This Can't Be Happening
Sites of Interest
William Blum/Killing Hope
The Distant Ocean
Welcome to the Sideshow
Mark Crispin Miller
Crooks and Liars
Black Agenda Report
The Raw Story
Iraq Vets Against the War
Blues and Dreams
Bright Terrible Spirit
Americans For Truth President Peter LaBarbera today called on the
National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) to rescind its â€œsexual
orientationâ€ policy as inconsistent with the GOPâ€™s professed pro-family
values, and said pro-â€œgayâ€ Political Correctness contributed to Sen.
George Allenâ€™s narrow loss for re-election in Virginia.
LaBarbera also called on all homosexual staff in both major parties to be open about their lifestyle in the interest of full disclosure to the public and each Memberâ€™s constituents. â€¦
â€œIn recent weeks, homosexual activists have sought to â€˜outâ€™ various high-level GOP staffers and leaders as homosexuals, to highlight their hypocrisy in working for a socially conservative party,â€ LaBarbera said. â€œNow we in the pro-family movement are calling for full disclosure for a different reason: because homosexual GOP staff and pro-â€˜gayâ€™ policies in the party are undermining the wholesome values Republicans say they support.â€ â€¦
Why isnâ€™t Mr. LaBarbera calling on all heterosexual â€œstaff in both major parties to be open about their lifestyle in the interest of full disclosure to the public and each Memberâ€™s constituentsâ€? Using his voyeuristic â€œreasoning,â€ wouldnâ€™t full disclosure about heterosexual staffersâ€™ perhaps promiscuous lifestyle, the reasons for their divorces, or their extra-marital affairs be just as â€œimportantâ€ for the public and membersâ€™ constituents to know?
Clearly, LaBarbera wants nothing more than to single out gay Americans so that they and their families can be targeted for discrimination. After all, fostering hate and promoting discrimination against gays and their families are the modi operandi of the perversely misnamed â€œpro-family movement.â€ LaBarbera made that very clear when he went on to damn Sen. Allen for signing a â€œâ€˜nondiscriminationâ€™ pledge for his Senate office.â€
Mr. LaBarbera finds a nondiscrimination pledge offensive. And this man has the nerve to claim he advocates â€œwholesome valuesâ€? LaBarbera would do well to reread Rep. Frankâ€™s statement of the â€œgay agendaâ€ as well as Dr. Martin Luther Kingâ€™s â€œI Have a Dreamâ€ speech.
â€œAmericans for Truthâ€ is anything but that. AFTâ€™s desire to discriminate against some American citizens is by definition â€œun-Americanâ€ and contrary to the ideals of civil equality and equal civil rights. AFTâ€™s version of â€œtruthâ€ rests squarely on a selective twisting of religious dogma and equally twisted selective Bible reading. The same tactics used by other groups in the Christian Right.
Under the heading â€œThe Bible, Churches, & Homosexuality,â€ AFT features an excerpt from an article by Albert Mohler, Jr., the president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and the host of a nationwide radio show that describes itself as â€œdevoted to engaging contemporary culture with the biblical truth.â€ Mohler is also a member of the board of James Dobsonâ€™s Focus on the Family and a member of the governing body of the Council for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood.
The AFT excerpt from Dr. Mohlerâ€™s article features bold, blaring (in purple, of course) highlights:
More than anything else, Sullivanâ€™s [October 2005] article should awaken thinking Christians to the fact that homosexuality is being normalized in the larger culture. This surely represents a matter of urgent missiological concern, for the normalization of sin represents a progressive hardening of the nationâ€™s heart against the Gospel. [link added]
At last check, the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John had absolutely nothing to say about homosexuality. Nor did Jesus have anything to say on the subject.
Dr. Mohler used â€œgospelâ€ to mean the man-made dogma that the institution of Christianity evolved as a means of social and political control, which is exactly how AFT uses dogma and selective reading of a book â€“ the Bible â€“ that was cobbled together over centuries by men picking and choosing from among myriad â€œsacred textsâ€ in order to create a religion that would justify their damning some and denying civil equality to those who didnâ€™t fit their agenda. You knowâ€¦ â€œthose people.â€
Bleating the same message as LaBarbera is master homophobe Louis P. Sheldon, founder and chairman of the Traditional Values Coalition. One of â€œLucky Louieâ€™sâ€ latest rants was against what he called the â€œpro-homosexual, anti-Christian Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)â€ that may receive renewed attention in the new Congress. Sheldon and the TVC vehemently oppose the bill because it would bar discrimination against gay Americans in the workplace. How is this type of civil equality â€œanti-Christianâ€?
Sheldonâ€™s concern is that ENDA would prevent â€œChristiansâ€ from basing hiring, firing and other business decisions and practices on their â€œreligious beliefs.â€ As noted earlier, the gospels â€“ and Jesus â€“ had absolutely nothing to say about homosexuals. They did, however, have something to say about divorce (Matthew 19:6). And St. Paul in First Timothy did direct Christians to â€œsuffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.â€
If, as he says, Sheldon believes â€œeach word, each sentence [in the Bible] â€“ is the Word of God,â€ why isnâ€™t he calling on â€œChristianâ€ businesses to fire, refuse to hire or do business with divorcees? Why isnâ€™t he calling on â€œChristianâ€ businesses to keep women â€œin their place,â€ as St. Paul dictated?
