada Doctrine" sees troops in Afghanistan sent to the country's most volatile regions with a newly-minted playbook; a playbook made in America. And, playing by American rules means paying like American troops.

Graham and his fellow Liberal quislings know a train of "transit-tubes," filled with the remains of Canadian soldiers, is leaving the station, setting in motion a sad and certain journey from the world-away fields of Afghanistan to the cemeteries of Halifax, Montreal, Toronto, Regina, Victoria, and all corners of the nation between. 

It's just as Brig.-Gen. Ward says: "Casualties do occur. That's the nature of war. That's certainly the nature of operations."

Naturally. But why? 

What petrifies Mr. Graham is the prospect of a "shit happens" answer to the inevitable question to come:

"Why, Mr. Graham did my son, daughter, brother, sister, husband, wife, father, uncle, grandmother, mother die?"  



Chris Cook hosts Gorilla Radio, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. He also serves as a contributing editor to PEJ News. You can check out the GR Blog here.

 
Canadians Target of Afghani Suicide Bombing

PEJ News - C. L. Cook - Three Canadian soldiers were injured today, none seriously, when their convoy was rammed by a suicide car-bomber. At least one bystander, a young child, was killed, as was the bomber.

www.pej.org


Canadians Target of Afghani
Suicide Bombing
C. L. Cook


PEJ News
October 5, 2005


If there were any hopes Canadian troops would be received in their new home away from the comforts of Kabul congenially by the inhabitants of Kandahar, they were quickly dispelled today with the attack against a three vehicle convoy of Canadian soldiers. The Canadians were lucky, escaping with reported "burns and minor injuries," and were also reported to have returned to duty within hours. Fate was less fortunate for the hapless Afghani motorists and pedestrians travelling the same road; at least one is dead, and several others injured.

In the Spring, Canada's Minister of Defense, Bill Graham announced a restructuring of the country's military and its traditional, world famous role as 'peacekeepers.' The redefinition of Canadian military parameters of "operationability " coincides with the redeployment of troops that have spent the last four years trying to keep the capital city quiet.

By most accounts, they've accomplished this without incurring local resentment common to American missions. The Canadians have been pulling up stakes in the north, and are headed to the heart of Taliban country in the south.

Graham has since been touring Canada, telling anyone who'll listen to get ready for body bags. That is to say; Canadians not used to Maple Leaf flag and coffin parades should get used to the idea. How Canadians will react once witnessing their fellow citizen's final journey, brought to their pitiful demise through yet another colonial adventure in the service of empire, is yet to be seen. Thus Graham's pre-emptive death watch warnings. 


It's as though no-one remembers what the poppy means.


Today's Canadian Liberal government is setting a century's agenda. Most are clueless about what's going on, let alone the intricacy of the grand design, or what it will mean for their future, and that of the nation. The news has been remarkably yawned over by Canada's renowned pinky pacifist citizenry. That may be attributed to the summer season, where the House of Parliament is turned over to the echoes of its history.

But, the wheels of government do grind on, even if unobserved by the House, and while the Loyal Opposition lolled in sultry summer hammocks and media Fat Cats vacated Ottawa, Prime Minister Paul Martin and his chief lieutenant, Bill Graham perverted Canada's recognized mission on the World stage as one dedicated to peace and justice.

No longer; Canada is now officially an apposite of Them. That is to say, we are Us. With you, George!

This isn't a necessarily new stance, only one kept on the cuff for the duration of this disaster movie of an administration south of the border. In large part, this is thanks to the masterful policy hypocrisy practiced by erstwhile P.M., Jean Chretien. The Little Guy from Shawinigan's place in the pantheon of fallen Canadian heroes is unrivalled, save for Brian Mulroney. Both served the long-simmering ambition within certain quarters for a North American 'Continentalism.'

Now, with Paul Martin, the millionaire son of a millionaire elite familiar, the final spike is struck to the heart of Canadian sovereignty and the values we so treasured for, if nothing else, differentiating ourselves from the behemoth next door.

Mr. Graham's "warnings" are less that than a promise; a promise to bear the bitter fruit of war to this land; a promise to prove the besmirching of Canada's name for years to come.

Whether the minister's profile will rise or fall on that inevitable occasion, remains to be seen.



Chris Cook hosts Gorilla Radio, a weekly public affairs program, broad/webcast fromt the University of Victoria, Canada. He also serves as Senior Editor to PEJ News. You can see the GR Blog here.

 
 
Afghanistan: Media Fiddles While Canadians Come Under Fire

PEJ News
- C. L. Cook - The "muscular" new Canadian approach to fulfilling the foreign policy objectives of the Bush administration today again bore bitter fruit for Canadian soldiers serving in Afghanistan. Dismissing the damage to troops and their Light Armoured Vehicle (LAV) as "minor," the national broadcaster missed entirely the damage being done to Canada's international image.


http://www.globalsecurity.org/
military/ops/images/oef-logo.gif

www.PEJ.org 


Afghanistan:
Media Fiddles While Canadians Come Under Fire

C. L. Cook


PEJ News
February 9, 2006

Four Canadian soldiers were hurt when their convoy, on what was described as a joint U.S.- Canadian reconnaissance mission, was struck by an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) planted along their route. The Canadian contingent, dubbed 'Task Force Orion,' are recently arrived in the Taliban heartland city of Kandahar, and are expected, according to the Canadian general slated to take command of the greater, 'Task Force Afghanistan,' Brigadier-General David Fraser, to both "kill and die" there.

Indeed, just last month, Glyn Barry, Canada's head diplomat to the country was killed, and three Canadian soldiers wounded when their convoy was hit by a suicide car bomber. Attacks have been on the increase for at least a year in Afghanistan; attacks increasingly emulating the tactics seen in Iraq.

The Brigadier-General minces no words about Canada's involvement and his upcoming role as the Number One of the Multinational Brigade in Regional Command South, adjunct of the greater, American-led 'Operation Enduring Freedom,' saying; "This is a dangerous mission. This is a dangerous environment, and I cannot reduce the risk to zero." 

Neither Canada's number one commercial broadcaster, nor Brig.-Gen. Fraser seem overly concerned with the greater danger the country's military adventurism poses for Canadian citizens, at home and abroad, or Canada's squandered reputation as mediator and peacekeeper on the world stage.

Instead, as Stephen Thorpe of Canadian Press reports, the increase IED and suicide attacks have led to "more liberal rules of engagement" for NATO troops, allowing they "fire on suspect vehicles and other attackers in Afghanistan." It can only be hoped, NATO will take more care than their American counterparts in Iraq, where un-tolled numbers of civilians have been killed at checkpoints, and just last week, a car carrying Canadian diplomats was shot at.

There will doubtless be more stories to come of Canadians wounded to a less "minor" degree as the campaign in Afghanistan continues, but few published by Canada's over-concentrated media are likely to explore their role in down-playing the nature of the conflict before the fact, the sea-change in Canadian foreign policy it represents, or the new understanding of Canada's role in further military deployments to Afghanistan, and those other "hot spots" around the edges of America's burgeoning empire.



Chris Cook is a contributing editor to PEJ News and hosts Gorilla Radio, a weekly public affairs program, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. You can check out the GR Blog here.
 
 
 
Canadians Too Thick to Support Afghanistan Mission: Defence Minister

PEJ News
- C. L. Cook - By way of getting to know his new subjects, freshly minted Conservative Defence Minister, Gordon O'Connor summed up what he sees as his greatest challenge: How to get through to the sixty-two percent of Canadians who don't believe the country should be involved with the worsening occupation of Afghanistan.


http://pm.gc.ca/grfx/
ministry/oconnor_s.jpg

"The population out there doesn't really understand right now why we're there and what we're doing. You have to say the thing five, six, seven, eight times before it really gets through to a large number of people." - Defence Minister O'Connor instructs the foreign press.


Canadians Too Thick to Support Afghanistan Mission:
Defence Minister

C. L. Cook


PEJ News
February 25, 2006


A Globe and Mail/ Strategic Counsel poll published yesterday (G&B, Fri. Feb. 24, 2006) pronounced, 'Majority Opposed to Afghan Mission.' As the Canadian Forces prepare to pick up the mantle of the NATO mission in-country this week, and as the nation expands its fifth year of picket duty for Afghanistan's effective occupation, a bewildered Defence Minister can merely shake his head. Or, so Gordon O'Connor would have it. 

With his bum barely in the chair at the head of Canada's armed forces, rookie Cabinet Minister O'Connor is holding forth to the world's press, complaining of the dumb-asses, in the form of the majority of Canadians polled, he has to deal with. More amazing perhaps to O'Connor is the desire of an even greater number of Canadians asked that demands be made of Parliament to debate war issues before committing troops, a novel notion sure to displease the Freshman Tories. 

But, put on the spot, O'Connor bleats:

"Our policy is that, in future, if we're committing troops somewhere in substantial numbers
we would go to Parliament and we'd basically seek the support of Parliament."

But, that future is happening fast. It's a miracle no more than eight unfortunate Canadians have seen their futures end in Afghanistan to date. If not for the professionalism of the Canadian military, and a deployment in the relatively calmer capital region, the only place effectively ruled by the Karzai government put into power, it would be much worse.

But, it's about to get worse. And, Saturday's wounding of a Canadian in a grenade attack near Kandahar is evidence of that.

For those Canucks too stupid to fail to support Minister O'Connor, or to see the gathering cloud, and what it is likely to mean for Canadian families from Victoria to Saint John, prepare for terrible news: Canada is taking over in the heart of the Taliban-led resistance.  

So, what makes Afghanistan worth it? Yes, Gordon do tell we, your dimmer fellow citizens: Why is Canada occupying a nation shattered in an illegal blitzkrieg, employing nuclear weapons of mass destruction, all carried out in the name of avenging the alleged perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks of 2001. Explain now please, what your party failed as the official opposition to mention.

Why Gordie, after four and more years of trying to teach the Afghans the glory of our superior ways, are the locals lobbing grenades and firing AKs' at "our" boys and girls?

And what about the suicide bombers? Are they ingrates? Or maybe too dumb to know what's good for them, too? Tell us do, Mr. Minister. But, speak slowly please, we're Canadian.

O'Connor's dismissive opinion of the mental alacrity of the citizenry is an attitude shared by Canada's number one military man, General Rick Hillier, as witnessed by his gape-jawed statement of wonderment: 

"Many Canadians do not know or understand the complexities of what the Afghan mission is about, why we are there, and its importance, its critical importance to Canada."

Those not yet brain-dead denizens of the Great White North may recall Hillier as the author of Canada's answer to George W. Bush's famous "Bring 'em on" performance regarding that other bunch of recalcitrant converts in Iraq. Clever tactical move, General. Original too. For more on Hillier, please see Justin Podur's piece, posted at KillingTrain.com.

With the exception of some sorrowfully late complaint by the NDP regarding the need to hold open parliamentary debate concerning matters of war in Canada, the house has sat largely silent on the Afghanistan "mission" through two elections. Despite wide-spread rejection of the official line doled over by the Liberals and now reiterated by their superior heirs, Canada and Canadians are being frog marched into George Bush's vision of global militarism.

Maybe O'Connor is right: Canadians just don't understand.




Chris Cook is  a contributing editor to PEJ News, and hosts Gorilla Radio, a weekly public affairs program, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. You can check out the GR Blog here.
 
 
 

Afghanistan: What Does it Serve Canada?

