Cermaq's Clusterfuck
The ‘
Salmon Far
ming Kills’
lawsuit is now entering the final week with only the closing arguments
to come (today is Day 17 in the scheduled 20 day trial).
David Sutherland, legal counsel for the defendant Don Staniford,
closed his case yesterday (6 February) at Noon after Cermaq’s lawyer
David Wotherspoon ended his cross-examination of Mr. Staniford.
This
morning (7 February) at 10am, lawyers for Cermaq present their final
case to Justice Elaine Adair (courtroom #52 - Hornby/Nelson St.
entrance).
Tomorrow (8 February), the defendant’s case will be
presented (Day 18). Thursday (9 February) could see the trial close
early on Day 19 – with Justice Adair expected to make a final ruling
over the Summer.
As PR blunders go, Cermaq’s d
ecision to carry on with this lawsuit must
rank up there with some of the biggest clusterfucks of military history
including the Iraq War and the Vietnam War (note that 'clusterfuck'
is a: "Military term for an operation in which multiple things have
gone wrong. Related to "SNAFU" (Situation Normal, All Fucked Up") and
"FUBAR" (Fucked Up Beyond All Repair)"). More classically, Shakespeare
coined the phrase ‘to hoist oneself up by your petard’ (petard literally
meaning a ‘bomb’ or ‘mine’) in his tragedy 'Hamlet'.
Cermaq’s reckless and self-destructive decision to pursue this
lawsuit has not only shot themselves in the foot and backfired badly but
it has also thrust the entire Norwegian-owned salmon farming industry
into the limelight. The unfolding unmitigated PR disaster has all the
elements of a Shakespearean tragedy, slapstick farce and comedy in equal
measure.
By launching this SLAPP suit, Cermaq have brought global public
attention and the international media spotlight on the salmon farming
industry. Norwegian TV (TV2) broadcast the third news report in as many
weeks on the lawsuit on Sunday (5 February) – with a Norwegian law
professor quoted as saying that Cermaq’s case was “very thin”.

Watch Cermaq’s PR flak Lise Bergan and Cermaq’s lawyer David Wotherspoon blowing smoke – online here
In the United Kingdom, The Sunday Times newspaper also featured the
lawsuit (5 February) with a Scottish news agency picking up the story
yesterday (6 February) via ‘Anti-fish farming campaigner to land on Scottish shores.’

This week a Swedish fly-fishing magazine - Fiske Journalen - published
the offending cigarette packets and featured the lawsuit in an article
headlined ‘David Vs. Goliath.’
Writing in The Common Sense Canadian, Damien Gillis wrote in an article ‘Bay Boy Salmon Activists Teaming Up in Norway’ (3 February):
“The Norwegian salmon farming industry got a lesson in the old adage,
"be careful what you wish for" this week when it learned of industry
critic Don Staniford's next job. The British-born, globe-trotting
salmon activist announced on his blog
yesterday that following his scheduled deportation from Canada later
this month he will be heading to Norway to work with that country's
leading environmentalist bad boy, Kurt Oddekalv, head of the Green
Warriors of Norway.”
The ‘Salmon Farming Kills’ campaign is also going viral on Facebook and donations via Go Fund Me leapt like a wild salmon over $44,000.
Day 15 (3 February) saw the defendant Don Staniford continue his
‘examination in chief’ questioned by his lawyer David Sutherland – and
then start his cross-examination by Cermaq’s lawyer David Wotherspoon.
The latter sparked a series of surreal and heated exchanges which
continued into Day 16 (6 February).
Mr. Wotherspoon and Mr. Staniford had sparred previously during two
‘Examination for Discovery’ sessions in September and December 2011. In
open court, however, the gloves were well and truly off and the packed
gallery witnessed some bloody and brutal exchanges.
“Would you consider your response to me to be respectful?” asked Mr.
Wotherspoon in his first question. “I said your letter of the 18 March
got the respect that it deserved. So your letter was so thoroughly
disrespectful that you got the reply in terms of the finger that it
warranted,” replied Mr. Staniford.
“I replied in a manner that I saw fitting,” added Mr. Staniford as Mr. Wotherspoon reiterated his question.
“That’s a cartoon image of Mary Ellen Walling,” said Mr. Staniford in response to a document – “The Girl Who Kicked the Hornets’ Nest and the Girl Who Played with Fire” – being marked as an exhibit.
“And she’s in bed with a number of people, correct?” asked Mr. Wotherspoon.
“Yes, I think she’s in bed with Dr. Dick Beamish from DFO, Prime
Minister Stephen Harper, Dr. Laura Richards, Stewart Johnson and the
Queen. And there’s a couple of legs sticking out,” replied Mr.
Staniford.
“And you made a comment about those legs on your Facebook page – do you remember that the comment was?” asked Mr. Wotherspoon.
“I think I mentioned that potentially the legs – one of the pair of legs
could belong to Monica Lewinsky,” replied Mr. Staniford.
“Is that respectful to these people?” asked Mr. Wotherspoon now turning to the MOD Squad cartoon.
