News

As I was recently informed by a Prof. of Civil Liberties, it isn't even a Constitutional Right that I have 'ownership' of my body/self, but a right that the Constitution states is given to me by my Creator and therefore not subject to restriction under our government.
 

I have lost all belief that Obama is a better man than the last two Presidents. He hired many people, including Atty. Gen. Holder (who was in the DOJ under Clinton and CIA Panetta) who have a guilty stake in keeping this technology secret and in (obviously) continuing its use.  

Seven months into his Presidency, the abuse and secrecy continue. What excuse can he possible have for not upholding the rule of law?  

This is the 'operational capacity' of the CIA that is secret to Americans as reported in the NY Times 5/17/07 Editorial “Mr. Gonzales’s Incredible Adventure” (special emphasis on bold sections below):
 

“it so alarmed Mr. Comey and F.B.I. Director Robert Mueller that they sped to the hospital, roused the barely conscious Mr. Ashcroft and got him ready to fend off the White House chief of staff, Andrew Card, and Mr. Bush’s counsel, Alberto Gonzales. There are clues in Mr. Comey’s testimony and in earlier testimony by Mr. Gonzales, Mr. Ashcroft’s successor, that suggest that Mr. Bush initially ordered broader surveillance than he and his aides have acknowledged.


Mr. Comey said his staff had reviewed the program as it was then being run and believed it was illegal.
 
July 8th, 2009 news was released that CIA's Panetta said he had "recently" testified that "top CIA officials have concealed significant actions from all members of Congress" and "misled members" from 2001 until this week.

And it’s been revealed by Homeland Security that ‘Domestic Terrorism’ is elevated as a high ‘threat’ to the U.S. That’s another Clinton era ruse that was proposed by the then F.B.I. director Louis Freeh.  

I write as a U.S. citizen who has been subjected to thought reading technology & other tortures since 1994. This technology I believe is on the brink of being exposed due to whistle blowers Atty. Mann (Newsweek 12/22/08) and Russell Tice (Countdown with Keith Olbermann 1/21/09) with reference to surveillance by NSA. I have been a victim for fifteen years. I have been remotely broadcast to, thought read, sleep deprived, had my heart palpitated and other techniques that I have heard fell under non-lethal microwave weapons programs. I believe that this technology supplies the intelligence that Attorney Mann reported to Michael Isikoff as being supplied to the D.O.J. under Attorney General-only approval and being back-doored through warrantless wiretaps; what Atty. Mann says some members of the D.O.J. have said is illegal.  

I believe that this is the technology that Russell Tice referred to as the ‘avenue’ that was keeping some un-terrorist Americans under surveillance 24/7 (he mentioned one group: journalists). Both men are under threat of prosecution for revealing some facets of NSA’s activities, and both are under State secrecy laws. I am not.  

Can you imagine the time from when one is 37 to the time when one is 52 as one of having no privacy, of physical and verbal abuse and other threats? All that I have lost?  

Eventually, like any other victim, I want to see my tormentors brought to trial. Please give this information to fellow Senators and President Obama; anyone you want to is fine with me. Feel free to contact me at any time.  

Until recently, information on the method of their ‘remote’ verbal broadcasting (which can be heard by the victim, but not by others in the same vicinity) has been kept secret.  

The August 5th edition of Newsweek has an article “Hearing is Believing” (written by Jamie Reno and N’gai Croal) that explains the manipulation of sound waves to isolate a target to hear what others around them cannot. Please note that this technology was developed over a decade ago at MIT. The system that the government is using to broadcast at me is definitely not limited to a 100 yard broadcast field. In a like manner, the outrageousness of claiming that thought reading technology exists and is in use currently by the government will be exposed in the future. Time Magazine reported in it’s October 12, 2002 article by Jeffrey Kluger “There are experimental -- and controversial -- sensors that analyze a suspect’s brain waves and determine what he knows and what he doesn’t.“ 

These two technologies, thought reading and remote broadcasting as currently introduced are weaker versions of the technologies that allow the broadcasting virtually word for word of my thoughts to me that the government has and is using. My guess is that the government is introducing these technologies in court cases so that legal precedents can be established to be used to support the introduction of thought reading in criminal investigations and trials. The technologies are probably not exactly like the powerful ones used on me, so that even if these current ventures into the legal system fail, the government can ignore the courts and try a different approach to the problems of legalizing thought reading. As it is, they are ignoring the Kyllo ruling in Oregon , when the judge ruled that new, even yet undisclosed more invasive technologies must at least be treated by the strict guidelines placed on less invasive technologies in regards to warrants, and the like.  

