by
Chris Floyd
Michael Massing has written a
very important story about a very important truth: the main reason that the American people are so deeply uninformed about the reality of the war of aggression being waged in their names in Iraq is that they do not want to know.
Massing shows that the rigorous self-censorship practiced by the American people and the media is actually worse than the machinations of Big Brother in Orwell's 1984; at least in that fictional world, the draconian repression of reality was imposed by force at the hands of an all-powerful state – but today we are doing it to ourselves.
Not that the Bush Regime isn't giving Big Brotherism the old
college try, but as Massing points out, there are too many venues and
formats of information dissemination for the state to control it all,
especially in the United States, where many vestiges of freedom remain.
Yet one of the most
disheartening aspects of American society today is how very little use
the people make of those freedoms they still have.
Indeed,
Massing's observations on Americans' self-censorship – the surrender of
the awareness of reality in exchange for self-regarding fantasy – have
implications far beyond war reportage. In our time, we are witnessing a
society voluntarily surrendering its liberties, its rights – its
gumption – to a harsh and malevolent authority.
We
are witnessing a society surrendering its pride and its moral core to
torturers and thieves, liars and killers. And it is a willing
surrender, as if vast swathes of the American people are relieved that
they can finally lay down the burdens and responsibilities of freedom.
What can you say about a society whose leaders – including the leaders of the so-called opposition – are
about to approve the appointment of an
enabler of tyranny and an apologist for torture
as the chief law enforcement officer of the nation? (And this is only
the latest of a series of such outrages, going back years.) You can
only say: This is a country that has lost its soul, lost its nerve and
– literally – lost its mind. It's like watching a loved one being
destroyed by a brain-eating disease.
But the Iraq War is where
this surrender of moral consciousness reverberates most sharply, and
most murderously. Massing's story draws heavily on the published
accounts of soldiers in the field – those who know the reality in all
its depths, and who have been maddened by their fellow Americans'
refusal to grasp it. Massing writes:
How can such a critical feature of the U.S. occupation remain so hidden from view? Because most Americans don't want to know about it.
The books by Iraqi vets are filled with expressions of
disbelief and rage at the lack of interest ordinary Americans show for
what they've had to endure on the battlefield. In "Operation
Homecoming," one returning Marine, who takes to drinking heavily in an
effort to cope with the crushing guilt and revulsion he feels over how
many people he's seen killed, fumes about how "you can't talk to them
[ordinary Americans] about the horror of a dead child's lifeless
mutilated body staring back at you from the void, knowing you took part
in that end."
Writing of her return home, Kayla Williams notes that the
things most people seemed interested in were "beyond my comprehension.
Who cared about Jennifer Lopez? How was it that I was watching CNN one
morning and there was a story about freaking ducklings being fished out
of a damn sewer drain -- while the story of soldiers getting killed in
Iraq got relegated to this little banner across the bottom of the
screen?"
In "Generation Kill," by the journalist Evan Wright, a Marine
corporal confides his anguish and anger over all the killings he has
seen: "I think it's bullshit how these fucking civilians are dying!
They're worse off than the guys that are shooting at us. They don't
even have a chance. Do you think people at home are going to see this
-- all these women and children we're killing? Fuck no. Back home
they're glorifying this motherfucker, I guarantee you."
Yes. Back home they're glorifying the war, or else, at most, tut-tutting over how "incompetently" it has been managed -- or,
as Hillary Clinton likes to do,
berating the Iraqis for not taking advantage of the wonderful
opportunity we've given them by invading their country, killing their
families, destroying their society, robbing them blind and empowering
violent sectarians to rule over them.
This
is the full range of acceptable, "serious" discourse on Iraq: it's
either a noble crusade marching steadily toward victory or a noble if
mismanaged crusade on behalf of a bunch of ingrates who don't deserve
our benevolence.
Only a nation that has willed itself and
dulled itself into a state of extreme torpor could stomach the
hideously depraved and infantile level of America's political debate
today – a mindless howl that will reach an unbearable crescendo in the
coming months as the sinister carnival of the presidential race kicks
into high gear. And then the reality of the abomination in Iraq will
recede even further out of sight, out of mind.