Home     The Writers     Search     Submissions     Contact Us     Gorilla Radio     Atlantic Free Press     Empire Burlesque  
  You are here: 

Sun

30

Nov

2008

Arresting Vancouver's "Contractor Cop" Creep
Written by Press Release   
Sunday, 30 November 2008 18:00
smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Pivot calls for private security ban
by PIVOT
V
ancouver - Pivot is calling for a ban on private security patrols in public space, and is asking the City of Vancouver to revoke public funding to Business Improvement Associations to pay for private security guards.
 
The organization is calling for the $1.8 million spent annually by BIAs on private security to be redirected instead into outreach and support services for homeless people.
 
Pivot's new report "Security before Justice" finds that the poorer you are, the more likely you are to be interrogated, harassed or experience violence at the hands of private security guards. The study, based on surveys and focus groups with over 160 residents of the Downtown Eastside, revealed that homeless people have more frequent and more problematic interactions with security guards than people who are housed.
 
 
 
People on income assistance or disability are also much more likely to be targeted by private security.
 
"This is a clear case of discrimination against the homeless and people who appear to be poor," says Laura Track, a lawyer with Pivot Legal Society. "Business Improvement Associations are hiring these guards to manage public streets and sidewalks as though they were private property. It amounts to a violation of people's right to make equal use of public space."
 
Downtown Eastside resident Gladys Radek agrees: "They say that private security guards are here to help, but in my case they just decided that looking poor made me suspicious and as a result I was subjected to harassment."
 
The authors of the study are calling on the City of Vancouver to cancel funding for the Downtown Ambassador program, ban private security patrols on public property, and re-direct the approximately $1.8 million of tax dollars currently spent on private security into genuine homeless outreach services. Public funding for private security amounts to nearly $100 a month per homeless person, money that could be directed to rent supplements that help people secure affordable housing.
 
"I would like to see my business's tax dollars spent on a more proactive and helpful solution to homelessness than private police" says Swami Lalitananda, owner of Radha Yoga and Eatery on Main Street.  "In a truly 'civil city', public money would be spent to support people to improve their lives, not to move them out of business areas."


Click here to see photographs taken this morning (November 27) at 4am, of Downtown Ambassadors forcing a sleeping homeless person to move from a storefront at the corner of Seymour and Helmken in Downtown Vancouver.


Click here to link to full report Security Before Justice
Pivot's mandate is to take a strategic approach to social change, using the law to address the root causes that undermine the quality of life of those most on the margins. We believe that everyone, regardless of income, benefits from a healthy and inclusive community where values such as opportunity, respect and equality are strongly rooted in the law.



For Immediate Release, November 27, 2008


Our mailing address is:


Pivot
678 Hastings Street East
Vancouver, BC V6A 1R1


Our telephone:
604-255-9700
 
Quote this article on your site

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.




Preview :


Powered by QuoteThis © 2008
Comments (1)Add Comment
Agreed - Help Rather than Security, but do you want a homeless person sleeping on your doorstep?
written by Joe "TheHairFarmer.com, November 30, 2008
I agree with most of what you wrote - help rather than security (I'm sure you realize this is an effort to clean up the Eastside for the Olympics). But in the photo of the homeless person getting kicked out of a doorway, it doesn't matter to me who is doing it, private security or the police. A business's doorway is not public property and I would not anyone sleeping (or relieving themselves)in the doorway to my office, shop or my home - would you?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smaller | bigger

busy
 
Top