Italy's Justice System Treads Where U.S. Courts Won't
by
David Swanson
The
United States of America owes much of the hope it has right now of
remaining what John Adams called “a nation of laws, not men” to Italian
law enforcement.
Were it not for the fact that Italian prosecutors, unlike their
American counterparts, answer to the law rather than a president, the
enforcement of laws against a massive crime spree by U.S. officials
(and their Italian accomplices) would not have begun.
In 2003, the CIA and the United States military kidnapped a man, a
political refugee, in Italy. His name was Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr,
also known as Abu Omar.
CIA agents spied on him from their luxury hotels and gourmet-meal
lives in Milano (all paid for by U.S. taxpayers). They were told to
kidnap Nasr and send him to Egypt to be tortured, and they did so.
According to recent statements by two of them, they knew perfectly
well they were violating the law. But they were not worried enough at
the time to refrain from discussing the matter on their cell phones as
they enjoyed the dolce vita and racked up credit card bills wasting the
same currency the U.S. government claims it has a moral duty not to
waste on healthcare.
Nasr was indeed kidnapped, flown to Egypt, and tortured. His wife,
Ghali Nabila, testified in Italian court for over six hours. In October
2004, she had been able to see him, briefly out of Egyptian prison. (He
was eventually released years later.) Nabila said in court:
“I found him wasted, skinny – so skinny his hair had turned white, he had a hearing aid.”
Ordered, against her will, to describe his torture, she said:
“He was tied up like he was being crucified. He was beaten up,
especially around his ears. He was subject to electroshocks to many
body parts.”
Asked if that included genitals, she replied “Yes.”
Nasr himself wrote in a letter smuggled out of prison and printed in the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera:
“I was hung by my feet from the ceiling, my head down, my hands tied
to my back, my feet tied up. I was subjected to electric shocks all
over my body, especially in my head, nipples, testicles, and penis. My
testicles where also beaten with a stick and squeezed tightly if I
refused to answer their questions or was suspected of telling lies.
“They fixed my body to an iron door and on a wooden instrument they
call the bride, where my hands where tied over my head from behind and
my legs tied together or sometimes each leg on different sides. The
torture that takes place during this is electric shocks, and beating
with a shoe and cables.”
Presidents Barack Obama and Silvio Berlusconi oppose prosecuting
Americans or Italians for kidnapping this man and transporting him to
his torturers. The U.S. Department of Justice will, therefore, not
prosecute.
In Italy, on the other hand, there is still some measure of law, law
as a standard applied to all equally, without immunity for those with
the power to commit the greatest crimes.
Last Wednesday, an Italian court convicted 22 CIA agents and one
member of the U.S. Air Force. The prosecutor Armando Spataro has
repeatedly asked the Italian government to issue an international
arrest warrant and request extradition by the United States. It has not
yet done so.
One of the convicted CIA agents, Sabrina De Sousa, openly admits
that the kidnapping was illegal, but says that she feels betrayed by
those who authorized the operation and failed to protect its
participants from prosecution.
De Sousa ignores Nuremberg Principle IV, which requires noncompliance with illegal orders or instructions:
“The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or
of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under
international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.”
But De Sousa also has a point, one well exemplified at Nuremberg: Those at the bottom are not the most responsible.
Those who must be held accountable first and foremost are the
decision-makers at the top. And who authorized the policy of kidnapping
people and shipping them off to be tortured? Three top U.S. officials
have authorized rendition: Presidents Clinton, Bush, and Obama. And in
this case, the presidents responsible were Bush and, almost certainly,
Berlusconi.
The New York Times reported
that most top CIA officials who planned the Abu Omar rendition have
since left the agency, with the exception of Stephen Kappes, who was
then assistant director of the CIA’s clandestine branch and is now CIA
deputy director.
For justice to reach to the highest levels and thereby deter the
practice of kidnapping, under the name rendition, in the years ahead,
justice must be permitted to proceed on the paths it has blazed thus
far.
Americans must make Italians aware of our gratitude for their
efforts to save us from ourselves. And Italy must be compelled to obey
its laws rather than its president on the question of issuing
international arrest warrants and a demand for extradition.
The 23 fugitives already can expect arrest if they visit any nation
of Europe. They should not be free to roam the rest of the world.
By U.S. standards, Italy would be justified in kidnapping these
fugitives and “rendering” them to Italian prisons. An extradition
request would be a generous favor of a sort that the United States does
not grant to others.
Failure to take that step on behalf of the rule of law will put the
blood of future rendition victims on the hands of the Italian as well
as the American people.
David Swanson is the author of the new book Daybreak: Undoing
the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union by Seven
Stories Press. You can order it and find out when tour will be in your
town by visiting davidswanson.org