Or is this just another example of how Sheldon, LaBarbera, and the other leaders of supposedly â€œChristianâ€ groups twist dogma and use selective Bible reading to justify their desire to discriminate against some American citizens?
The hypocrisy of the leaders of the Christian Right was blatantly exposed in an interview Sheldon gave that was the centerpiece of a November 10, 2006 article by Larry Cohler-Esses, editor at large of The Jewish Week: â€œSheldon disclosed that he and â€˜a lotâ€™ of others [the leaders the Christian Right] knew about [Rev.Ted] Haggardâ€™s homosexuality â€˜for awhile ... but we werenâ€™t sure just how to deal with itâ€™â€ [italics and link added].
So they just covered it up.
What does that say about these leaders? What does that say about their ethics, their morals, and their holier-than-thou posturing? It certainly speaks volumes about their very secular sociopolitical agenda.
And what of the Republican party that had used and been used by these leaders of the Christian Right? Even after the â€œthumpingâ€ they took in this yearâ€™s elections, they too are still intent on fostering discrimination against gay and lesbian Americans:
Mel Martinez, a notoriously antigay U.S. senator from Florida who previously served in President Bushâ€™s cabinet, will assume the high-profile post of Republican National Committee general chairman, GOP officials said Monday [November 13].
â€œSenator Martinez was elected in 2004 by taking page 1 out of Karl Roveâ€™s gay-baiting playbook,â€ said Joe Solmonese, president of the gay rights group Human Rights Campaign. â€œHis campaign was one of the most antigay, bigoted, and divisive campaigns in the nationâ€™s history. We are deeply troubled that this kind of senator has been chosen to lead the Republican Party.â€
Martinez and the rest of the conservative GOPers would do well to read Michael Mooreâ€™s November 14, 2006 letter, â€œA Liberalâ€™s Pledge to Disheartened Conservatives.â€
Sheldon and LaBarbera â€“ along with other flamboyantly antigay leaders of the politicized Christian Right, such as James Dobson and Don Wildmon â€“ would do well to read a November 16, 2006 New York Times OpEd by David Kuo, former deputy director of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives and author of Tempting Faith: An Inside Story of Political Seduction:
John W. Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute, the conservative Christian organization that gained notoriety during the 1990s when it represented Paula Jones in her sexual harassment suit against Bill Clinton, wrote this after the elections: â€œModern Christianity, having lost sight of Christâ€™s teachings, has been co-opted by legalism, materialism and politics. Simply put, it has lost its spirituality.â€
He went on, â€œWhereas Christianity was once synonymous with charity, compassion and love for oneâ€™s neighbor, today it is more often equated with partisan politics, anti-homosexual rhetoric and affluent mega-churches.â€
Mr. Whitehead is hardly alone. Just before the elections, Gordon MacDonald, an evangelical leader, wrote that he was concerned that some evangelical personalities had been seduced and used by the White House. He worried that the movement might â€œfragment because it is more identified by a political agenda that seems to be failing and less identified by a commitment to Jesus and his kingdom.â€ â€¦
C. S. Lewis once warned that any Christian who uses his faith as a means to a political end would corrupt both his faith and the faith writ large. A lot of Christians are reading C. S. Lewis these days. [italics added]
Mr. Kuo cited a post-election survey of evangelicals conducted by Beliefnet and summarized in their article â€œEvangelicals Sour on Politics: A new Beliefnet survey reveals why many born-again Christians have cooled on Republicans and political fray.â€ The survey showed that â€œ40.2 percent of the evangelicals surveyed favored the idea of Christians taking a â€˜fastâ€™ from politics,â€ especially the divisive, hate-mongering politics exemplified by Sheldonâ€™s Traditional Values Coalition and LaBarberaâ€™s Americans for Truth. As Mr. Kuo noted, â€œBeliefnetâ€™s poll showed that nearly 60 percent of non-evangelicals have a more negative view of Jesus because of Christian political involvement.â€
Homophobia and the blatant desire to hurt others have blinded some evangelical â€œChristianâ€ leaders to the message of the faith they say they represent. Thatâ€™s not surprising. Bigotry is always blind and blinding.
The ongoing attempts to disenfranchise gay and lesbian Americans and their families by those who claim to be â€œChristian pro-familyâ€ advocates defiles not only Americaâ€™s promise of equality for all and the essence of true spirituality, but underscores how some sick souls continue to use â€œreligionâ€ to foster hate.
As Ermalou Roller, ordained minister and dean of the cabinet of the Northern Illinois Conference of the United Methodist Church, so accurately stated in her November 12, 2006 Washington Post article â€œHurting Gays, and Ourselves,â€
Today too many people are hurting and too much damage is being done to continue to wait for any church to step up and admit it is wrong about its condemnation of the â€œpracticeâ€ of homosexuality. Itâ€™s time we did our own critical thinking and rejected outdated â€¦ theology. For, ironically, the anguish of our rejection of gays and lesbians, as horrible as it is for them, affects us all. â€¦
I would urge us all to seek actively to inform ourselves and change our attitudes about gays and lesbians. For only in this way will we begin to address the real problems that our condemnation has visited upon them, upon those who love them and, indeed, upon us all.