PEJ News - C. L. Cook - Five Canadians were injured, one "seriously," today when their convoy was struck by a suicide attacker driving a bomb-laden car outside Kandahar, Afghanistan. The incident comes as Prime Minister Stephen Harper engages in an increasingly vitriolic Ottawa shooting match over the legitimacy of 'Operation Enduring Freedom' and only days after the death of Corporal Paul Davis in an auto accident. Davis was the second Canadian killed in the Kandahar redeployment. Nine Canadians have been reported killed in Afghanistan since 2001, four of those in the infamous "friendly fire" U.S. bombing of an active target range.




Afghanistan:
What Does it Serve Canada?

C. L. Cook

PEJ News
March 3, 2006

Just a year ago, while holding the Defence portfolio, the now nominal leader of the Liberal party, Bill Graham went on a ghoulish public relations tour, warning every rubber-chicken devotee who would listen about the coming Canadian casualties. The effort seemingly designed to "soften up" a public already dubious of Afghanistan. That unease was magnified today by Canadian Forces honcho, Rick Hillier who says Canada could expect to be in Afghanistan for at least a decade, or more. Hillier is the shoot from the lip General who marked his arrival on the Aghan scene last year, talking tough as George W. "Bring 'em on!" Bush, who last week lamented in the national press the too-dumb public's failure to grasp the vital importance impoverished, distant, hopeless Afghanistan poses Canada, and why a "decade, or more" military occupation is its duty.

This past week, Stephen Harper too sputtered across the front pages, outraged that "any Canadian" would challenge the country's commitment to "its men and women in uniform, etcetera ..."  That commitment has deepened with Canada's leadership ascension of Nato's ISAF mission in the Kunar, centre of Taliban activity. Until recently, Canadians had it relatively easy, based at Camp Julien, outside the capital, Kabul. But, that all ended last year, when Defence Minister Graham, addressing another banqueting gaggle of camp followers, pronounced Canada's improved military, apparently equipped with a spanking new set of marching orders; orders bearing an unmistakable echo.

What Graham outlined, and Stephen Harper is executing, is the end of Canada's "traditional" Peacekeeping role. Today, Nato, not the UN is where Canada's foreign "commitments" are drawn up. Brussels, not Ottawa decides where, when, and how many of Canada's soldiers will take the field. As for why, it depends on who you listen to. But, the most scarifying question, a query naturally left untended by the "mum's the word" media, is the question gnawing at the conscience of, according to a Globe & Mail poll, at least 62% of Canadians is: "What?"

Just what will Canada be doing?

Will it look like what America is doing in Iraq? Or, will it look like what Israel is doing in Palestine? Will it look like Gaza? Groszny? Llassa. Or, perhaps it will be another Port-au-Prince, with countless Somalia-like instances of random torture and murder thrown in.

Yes. Port-au-Prince where blue-helmets kick in the doors of the poor, pouring hundreds of rounds of automatic rifle fire, and a shock grenade, or two into and through where the tarpaper-shacked populace cowers in terror sounds more the future of Canada's Afghanistan Mission. Besides the ludicrous notion Afghanistan bears any threat to the security of Canada; and, ignoring the situation, worsening after four years of liberation from the despotic religious zeal of the Taliban regime, is commiting thousands of soldiers for years sound reasoning?

Can history teach us anything?

Following the aerial destruction of Afghanistan's military and infrastructure, the infantry started collecting prisoners. Thousands were bagged and tagged in the manner now made familiar through Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, and the long list of other chambers of horror located, seemingly, everywhere. The least fortunate we know of being those finding
themselves at Shebarghan Prison. Thousands of men, rounded up in village sweeps by U.S. forces, were sent on a death journey across the wastes of Afghanistan, crammed into unventilated semi-trailers.

Three thousand souls now inhabit shallow graves in the desert beyond Shebarghan, a crime left largely unaddressed yet. And, now in the news, revelations Bagram Airbase still hosts facilities at least as gruesome as those in Guantanamo, or Iraq.  Kandahar, now under titular Canadian control, too has an airbase, and attendant prison/torture centre. Will Canada, a willing supplier of prison/torture fodder until now, also oversee the America's prison methodology?

Shall Canadians become further mired with a demented president bent on a program the scope of which even the bravest dread mention? How long before Canadians serve picket duty in Iraq, or Iran?

George W. Bush is even now busy lighting fires. He's today reported in Pakistan, following his jaunt to India, where he pledged U.S. nuclear technology. Something of more than passing interest to bitter India foe, Pakistan, and regional rival, China. Some analysts warn this is a move promising a renewed nuclear arms race. Bush's stop in India brought hundreds of thousands in protest. In Pakistan there was a suicide bombing attack that killed a high-ranking American diplomat, and three others.

Canada's facade of independence is now its only hope of side-stepping the American march to self-destruction. When America falls, Canada will too be economically wounded, but how much worse for the nation should it now abandon its soul to only forestall the inevitable American demise?

The Canadian rabble is finally rousing to Afghanistan, as reflected in some major media. The country's most influential newspaper, The Toronto-based, Globe & Mail, picked up the gauntlet last week, promising to run a "talking to Canadians" campaign to gauge public opinion. A campaign they maintain necessary due to Parliament's failure to adequately debate the issue.

In the meanwhile, Canadians are at grave risk, and as Minister Graham told all who'd listen last Spring:

It's to be expected.

 

Chris Cook is a contributing editor to PEJ News and host Gorilla Radio, a weekly public affairs program, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. His writings are also featured at Chris Floyd's Empire Burlesque. You can check out the GR Blog here.
 
 
 
Friendly Fire: Pat Tillman Inquiry Called

PEJ News - The U.S. military has announced a probe into the death of professional footballer turned Army Ranger, Pat Tillman, killed in a "friendly fire" incident in Afghanistan nearly two years ago. From the files: this is a piece from 2004. - lex


http://www.truthout.org/imgs.art_01/tillman.jpg

www.PEJ.org




Peter Mansbridge: Carrying the Torch of the New Told Lie

PEJ News
- C. L. Cook - Is it possible, after nearly three years of the war and occupation in Iraq, after the millions of words written and uttered regarding the lies leading to that illegal act, and the bald-faced perfidy that has followed, anyone with half an eye to what is going on could still believe the Iraq "campaign" was a result of the September 2001 attack against the World Trade Center and Pentagon? Is it possible someone working at the apex of the Canadian media could seriously ask the nation to swallow this demonstrably false premise?

"9/11 was, of course, the event that prompted the military campaigns both here in Afghanistan, and in Iraq." - Peter Mansbridge, The National Mar. 6, 2006

www.PEJ.org


Peter Mansbridge:
Carrying the Torch of the New Told Lie

C. L. Cook

PEJ News
March 6. 2006

Fascinating, now Canada has moved into the war-footing we've witnessed south of the border these past terrible years, to hear Canada's government news organ, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, importing propaganda from the mired U.S. The grossest of the lies designed to lend credibility to America's murderous rampage through benighted Iraq was George Bush's ludicrous allegation implicating Saddam Hussein with the 9/11 attacks. 

For Peter's sake, and for Canadians who may have spent the past three years lost in the wilds; the connection between Iraq and 9/11 has been dismissed by everyone. Even the Bush camp never went as far as Mansbridge did tonight; having the good sense to merely mention, time and time again, Iraq and 9/11 together, leaving it to the feeble-minded to fill in the blanks. 

Maybe Peter is onto something; maybe Afghanistan and Iraq are connected afterall. As Canada's role in-country becomes "more robust" in nature; and, as "our" generals appear on television, telling Canadians the mission could last more than a decade, and saying we should be prepared for more casualties, Afghanistan is starting to look a lot like Iraq.

And, isn't Ottawa starting to sound a lot like Washington?

Conservative Party Foreign Affairs minister, Peter McKay refuses to waver on the policies drawn up by his Liberal predecessors, while the freshly sworn Defence minister and former General, Gordon O'Connor refuses to consider debating Canada's Afghan adventure in Parliament. The Liberals have little to say, beyond that they too support the deepening mire that is the occupation. The New Democrats, arrived to the debate a day late and dollar short, having allowed the war issue disappeared through two elections, now have Jack Layton bleating for public hearings, though not going so far as to call for troops to be removed.

Canadians are dying and killing in Afghanistan. The death will continue, and for what?

The generals tell us "defence begins abroad," and if the Taliban take back the country, what country will fall, domino-like next? The C.B.C. promises more stories from Afghanistan to explain better to too-dumb Canadian opponents of the glorious little war beginning there. 

And, the Prime Minister tells us today, it is the generals, not Parliament, not the government, not the people, that will determine how long Canada stays in Afghanistan.

Perhaps it is all connected.



Chris Cook is a contributing editor at PEJ News and host of Gorilla Radio, a weekly public affairs program, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. You can check the GR Blog here.        

 

 
Navigating Afghanistan's Propaganda Minefields

PEJ News
- C. L. Cook - An e:mail press release from no less an august body than the irreproachable Canadian Landmine Foundation found its way recently into my in-box, informing: "Canadians Support Canada's Commitment to Afghanistan." Being a Canadian singularly unsupportive of Canada's support of an immoral and illegal invasion and occupation of a once-sovereign nation, I was anxious to discover what changed "my" mind.

www.PEJ.org


Navigating Afghanistan's
Propaganda Minefields

C. L. Cook

PEJ News
March 9, 2006


On its face, the Canadian Landmine Foundation is the perfect example of a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) doing good in the world. Who could argue with the cause of the saintly Lady Diana (RIP), or its mission statement: "to raise awareness and funds to end the human and economic suffering caused by anti-personnel landmines," after all?

Queer then the CLF would join the Public Relations battle currently being waged for the hearts and minds of Canadians regarding an always unpopular decision by the former Liberal government to send Canadian soldiers, reconstruction, and civil infrastructure specialists on an open-ended mission to Afghanistan - unpopular not because Canadians don't care about the deprivation of those necessities suffered by the people of Afghanistan, but more due to how those deprivations came about - to many of the "Canadians" scooped wholesale into the CLF's news release headline, Canada's military deployment, an incumbent requirement for any humanitarian effort, served to legitimize the ruthless and bloody senseless American aerial annihilation of what little infrastructure remained in war-torn, Taliban Afghanistan on September 10th, 2001. 

Queer until you probe the groundcover.

The CLF is an affiliate of the larger Adopt-A-Minefield organization. The AMA is, as cited on the CLF website: "an initiative of the Canadian Landmine Foundation in partnership with the United Nations Association of the United States of America (UNA-USA) and the Better World Fund (BWF)." Those affiliated with the CLF's affiliate are not largely the group of peaceniks one might expect. They include: spookworld notables from perennial conspiracy theorist favourite, the Council on Foreign Relations; State Department officials; ex-diplomats; Reaganites; and oily businessmen of all stripe. 

A look at the UNA-USA's board reveals principles: President Ambassador William H. Luers, "active" CFR member, who cut his diplomatic teeth in communist Czechoslovakia, (shortly before it becoming the tipping point that brought down the USSR in Eastern Europe), and Venezuela. Luers served in South America during the opening days of Reagan and George H. W. Bush's reign of terror there, 1978-82. When not busy ridding the world of landmines, William spends his time championing other humanitarian efforts, such as those led by the Harriman Institute and Rockefeller Brothers Fund.

