Home     The Writers     Search     Submissions     Contact Us     Gorilla Radio     Atlantic Free Press     Empire Burlesque  
  You are here: 

Sat

17

Oct

2009

Killing El Salvador: Canadian Mining Company Adds Law Suit to Injury
Written by Press Release   
Saturday, 17 October 2009 09:24
smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Tell Pacific Rim to Drop the $77 Million Lawsuit Against El Salvador!
by Si a la Vida!
In the department of Cabañas, El Salvador, communities have been protesting against a proposed gold mining project by Pacific Rim, a Canadian mining company. Their concern? That cyanide used to extract gold would poison El Salvador’s largest river, the primary source of drinking water for millions in the country.
 
Their protests were strong enough to shut down the El Dorado gold mining site.  In 2007, the Ministry of Environment denied Pacific Rim’s permit to start drilling for gold.

But Pacific Rim is not listening. Instead, the company is suing the Salvadoran government for $77 million for “lost profit” (read more about the Pacific Rim lawsuit). How can they do this?! 
 
 
 
The U.S. Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) protects the “rights” of corporations over national laws that safeguard workers and the environment. Chapter 10 of CAFTA gives private foreign investors the “right” to sue for “profit infringement” and extort millions of dollars from governments like El Salvador.
 
[For complete article links, please see source at Si a la Vida! here.]
 
 
Since the U.S. Congress voted to approve CAFTA in 2005—by a mere two votes—the cross-border resistance has continued. The Salvadoran people have successfully mobilized to block the privatization of health care and water and other policies tied to this “free” trade agreement.

But death squad violence in El Salvador has resurfaced since the passing of CAFTA, specifically targeting trade unionists, resource rights activists and members of the left political party, the FMLN (Farabundo Martí Front for National Liberation). In June 2009, the anti-mining struggle turned deadly when outspoken community leader Marcelo Rivera was tortured and killed. The right-wing Attorney General has refused to investigate this as a political assassination, or to investigate numerous death threats, kidnapping and assassination attempts in Cabañas.

Pacific Rim’s lawsuit could devastate El Salvador’s economy, taking state funds out of necessary social programs like farming, health care and education and putting it in the pockets of corporate shareholders in North America. Call CEO Thomas Shrake and demand that Pacific Rim withdraw its lawsuit and respect the will of the Salvadoran people by closing the mines!

CALL Pacific Rim Headquarters today -- from the U.S. 1- (888) 775-7097 or from Canada (604) 689-1976 -- and leave a message with the corporate secretary (see call script on back of page).

You can also email CEO Thomas Shrake directly:  tomshrake@usa.net

 For more information on local actions and the anti-mining struggle, please visit www.cispes.org:

    * Find out about actions happening this week in U.S. and Canadian cities near you
    * Check out recent CISPES Updates and Action Alerts
    * Read the CISPES lawsuit info-sheet “CAFTA’s Golden SWINDLE”  

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Use the following script to contact Thomas Shrake, CEO and President of Pacific Rim:

 To call from the U.S. dial 1- (888) 775-7097, or from Canada (604) 689-1976, then leave a message for the corporate secretary:

 1. Hello, I am calling to urge President and CEO Thomas Shrake and the Board of Pacific Rim, to drop the lawsuit you filed against the government of El Salvador.  Local and national civic organizations have been actively opposing the El Dorado mine since 2004.  Salvadoran environmentalists, economists and social movement leaders have roundly rejected the mine, and now this outrageous lawsuit, on a number of grounds.

2. Choose 1 or 2 of the following points.

·        Environmental: Salvadoran community activists and environmental organizations have consistently denounced the devastating environmental impacts that would result from the El Dorado mine. The mine would contaminate the river that serves as the primary source of drinking water for the majority of Salvadorans and use over 10,000 gallons of water a day.  All this in a country where 30% of the rural population lacks access to potable water.

·        Trade justice: The Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), the basis for Pacific Rim’s lawsuit, was widely opposed throughout the U.S. and Central America. Citizen advocacy groups in El Salvador charge that CAFTA is unconstitutional and have brought the case before their Supreme Court.  As CAFTA’s legitimacy itself is in question, Pacific Rim’s lawsuit appears even more bogus.

·        Economic: According to economic experts, the mine provides no long-term economic benefit for El Salvador, only for Pacific Rim. The gold mining industry contributes only 0.04% to El Salvador’s GDP while foreign companies like Pacific Rim plan to take away millions in profit.

·        Human rights: I have heard first-hand accounts of horrible political violence against community members in Cabañas who have actively opposed the El Dorado mine. Even if Pacific Rim did not directly instigate this violence, the murder of Marcelo Rivera, and the attempted assassinations of Father Luis Quintanilla and Ramiro Rivera are undoubtedly a result of Pacific Rim’s presence. The fact that people are risking their lives to fight against El Dorado shows just how unwelcome gold mines are and how disgraceful this lawsuit is.

·        Sovereignty: This lawsuit infringes upon the rights of sovereign governments to protect the interests of their people as they see fit.  Each country has the right to determine how its land is used, as well as the fate of its natural resources. Your lawsuit tramples on those rights.

 3. It is shameful that Mr. Shrake is willing to wreak profound economic damage on an entire nation for the financial gain of his company. These lawsuits will hit the poorest people in El Salvador the hardest. If Mr. Shrake has his way, much-needed funding for social programs like health care, food and housing will go directly into the pockets of your shareholders.

 For these reasons, I again urge you to withdraw the disgraceful lawsuit that Pacific Rim has filed against El Salvador.  
Comments (2)Add Comment
RE:
written by Rogelio Muños, October 18, 2009
C'mon can you be honest? Pacific Rim is suing because El Salvador goverment infringed the due process of law giving authorization to work the mine fields. Now the FMLN is the goverment in El Salvador, they control every single institution there and they haven't found any proof against Pacific Rim. So shut up because you're making unfounded comments and let the people in El Salvador get good paying jobs. Why CISPES better talk about human rights violation by FMLN? I think that can be a more efficient use for your time.


[Shut up yourself, asshole. It was the indigenous opposition to this project, not the government, that brought it to a halt. Read the articles before wasting our time with your propaganda. Good paying jobs? You gotta be joking. And what good is a job when the rivers are poisoned? And I suppose killing, torturing, and terrorizing opponents is just OK with you eh Munos? You're a lousy fascist. -ed.]
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
El Salvador, always getting screwed
written by sp, October 22, 2009
Ehe mining will undoubtedly destroy the already limited fresh water supply in the region which is the primary source of drinking water for people in the department of Cabanas and most of rural el Salvador. FMLN is implementing a true democracy by supporting the VAST majority of Salvadorans who oppose environmental exploitation by foreign corporations. El Salvador environment is at a critical state from years of exploitation and the effects from mining would be devastating. I say this as someone who does not entirely oppose mining, but in this case it would be a crime against the citizens of Cabanas. FYI, I lived there for many years and my opinion is based on knowledge of local sentiment and the environmental and health risks associated with mining in this area. Support for Pacific Rim Mining in this particular case can only be explained by ignorance to the case or complete disregard for human life.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smaller | bigger

busy
 
Top