George W. Bush made a big show of having Attorney General John Ashcroft take charge of the private investigation into the actions of the F.B.I. This was in response to our Senate making mumblings about investigating the F.B.I. themselves. The reason that the government gave was because of the attack on American on Sept. 11th. The real reason is that this secret thought reading technology is known by many members of the government has been for years. The F.B.I., under the Clinton Administration, used 'domestic' terrorism as a reason of excuse for their abuse of power. The reason some people like me where chosen to be pure victims, unused in any crime prosecution, was in case the thought reading technology's use by the F.B.I. or Justice Department was exposed. They didn't want to bring into contention any convictions that were won by Feds during it's use. They wanted a fail safe, "Yes, we committed an unreasonable crime" defense to hold off any great review of Federal Court Cases (a political sacrificial lamb).  

President Clinton and Attorney General Janet Reno wanted this secret technology (thought reading) to be made acceptable legally in the United States , but knew that they first had to set up a propaganda machine to try to over-ride the expected negative reaction from the public. Because they ultimately wanted to use it in law enforcement, they gave this technology for use in the United States to the F.B.I. Because they expected a backlash from the citizens, they kept this technology mostly secret.  

The Clinton Administration and Reno also wanted to neutralize any small group that could attract a bigger middle class following if the middle class decided to organize against the use of thought reading technology by law enforcement in America . That is when militia groups and splinter religious cults were satanized. Ruby Ridge and the Branch Davidians were deliberately targeted by the Justice Department and their downfall was deliberately made into a media event, rather than by handling the situation in any less dramatic way. The government wanted Mom and Pop middle class to see the destruction wrought by fighting authority. Plus, they added to the repulsiveness or picked the Branch Davidians to highlight admists allegations of child sexual abuse. Something that was sure to turn off the American public, and accentuate that anyone that goes against the status quo will die a violent death and is associated with predatorial sexual perversion. The movie "Terms of Engagement" suggests that verbal broadcasting of an abusive nature was used by the government during it's siege of the compound. This is similar to the verbal abuse that I have endured since 1994 (previous to the Branch Davidians confrontation). Keep in mind that there was active thought reading being done by at least the same organization (F.B.I.) that controlled the raid. Couldn't thought read technology have informed the Federal Agents involved of where the children where, when it might be the best time to attack without threatening the lives of the young? Or even, what negotiation technique might have kept the violence from happening? But at that time, Janet Reno wanted a showcase. Not only the media and civilian propaganda of what happens to individuals who would join any organized group against the government, but also of the complete power and control of the F.B.I. And that, no matter how broadcast the event was, people were puppets who would not speak up.  

Plus, Oklahoma Federal Building bombing: there was a fairly large spread rumor via the Internet that Timothy McVeigh stated that he had had a chip implanted so that the government could know what he was up to. Was anyone speaking out about being thought read to be put under the suspicion of being possibly violent? It could have been used after the fact as a dividing factor. Plus, the Oklahoma Federal Building was bombed long after I became victimized by thought reading ability. It was on 60 minutes that a woman informant told F.B.I. officers prior to the event that something big was happening at the extremist group that Timothy McVeigh was visiting. And nothing was done. While repeatedly going before the Senate to justify their non-disclosure of their technology and their use of it based on their testified knowledge of threats to America by domestic terrorists, the F.B.I. was furthering proof of these threats by politicizing their investigations to encourage the appearance that domestic terrorism was a real threat. Even to the point that a brother agency, Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms issued a daring public statement that the F.B.I. deliberately delayed the findings from the in flight explosion of a TWA jetliner on the East Coast to advance the belief that domestic terrorism was a real threat; even though the F.B.I. had themselves concluded that the accident was caused by a gas explosion in the cargo bay.  