And, on his right-hand: John C. Whitehead, former Deputy Secretary of State in the Reagan administration, so highly held in fact was "the Gipper's" regard for the work Mr. Whitehead carried out for on-again-off-again G-Man/Bechtel Corporation CEO, Secretary of State George Shultz during those sticky Iran-Contra years, Reagan awarded Whitehead the Presidential Citizens Medal. The former head of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Whitehead is a current confrere to blue-blood trusts, institutes, and foundations too numerous to mention. He's also serving as appointed chair of the Board of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation. That's the outfit overseeing the reconstruction of the World Trade Center lands.

It seems a little less strange that an humanitarian organization would be trying to deliver the soul of Canada wholesale over to, as Canadian Broadcasting Corporation icon and 'The National' anchor, Peter Mansbridge refers it, a  "more robust mission," in Afghanistan, when looking at some of the personalities at the Canadian Landmine Foundation itself. It reads like a Who's Who of the Canadian Public Relations industry and the companies it represents; companies that spend more of their time flogging "Genetically Modified" Frankencrops, munitions, drugs, and eager to cover any number of malefactions their commited pursuit of pure profit engender. Luckily, the equally eager PR sweepers are there, ready to brush the latest outrage under the media rug.

Among the crop at CLF are: Gaetan Lussier, President of Gaetan Lussier and Associates. You can catch Gaetan at the upcoming 'Smarter Regulation of Foods in Canada' conference in Ottawa later this month. He's scheduled to present, "The Impact of Regulation on the Business of Food in Canada" lecture.

I'll bet that impact is BAD!

The conference is sponsored by notable humanitarians, Nestle, Unilever, and General Mills, amongst others. 

Joining Gaetan at the CLF: The mysterious Dr. Irene Sage, Director of the shadowy, U.K.-based, 'Foundation for International Security.' Her name appears on lists, and as a funding friend of the Institute for Multi-Track Diplomacy, itself another gaggle of Council on Foreign Relations; State Department diplomats; Reaganites; and, oily businessmen of all stripe types.

With Irene and Gaetan: Remi Bujold, Senior Counsel for GPC International, an adjunct of Canadian Public Relations firm, Fleishman-Hillard Canada, subsidiary of Omnicon Group Inc. Fleishman-Hillard sums up their company values and culture in the pithy (and copyright phrase): "To make ourselves as valuable to our clients as they are to us."

They list some of their areas of special service as: government affairs and advocacy consulting; issues management; government communications, and of course; crisis communications. As the "robustness" of Canada's mission in Afghanistan increases, there will no doubt be a great need of some of that "crisis communications" stuff. It could be just the job for an upright sounding organization, staffed with a raft of operators operating from a spider's web of cross-referenced do-gooder organizations. 

The recent redeployment of Canadians, sent to fill the boots on the ground of departing Americans, has already meant death for both Canadians and Afghans. Just tonight, (M9, 2006), the CBC announces a massive military mobilization of Canadian soldiers in an operation to scour the countryside around Kandahar for Taliban "insurgents." They're reported to begin the operation in the village where a Canadian soldier was recently wounded in an axe-attack

Yes, it seemed passing queer an organization so concerned with "human and economic suffering," as the CLF proposes to be, would stand behind a massive military campaign currently ramping up in benighted Afghanistan; queer until considering the pedigree of the Canadian Landmine Foundation's stable of corporate promoters. 

And who supports the Canadian Landmines Foundation and its President and CEO Scott Fairweather, another PR operative, when he says "Canadians support Canada's commitment to Afghanistan?"

Polls reveal a large and growing discomfort with the already four plus-year Canadian commitment in Afghanistan. But, Scott does hit the nail on the head when he says: "Landmines are a significant threat to Canadians serving in Afghanistan..."

And what better way to alleviate that threat than to leave Afghanistan to the Afghans?


The Canadian Landmines Foundation news release is reproduced in full below.



Chris Cook is a contributing editor to PEJ News, and host of Gorilla Radio, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. You can check out the GR Blog here.

 
 
O! Wretched Canada: A Patriot's Sick-Making Revelation

PEJ News
- C. L. Cook - Springtime in Kandahar, Afghanistan: In India they call them "tuk-tuks," but everywhere the wee, three wheeled, two-stroke taxis ply their trade throughout Asia, there's a variation of the name, based on the distinctive sound of the motor... tuk-tuk-tuk-tuk-tuk ...

www.PEJ.org


O! Wretched Canada:
A Patriot's Sick-Making Revelation

C. L. Cook


PEJ News
March 17, 2005

That "tuk-tuk" was likely the last sound Nasrat Ali Hassan heard, the lethal shot, fired from a Canadian rifle, that ended the life of the father of six coming without warning.
.


Canadian military forensic specialists, tap-danced the riddling of a taxi-cab in Kandahar this week, explaining it away. But, it was a shot not gone unnoticed in Afghanistan, where Canadian marching orders are transforming not only the duties of "our" boys and girls in service, but the way they are perceived by "the Natives."

Canada is now experiencing the media frog-march to battle.
So far, the state, and corporate press remain less than critical.

Following tediously along the tired America propaganda campaign witnessed before the atrocity of Iraq's destruction and humiliation, Canada's "military-media complex" can do little better than to ape the long discredited 9/11 scripts, dusted no doubt from the depths of the files of the last true Bush believers. It would be laughable, but for the near billion CDN-dollar per year publicly-financed Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's propaganda blitz in support of Canada's "New Role in the World."

So, Canada, we stand at a threshold crossed yet by those who would rule; but do you too, fellow Canadian, not feel an imminent finishing? Canada's habitual supine posture, vis a vis the U.S., shouldn't surprise, but Canada's au courrant Tories are moving this country at lightning speed towards American full-integration; in essence, surrendering the long-held sovereignty of the nation.

And, that surrender is first and foremost coming from within Canada's armed forces.

 What Canadians want now is an open discussion, not only about Afghanistan and Haiti, but too about the radical restructuring of both Canada's military, and its new mission in the world. These are topics the "ruling party" would, it seems, prefer left unaddressed.



Chris Cook is a contributing editor to PEJ News, and hosts Gorilla Radio, a weekly public affairs program, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. You can check out the GR Blog here.

Comments are welcome at: info(AT)pej.ca
 
 
A "Good" Day in Afghanistan

PEJ News
- C. L. Cook - Who are these men? What manner of man could survey the killing of dozens of people, and observe it a "good" day's work? Has our moral compass been so perverted we can as a society not only accept this twisted attitude, but laud the men who view the world through this skewed lens, and promote them to positions of authority?

www.PEJ.org


A "Good" Day in Afghanistan

C. L. Cook

PEJ News
April 5,2006

Today, last month's death of Canadian soldier, Private Robert Costall is being investigated as a possible case of "fratricide." Fratricide is neo-Military-speak for the old familiar, "friendly fire." What it means in both contexts is, "killed by one's own colleagues."

But, Canada's number one military man in Afghanistan was philosophical about the untimely death of Pte. Costall. Speaking to reporters, Brig.-Gen. David Fraser, overall commander of Task Force Afghanistan covering six of that country's southern provinces, says of the incident that left Costall dead; 

"We killed over 30 Taliban. We had a good day. But good days come at a cost. This is the cost of the business that the Afghan authorities have asked the international community to come here to put back in the legitimate authority."

The Brigadier's sentence, besides revealing his cavalier understanding of what death means, speaks volumes for the overall "Canadian mission" in Afghanistan, and the "business" Canadian's tax dollars are providing there. To be fair, Fraser did show his human side during his press briefing, saying of Costall's death;

"Our hearts and our prayers go out to the families, but those soldiers who died there that night and who were wounded there that night did a great job."

Adding;

"If someone dies, that matters. Canadian, American, British, Dutch, Afghan, it all matters to me, because casualties mean there's a family that doesn't have a mom or a dad."

Or, more likely, it means a mom or a dad that doesn't have a son or daughter.

I doubt it's a great comfort to the twenty-two year old Costall's grieving friends and family in Thunder Bay, Ontario to know he died doing a "great job." One wonders if it was the kind of job he thought he was getting into when he enlisted in the Canadian Forces?

Until last year, Canada's military focussed on "peacekeeping, not "peacemaking" missions. The difference is more profound than the linguistic similarity suggests. "Peacekeeping" means a third party, being agreed by both belligerent parties in a conflict, to ensure a peaceful resolution is given a chance to succeed. "Peacemaking" is, on the other hand, merely the au courant term for "war waging," thinly veneered with declarations of "good intent," but not necessarily conducted at the behest of either parties to the conflict in question.

Brute force is the only recognized lingua franca in such missions, with the "peacemakers" reserving for themselves the "right" to destroy any they perceive as a threat to the "peace." Of course, there are always the regrettable cases of innocents either caught in the cross-fire, or mistakenly targeted. This "collateral damage" is endemic to these types of operations, and the examples of it in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Occupied Palestine are too numerous to document here.

Ultimately, there is no way to make the peace with "peacemaker operations" short of annihilating one of the conflicting parties. And, Brigadier-General Fraser, and his bosses in Ottawa acknowledge as much. Says Fraser of the Canadian Forces' new role, and its recently launched 'Operation Peacemaker' mission;

"All the fighting that you're seeing is fighting that we've generated. We've initiated this fight. We have gone out into the areas and put the pressure on them. So, instead of having them just sit back in the hills ... we're going out and assisting the Afghans to re-establish control of those areas."    

A strange way to make peace.

This week, a newly reinforced operation, 'Mission Dagger' will commence where 'Operation Peacemaker' left off, and will likely mean more "good days" for Brigadier General Fraser to savour. But, it will bring peace no nearer for Afghanistan.

As the name of this new effort suggests, this has nothing to do with peace.

Private Robert Costall has been posthumously honoured by his colleagues by the naming of a garrison gate in his memory. The investigation into the exact nature of his death, and the death of American medic, Sergeant John Thomas Stone, is ongoing.



Chris Cook is a contributing editor to PEJ News, and hosts Gorilla Radio, a weekly public affairs program, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. You can check out the GR Blog here.
 
 

Media Cheers Canada's Military Future

PEJ News - C. L. Cook - Child of the myth, I clung to the idea taught: Canada was a lesson to the world. Therein, despite gruesome  history, resided hope we Canadian apes all could finally live together in something resembling peace. Peace, the  Big "P" could we achieve in our unassuming way. How different our history is turning to be.
 
www.PEJ.org



Media Cheers Canada's Military Future

C. L. Cook


PEJ News
April 13, 2006

What is this place we've found ourselves in? Am I alone in discomfiture?


Canada's flower, "our" young men and women serving in uniform far afield demand support. They beg, so their spokesmen would have me believe, I cheer they and their mission for fear of otherwise being deemed a coward, or worse. They demand, as the body count rises, I keep council of my grave doubts and trust the men at their head have my and mine's best interests at heart.

And yet, I doubt.

Though I would enjoin my fellow's enthusiasms for the latest season's heroes and their exploits, I find myself nagged by images of exploding babies, their entrails splayed against nursery walls, and find I can find no comfort, while considering this, in media diversions. While my peace-loving Canada moves into the play-off season, agents paid by We, and named as working in our interest are moving ever deeper into the dark water.

Aside the moral midgets, nominally emplaced atop the pyramid of "our" system, (General Rick Hillier and his ilk spring immediately to mind), America trained torture and its Nazi-minded settle, incumbent it seems for the prosecution of perpetual warfare. It is they and their vision that commits Canada to the "long war." Yet, Canada's public seem content too to disregard civic and humanitarian duty, and allow the nation subverted, as long as it serves a cosseted comfort. Comforts in service, entirely coincidental to service of the new realization of Empire?s pre-eminence.

