Silencers are for Guns not People
by Jayne Lyn Stahl
Earlier this month, I wrote a piece called "Another Poster Child for the NRA" in response to a horrific and disturbing account of a young police officer, in a small town in Wisconsin, who apparently went insane, out of jealousy, and killed his girlfriend, and several friends. As one who has the utmost respect for law enforcement, what I found so shocking was that it was a member of the force who committed this crime.
Nelson "Family" of Silencers
It was never my intention to rant against the National Rifle Association, or law enforcement, but instead call for a closer look at a national ethos which enables, and legitimizes, the use of weapons, and deadly force in lieu of dedicated problem solving.
No sooner did my piece appear than I was besieged with hate mail,
most of which came from National Rifle Association members, some from
law enforcement, and the military, all of whom mistakenly seemed to
think that I was targeting them with my comments. To the contrary, it
is the intellectual climate, rife with fear and prejudice, one that
provides safe haven, and immunity, for paid assassins while locking up
protestors who belong to Code Pink. This newfangled militarism makes
one nostalgic for the culture of narcissism.
So, by way of
rejoinder: for openers, no one in their right mind would blame any one
person, or group, for the outrageous escalation in violence in American
society, much of it involving hand guns, in recent years. About a
decade ago, then President Bill Clinton said "Every single day there
are 13 children who die from guns." How many more children are dying
from guns today? Yet, there hasn't been any gun control legislation
since 1994, and those who defend their right to bear arms are
ostensibly unnerved by the prospect that their friends, the
hunters-in-chief, are leaving town.
Why this egregious absence
of legislation attempting to stem the proliferation of assault rifles,
hand guns, and illegal firearms in the past several years? A virile,
righteous, and omnipresent gun lobby has successfully managed to
silence their opposition, as has a vice president who, while he may not
have the best aim, is himself a devout hunter, and a foreign policy
which caters to the hunter ethos. Silencers aren't only being used for
firearms; they're now handy ways to stifle dissent, too.
Indeed,
the gun lobby has never been in better shape in Washington than it has
been under the tutelage of President George W. Bush, so not a peep has
been heard from those whose custom it is to speak out against guns, and
the rash of violence in our nation's public schools; schools like
Columbine, Virginia Tech, in our nation's inner cities, cities like
Compton, East Los Angeles, in our nation's workplaces. We've not heard
a peep from the usual suspects who would be active in speaking up for
more stringent laws to keep weapons of mass destruction out of the
hands of our youngsters.
Increasingly, in a world in which the
American flag has become synonymous with another four letter word
"duck," and yet another "bomb," this is not time to mince words. These
folks who equate what they think of as their constitutional empowerment
have, for the past several years, had a free ride, but now that a
changing of the guard is in sight, they cling to their illusions of
entitlement like a leper clings to what little skin he has left. And,
to parody the Dylan Thomas poem, it's as if every gun-toting Tom, Dick,
and Harry decided not to go "gentle into that night," but to "rage,
rage, against the dying of the might."
The gun lobby has managed
to exercise that might religiously, and faithfully, to quiet their
opposition, over the past half dozen years, because they have been the
vocal majority, but that may be about to change, and they may well lose
their leverage once the hunters, and Bible-thumpers, leave town. And,
faced with the prospect of another Clinton in the White House, and the
real prospect of yet again having to defend their right to bear arms,
those who extol the virtues of the Second Amendment while ignoring the
First and Fourth Amendments may be scared, scared of losing their
leverage, scared they may be slipping. Violent crime isn't slipping,
though.
We're experiencing what may be called a renaissance in
violent crime, and can anyone not ask how it is that a youngster in
high school can amass an arsenal in his bedroom which would rival any
one might expect to find in a bunker in Baghdad, and how it is that
moms and dads are giving Johnny his first gun for Christmas, as well as
access to the kind of cache that could decimate an entire schoolyard?
Why does it take a shooting at Columbine, or Virginia Tech to wake
people up?
No one is suggesting, for a moment, that even if guns
were to be eliminated from the face of the earth, random, and heinous
crime would disappear with them. Where there's a will to do grave
bodily harm, there's always a way.
It isn't use of a weapon, per
se, but the abuse of weapons, in general, and the lack of oversight
that requires our attention. It's not an issue with an occasional bad
apple, in law enforcement, that requires our attention, but a culture
in which intellectual lassitude is a way of life. Anyone possessing
even a modicum of reason, whether they be a member of the NRA, or the
AARP, can see there's a need for all of us to sit down and talk about
the proliferation and abuse of legal and illegal firearms, and how to
keep guns out of the hands of those who can least handle them, even if
they've been deputized to do so.
If it's true, as we hear, that
guns don't kill people; rest assured that ignorance does. Awareness,
and education, are essential steps in the direction of finding a
solution, not sweeping, under the rug, all those who dare to speak up
in violation of a code of silence that is as outmoded as it is deadly.
From
the beginning of time, the forces of darkness have somehow managed to
overpower, and silence, the forces of light. This explains the
phenomenon of extinction. And, if things continue at this rate, we,
too, will be staring down the barrel of an existential shotgun.
One can only hope that it isn't loaded.
|