Planet Pentagon: How the Pentagon Came
to Own the Earth, Seas, and Skies
by Nick Turse
Recently,
the Wall Street Journal reported on a proposal, championed by Defense
Secretary Robert Gates, to reduce the number of U.S. troops in Iraq in
exchange for bipartisan Congressional support for the long-term (read:
more or less permanent) garrisoning of that country.
The troops are to
be tucked away on "large bases far from Iraq's major cities." This plan
sounded suspiciously similar to one revealed by Thom Shanker and Eric
Schmitt in the New York Times on April 19, 2003, just as U.S. troops
were preparing to enter Baghdad.
Tomgram: Nick Turse, The Pentagon as Global Landlord
As the editor of Chalmers Johnson's Blowback Trilogy for the
American Empire Project, I was struck by an oddity when the second
volume, The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the
Republic, was published in 2004 to splendid reviews in this country.
Johnson's focus in the book -- its heart and soul, you might say -- was
what he called our "empire of bases," the over-700 military bases,
giant to micro, that the Pentagon then listed as ours. The book vividly
laid out the Pentagon's global basing structure, its "footprint" (to
use the term the Defense Department favors), in startling detail.
It
was a way of getting at the nature of imperial power for a country that
largely avoided colonies, but nonetheless managed to garrison the
globe. As a topic, all those bases would have seemed unavoidable in any
serious review, no less one praising the book. Yet, somehow, review
after review managed not to mention, no less substantively discuss,
this crucial aspect of Johnson's thesis. Only recently, all these years
later, has a mainstream review appeared in this country that focused on
his work on those bases. Jonathan Freedland, reviewing the third volume
in Johnson's trilogy, Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic,
in the New York Review of Books, took up the subject eloquently -- and
(wouldn't you know it?), he isn't an American. He works for the British
Guardian.
Isn't it strange that we Americans can garrison the
planet and yet, in this country, bases are only a topic of discussion
when some local U.S. community suddenly hears that it might lose its
special base and an uproar ensues. Typically, we have made it through
years of war since 2001, during which untold billions of dollars have
gone into constructing massive bases in Iraq and Afghanistan, and yet
these bases (as well as the planning behind them) have, until recently,
gone almost totally unmentioned in all the argument, debate, and uproar
over what to do about Iraq.
In reality -- explain it as you
will -- Americans have little grasp of the enormity of the Pentagon,
despite real military budgets that, by some calculations, exceed
three-quarters of a trillion dollars yearly. (And don't forget that,
since 2002, we've been piling on with a second Defense Department, the
hapless bureaucratic morass that goes by the name of the Department of
Homeland Security.) Nick Turse, Tomdispatch associate editor whose
book, The Complex -- about all the newest twists on the old
Military-Industrial you-know-what -- will be out in the spring of 2008,
quite literally sizes the Pentagon up for us. Tom
Planet Pentagon: How the Pentagon Came
to Own the Earth, Seas, and Skies
by Nick Turse
Recently,
the Wall Street Journal reported on a proposal, championed by Defense
Secretary Robert Gates, to reduce the number of U.S. troops in Iraq in
exchange for bipartisan Congressional support for the long-term (read:
more or less permanent) garrisoning of that country. The troops are to
be tucked away on "large bases far from Iraq's major cities." This plan
sounded suspiciously similar to one revealed by Thom Shanker and Eric
Schmitt in the New York Times on April 19, 2003, just as U.S. troops
were preparing to enter Baghdad. Headlined "Pentagon Expects Long-Term
Access to Four Key Bases in Iraq," it laid out a U.S. plan for:
a
long-term military relationship with the emerging government of Iraq,
one that would grant the Pentagon access to…. perhaps four bases in
Iraq that could be used in the future: one at the international airport
just outside Baghdad; another at Tallil, near Nasiriya in the south;
the third at an isolated airstrip called H-1 in the western desert,
along the old oil pipeline that runs to Jordan; and the last at the
Bashur air field in the Kurdish north.
Shortly thereafter,
then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, denied any such plans: "I have
never, that I can recall, heard the subject of a permanent base in Iraq
discussed in any meeting…" – and, while the bases were being built, the
story largely disappeared from the mainstream media.
Even with
the multi-square mile, multi-billion dollar, state-of-the-art Balad Air
Base and Camp Victory thrown in, however, the bases in Gates' new plan
will be but a drop in the bucket for an organization that may well be
the world's largest landlord. For many years, the U.S. military has
been gobbling up large swaths of the planet and huge amounts of just
about everything on (or in) it. So, with the latest Pentagon Iraq plans
in mind, take a quick spin with me around this Pentagon planet of ours.