Last week, as the rockets and artillery fell upon the hapless residents of ?Concentration Camp Palestine,? the ?Canadian? government, under steerage of our own Jaruzelski, denied humanity through its denied support of Hamas, the duly elected rrepresentatives of the Palestinian people. The vicitims whose daily fate is too gross for the tender tummies in Ottawa, too base to display in the evening paper, or State TV. But for those whose tum tums are not so weak to withstand the widespread blitz currently underway, courtesy of Israel?s armed actors, I pray you, fellow Good Canadians, look at what is wrought in your name.

All  while the Good people of Canada, you quietly pay the piper for these outrages.  

Another hump for the furtherence of "Canadian" militarization was proferred tonight by the weasels presiding over 'The National,' Canada's pre-eminent news progam. It seems, the hub city media would have you believe all that is worthy to publicise is Prince Harry's debut in the military; dutiful youth, head-long diving onto the pyre of 21st Century large "I" Imperialism.


Right Speech

Right speech dictates I consider the whole, and meditate the issue
before emoting. So, I ask: What does it serve Canada?

Very well...

There be glory in defeat. We, Canadians, the most glorious example of this, having snatched through our ever-surrendering to the diktats of imperial masters a collective prosperity, serve exemplar of how far one can go, simply by going along. Never mind, going along now means booting in doors, and delivering sacked prisoners into the hands of the infamous jailors. We are making safe the world for the principles of emancipation, though sacrificing its avowed principles.

All in an noble effort, no doubt.
Yet, I still doubt.


Chris Cook is a contributing editor to PEJ News, and hosts Gorilla Radio, a weekly public affairs program, broad/webast from the University of Victoria, Canada. You can check out the GR Blog here

 
 
Completing the Cycle of Usefulness: Harper Doing his Master's Bidding

PEJ News - C. L. Cook - Newly forged Canadian Prime Minister, Stephen Harper is peeved with the country's bleeding heart media reports to the people of their fallen fellow citizens overseas. Echoing his philosophical master in Washington, Harper demanded "No pictures, please!" of the sombre casket bearing processions certain to grow only more frequent. Indeed, so frequent are those processions expected to become, Canada's dead young will too pass unmarked by half-mast flags in the nation's capital. Mr. Harper sees no practical use for ceremonies of this nature.

www.PEJ.org 


Completing the Cycle of Usefulness:
Harper Doing his Master's Bidding

C. L. Cook


PEJ News
May 7, 2006

Naturally, Stephen Harper is not always miffed at the media, it has proven useful to his [sic] cause for the most part. As Canada's little remarked overhaul of the Canadian Forces under the vacated Liberal government of Paul Martin, the media silence serves still to further Harper's American dream of Canada's [sic] global muscularity, military conquest, and perhaps one day he being referred to as the "Wartime P.M."

As the plan lain out by his Liberal predecessors began to bear its terrible fruit, Canada's [sic] media, led by State television's flagship news program, The National, rushed the breach, inundating the airwaves with tales of the good-hearted intent of our [sic] armed actors sent to Afghanistan. Peter Mansbridge went so far as to obscure the facts of history, reminding Canadians the invasions and occupations of both Afghanistan and Iraq were due to the 9/11 attacks in America. An extra bit of disingenuousness on Pete's part, no doubt to ensure the continuance of his six figure salary.

Little mention in the media though, that the majority in Canada opposed "The Mission" when it was strictly an American show; opposed it when the U.N. relented, granting the patently illegal retribution bombing campaign a patina-thin imprimatur; opposed when Canadians followed orders and marched into northern Afghanistan to "reconstruct" the country, once affording it "stability;" opposed as our fellow Canadians, since redeployed to the hot zones in the south and west of Afghanistan began killing and dying more regularly; and oppose it still. As the Globe and Mail reported yesterday, (Sat. May 6, 2006), the Globe being one of the few major media players in the country to seriously question Canada's role in the burgeoning quagmire of Afghanistan, "Support Plummets for Afghan Mission." But for the most part, it's been silence from the fourth estate; a useful silence, from Mr. Harper's perspective.

Harper makes no bones about his support of all things Bush. Aping the policies of George W. Bush on media access and flag-dipping for the dead, killed in the wars they share enthusiasm for is not the only similarities der two "leaders" share. Both men reveal a sneering contempt for their respective constituencies, Harper made a career, before his ascension to Sussex Drive, of hammering all things Canadian, and now has the temerity to tell Canadians opposed to the war and continuing occupation of Afghanistan they're too dim to understand the nation's purpose there, and the import of "The Mission." 

Harper also shares the Bush's belief that the best place for the citizenry is filling jail cells. Parroting the D.C. Machiavelli, Harper now wants to emulate his spiritual guru's expansion of not only Gulag America abroad, but too in bringing home the benefits of a more broadly criminalized electorate to the corporate interests invested in the so-called 'prison-industrial complex,' in the form of the disastrous "Mandatory Minimum" sentencing policies of the U.S. It's a place, no doubt in Stephen's mind to house an indigent population of slackers, as he characterized the nation when addressing his pals from the U.S.-based, Council for National Policy.

"In terms of the unemployed, of which we have over a million-and-a-half, don't feel particularly bad for many of these people. They don't feel bad about it themselves, as long as they're receiving generous social assistance and unemployment insurance." - Conservative leader Stephen Harper, then vice-president of the National Citizens Coalition, June 1997

Harper's generosity seems less limited when it comes to spending billions of public dollars growing his proposed prison industry in Canada. Neither does he hesitate to send troops across the planet, or in doling out billions more for what Canadian Forces honcho, General Rick Hillier says will be a decade-long mission in Afghanistan for Canada. But when it comes to those nasty, Northern European social programs, his purse-strings tighten faster than a sphincter at a border crossing.
 
On Medicare a pre-Conservative Harper informed the same gathering: "Then there is the Progressive Conservative party, the PC party, which won only 20 seats. Now, the term Progressive Conservative will immediately raise suspicions in all of your minds. It should... They were in favour of gay rights officially; officially for abortion on demand. Officially -- what else can I say about them? Officially for the entrenchment of our universal, collectivized, health-care system and multicultural policies in the constitution of the country."  

Stephen Harper's fifth column tendencies were no secret before his minority-election. With approval ratings only George Bush and Tony Blair could envy, Harper has sallied forward, ramming down the collective Canadian gullet mirror image policies of the above mentioned war criminals both at home and abroad. And he's been able to get away with it so far because a complacent public, complicit media, and non-existent "opposition" allow it.

And, in that we are all Stephen Harper's, and George W. Bush's, and Tony Blair's useful idiots.



Chris Cook is a contributing editor to PEJ News, and host of Gorilla Radio, a weekly public affairs program, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. You can check out the GR Blog here.
 
 
 
Afghan Anniversary; This Date in History

PEJ News
- C. L. Cook - [from the way back file] Canada's pretence to non-alignment, or at least nothing more than a loose affiliation, with Bush administration ambitions of global energy domination lost another veil with Bill Graham's announcement of a Canadian troop deployment to the oilfields of Darfur. -{lex}

www.PEJ.org


Inexorable War Creep

C. L. Cook

PEJ News
May 9th, 2005



http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/
department/pr_2003/site/images/bill.gif



PEJ News - There's been thunder and bluster coming from the Tory benches for more than a year demanding the humanitarian situation in Darfur requires an immediate military response. The risk we take in waiting, they insist, is another Rwanda in Sudan But that logic begs belief in the necessity to spend Canadian lives and taxes to avoid the possible repeat of an event they didn't care about when actually happening in Rwanda.

Saving black African lives has never been a priority here, not among the men making policy. Who cares today about Congo, where nearly ten times as many have died as have in the tragic Sudan, and continue to do so ? No, the real tragedy of Darfur is its unfortunate proximity to a great black sea of oil. As in other theatres of the grand global turmoil: Iraq; Colombia; Venezuela; it's oil putting Sudan in the octopus' sights. The humanitarian disaster is simply side-show, another Kosovo.

Canada's tentacles do great agency to the Bush administration's great work: Canadian troops engaged in the illegal war and regime change in Afghanistan. Canadian war ships, under U.S. command running search and seizure patrols in the Persian Gulf, federal police and Canadian military aiding an illegal and brutal regime in Haiti, a regime Canadian machinations helped implace. Yugoslavia, Somalia and now Darfur; it would be just another sad and too typical foreign policy story Canadians have endured these past years, but there's more to Darfur than meets the media eye. Because, there's more than one monster lurking in the tar.

Both China and India haven't rested on their sweatshop laurels. The two most rapidly growing economies in the world have been going abroad, investing, greasing palms, doing the ugly deeds need done to cut deals. China has been especially industrious, securing much of coveted Darfur, and they're determined to keep it. With the "Stans" gone Uncle Sam's way for now, China has to make a play in Africa. They've supported the government there with equipment and, depending on the source, some thousands of Chinese troops. Are Canadians really up for the Red Army? Is the final gambit in the great game a WWIV scenario over control of Africa's oil and minerals?

Clearly there is a humanitarian crisis in Darfur, but it has little to do with the story being peddled to "justify" another bloodbath for oil and reconstruction contracts. The infamous dastards this time are the Janjawid, an "anti-government militia" much in the style of Colombia's AUC; they are conveniently classified as enemies, while being used to do the government's dirtiest work. In this case, as in the wilds of Colombia, their job is to clear the indigenous from the riches they happen to reside atop. Meanwhile the emperor's agents have the ears and balls of the "rogue" leadership firmly in hand. It's a crisis, but not without a calculated cause.


Judging by ongoing Canadian interventions around the world,
is it reasonable to expect positive results from a Canadian-style operation?

Afghanistan is still a disaster three and half years after their liberation. Haiti worsens by the day; Iraq and the Persian Gulf boil hotter now than ever, and Central America is poised on a hair's edge, Castro and Chavez calling militias to readiness.

And now, Canada is to sally 150 hapless souls into the emperors breach. Just the first of more hundreds of handfuls of fodder to feed the indefatigable maw of war?

And barely a murmur. The great opposition to our collective march into the 19th century coming from Ottawa is a political slingshot sent at Minister Graham, purporting his announced intentions are merely a move to appease a dissaffected defector of the Liberal party.

Like the Gomery hullaboo, it's a stain on a blue dress to keep the "dogs of the press" busy while Martin dons the steel.

 

Chris Cook hosts the weekly public affairs program, Gorilla Radio, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada and serves as a contributing editor to the progressive news site, PEJ.org. You can check out his blog, here.

 
House Folds: Harper Lip-Syncing Canada to War

PEJ News
- C. L. Cook - It's fair to say, the honeymoon phase of Stephen Harper's minority government is over, and the bride's none too happy with his less than upright performance. Undeterred, Harper has urged his party rise again to make of Afghanistan the stick to assert his mastery of the House of Commons. Tonight Harper risked his party's newborn power, putting the Afghan Question in the crucible, making of it a test of confidence.

www.PEJ.org


House Folds:
Harper Lip-Syncing Canada to War

C. L. Cook

PEJ News
May 17, 2006



With scant notice given his partners in the Parliament, Harper has put forward a motion to the House proposing legislation to ensure an extension of Canada's commitment to the United States, and a continued supply of troops and treasure for Afghanistan through 2008. He's betting the opposition fears forcing another federal election, the third, should his gambit fail and the government fall, in just more than two years; he's betting Canadian voters would punish such a move, and he thinks the Liberals think so too.

