Federal Ethics Comm. Stifles Review of Mulroney-Schreiber Situation
by Democracy Watch
Federal Ethics Commissioner files motion to try to stop court review of her ruling that Prime Minister and his cabinet are not in a conflict of interest over Mulroney-Schreiber situation, but rules Liberal MP is in a conflict of interest.
The motion is an attempt to stop a review by the Court of her ruling issued on January 7, 2008 which concluded that, even when the Prime Minister's and his Cabinet ministers' own actions and the actions of their close associate Brian Mulroney are in question, they are not covered by the Conflict of Interest Act and it is fine for them to:
- choose whether an inquiry into the Mulroney-Schreiber situation will take place;
- to set the scope of the inquiry;
- choose the inquiry commissioner(s) who will judge them and Mr. Mulroney, and;
- to control the legal proceedings against Karlheinz Schreiber even though he made allegations about them.
OTTAWA - Today, Democracy Watch released its response to federal
Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson's motion which
she filed in the Federal Court of Appeal in April.
Last week, Ethics Commissioner Dawson ruled that Liberal MP
Robert Thibault is in a conflict of interest over the
Mulroney-Schreiber situation because Mr. Mulroney had filed a lawsuit
against him demanding Mr. Thibault pay more than $2 million for making
libellous comments on TV about Mr. Mulroney.
This is a legally correct
ruling based on the rules in the Conflict of Interest Code for Members
of the House of Commons (which came into force in October 2004) that
say you can't take part in discussions or decisions on matters that
affect your private financial interests.
The ruling is a welcome change
from the past ridiculous rulings of former Ethics Counsellor Howard
Wilson and former Ethics Commissioner Bernard Shapiro, who almost
always did everything they could to ignore ethics rules and let people
off the hook even when they had clearly violated ethics rules.
Commissioner
Dawson's ruling on Liberal MP Thibault highlights just how legally
incorrect her ruling on Prime Minister Harper and his Cabinet ministers
is. Extraordinarily, Commissioner Dawson's motion claims that she did
not even make a ruling concerning the Prime Minister and his Cabinet
ministers, even though she sent the ruling in writing to Democracy
Watch in response to the complaint it filed with her on November 26,
2007, and the ruling sets out 12 decisions that lead to Commissioner
Dawson's overall conclusion that it was not within her jurisdiction to
even investigate the Prime Minister and his Cabinet ministers, let
alone find them in a conflict of interest with regard to the Mulroney
Schreiber situation.
- "It is unethical for the federal Ethics
Commissioner to uphold or ignore ethics rules depending on whom the
Commissioner's ruling affects, and very unfortunately this is what
seems to have happened with the Commissioner's rulings that Liberal MP
Thibault is in a conflict of interest concerning the Mulroney-Schreiber
situation but Prime Minister Harper and his Cabinet ministers are not,"
said Duff Conacher, Coordinator of Democracy Watch. "Democracy Watch
hopes the Federal Court of Appeal will reject the Ethics Commissioner's
ruling and make it clear that federal politicians and government
officials cannot discuss or make decisions about matters in which they,
their relatives or friends have an interest."
Even Prime
Minister Stephen Harper has acknowledged, and stated publicly, that he
and all members of his government are in a conflict of interest
concerning the Brian Mulroney-Karlheinz Schreiber situation, given that
Mr. Mulroney acted until very recently as an adviser to the Prime
Minister, Mr. Schreiber sent documents to the Prime Minister and named
him in a court affidavit, and the government was involved in legal
proceedings to extradite Mr. Schreiber to Germany.
However, despite
recognizing their own conflict of interest, Mr. Harper and his Cabinet
continue to take part in and make decisions about the situation.
Ethics
Commissioner Mary Dawson's ruling ignored clear measures in the
Conflict of Interest Act, well-established legal standards, and the
public interest, in reaching the following legally incorrect
conclusions, thereby letting Prime Minister Harper and his Cabinet
ministers and Cabinet staff off the hook:
TO SEE the list of decisions, and links to other key documents, go to:
http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/RelsMay2108.html
It
should be noted that Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson was appointed
Associate Deputy Minister of Justice by then-Prime Minister Mulroney in
1988, and was selected by Prime Minister Harper and his Cabinet to be
the Ethics Commissioner in spring 2007.
Democracy Watch is being
represented on a pro-bono basis in the case by Yavar Hameed of the
Ottawa law firm Hameed Farrokhzad St-Pierre. The Federal Court of
Appeal case file number is A-174-08. The Ethics Commissioner's motion
is expected to be ruled upon by the end of May.
- 30 -
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
NEWS RELEASE
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Duff Conacher, Coordinator of Democracy Watch
Tel: (613) 241-5179
See this news release with links to all key documents at:
http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/RelsMay2108.html
Democracy Watch
P.O. Box 821, Stn. B
Ottawa, Canada
K1P 5P9
Tel: (613) 241-5179
Fax: (613) 241-4758
Email: dwatch@web.net
Internet: http://www.dwatch.ca
Democracy Watch: Since
1993, cleaning up and making governments and corporations more
responsible and accountable to you, and making Canada the world's
leading democracy -- please donate now at:
http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/support.html
|