On Terrorism: Retail and Wholesale
by Ed Kinane
We keep hearing certain words — “democracy†is one, “terrorism†is another — that are seldom defined. The pretense is that we all know what these words mean. Yet that’s hardly the case.
Here’s how the U.S. State Department defines terrorism: the use of violence or the threat of violence to harm or intimidate civilians for political purposes.
Given all the commentary out there about terrorism, you’d think
this pithy definition might often be invoked. It seldom is. Why?
Because applying that definition evenhandedly — to assess each violent
episode or campaign, regardless of who perpetrates it — would
boomerang. It would expose terrorists who usually aren’t thought of as
terrorists.
Retail terrorism — like abduction or suicide bombing
— is a tactic of the hardware have-nots. It gets all the attention.
Wholesale terrorism — invasion and aerial warfare, for example — is the
strategy of the haves. It has a bigger budget and cuts a huger swathe.
By some magic consensus wholesale terrorism never, never gets called
terrorism.
Now, the State Department definition is pretty good.
But it needs to make clear that terrorists use all levels of
technology. A box cutter can perpetrate terrorism; so can a “smartâ€
bomb. Just because it’s high tech doesn’t mean it isn’t terrorism.
Terrorism
need not target civilians directly. Often it targets the infrastructure
that sustains human life – hospitals, electrical grids, water
purification and sewage systems, etc.
In the U.S. we assume only
the other guys use terrorism — never our side. Judging by our media and
our politicians, terrorists are only those who oppose powerful military
machines. Even if those terrorists are defending their land.
With
the fall of the Soviet Union, our military industrial complex no longer
has its bogeyman. These days instead of the Red Menace, Swarthy
Terrorists are the enemy.
For U.S. people 9/11 was the
watershed, the iconic, terrorist event. This serves the
neo-conservative world-dominating agenda. 9/11 was the neo-cons’
answered prayer, their Pearl Harbor and Gulf of Tonkin.
A
frightened public is so much easier to mobilize for a bellicose,
expansionistic foreign policy. Such policy — and the lies promoting it
— led the U.S. into the Iraq quagmire and back into the civilian
massacring business.
In a further victory for the neo-con
agenda, the so-called war on terror erodes civil liberties here at
home. Further, it erodes our quality of life. The war on terror diverts
resources from health, education and other human needs to the military.
Military
adventurism makes us less safe. It generates even more fear. In a
self-perpetuating cycle, war spawns further terrorism: reactive
terrorism. So does military occupation, whether in Afghanistan, Iraq or
Palestine.
In the past century most war dead were civilians.
They were victims of terrorism — not in the mainstream media sense, but
in the U.S. State Department sense.
Tens of millions of
civilians have been killed by bullets, shells, missiles, cluster bombs
and, in Iraq, many are also being killed by toxic and radioactive
depleted uranium.
Depleted uranium is just one of kind of
nuclear weapon. As the world learned at Hiroshima, Nukes don’t
distinguish civilian from military. Nuclear blackmail has been with us
for over 60 years.
Some nations stockpile nuclear weapons.
(Remember, the threat of violence is also terrorism.) These devices are
delivered by artillery or aircraft which few “terrorists†have access
to. One might say aerial warfare by its very nature is terrorist.
Militarism,
of course, yields enormous corporate profits. These days war
profiteering is rife. Some of these profits finance the purchase of TV
networks and other corporate sources of news. For example, the war and
nuclear contractor, General Electric, owns NBC. Might that (little
publicized) fact affect how NBC News reports on terror?
In our
democracy another slice of the profits goes to finance the election
campaigns of the candidates who favor warlike rather than diplomatic
solutions to international issues.
Although NBC News et al. are
too discrete to mention it, a leading presidential candidate, a former
Viet Nam bomber pilot, was a wholesale terrorist.
What does that say about our rulers? What does that say about us?
Ed
Kinane worked in Iraq with Voices in the Wilderness before, during and
after “Shock and Awe.†Reach him at: edkinane@verizon.net
|