At the same time, Janet Reno and the Clinton Administration had spread to privileged circles that this technology existed and was in use. Though the general American population still isn't aware of this technology, some in powerful positions who were in the know were disagreeing with the secret use of this technology, it's unconstitutionality, and the fear of personal reprisal politically if the secret use of this technology was exposed. Plus, there was a gut fear reaction to the extreme measures that Clinton and Reno were purposing be used to force Americans to live with their thoughts being read. Just as splinter groups (such as militias) where expected to get more members, there was expected to be a movement toward the underground for some Americans who wished to protest. A gray area, where last names where not known in order to protect third party information from being privy to the listening ears of the government. Janet Reno went on national television to propose DNA sampling at the time of arrest. This was to be stored in a huge, national DNA databank so that any individual that the government wanted to know the identity of could be ascertained upon detention. Most adults realize that it is not difficult to be charged with a minor offense, one that is customarily dismissed before trial. It is hardly ever challenged when the DA drops charges due to lack of evidence. But, if DNA samples where taken and stored upon search (i.e. arrest, regardless of innocence), they could be matched up anytime in the future to identify anyone the government had become interested in via thought reading and wanted to identify.  

At the same time, it was being proposed by Reno and the Justice Department that professional military troops be used to guard our borders. Senator John McCain took the time and trouble to officially respond in writing to Ms. Reno to state his opposition to her proposal. It was posted on his official web site. He stated a fear of the confusion in roles is the military was used to target civilians. Reno was proposing this military law action as a dry run to show that, if necessary, martial law was workable against the American civilian population in order to force U.S. citizens to accept her radical proposal that thought reading was constitutional. When the Generals comprising the Joint Chiefs of Staff of our armed forces addressed the Senate (I saw it on C-Span) and pointedly stated that they could not win a war on two fronts they were not talking about the U.S. fighting two different countries, but fighting any other foreign entity and fighting the governments proposed civil war against it's population. It was an extraordinarily public gesture by men more accustomed to remaining distant from the politics of the day, but necessary to these elder warriors when faced with the private agenda of the last administration.  

Opposition was growing and a lot of the communication done by Janet Reno was done publicly, via T.V. and written statements. Obviously, the number of people who knew about this technology had grown and the opposing sides were not in private communication with each other. The Clinton Administration and Attorney General Janet Reno thought that the best way to ensure that their plan would work was to make the technology so commonly in use that it would be impossible to point a finger at a select group of law enforcement for using thought reading technology. When the F.B.I. had supplied personal files on leading Republican Senators to the Clinton White House, it was telling opposing politicians, hey, not only are legally obtained intelligence information on you available to your political enemies, but imagine how damning having every deed you've ever committed that only you know about, made public. With thought reading technology, and the techniques that have been practiced on me, of leading a person to personal recollections of their past, it is impossible to keep anything private from the listeners. (Unless it is something that you've forgotten yourself).  

Reno wanted to make this technology familiar to local and State police. In the name of helping with federal investigations into State Hate Crime prosecutions, Reno told the State Attorney Generals that at their request, F.B.I. investigators were available to help with these crimes. Many agreed and felt flattered that an elite group of agents from the F.B.I. would assist them. In this way, the number of individuals who knew about thought reading technology grew.  

After the failure of Clinton to win re-election, the job fell to President George W. Bush, who has continued the use of these technologies on American citizens like myself. One questions why torture was required to interrogate suspected terrorists when the government has had thought reading for the decade prior. There is a great threat imposed by these individuals who intimidate the normal entities that safe guard our constitution by checks and balances in power between the Courts, the legislature and the executive branch of the government.  

