The joint initiative
officially known as the Integrated Cross-Border Maritime Law Enforcement
Operations first began as a pilot project. It allows RCMP and U.S.
Coast Guard officers to operate vessels together and pursue criminals in
the waters of both countries. The Council of Canadians
reported
that the NDP is demanding that the Shiprider policing program be taken
out of budget implementation bill. Brian Masse, the NDP border critic is
pushing for separate legislation and pointed out that, “it’s totally
irresponsible to have it as part of the Budget Implementation Act.” He
added, “There’s significant policing issues that really warrant a
standalone bill. If it was so important that they did all the fanfare
for it, why doesn’t it warrant its own process?” The proposed changes
could have serious sovereignty implications with regards to
accountability, due process and civil rights and therefore, need to be
fully scrutinized.
The U.S.
and Canada are also scheduled to deploy a land-based version of the
Shiprider program at some point this summer. As part of the security
perimeter deal, both countries will, “implement two Next-Generation
pilot projects to create integrated teams in areas such as intelligence
and criminal investigations, and an intelligence-led uniformed presence
between ports of entry.” In September 2011,
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder
revealed plans that would allow law enforcement officers to operate on
both sides of the border. He announced that, “the creation of ‘NextGen’
teams of cross-designated officers would allow us to more effectively
identify, assess, and interdict persons and organizations involved in
transnational crime.” Holder went on to say, “In conjunction with the
other provisions included in the Beyond the Border Initiative, such a
move would enhance our cross-border efforts and advance our
information-sharing abilities.” Both countries continue to expand the
nature and scope of joint law enforcement operations, along with
intelligence collection and sharing.
On April 20 of this year, the Red River Integrated Border Enforcement Team’s (IBET)
joint intelligence office
was opened in Altona, Manitoba. The facility will house representatives
from the RCMP, U.S. Border Patrol, Homeland Security. Canada Border
Services Agency (CBSA), as well as U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP). The
IBET
is a binational partnership designed to, “enhance border integrity and
security along the shared Canada/U.S. border through identification,
investigation and interdiction of persons, organizations and goods that
threaten the national security of both countries or that are involved in
organized criminal activity.” The specialized teams have been,
“established in strategic regions to ensure more effective border
enforcement capability between ports of entry, based on intelligence-led
policing.” The new joint headquarters could serve as a model for other
IBETs along the northern border.
On May 8, the CBP and the CBSA
announced
that, “they are delivering on key commitments under the U.S.-Canada
Beyond the Border Action Plan for Perimeter Security and Economic
Competitiveness—increasing benefits to NEXUS members, streamlining the
NEXUS membership renewal process and launching a plan to increase NEXUS
membership.” Under the
NEXUS program,
pre-screened travelers are granted expedited access across the border,
by air, land or sea. Canadian Public Safety Minister Vic Toews explained
that, “The Border Action Plan is designed to speed up legitimate trade
and travel, and improve security in North America by aligning the entry
of people and goods at the perimeter while streamlining processes at the
Canada-U.S. border. With these commitments to retain and increase NEXUS
membership, Canada and the United States will increase efficiency to
better focus their resources and examination efforts on travellers of
high or unknown risk.” NEXUS is part of the process of implementing
equivalent biometric standards across North America which could be used
to restrict, track and trace our movements.
Last month,
Canada’s federal privacy commissioner Jennifer Stoddart, along with her
provincial and territorial colleagues urged transparency and respect of
Canadian privacy standards with regards to the perimeter security
agreement. A
joint resolution
recommended that, “Any initiatives under the plan that collect personal
information should also include appropriate redress and remedy
mechanisms to review files for accuracy, correct inaccuracies and
restrict disclosures to other countries; Parliament, provincial Privacy
Commissioners and civil society should be engaged as initiatives under
the plan take shape; Information about Canadians should be stored on
Canadian soil whenever feasible or at least be subject to Canadian
protection; and Any use of new surveillance technologies within Canada
such as unmanned aerial vehicles must be subject to appropriate controls
set out in a proper regulatory framework.” According to a self-imposed
deadline, the U.S. and Canada are supposed to release privacy provisions
associated with the perimeter security deal by May 30.
The
perimeter agreement is also getting the attention of provincial and
state leaders. B.C. Premier Christy Clark and Washington Governor Chris
Gregoire have
signed,
“a joint letter to President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Stephen
Harper commending the U.S.-Canada Beyond the Border Action Plan and
committing British Columbia and Washington to support and expedite
federal commitments to improve the flow of people, goods and services
across the border.” When the perimeter security deal was first released
last year, Premier Clark issued a
statement which welcomed the announcement. In addition, Washington’s state Legislature
passed
a joint memorial which also acknowledged its support. The backing of
governments at all levels will further assist in implementing some of
the Beyond the Border initiatives. Not to mention the fact that state
and provincial regional integration is already being achieved in areas
of trade, the environment and energy.
As the U.S.-Canada action
plan implementation process continues, there still remains many concerns
with the further integration and militarization of the northern border.
This includes the loss of sovereignty and risks to privacy rights
related to more cross-border sharing of personal information. While
there have been online consultations surrounding the perimeter security
agreement, there has yet to be any open public hearings or congressional
and parliamentary debates.