Stephen Harper's short tenure at Sussex Drive has some who supported the Conservative/Reform party union wondering today if they chose their man wisely. From the start, Harper displayed an arrogant willingness to set procedural precedents in a manner more suiting a president than prime minister; that is, if George W. Bush is to be considered the exemplar of presidential behaviour. He's made an enemy of the Ottawa press corp., and now refuses to consider anything, or anyone that falls outside his "stay the course" mantra.

The Harper Doctrine

"We cannot walk away quickly. If we need further efforts or further mandate to go ahead into the future, we will go so alone and go to the Canadian people to get that mandate.'' - PM Stephen Harper tells Parliament



Enjoying a mandate slimmer than the debatable 50% plus one granted Bush in 2004, Harper has shown, in the early days of his government (has it been only four months!), a dogged determination to make of Canada a perfect emulation of his philosophical hero, George W. Bush's America. Today in Canada's Parliament, Harper held forth, accusing any who would oppose his pledge, a blank cheque of blood and money, to commit the nation to Bush's disaster in Afghanistan. 

Buoyed following the faux debate on the Afghanistan debacle that brought not a single party's censure, Harper's inherited military muscularity must seem to he and his ruling tyros a bullet-proof shield they can hide all manner of "adjustments" to the country behind, and employ as cudgel to wield against the opposition. In his now revealed secret identity, Stephen 'Hawk' Harper is on the offensive, attacking any who would challenge "The Mission," charging they don't "support the troops." 

NDP leader, Jack Layton reacted to the prime minister's innuendo, saying:

"This Prime Minister has refused to answer these questions and has said in no uncertain terms that if you question the mission you're against our troops. Well, let me be very clear, Canadians will not be lured into this false trap of the prime minister's borrowed sloganeering." 

Layton, who was slow to wade into an Afghanistan debate while the Liberals, the initiators of Canada's calamitous policy there, were in power, has finally found voice, and an easy target in the person of Bush impersonator Harper. But, I doubt Harper's "sloganeering" was borrowed; the kind of spin coming out of Ottawa these days costs.

Stephen has been given a professional make-over by the same idealogical flackery practiced south of the 49th that has served George, Tony, and Howard of Oz so well for so long. One only hopes Harper didn't pay full fare for the over-worn rhetoric and practiced outrage he's currently inflicting upon the country. Or, for that matter, full price for his newly elevated head flack, former corporate lobbyist, Sandra Buckler, whose political imagination seems limited to FOX News reruns of the base propaganda that has sustained the war against Iraq, while denying yet the proven fictions that led to it. 

Ms. Buckler's resume includes service to De Beers Canada, Coca Cola, and Power Corp. She endeared herself further to the aforementioned miffed Ottawa press gang Monday, coyly insinuating the Harper administration would follow the George W. Bush template not only in its treatment of returned dead and wounded soldiers from foreign adventures, but ape too its methods of managing press access, blithely saying:

"[the Tories are] getting to know the press corp, [discovering] what we like, and what we don't like."

For their part, the press is complaining about lack of access to the government, and an insulated PMO, reticent to inform the press, or the people of what they're getting up to.  
 
Denial

The core of the administrations in the United States, Britain, Australia, and now Canada is the refutation of the popular will by those in power. The majority of Canadians polled on the Afghanistan issue have consistently rejected the country's involvement. Turning the democractic paradigm on its head, the few pulling the levers of public policy deny the will of the majority, deny in fact such a majority exists. As George W. Bush would say, (doubtless to be soon echoed by an increasingly embattled Harper)

"I don't do focus groups."

Blair can blunder along, keeping the course charted for him by the certifiable Maggie Thatcher, heedless of the hundreds of thousands marching in the streets as his party bleeds white; while John Howard is free to harumph in antipodal agreement, regardless of his fellow citizens. 

Democracy it seems is meant only for the Iraqi's and Afghans. 

And Stephen's schtick? 

From the House of Commons today, Harper offers this to Parliament:

"Canadians accept risks when those risks are in the service of a greater good, and we honour those who take risks and make the ultimate sacrifice by staying the course and supporting their mission. The events of September 11, 2001 was a wake up call, not just to Americans but to people in all free and democratic nations. Two dozen Canadians were killed as result of the attacks on the twin towers . . . Canada is not safe from such attack and we will never be safe from such attacks as long as we're a society that defends freedom and democracy."

Harper's hypocrisy is as transparent within the House as without. The prime minister continues to insist Canada's involvement in the occupation of Afghanistan is a United Nations supported, and NATO-run mission, though 'Operation Enduring Freedom' is explicitly and solely an American operation. As does his defence minister, Gordon O'Connor, Stephen Harper must believe Canadians too dim to know the truth of the matter; too stupid to recognize his Charlie McCarthy act on the Rideau.

And maybe he's right in that.

The House voted tonight on Harper's "two year extension" to Canada's commitment to the American-led occupation, winning their effort 149-145. With this landslide mandate, Harper promises to reshape the country, one confidence vote at a time, until molded into a tiny replica of his Republican ideal. 

Step One: Ensuring an open-ended, illegal war abroad.

Check!

Two: Get Tough on stuff.

Check!

Three:

Fix the laws; create private prison industry at home. 

Pending.

With this endorsement, Harper needn't worry for at least another two years about "debating" Afghanistan; it's a done deal. How many Canadians will kill and die in those two years is something he will also fail to debate.

As if marking this dark passage, tonight, as the House sat, another Canadian soldier died in an offensive against "Taliban elements" west of Kandahar.

Capt. Nichola Goddard has now the distinction of being the first Canadian woman in uniform to die in combat since WWII, and the seventeenth Canadian killed in Afghanistan.

Speaking of the fallen woman, Brig. Gen. David Fraser told the cameras, she died:

"Doing a job she liked; she loved." 

  
Chris Cook is a contributing editor to PEJ News, and hosts Gorilla Radio, a weekly public affairs program, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. You can check out the GR Blog here.
 
 
Canada's First War President: All Hail Chief Harper

PEJ News
- C. L. Cook - That Stephen Harper hates Canada: It's wet insistence on social safety nets; healthcare; public education; and lame Peacekeeping traditions, is manifest in speeches to his right wing think tank pals in the United States, and many publicly expressed disaffections with the country of his birth. Preaching for the end of the Canadian Social Democratic experiment, and rabble-rousing Red State righties is one thing when in opposition, but its quite another when sitting at the helm of the nation.

www.PEJ.org 

Canada's First War President:
All Hail Chief Harper

C. L. Cook

PEJ News
May 25, 2006



As the leader of the opposition, Stephen's harping criticisms of the government serve a purpose; for our system to work, the rulers of the day must be held to account for their actions, and inactions on issues important to the continued prosperity of the greater nation; but leading the country requires a defter hand.

The first minister of the government must think beyond the political confines of his caucus, his party, and even too his closest supporters. It is the Prime Minister's duty to govern for the whole country, recognizing that not all Canadians share her vision. As the leader of all of Canada, the PM must respect both the subleties of the multi-cultural, mult-racial, pan-political nature of Canada, while too respecting its traditions. Being granted the latch-key to Sussex Drive is, for any Prime Minister, a caretaking agreement: Take care of this house for the next tenant, take care with this country for all of its tenants.

But then, Stephen Harper doesn't do Subtle.

  No; the precedent setting, president following Prime Minister, who would over Canada preside a complete alteration of the country, willing into being the subsuming of, along with its already surrendered financial and political independence, the soul of the nation, making of it a Northern Republic, fashioned whole from star spangled cloth, merely a colder companion to the philosophies of George W. Bush, and his criminal collaborators. In his first 100 days, Stephen "W." Harper has made his 'Project for a New Canadian Century' plain to see.

And it looks a lot like an American nightmare. But, he's just getting started. Along with his "justice" measures, Harper would have the nation devote more of its young, and more of its treasure, to engage forever in war, endlessly inflicted upon the weakest of the world, for little more than the enrichment of his dear brothers in the arms trade, and its attendant profiteers, hanging around the fringes as jackals who shadow the death-dealing lions of war to the south. With a flaccid minority government, American idolater, Harper would attempt to complete the long sought "Continentalist's" dream, and deliver finally Canada into the Washington consensus.

Fortunately, as with his political role models, Richard Nixon, and the George's Bush, Harper's inherent contempt for the popular will, and disdain of the precepts of democracy, will undo him too. Now, it's up to the marginalized media in Ottawa, and the rest of the country, (CanWest Goebbels excepted) to dispel Mr. Harper's facade, revealing to the citizenry the disaster he, and his Liberal Party supporters pose the nation.

We've all witnessed the terrible ascension of the killers of democracy these last awful years. The fall of decency at the apex of America, Britain, Australia, Canada, and a host of more minor collaborators, all utilizing the terrific, open-ended possibilities the 'War on Terror' provide to justify horrific abuses of power. The writing, writ large on the world's burgeoning new walls says: The battlefield is everywhere. The war is to preserve "our freedoms," etc.

This gruesome graffiti appears prominently in the bombed out villages of Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, and Darfur; it's seen in the shot up "ghettos" of Mogadishu and Port au Prince, and in the Halls of [sic] Justice in the capital cities of the Untied States, Great Britain, Canada, Germany, and those of their willing allies, who would turn their faces from the outrages being commited today with impunity.

Without "terrorism," the end of this dark period of human history can never be won. So "terrorism" will remain, and where it does cease, it will be created.

It's a future, prime minister Harper promises Canadians. In Afghanistan, ruling America is making clear, (if not to the play-off distracted at home), is Canada's complicity in the atrocities of the "Mission" there. Mourning their dead family members, neighbours, and fellows, erased recently in an American air attack against yet another village in Afghanistan, the survivors indicated: They see no distinction between America and its allies currently complicit in the killings of the innocent in their homeland.

It's a similarity more apparent to them than to the citizens of the, largely sleeping country's dropping the bombs.


Chris Cook
is a contributing editor at PEJ News, and host Gorilla Radio, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. You can check out the GR Blog her.




This Revulsion Will Not Be Televised: America Do You Think it's Bad Enough Now?

PEJ News - C. L. Cook - What it takes and when it will happen is a mystery, but history has shown: America does have a "disgust threshold," a moment of grotesque self-discovery, an involuntary recoiling from itself, an automatic reflex against the "new normal," manifest as a desire to flee ugliness and be home returned; headed back to the America of better days. Is the Haditha Massacre My Lai-esque enough to jolt the nation's conscience out of its blinkered denial?

www.PEJ.org

This Revulsion Will Not Be Televised:
America Do You Think it's Bad Enough Now?

C. L. Cook

PEJ News
May 30, 2006



Many believed Afghanistan's death march, where three thousand or so men were stuffed into semi-trailers, and taken on a ride to nowhere, would do it. Some thought 'Shock and Awe,' with its rain of cluster bombs, depleted uranium munitions, Tomahawk rockets, and heartless snipers was enough. For others, awakening waited Guantanamo Bay, Bagram Air Base, and Abu Ghraib. But, Americans are a patient people.

Millions still believe. Millions in America still want to think their president, George W. Bush would never lead the country to ruination for the seeming benefit of only a close coterie of international businessmen. These voters don't want to think anyone could so cynically destroy so many, for the betterment of so few. Who could? But,  more, much more than this, they don't want to believe it is their way.

Prove the tipping point!

Today, tales of a U.S. Marine Corp. killing spree; the brutal and calculated murder of men, women, and children; the murder of entire families, executed while in their dressing gowns and P.J.'s, standing and kneeling in their own living rooms, carried out last November knells, an old familiar bell ringing in the heads of Americans, peals not kenned since the terrible end days of America's war against Vietnam.

