Unguarded Moment: Another Brake on Tyranny Stripped Away
by Chris Floyd
CIA Director Michael Hayden has launched an investigation of the agency's Inspector General -- who, in our brave new authoritarian state, where Congress has long abandoned its oversight of a regime which brazenly disregards all legal restrictions on its arbitrary power, is one of the few remaining checks on the torture squads, rendition ops and assassination teams of the security apparat.
Yes, we have sunk so low; like the subjects of the old Soviet Union, we can only cringe before the Chekists and hope wanly that some slightly more enlightened KGB officer will restrain the goons. But as we know – for we have seen it demonstrated daily for almost seven years now – the goons of the Bush Regime will not be restrained, not even by one of their own.
And the sins of the inspector, John Helgerson, are indeed heavy.
Who will guard the guardians? Why, the guardians, of course.
He apparently has had the temerity to question the Leader's
personally approved torture program, carrying out what the Times calls
"aggressive investigations of the C.I.A.’s detention and interrogation
programs and other matters." (Those "other matters" are most
intriguing. Perhaps they have something to do with this?) It seems that
Helgerson's has "created resentment among agency operatives" doing the
Leader's bidding by subjecting his captives to beatings, psychological
torments, waterboarding and strappado.
And so CIA chief Hayden – the
usual "straight shooter," "moderate," "safe pair of hands" whose
appointment was hailed by most of the Democratic "opposition" – has
ordered an unprecedented probe of the probers. The intent is clear: to
chill any effort to dilute the cruelty and lawlessness so beloved by
the Leader.
And so we ask again: why do the Democrats in
Congress – or indeed, any figure in the Establishment, Democrat or
Republican – continue to treat this criminal gang as the legitimate
government of a constitutional republic?
How can any Senator or
Representative go about their daily business while these brutal apes in
tailored suits degrade the nation with their torture, their tyranny,
their war crimes? Why are they not moving heaven and earth, using all
the powers and legal procedures at their command, to oust Bush and
Cheney and the whole sick crew from office?
The answer, of
course, is that they do not really object to torture, tyranny or
military aggression. Oh, they may have a few quibbles about how such
things are carried out; after all, the great theme of mainstream
Democratic "opposition" to the Iraq War is that Bush has "botched" the
conquest with his "incompetence," not that it was a monstrous crime
against humanity from the beginning, on precisely the same moral level
as Hitler's invasion of Poland.
They may object to a few
varieties of the tortures being used against the captives being held
indefinitely without charge in concentration camps like Gitmo and
secret CIA prisons; but they have never registered a single formal
protests against these procedures, not even a toothless censure of the
president, much less moving articles of impeachment against Bush not
only for the flagrantly illegal tortures themselves, but also for
brazenly disregarding the few strictures on torture that they did
manage to pass.
As for opposition to the authoritarian tyranny
that the Bush Regime has imposed (or rather perfected) -- there is
none. Quite the contrary; the Democrats have rushed headlong to
countenance practically every power-grab the Bush Regime has made. Even
as we speak, the Democratic "leadership" is working feverishly to
immunize their corporate paymasters in the telecommunications industry
(which was deregulated so very profitably – for a gilded few – with the
help of Bill Clinton and John Kerry in the 1990s) from the consequences
of their criminal collusion with the Regime in conducting illegal
surveillance of American citizens for years. And naturally, there is no
move whatsoever toward prosecuting the Regime itself for these openly
admitted crimes.
Now one of the last relatively independent
watchdogs in the bowels of the security organs is being put down. As we
have seen, external restraints on the apparat's sinister practices have
long been abandoned; soon there will be no inner restraints either. And
hasn't history taught us what happens when ruthless extremists in
control of the state are freed from all restraints?
|