Garrisoning the Globe
In 2003, Forbes magazine revealed
that media mogul Ted Turner was America's top land baron -- with a
total of 1.8 million acres across the U.S. The nation's ten largest
landowners, Forbes reported, "own 10.6 million acres, or one out of
every 217 acres in the country." Impressive as this total was, the
Pentagon puts Turner and the entire pack of mega-landlords to shame
with over 29 million acres in U.S. landholdings. Abroad, the Pentagon's
"footprint" is also that of a giant. For example, the Department of
Defense controls 20% of the Japanese island of Okinawa and, according
to Stars and Stripes, "owns about 25 percent of Guam." Mere land
ownership, however, is just the tip of the iceberg.
In his
2004 book, The Sorrows of Empire, Chalmers Johnson opened the world's
eyes to the size of the Pentagon's global footprint, noting that the
Department of Defense (DoD) was deploying nearly 255,000 military
personnel at 725 bases in 38 countries. Since then, the total number of
overseas bases has increased to at least 766 and, according to a report
by the Congressional Research Service, may actually be as high as 850.
Still, even these numbers don't begin to capture the global sprawl of
the organization that unabashedly refers to itself as "one of the
world's largest ‘landlords.'"
The DoD's "real property
portfolio," according to 2006 figures, consists of a total of 3,731
sites. Over 20% of these sites are located on more than 711,000 acres
outside of the U.S. and its territories. Yet even these numbers turn
out to be a drastic undercount. For example, while a 2005 Pentagon
report listed U.S. military sites from Antigua and Hong Kong to Kenya
and Peru, some countries with significant numbers of U.S. bases go
entirely unmentioned -- Afghanistan and Iraq, for example.
In
Iraq, alone, in mid-2005, U.S. forces were deployed at some 106 bases,
from the massive Camp Victory, headquarters of the U.S. high command,
to small 500-troop outposts in the country's hinterlands. None of them
made the Pentagon's list. Nor was there any mention of bases in Jordan
on that list --or in the 2001-2005 reports either. Yet that nation, as
military analyst William Arkin has pointed out, allowed the garrisoning
of 5,000 U.S. troops at various bases around the country during the
build-up to the war in Iraq. In addition, some 76 nations have given
the U.S. military access to airports and airfields -- in addition to
who knows where else that the Pentagon forgot to acknowledge or
considers inappropriate for inclusion in its list.
Even
without Jordan, Iraq, Afghanistan, and the more than 20 other nations
that, Arkin noted in early 2004, were "secretly or quietly providing
bases and facilities," the available statistics do offer a window into
a bloated organization bent on setting up franchises across the globe.
According to 2005 documents, the Pentagon acknowledges 39 nations with
at least one U.S. base, stations personnel in over 140 countries around
the world, and boasts a physical plant of at least 571,900 facilities,
though some Pentagon figures show 587,000 "buildings and structures."
Of these, 466,599 are located in the United States or its territories.
In fact, the Department of Defense owns or leases more than 75% of all
federal buildings in the U.S.
According to 2006 figures, the
Army controls the lion's share of DoD land (52%), with the Air Force
coming in second (33%), the Marine Corps (8%) and the Navy (7 %)
bringing up the rear. The Army is also tops in total number of sites
(1,742) and total number of installations (1,659). But when it comes to
"large installations," those whose value tops $1,584 billion, the Army
is trumped by the Air Force, which boasts 43 mega-bases compared to the
Army's 39. The Navy and Marines possess only 29 and 10, respectively.
What the Navy lacks in big bases of its own, however, it more than
makes up for in borrowed foreign naval bases and ports -- some 251
across the globe.
Diversification
Land and large
installations, however, are not all that the Defense Department owns.
Until relatively recently, the U.S. Navy operated its own dairy,
complete with a herd of Holsteins. Even though it did get rid of those
cows in 1998, it kept the 865-acre farm tract in Gambrills, Maryland,
and now leases it to Horizon Organic Dairy.
While it doesn't
have a dairy, the Army still operates stables -- such as the John C.
McKinney Memorial Stables where many of the 44 horses from its
ceremonial Caisson Platoon live. It also has a big farm (the Large
Animal Research Facility). In fact, the Pentagon owns hundreds of
thousands of animals -- from rats to dogs to monkeys. In addition to an
unknown number of animals used for unexplained "other purposes," in
2001 alone, the DoD utilized 330,149 creatures for various types of
experimentation.