Whether these "new" revelations are revolting enough to move the nation to quit its abominable "war" or not though is moot: America has sown the seeds of its imminent defeat in Iraq and if, my fellows, you think the daily parade home of the dead and maimed, or the wanton destruction of innocents in Iraq and elsewheres is bad now, the first reel has already begun to roll on the singularly most ignoble end for the United States of America and what She has practiced against Iraq, its predecessors, and the world. What's now is the end of the American Century.

And, thank God.

Though the horrors of last November's Haditha Massacre are gruesome enough to revolt any sentient being with a modicum of empathy, it doesn't matter in and of itself. It doesn't matter when Haditha's happen in Iraq everyday. Yes, the names and details change, but the mentality of the killers, and the mortality of their victims exists in a continuum. It is Terror's routine, as intrepid American, self-made journalist, Dahr Jamail reports. Jamail is one of the few, and I expect only American reporter, to have penetrated the truth behind the resistance in Iraq and survive to tell the tale says:

"There have been countless My Lai massacres, and we cannot blame 0.1% of the soldiers on the ground in Iraq for killing as many as a quarter of a million Iraqis, when it is the policies of the Bush administration that generated the failed occupation to begin with."

Jamail reminds; even if the Pentagon's well-worn mea culpa of "bad apples" run amok soothes the digestion of those who still defend the "war" and its "war president" at home, in Iraq, in the real world, where both morgues and hospitals overflow, the systemic destruction and the true nature and scope of the suffering this grand Bush adventure exacts on the people is known better.

None in Iraq can credit the American effort there without seeming utter fools; or agents. That includes the nominal prime minister, emplaced by the universally hated United States, and every soldier, or policeman trained and armed to service the occupier's demands. While it's true, the Anglo-American covert car bombing campaign has succeeded in some measure to turn the more thick-headed sectarians against one another in Iraq, most Iraqis, sectarian and lay, recognize this crude manoeuvre for what it is, and will not be fooled again.

The media ballyhooed "civil war" will not happen as predicted. But the civilians will go to war in greater numbers, bringing with them their brothers, cousins, uncles, fathers, and sons now serving the puppet government. The time is coming soon when Iraqis will unite in their efforts to rid the nation of the festering wound inflicted upon them by George W. Bush and his backers.

History is not an abstract to a nation similarly invaded and brutalized by the forces of empire. Iraqis remember the British, they remember the promises, lies, and brutality. And, they remember expelling the odious influence, if not completely then, gradually over the generations that make up the Iraqi Century past. 

Inching Toward Liberation

Slavery was ended, the story goes, back when Abe Lincoln destroyed the economy of the South. Newly free men made free to slave in the factories and farms of the nation renewed can inform still the breadth of their freedom, (as can the millions of "tired and hungry," swarmed to the 'Land of Liberty,' to find themselves welcome only to fill labour shortages created by America's Civil War; recruited just to keep the engines of commerce whirring), their freedom from oppressive poverty and privations meted out at home, proved only to be as cruel a joke on the shore of their hopes across the sea as it was in their native lands. And, those freemen of yore say:

"Freedom and Liberty is a crock!"

But the wardens too are prisoners, their incessant, craven, infantile desire
for attention penning them from their higher aspiration. Mind-locked in a prison built of fear and doubt, bars made and reinforced daily through overt and less so messaging from State and corporate media, the people of America too feel incarcerated, and they also long for 'Freedom' and 'Democracy' and "Dignity.' And, in their collective heart, they know they can never fulfill for others a world away and by force of arms the 'Freedom' their "leaders" promise, when no such animal has been seen in these woods, their homeland. They know it's a sham.

So, Have You Seen Enough, America?

Haditha is the word now that marks your effort in Iraq. It will rise and fall, briefly fluttering across your television screens and newspaper headlines, then to be subsumed by other trivia. On St. Patrick's Day of this, 2006, I wrote a sequel to Hidatha, titled 'Root and Branch: American Forces Wipe Out Family,' In that article are the details of Haditha repeated, exactly: A mob of soldiers kicks in your windows, and kicks in your doors. There inside your home, they bind, beat, and berate you for information. Then you watch your family die, one by one before your eyes. When they come to end you, it doesn't matter anymore, you've witnessed your life's end already.

Can you, my fellow Americans, look through this mirror darkly without feeling revolted? Can you hold a stare long enough without turning your gaze to the blue blare of your televised reality, forgetting the awful truth long enough to return to the order of your daily duty? Can you laugh and love and live in a paradise made of misery, torment, and blasphemy?

It doesn't matter

No one is calling on America's absent conscience in Iraq today. Today, that nation is nursing an outrage unseen. Tomorrow, that outrage will be loosed upon the occupation.

And, God help us all.


Chris Cook is a contributing editor for PEJ News, and host of Gorilla Radio, a weekly public affairs program, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. You can check out the GR Blog here.   


Four out of Five Surviving Iraqi Dentists Agree:

"War is bad for teeth."



Bad Apples Notations

Countless My Lai Massacres in Iraq

By Dahr Jamail

While the media spotlight shines squarely on the Haditha massacre, countless atrocities continue daily, conveniently out of the awareness of the general public. Torture did not stop simply because the media finally decided, albeit in horribly belated fashion, to cover the story, and the daily slaughter of Iraqi civilians by US forces and US-backed Iraqi "security" forces had not stopped either.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13427.htm

===
Spreading Democracy in Haditha

By Mike Whitney

Who?ll believe Bush?s rosy scenarios after they?ve heard the testimony of children who watched while their parents and siblings were butchered in front of their own eyes?

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13421.htm

54 killed in Iraq violence  :

The worst bombing hit the market as Iraqis were doing their evening shopping in Husseiniyah, 95km south of Baghdad. At least 25 people were killed.
http://tinyurl.com/ofsg3

===
U.S. Increases Number Of Troops In Iraq:

The top American commander in Iraq has decided to move reserve troops now deployed in Kuwait into the volatile Anbar province in western Iraq to help quell a surge in insurgents attacks
http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/14697487.htm

===
Iraq PM impatient with US troops killing civilians:

Iraq's prime minister said on Tuesday his patience was wearing thin with excuses from U.S. troops that they kill civilians by "mistake" and said he would launch an investigation into killings at Haditha last year.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13430.htm

===
Haditha Massacre:

Was it an Isolated Event and Did the Military Try to Cover it up?

Must listen : Audio and transcript
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13434.htm

===
New details found in deaths of Iraqis:

 Investigators say they have found drone video from the same day when Marines allegedly killed civilians after bombing
http://tinyurl.com/oacv9


Video: Murtha: Military Still Trying to Spin Haditha Massacre :

Pennsylvania Congressman John Murtha appeared on CNN America Morning where he expressed outraged at military's handling of the massacre of innocent Iraq's by Marines in Haditha, Iraq.
http://tinyurl.com/oqr9x

===
Photo Gallery: Chaos in Kabul :

US troops reportedly shot dead at least four people when they opened fire on a crowd of Afghans demonstrating after an accident involving a coalition military vehicle.
http://tinyurl.com/ngyvf

===
Afghan parliament demands arrests after US crash : I

t was still uncertain how many people were killed in the violence, in which gunshots rang out throughout the city as security forces tried to control the crowds.
http://tinyurl.com/luwu5

Root and Branch: American Forces Wipe Out Family

PEJ News - C. L. Cook - News of just one event in a doubtless eventful military operation was reported by Reuters today. U.S. forces taking part in the so-named, 'Operation Swarmer' entered the home of a suspected al Qaida in Iraq operative, bound his entire family, lined them up and shot them dead. The house containing the bodies was then demolished with explosives.

www.PEJ.org

http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=4373

  
 

Clumsy Fuckers, Fly My Prospect!

PEJ News - C. L. Cook - Hurrah! It's the Oak Bay Teaparty in Victoria, wherein the well-heeled inheritors of their forefather's occupation of the lands of the dirty indigents celebrate infamy. And, to accentuate that victory, we're today treated to a fly-over of vintage death-bringing machines of the WWII era.


http://www.zoobooks.com/newFrontPage/animals/
virtualZoo/animals/c/cityanimals/images/swallows.gif

www.PEJ.org



Clumsy Fuckers, Fly My Prospect!

C. L. Cook

PEJ News
June 4, 2006



Here we are, 51 years past the culmination of the awful war, ostensibly meant to liberate us all. Millions perished, we're told, to bring at last decency to the conduct of global affairs; to end, finally, the baser urges of the human psyche, that would take, and take, and take for itself, irregardless of morality. Emblems like the Swastika, now banned in its adopted land, of this philosophy survive yet, paraded today before our gawking kinder in the form of fighter planes.

Watching from my stoop the birds go about their daily business, while the skies o'er quaint Victoria are rent by the roar of the relics of past warfare. They turn, formations of killing efficiency, attempting to delight the groundlings their artistry. As I witness the swallows, sparrows, crow, and yes, the obnoxious starlings sail, above the cranking behemoths of man's ingenuity lumber.

Oh, to have a gun!

Bruce Cockburn, a fellow citizen of this once Canada once wrote:
"If I had a rocket launcher..." 

Bruce then spake of the disaster wrought against the South Americans by "America's" legions in the terrible, largely forgotten, Nineteen-Eighties. But, today, as Canada's [sic] blood and treasure are devoted to the 'oldest profession,' become war whores, loosed upon the world to kill and be killed in foreign adventure, I comfortably purvey the technological ancestors of today's military mayhem as they entertain.

Beneath the testimony to carnage, pedestrian Canada sleep-walks, ne'er a heaven-ward glance as "we" are conscripted to the horrific enacting of war, death, and destruction. All most see is a flying-circus, circumventing our role and responsibility; our collective complicity.

The swallow fly, soaring off my balcony, dodging and weaving, an air show no clumsy spitfire could emulate. As they continue their nature, so unnatural minions of hatred and death drive the nation to oblivion.

I pray you, clumsy bastards:

"Fuck Off!"



Chris Cook is a contributing editor to PEJ News, and host of Gorilla Radio, a weekly public affairs program, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada.
 
 

Canada Following Down the Rabbit Hole: Harper's Succession

PEJ News
- C. L. Cook - The tales emanating the estimable "intelligence" agencies in Canada tonight inform of the thwarting of a plot to no less than: decapitate the nominal Head of State, destroy the Parliament Buildings, and take over the head offices of the State media, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Ambitious plans for a gang of young adults, and five teenagers. But, they had help, in the form of the best terrorist experts around, the very ones that made the huge bust; the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

 


http://www.cbc.ca/includes/promos/
promo/images/toronto-bombplot_190.jpg



www.PEJ.org



Canada Following Down the Rabbit Hole:
Harper's Succession

C. l. Cook

PEJ News
June 6, 2006

 

Though the CBC hasn't included that kernel of truth in their latest reportage on-line, to their credit, CBC Radio has reported on this, and the fact the families have been denied visitation of the incarcerated "terrorists;" bail too "deferred." Thankfully, the Toronto Star newspaper thought the pre-raid involvement of Federal law enforcement something worthy of a line, or two. The fact that the reported raids, carried out by "400+" armed agents against the 17 accused suggests a high level of intelligence activity prior to the alleged plot(s) is something too absent from CBC on-line coverage. Disappeared now from most State and corporate versions is the nature of the RCMP's involvement, and their changed story.  

