A December deadline for Iran to “unclench its fist” has now been moved forward to September.
They always have a reason for not giving away anything. They bluster eternally about being fair, but they seldom do things out of compassion. Netanyahu does not intend to return lands stolen from the Palestinians. Here is his justification:
The connection of the Jewish people to the land has been in existence for more than 3,500 years. Judea and Samaria, the places where our forefathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob walked, our forefathers David, Solomon, Isaiah and Jeremiah – this is not a foreign land, this is the land of our forefathers.
What about the Palestinians? Netanyahu addressed that when he spoke to students at Bar Ilan University: “Israel should have exploited the repression of the demonstrations in China, when world attention focused on that country, to carry out mass expulsions among the Arabs of the territories.”
They have demanded much from the world because they suffered a holocaust over a half century ago. However, the world has paid dearly for Nazi crimes. Netanyahu would have the world pay more.
He says: “The right to establish our sovereign state here, in the ‘Land of Israel’, arises from one simple fact: Eretz Israel is the birthplace of the Jewish People.”
The talk of restraining settlement activity is nothing more than a ruse, a bargaining chip for Netanyahu’s real goal – eliminate any possibility of Iran developing nuclear power in what Israelis like to call an “existential threat”.
On 27 August, Peter Beaumont, writing in the Guardian, said: “…Netanyahu has always wanted: a link between Iran’s nuclear programme and a very partial freeze on settlement building, offered in exchange for opening up an even more partial track of a peace process whose focus would be on the West Bank.”
Of course, any settlement “freeze” will be like those in the past, ignoring their illegality and continuing their development when the West isn’t looking. Netanyahu would never give up Jerusalem.
The problem with the ruse? As Beaumont observes, it makes “Israeli-Palestinian peace talks contingent on progress in an unrelated and equally difficult issue. In that respect, it is nothing less than a grand act of displacement that makes the prospect of a final settlement more distant still rather than hauling it closer.”
Israel’s Zionist front men own the media, they own the Congress and the US administration, and they own major European leaders. The Zionist leaders will have greater difficulty owning Iran or the Palestinians.
One of the problems with Israel seems to be that they can never do something because it’s the right thing to do. They usually have to bargain for something in exchange. –Here’s the way Netanyahu put it: “The continuation of unilateral withdrawal without receiving anything must stop. In business, there are no free lunches, and this also is true with politics. There can be no free withdrawals.”