Then, there's the equipment the DoD owns,
loads of it. For instance, it is the unlikely owner of "over 2,050
railcars, know[n] as the Defense Freight Rail Interchange Fleet." The
DoD also reportedly ships 100,000 sea containers each year and spends
$800 million annually on domestic cargo, primarily truck and rail
shipments. And when it comes to trucks, the Army, alone, has a fleet of
12,700 Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Trucks (huge, eight-wheeled
vehicles used to supply ammunition, petroleum, oils, and lubricants to
other combat vehicles and weapons systems in the field) and 120,000
Humvees. All told, according to a 2006 Pentagon report, the DoD had a
total of at least "280 ships, 14,000 aircraft, 900 strategic missiles,
and 330,000 ground combat and tactical vehicles."
The Defense
Logistics Agency (DLA), the DoD's largest combat support agency (with
operations in 48 of the 50 states and 28 foreign countries) boasts: "If
America's forces eat it, wear it, maintain equipment with it, or burn
it as fuel…. DLA probably provides it." In fact, the DLA claims that it
"manages" some 5.2 million items and maintains an inventory, in its
Defense Distribution Depots (which stretch from Italy and Japan to
Korea and Kuwait), valued at $94.1 billion.
The DLA runs the
Defense National Stockpile Center (DNSC) which stores 42 "strategic and
critical materials" -- from zinc, lead, cobalt, chromium, and mercury
(more than 9.7 million pounds of it in 2005) to precious metals such as
platinum, palladium, and even industrial diamonds -- at 20 locations
across the U.S. With a stockpile valued at over $1.5 billion and $5.7
billion in sales of excess commodities since 1993, the DNSC claims that
there is "no private sector company in the world that sells this wide
range of commodities and materials."
All told, the Department
of Defense owns up to having "[o]ver $1 trillion in assets [and] $1.6
trillion in liabilities." This is, no doubt, a gross underestimate
given the DoD's historic penchant for flawed book-keeping and the fact
that, according to a study by its own inspector general, it cannot even
account for at least $1 trillion dollars in money spent -- or perhaps,
according to former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, as much as $2.3
trillion. Cooking the books and stashing cash is fitting enough for an
American organization, in the age of Enron, that thinks of itself not
just as a government agency but, in its own words, as "America's oldest
company, largest company, busiest company and most successful company."
In fact, on its website, the DoD makes the point that it easily bests
Wal-Mart, Exxon-Mobil, and General Motors in terms of budget and staff.
It's Got the Whole World in Its Hands
In addition to
assembling a dizzying array of assets, from tungsten to tubas -- in
2005 alone, it spent more than $6 million on sheet music, musical
instruments, and accessories -- the Pentagon owns a great deal of
housing: 300,000 units worldwide. By its own admission, it is also a
slumlord par excellence -- with an inventory of "180,000 inadequate
family housing units." According to the Office of the Deputy
Undersecretary of Defense (Installations & Environment):
Approximately
33 percent of all [military] families live on-base, in housing that is
often dilapidated, too small, lacking in modern facilities -- almost 49
percent (or 83,000 units) are substandard.
Meanwhile, the
Department of Defense's own home, the Pentagon, bests the Sultan of
Brunei's Istana Nurul Iman palace, the largest private residence in the
world -- 3,705,793 to 2,152,782 square feet of occupiable space. The
DoD likes to boast that the Pentagon is "virtually a city in itself" --
with 30 miles of access highways, 200 acres of lawn space. It includes
a five-acre center courtyard, 17.5 miles of corridors, 16 parking lots
(with an estimated 8,770 parking spaces), seven snack bars, two
cafeterias, one dining room, a post office, "credit union, travel
agency, dental offices, ticket offices, blood donor center, housing
referral office, and 30 other retail shops and services," a chapel, a
heliport, and numerous libraries. Moreover, says the DoD, the Pentagon
consumed a huge portion of its natural environment, its concrete
reportedly contains "680,000 tons of sand and gravel from the nearby
Potomac River."
In value, the Pentagon's other properties are
almost as impressive. The combined worth of the world's two most
expensive homes, the $138 million 103-room "Updown Court" in
Windlesham, Surrey in the United Kingdom and Saudi Prince Bandar bin
Sultan's $135 million Aspen ski lodge don't even come close to the
price tag on Ascension Auxiliary Airfield, located on a small island
off the coast of St. Helena (the place of Napoleon Bonaparte's exile
and death). It has an estimated replacement value of over $337 million.