Friend Kurt Nimmo, writing from Another Day in the Empire, is well familiar with "Black Flag" covert intelligence operations, and has worked to expose the dubious claims of Government in Britain, the Untied States, Spain, Italy, and of course, Iraq. Invariably, these plots hatched from the deepest recesses of State power, are proven gross attempts to manipulate the popular mind; an effort to instil a desire amongst the "electorate" to bolster both the responsibilities and budgets of said "intelligence" agencies.

In a country like Canada, with its devout self-belief it operates within the parameters of justice and fair play, it's a politically dicey thing to play a card already seen laid in the U.S.A., (with such disastrous effect) to terrify Canadians. It stinks of the South. Harper's southern counsel may yet be unaware: Canadians ken media more sharply than their cousins do. This likely a result of generations prior casting a dubious eye to their gargantuan neighbour.

As the saw here says: "When the mouse and the elephant go to bed, the mouse gets little sleep."

One Would Think

As though Canadians have lived in a vacuum these last years, the Harper regime repeats verbatim, ad nausea, messages taken straight from the stale repositories of the American PR enablers of post-9/11 reversals of democracy at home and international law abroad, not bothering even to change the script. Now, Canadians are told they must "fight vigilant" the deleterious effects of "Activist Judges," bent the story goes, on perverting our nation's purity. This while the State is saying, as in America, they're not interested in following the law, and inform they will be devoting greater percentages of the national budget to buck-up defence, policing, and lading the rich with tax breaks, to ease the Creme's discomfort with investing in the nation.

In essence, America 'Land of the Brave,' these last years proving anything but, is the new exemplar the Conservative challenge would offer Canada. Will you, Canada mine, fold to the Goebbels-esque campaign, determined to undermine Canadian democracy here as it has in "America?"

True  North

Now,  back to the heroics.

Depending on who you believe: 17 were "taken down" by a joint force of the RCMP, CSIS, etc. Five of those appear to be juveniles. Whether these will be "transferred" to Syria, Guantanamo, Bagram, or any of the other myriad torture facilities currently working overtime to abate the destruction of western society is uncertain, though Canada's minority, and clearly compromised "government" did announce last week, they thought 'Geneva,' as in conventions, quaint too.

As George before them, it seems [sic] Canada will free its forces to enjoin the slaughter with impunity of dusky foreigners, kicking in their windows, and breaking down their doors; as their "American" leaders do.

And now, Canada.

What Nimmo discloses is an uncomfortable coinciding of western spy networks in efforts to thwart "terrorist attacks" targeted against, primarily honest citizens, who have an interest in truth and peace, democracy and the political and physical environment we must share. Worse though, he reveals how bombings, and other outrages use civilians victims to "justify" draconian "legal measures" in the countries where these nefarious deeds succeed. These measures are ostensibly needed to "protect the citizenry."

That these measures erode the essence of democracy is at the crux of the geopolitical shift witnessed these last tragic years. It's a global phenomenon, effectively erasing what we've come to know as "democracy."

The peoples of the Americas, Europe, and the World, are suffering a veritable propaganda barrage, across the burgeoning media spectrum. It's a battle for the hearts and minds to be sure, but really only for insurance. The Powers ruling today care little for either public opinion, or jurisprudence. If enough of the herd can be convinced to play along, along the path to apparent ruination, so much the better.

Or at least, so much the easier.

Stephen Harper's pedigree is amply available on-line; not least some of which here at PEJ News, and other places. It's clear, Mr. Harper does not like "Canada," as defined by the majority of its citizens, and indeed others around the world. Harper doesn't like "socialized" medicine, something of a point of pride for millions of Canadians. The creation of guaranteed, affordable medical treatment to all citizens was, and is, seen in most quarters of this country as a seminal social achievement. And not won easily.

Likewise, the Social Insurance, taken from all, so that the few would not in old age be reduced to dog food, or choosing between the medication and the rent, Stephen Harper and his predecessor governments would have our elders supine, wondering where their next meal is coming from; they would support the extension of copyright protections, protections that ensure generic palliatives can't trickle down to the poor, and sick. He and his party would have the nation reduced to a plenary not seen since the 19th Century. 

War on the Poor

Signally, among the myriad outrages PM Harper would heap upon the heads of us, we Canadians, is averred in his stolid determination to bring God, and the force of the prison-industrial complex North to Canada. This of course, through "get tough" seminaries, replete with media magnification.

Tonight, 12 men and five boys wait and wonder what 'Canadian Justice' holds  for them. They know already of the secret complicity the nation is guilty of. They know of others, held in horror camps around the world, delivered by the agency of "their" government. They doubtless too have heard Canada's new leadership proclaim objections to 'Geneva,' and might wonder what that may mean for them.

But behind the media circus, left largely unattended, is: What does this mean for the rest of us?

While Harper hunts, or ensnares, domestic ?terrorists? what privations of law and rights are Canadians willing to accept?

Will this country too fall victim to Public Relations, and finally "succeed" the South now?



Chris Cook is a contributing editor to PEJ News, and host of Gorilla Radio, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. You can check out the GR Blog here.
 
 
From Your Pocket to War: Canada's Burgeoning Military Complex

PEJ News
- C. L. Cook - Well hurrah! Canada is to, if Mr. Harper gets his way, dole out an approximated 15 billion dollars next week to "beef up" the country's military. Though the Canadian Forces has seen annual budget increases through three administrations over the last few years, it's still many tax dollars short of attaining its goals. What, harried tax-payer, are those goals? Well you may ask.

www.PEJ.org


From Your Pocket to War:
Canada's Burgeoning Military Complex

C. L. Cook

PEJ News
June 24, 2006



It costs money to kill people. Think of it: There are bullets and bombs, rifles and airplanes; soldiers, sailors, and spooks to be paid. Then, those good boys and girls, our good boys and girls, needing feeding, clothing, toilet papering, etc. But, then you have to get those masters of democracy to the killing fields; far-flung locales most of those picking up the tab have never heard of, and certainly couldn't afford to holiday in.

But there's more, much more to be paid to get a good killing spree off the ground. And, this week, Canada's new prime minister, Bush apparatchik, Stephen Harper promised to provide the moola required to wipe out the Mullahs. Hee hee, it's off to glory we go.

Already in the hole for more than a reputed four billion supporting the occupation of Afghanistan, and military geniuses like Canada's Numero Uno at defence, Rick Hillier opining a decade, or more "in-country" commitment required to bring at last freedom and democracy to the too dumb to form a society on their own Afghanis, Stephen's 15 billion dollars would appear just a down payment on the full cost of this misguided adventure in Central Asia. But the costs are to be greater by magnitudes less easily measured through pure accountancy.

Some of you older Canucks may recall travelling the world in your youth. You may remember encountering American backpackers in Europe, who would affix little Maple Leaf insignia to their gear in hopes of "passing" as Canadians. They would abandon their citizenship for safety, knowing "their" government's policies abroad were so repugnant to so many around the world, it better to play Peter and deny affiliation, three times before the cock crows. What little emblems will the young intrepid denizens of the Great White North eager to see the wider world affix their backpacks, as they must now because Stephen Harper, and his previously corrupted predecessors, acquiesced Canadian sovereignty, adopting whole the horrible precepts and repugnant realities of the foreign policy of the United States?

Don't Shoot! I'm Irish, eh?

Lucky charms will not save those daring a venture. You see, we're seen in the lands of those oppressed as a monolith too: The West, a bunch of rich, white, Christian men; a maniacal uber mensch that would have the Prophet dragged through the dirt and the mud, His adherents put to sword and flame; man, woman, and child together smote, while not even the animals, the lands and waters spared the scorched earth crusaders. And who, looking at the annuls of atrocity these last terrible years has writ, could disagree?

Like they are presented to we, we too look to them as a polyglot singularity; as if there are no secular "Muslims;" as if there exist no Agnostics east of Constantinople. Here, we perceive they a homogenous blob, religious fanatics, unreasonably threatening we that would take their hand and lead them from their dismal darkness of ignorance to the shining New Jerusalem on the hill: The Free Market.

Hallelujah! Amen.

Well Stephen, more bullets and bombs, and the means of their deliverance will not accomplish your stated tenets. What "Canada" is promising is a mere reflection of the disaster, in all terms, of America. And you, gentle tax-payer can go quiet into your good night knowing you are contributing to the Great Project, promising to pay the piper for this abortion of humanity, guaranteed to continue for generations to come.

Before I vomit at the thought of what's become of us, a shout out to the CBC, and their conspirators in the corporate media, for all your diligent work assisting the mass murders abroad.

Didn't they hang 'Tokyo Rose?'

Sleep well fellow Canadians, knowing your labours are put to such good use.



Chris Cook is a contributing editor to PEJ News, and host of Gorilla Radio, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada. You can check out the GR Blog here.



 
An Open Invitation to Jack Layton: Why Do We Not Fight?

PEJ News
- C. L. Cook - It's said: "A hero dies once, but a coward dies a million deaths." If true Jack, how many of those millions of deaths have you yet died? And, how many more dead are required before you and the vaunted inheritors of the "peace" party currently marking time at NDP HQ stand on your stated principles?

www.PEJ.org


An Open Invitation to Jack Layton:
Why Do We Not Fight?

C. L. Cook

PEJ News
June 25, 2006


Beside the cretin-like complicity of the current crop of so-called Liberal party members wearing the varnish off their privileged chairs in Canada's House of Parliament, no other single entity bears more responsibility for what has come to pass in Canada than the New Democrats. The country is now nominally ruled by a cadre of blatant Republicans, killers that would have our treasury devoted to the kinds of death and destruction policies so evident in our tortured neighbour to the south.

Is that O.K. with you and yours? Apparently so with Jack Layton and the NDP.

How many thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions of maimed and killed Afghani, Haitians, and others will it take, Jack before you and your pitiful party find legs to stand against this? Shall I support my local NDP federal candidate, (a decent and truly concerned woman) here in Victoria, while hoping the political machinery behind your machinations turn finally to this issue? Well, forget it.

There's a poster of Tommy Douglas pinned on my wall. Do you know him, Jack? Tommy reminds me daily of the promise of this nation, and the courage of those who would stand against outrageous calumny to forward an agenda that would, finally, serve the people's best interest. You, Jack, are the beneficiary of that nobility. And what have you done with that great privilege and responsibility? Nada

And what does the New Democratic Party have to say? Nada.

There's a piece of mail sitting in my crowded 'mail-crutch' sporting a smiling visage. It's Denise Savoie, "my" duly elected Member of Parliament from Victoria. I didn't vote for Denise, though I know her intents to be true, because of you, Jack.

I can stand the liars, and the cons, those that would present themselves to their fellow citizens as concerned and conscientious, while lining their own pockets; one expects that of the lying Liberals, and their radical twins, the  Conservatives; what I can't accept though, Jack, is cowardice. That you can face the mirror of public expectation, pretending to promote the concerns of your constituents, and do nothing is unforgivable.

The NDP's role in the ascension of Stephen Harper is irrevelant in this; your party has proven itself a traitor to its principles for decades, but now, as Canada careens towards what can only be accurately described as an fascist future, will you yet not peep? How far must we slide before courage is rediscovered on the Rideau?

I expect little of you and yours, Jack. You remind of the Toronto Maple Laughs, and all those other unfulfilled ambitions vexing our nation - do you think it "yours" too? - but still  I implore you to heroic, if doomed, effort.

The majority of Canadians polled are against the gruesome transformation going on in the country. How safe must your message be before you dare open your pie hole?

Or do you disdain the populace as your "opposition" and privileged forebears?