Bush’s first tactic was to stall. He delayed the announcement of his Attorney General for months, and longer for the Director of the F.B.I. (Mueller). While Congress was insisting on Committee hearings regarding the F.B.I., John Ashcroft assured the Senate that the Justice Department would handle it's own review. Ashcroft named six entities that would conduct this review. The only outside of the Justice Department entity named was the firm of Author Anderson, since infamously associated with the Enron scandal. Remember the delay in Timothy McVeigh's execution (one of the first acts by Ashcroft in office)? The painstaking report gathering of thousands of government files on McVeigh was to guarantee that even if thought reading technology during the McVeigh crime and trial became public, there would not be much room for questioning that any information was gathered and used to help convict McVeigh that was not disclosed during his trial to his attorney. Thought reading technology, as used to date, is an illegal and unwarrantable search that could overturn a conviction.  

After the September 11 attacks, the huge internal controversy between President Bush and Colin Powell regarding the status of the detained Al-Queda members at our base in Cuba regarded whether these individuals would be treated as Prisoners of War. The Geneva Convention inherently outlaws thought reading technology. If these people were given Prisoner of War status that could not be thought read for information. Powell wanted to be able to assure the international community at some future date, that thought reading technology was not used. He wants to guarantee that it won't be used against American solders in future conflicts. Hence, though not given Prisoner of War status, it was decided and announced that they would be treated equal to the privileges of the Geneva Convention.  

At home, after the attacks on the World Trade Towers on September 11, 2001, no one would justify the use of illegal secret technology to protect Americans from terrorist attack. It had happened anyway. The Senate was chafing at the bit to again open an investigation concerning the F.B.I. Bush held a top secret meeting with the Senate. It was so secure, that Senators could not remove paperwork or notes from the meeting. The next day, Bush announced the plan to fund and man the Homeland Security Task Force. The administration feels that when it is exposed that the F.B.I. has used this technology, and in the criminal way that they have used it, our foreign enemies will see any serious investigation into the F.B.I. as an opportunity to attack because to them we will appear weaker.  

Despite all of Bush's speeches after the Sept. 11th attacks, evoking the American spirit and our commitment to freedom, I have continued to be thought read, dream manipulated, tortured and verbally abused by F.B.I. agents who have basically done the same thing to me for almost a decade. They have spent more man-years on my abuse then they stated that they spent on the Oklahoma Federal Building bombing. I have been under thought read surveillance 7 days a week for over eight and one half years.

The American people have to know on what issues they should hold their elected representatives accountable. With secret thought reading technology, we are vulnerable to any whim of our current or future leadership. The people we entrust with power appear to be basically holding themselves hostage in a stand off. The F.B.I. agents are relying on pointing a finger at their leadership, who can point a finger at the Executive Branch, if prosecuted for their continuing crimes. Any order to these agents to stop their crimes holds with it an acknowledgement that crimes where taking place. Any elected or hired federal officer or politician, including the President, is impeachable if they do not disclose illegal activity, especially activities paid for under their command.

Just as the equipment used to broadcast to me has become available to the public (Newsweek, Aug. 5th, 2002 “Hearing is Believing”), the government will soon introduce thought reading technology and propose that using thought reading technology is a limitable, specific, warrantable search tool. Seven years ago they practiced a technique on me where they had people who looked like people I knew placed near me, or had people say things by me that triggered memories of my past. They will propose that under such directed stimuli, it can be reasonably assumed that the search of a person’s thoughts at that time will yield specific information and is warrantable. Miranda rights are required because the Supreme Court reasoned that during arrest, the display of authority by police versus the vulnerability of the suspect creates an environment likely to compel a suspect to violate their own civil rights prior to counsel.  

To create a state of mind in a person during an investigation is a display of force unjustified under the presumption of innocence that inv9oluntarily compels subservience to law enforcement authority without reasonable cause or due process. And thoughts, unlike hard evidence discovered in a normal search, are incapable of being scrutinized past their event, for example by defense counsel, judge or jury. Paths of thought reflect inscrutable subconscious stimuli and thoughts are not the same as intent or action. They are an involuntary reflex which we have no control over, unlike our actions.
 
"The sanctity of the privacy of one's own thoughts to use as counsel to oneself" - that's my saying. Or to quote a Supreme Court Justice "The right to be left alone".