Other high-priced facilities include Camp Ederle in Italy at $544
million; Incirlik Air Base in Turkey at almost $1.2 billion; and Thule
Air Base in Greenland at $2.8 billion; while the U.S. Naval Air Station
in Keflavik, Iceland is appraised at $3.4 billion and the various
military facilities in Guam are valued at more than $11 billion.
Still,
to begin to grasp the Pentagon's global immensity, it helps to look,
again, at its land holdings -- all 120,191 square kilometers which are
almost exactly the size of North Korea (120,538 square kilometers).
These holdings are larger than any of the following nations: Liberia,
Bulgaria, Guatemala, South Korea, Hungary, Portugal, Jordan, Kuwait,
Israel, Denmark, Georgia, or Austria. The 7,518 square kilometers of 20
micro-states -- the Vatican, Monaco, Nauru, Tuvalu, San Marino,
Liechtenstein, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Maldives, Malta, Saint Vincent
and the Grenadines, Barbados, Antigua and Barbuda, Seychelles, Andorra,
Bahrain, Saint Lucia, Singapore, the Federated States of Micronesia,
Kiribati and Tonga -- combined pales in comparison to the 9,307 square
kilometers of just one military base, White Sands Missile Range.
Downsizing?
While
it has been setting up hundreds of bases across the globe to support
ongoing wars, the Pentagon has also been restructuring its forces in an
effort to reduce troop levels at old Cold War mega-bases and close down
less strategically useful sites. Does this mean less Pentagon control
in the world?
Don't bet on it. In fact, the U.S. military is
exploring long-term options to dominate the planet as never before.
Previously, the DoD has only maintained a moving presence on the high
seas. This may change. The Pentagon is now considering -- and planning
for -- future "sea-basing." No longer just a ship, a fleet, or
"prepositioned material" stationed on the world's oceans, sea-bases
will be "a hybrid system-of-systems consisting of concepts of
operations, ships, forces, offensive and defensive weapons, aircraft,
communications and logistics." The notion of such bases is increasingly
popular within the military due to the fact that they "will help to
assure access to areas where U.S. military forces may be denied access
to support [land] facilities." After all, as a report by the Defense
Science Board pointed out, "[S]eabases are sovereign [and] not subject
to alliance vagaries." Imagine a future where the people of countries
at odds with U.S. policies suddenly find America's "massive seaborne
platforms" floating just outside their territorial waters.
With
a real-estate portfolio that includes the earth and the sea, the sky
would, quite literally, be the limit for the DoD. According to Noah
Shachtman, editor of Wired's "Danger Room" blog, the "U.S. Air Force
Transformation Flight Plan" of 2004 outlined what "analysts call the
most detailed picture since the end of the Cold War of the Pentagon's
efforts to turn outer space into a battlefield…. the report makes U.S.
dominance of the heavens a top Pentagon priority in the new century."
As the U.S. military's outer-space policy statement puts it, "Freedom
of action in space is as important to the United States as air power
and sea power."
When you're focused on effectively controlling
a planet, the idea of occupying Iraq, a country about the size of the
state of California, for the next decade or five, must seem like a
small thing. In practice, however, the global landlord on the Potomac
has found property values in Iraq steep indeed. As all now know, it has
been fought to a standstill there by modest-sized bands of guerillas
lacking air power, sea power, or high-tech spy satellites in outer
space. The Pentagon may be landlord to massive swaths of the globe, but
from Vietnam to Laos, Beruit to Somalia, U.S. forces have also found
themselves evicted by neighborhood residents from properties they were
prepared to consider their own. The question remains: Will Iraq be
added to the list of permanently occupied territories and take on the
look of long-garrisoned South Korea as Secretary of Defense Gates and
President Bush have urged -- or will it be added to a growing list of
places that have effectively resisted paying the rent on Planet
Pentagon?
Nick Turse is the associate editor and research
director of Tomdispatch.com. He has written for the Los Angeles Times,
the San Francisco Chronicle, the Nation, the Village Voice, and
regularly for Tomdispatch.com. His first book, The Complex, an
exploration of the new military-corporate complex in America, is due
out in the American Empire Project Series by Metropolitan Books in 2008.
Copyright 2007 Tom Engelhardt
|