There is no wiggle room left, Jack. You stand now, or fall forever remembered as Benedict Arnold is south.



Chris Cook is a contributing editor to PEJ.org, and hosts Gorilla Radio, a weekly public affairs program, broad/webcast from the University of Victoria, Canada.; You can checkl out the GR Blog here.


http://www.ndp.ca/contact

 
Another Canadian Killed in Afghanistan: Dying Doing "What He Loved"

PEJ News - C. L. Cook - As they report the "repatriation" of another Canadian soldier killed, the CBC Online News hasn't got up to speed on the latest known Canadian killed in the deepening disaster that is Afghanistan today. They do however present a report written by Canadian Press (CP), an organization that has failed to grant PEJ News republishing privileges. The link to the "CBC" story appears below.

www.PEJ.org


Canadian soldier killed in fiery suicide attack identified as medic
16:22:02 EDT Aug 12, 2006

Canadian Press: TERRY PEDWELL

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan (CP) - The Canadian soldier killed Friday in a fiery suicide attack has been identified as a medic, Cpl. Andrew James Eykelenboom, who served with 1st Field Ambulance based in Edmonton. He was killed when a suicide bomber plowed an explosives-laden pickup truck into a NATO convoy near Spin Boldak, about 100 kilometres south of Kandahar.
 
 
The Unknown Fodder: "NATO" Soldier Killed in Afghanistan

PEJ News - C. L. Cook - Canadian State media is repeating today NATO reports of the death of yet another soldier in Afghanistan. The CBC blandly reiterates, "A roadside blast killed one NATO soldier and wounded eight others in southern Afghanistan, the alliance said Sunday, without disclosing the nationality of any of the soldiers." So, is this how it is to be; will we the citizens of contributing [sic] countries in the Afghani disaster now be shielded from the knowledge of the destruction of "our troops," they being lumped instead into an amorphous NATO non-entity? The CBC story is below.

www.PEJ.org 


 
Canada at War: You Must Remember This

PEJ News
- C. L. Cook - More than 5,000 Victorians attended American ex-president, Bill Clinton's book fair yesterday, if the Times-Colonist newspaper is to be believed. The gathered scions of the city heard the unindicted war criminal, and butt of countless lewd water-cooler comments commend Canada its rapine entanglement in Afghanistan, but urge we too further our [sic] efforts, and send more young men and women soldiers to that benighted nation to kill and die, and terrorize the too stupid to govern themselves in "our" interest locals.

www.PEJ.org   


Canada at War:
You Must Remember This

C. L. Cook


PEJ News
November 11, 2006


"I know it is painful for you when you lose your soldiers there, but you are doing a good thing."
- Praise for Canadian military involvement in Afghanistan from former Caesar, William Jefferson "Slick Willie" Clinton



Sadly, I couldn't afford to take the day off work, and fork out the couple hundred bucks required to witness Bill delivering his pearls before the rubes at the Save-On-Food cultural mecca, but I was blessed with the traffic snarl that followed; a mass exodus of Lexus' and Benz's, and troops of Sunday best-dressed aspirants over-flowing sidewalks and "don't walk" blinking intersections. So these, thought I, are the 28% of the populace willing to send the children of anonymous fellow citizens to their spiritual, and in at least 43 cases, physical doom in foreign adventures. They too must be among the estimated 71,763 Victorians still subscribing to the city's only daily, CanWest Global organ the Victoria Times-Colonist.

Happily, the lobby of my building contained several extraneous copies of the T-C today, left-over trees, shorn from our [sic] forests, pulped, bleached, and printed with poison ink that we may be informed; lest we forget the price our [sic] society's continuance demands: Today's bulletin says that cost is endless slaughter and sacrifice. Be proud of holocausts past and, reminds the rag, be proud to send your sons and daughters into the fires of war burning now in Afghanistan, and the elsewheres the Imperium and its spokespersons like the scandal and blood-tainted Bill Clinton dictate.

Blood red poppies adorned their lapels in the front page picture of the War Paper today; two old men, grey-haired and blue-suited standing, buttoning their jackets in unison following a job well done. One can imagine the applause emitting the rich citizenry echoes in their ears, as the pair congratulate each other. Bill and fellow traveller, premier Gordon Campbell, the backwater politico currently steering British Columbia into the corporate fold, twins though ostensibly from opposite sides of the political and continental divide, clasp hands, smile for the cameras, and wave to the fools desperate to receive marching orders, promises they hope to carry them and theirs through a chaotic time; desperate enough to shell out hundreds of dollars for the privilege of hearing a killer preach peace and plea the carnage continue.

Lest we forget, it was this same Clinton ordering the destruction of Serbia, a phoney war necessary he said to remove the "new Hitler" Milosevic, that dead-in-custody "dictator" and World Bank denier; the same Clinton who signed into law the predecessor to the onerous Patriot Act, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996; the same Clinton who, as governor of Arkansas allowed the prisons there become blood "milking" stations, the tainted products of which were then exported to Canada and around the world, infecting and killing untold millions; the same Clinton who now calls, between protestations for peace and the brotherhood of man, for not less but more war in Afghanistan and Iraq; the same Clinton who admitted issuing assasination orders against his enemies; the same Clinton whose wife, Hillary now presides as one of the newly made majority Democrat senators in Washington too calling Afghanistan the "good war." And for this, the doyens of Victoria and their saddled husbands stand and cheer.

11/11 11:11

The moment of silence is past on this day of remembrance. For those not taught the meaning intended by that sombre clock marker; the eleventh minute of the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month is a moment meant as a silent yet determined resistance to war. Lest we forget war's horrors and repeat the folly that all but destroyed a generation, we will make war no more.

The youngsters in the crowd can be forgiven if that sentiment is news to them; they are excused if they believed this day is meant to glorify and not condemn war and the men that make it; they are innocent if they believe war is good and fun and exciting and the road to higher education and public service, because that is what they are told, repeatedly.

Canada's titular leaders, both past and present, have set a course for permanent warfare for this nation. There will, they contend, be no peace in our time, nor for the times of our children, and their children. There will be endless parades every November 11th from here until eternity, though fewer than a handful of the Great War's, the War to End All Wars, combatants survive today. There will be veterans of other wars guaranteed to fill the ranks and grandstands as the pipes play mournful, and the politicians bravely salute for forever to come Remembrance Days: So dictate the grey-haired, blue-suited men, their lapels adorned with blood-red poppies.

"Lest we forget, the guns will be silent on Remembrance Day," wrote Canadian bard, Bryan Adams. Are they silent today in Afghanistan?



Chris Cook
is a contributing editor to PEJ News, and hosts Gorilla Radio, broad/webcast from CFUV Radio, at the University of Victoria, Canada. You can check out the Gorilla Radio blog here.


[Richard Sanders of the Coalition to Oppose the Arms Trade (COAT) has put up this informative slide presentation to educate Canadians as to the true nature of the nation's involvement in Afghanistan - lex]
 
 
 
Two Canadians Killed in Afghanistan

PEJ News
- C. L. Cook - The Canadian Press (CP) is reporting tonight the deaths of two Canadian soldiers, part of the roughly 2500 soldier-strong contingent in Afghanistan. The pair were killed in a suicide bomb attack against a convoy in Kandahar.

www.PEJ.org


Two Canadians Killed in Afghanistan

C. L. Cook

PEJ News
November 27, 2006


While CBC television news flagship The National's lead tonight was Stephen Harper's latest gambit to dismantle Canada, the recognition of "the Quebecois people" as a nation within Canada, two more Canadians died fighting for the national integrity of Afghanistan today. 

In the first fatal casualties for Canadian soldiers following a spate of deaths in September and October, the pair, identified only as serving with the Royal Canadian Regiment based in Petawawa, fell following a suicide car attack against their Bison armoured vehicle as it rode in convoy on the road outside Kandahar Airfield.

Speaking of the attack, Brigadier General Timothy Grant, commander of Canadian Forces in Afghanistan called the attack an act of desperation by the Taliban, saying it would only strengthen the Canadian's resolve;

"Although they have lost good friends, it will only harden them more to make sure they carry on with the mission and bring it to a successful conclusion."

Lieutenant Comander Kris Phillips was more matter-of-fact, saying;

"It's simply a suicide attack. I don't want to make light of it but this is something they have deployed in the past and this is something they will deploy again in the future."

 
 
Unknown Soldiers: NATO's Non-Nation Casualties

PEJ News - C. L. Cook - Two more "ISAF" soldiers were killed today in Afghanistan, reportedly by an "improvised explosive device." Where the two dead men called home was not released, "as per NATO policy." NATO's secrecy is a convenient policy for NATO-member governments whose support for "The Mission" in the troubled country is failing, even as "their" soldiers are falling.


[Update November 30th - Canada names two soldiers]

www.PEJ.org


Unknown Soldiers:
NATO's Non-Nation Casualties

C. L. Cook

PEJ News
November 29, 2006

Two more NATO soldiers killed in Afghanistan

Kuwait News Agency (KUNA) reports tonight, "two soldiers of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) have been killed in a roadside bomb explosion in central Afghanistan, the foreign military announced on Wednesday." Though the KUNA story is technically correct, parsing the spaces between the lines of its lead sentence is revealing. 

As George W. Bush made clear at the recent meeting of NATO members in Riga, America calls the shots for the North Atlantic Treaty Organziation. Calling ISAF "NATO-led" may be salve enough for the sensibilities of Old Europe, but it doesn't fool anyone in Central Asia, least of all in Afghanistan. As for just whose "security" the International Security Assistance Force protects is also not a mystery in Kandahar, or around Kabul where the roadside bomb was detonated Tuesday.

Of course, neither KUNA, nor any other "credible" news agency would lead one of their, increasingly frequent, dispatches of soldiers killed in Afghanistan truthfully, as: "Two of America's proxy garrison occupying Afghanistan died today following resistance actions." KUNA, and the rest will continue to reiterate the acceptable myths of what the invasion and Afghanistan is, and who it serves until the end.

Canadians have been more intent on learning the truth of the situation "in-country" than most of NATO's contributors; this because there are currently more than 2500 Canadian soldiers in harm's way, with 44 officially reported killed; the latest two dying over the past weekend in a suicide bomb attack.

Officially: "According to a statement released from the headquarters of the multinational force, a bomb struck a military patrol in Puli Alam, capital of Logar province, on Tuesday afternoon. Two soldiers were killed while the two injured included an ISAF soldier and an interpreter. Nationalities of the casualties are withheld as per policy of NATO. Two days back, two foreign soldiers had [been] killed in a suicide attack in Panjwayee district of the southern Kandahar province."

The previous two "foreign soldiers" killed proved to be Canadians; a likely case with those killed Tuesday. But, it's not NATO's policy to release the names and histories of those killed under the all-encompassing NATO mantle. Like-wise, it's not Canada's place to determine the fate of Canadian soldiers, nor necessary the Canadian people know of their fate.



[The Canadian administration today named the two "NATO" soldiers killed Tuesday last in Afghanistan. Corporal Albert Storm and Chief Warrant Officer Robert Girouard became the 43rd and 44th Canadian soldiers killed in Afghanistan, according to official sources. - lex]  

 

 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Top

Sister Sites

Atlantic Free Press

Atlantic Free Press

Pacific Free Press

Pacific Free Press

tv apps tv widgets market
appmarket.tv

agora media group
Agora Media Group

New Advertiser
BetDSI has come on for the 2012 NBA Playoffs as a platinum sponsor of Pacific Free Press.