“We live in a democracy still,” replied Mr. Staniford. “Under
Stephen Harper it’s still thankfully a democracy. And free speech and
different divergent views are allowed. And I think it is fair to
criticize and lampoon and spoof public figures. These are all public
figures. Darth Vader was a public figure. John Fredriksen, the owner
of Marine Harvest, he’s the 72nd richest man in the world. He’s the
owner of the largest salmon farming company in the world and in British
Columbia. Gail Shea is a public figure. Geir Isaksen was the CEO of a
state-owned company. Again, a public figure. Mary Ellen Walling is in
the public domain as a propaganda spin doctor for the salmon farming
industry. And Clare Backman is again a public figure. So I think it is
fair and reasonable to be able to, in this modern society, to criticize
public figures and lampoon them. And I’m a very big fan of zombie
film, you know.”
“Would you agree with me, Mr. Staniford, that your comments of Ms. Brunt
and Ms. Walling are disrespectful of them?” asked Mr. Wotherspoon now
turning to the issue of the ‘Fat Bottomed Girls.’
“I agree that some people might find them distasteful,” replied Mr.
Staniford. “And in relation to the consumption of farmed salmon, then
this lawsuit is all about consumption advisories and cancer risk about
consumption of farmed salmon. These two people, Mary Ellen Walling and
Leanne Brunt, are executives and proponents of big aquaculture, just
like the fat cats pictures from the big tobacco lawsuit. So I think
it’s fair to draw an analogy in a very spoof lampooning manner. And I
think the image speaks for itself – it’s a very beautiful, complimentary
image. If you look at the lyrics to the Queen hit, then it’s very
complimentary.”
“You don’t care about Ms. Walling’s feelings as a result of being
referred to as a fat bottomed girl, do you?” asked Mr. Wotherspoon.
“I think somebody who promotes farmed salmon as free of contaminants as
she does in the BC Salmon Facts adverts, and markets a cancer
contaminated product as healthy, and pushes those adverts on pregnant
women, I find that thoroughly distasteful and nauseating,” replied Mr.
Staniford. “And I think it’s legitimate to criticize a person for those
views.”
“So you don’t care about her feelings – is that what you’re saying?” asked Mr. Wotherspoon.
“Corporations don’t have feelings,” replied Mr. Staniford.
“I’m talking about Ms. Walling,” said Mr. Wotherspoon. “Is she a corporation? She’s not a corporation?”
“She represents the BC Salmon Farmers Association whose membership
includes the plaintiff, Marine Harvest, Grieg, EWOS, Creative Salmon and
lots of other supplier companies,” replied Mr. Staniford.
“Do you care about Ms. Walling’s feeling and whether or not they’ve been
hurt by your publication referring to her as a fat bottomed girl?”
asked Mr. Wotherspoon (who is now developing a fettish for fat bottomed
girls).
“I think she should be flattered that I compare her to the fat bottomed
girl in this picture from the Queen album,” replied Mr. Staniford who
was a big Queen fan growing up in Liverpool (where there were plenty of
fat bottomed girls). “This is an iconic image. This is like the famous
tennis player, or the lady in the rainforest. This is a beautiful
image.”
[Further details of the cross-examination – including yesterday’s exchanges – will be included in a blog tomorrow]
Earlier in the morning on Day 15 (3 February), Mr. Staniford’s lawyer
David Sutherland questioned the defendant on various documents tabled as
evidence in the trial.
“This gets to the heart of the matter of the spread: the cancerous
spread of salmon cages around the coast and how salmon feedlots are
located in the mouths of rivers and in the migration routes, choking the
wild baby salmon as they swim past spreading infectious diseases and
parasites like sea lice,” said Mr. Staniford referring to a
2007 letter to Marine Harvest’s owner
John Fredriksen
(72nd richest man in the world – worth $10.7 billion). “As you can see
on the ‘Salmon Farming Kills Wild Baby Salmon’ and ‘Salmon Farming
Sucks’ cigarette packets.”
“There’s a plague of ‘super lice’,” said Mr. Staniford referring to an
article by Rob Edwards published in The Caledonian Mercury in 2010.
“These are like the super bugs – the rats that can’t get killed by
Warfarin or the bugs that can’t get killed by Round Up. Sea lice on
salmon farms are developing chemical resistance – chemotherapy no longer
works. There are several cigarette packets regarding salmon farming
killing with chemicals – and the whole notion of this carcinogenic
spread. We’ve got to a situation with our sea lice chemicals – these
weapons – don’t work anymore. So sea lice are spreading. The industry
is effectively in a chemicals arms race that it’s losing – trying to
fight a losing battle to kill sea lice.”
Read more via ‘Plague of ‘super lice’ threatens wild salmon’
“Kurt Oddekalv is talking about the ad campaigns around the world promoting farmed salmon,” said Mr. Staniford quoting from a press release
launching the ‘Salmon Farming Kills’ campaign issued in January 2011.
“He talks about the industry denying peer-reviewed scientific evidence
detailing human health and environmental risks. That’s exactly like the
tobacco industry in terms of their denial of the science, how they try
to bury the science, and smear those campaigning against smoking. It’s
eerily familiar with what’s happened in the salmon farming industry.”
“I’m actually going after this trial to work in Norway for the Green Warriors and take up a position with Kurt Oddekalv,” said Mr. Staniford. “It’s a global campaign.”
“That’s a sea lion caught in a net,” said Mr. Staniford pointing to one
of the ‘Salmon Farming Kills’ cigarette packets. “That’s a dead sea
lion – salmon farms and salmon farming operations kill marine mammals
around the world. We have seen cartoons showing or depicting Mary Ellen
Walling from the BC Salmon Farmers Association machine-gunning sea
lions. And we filed a complaint
to the Department of Commerce in the United States in relation to a
breach of the US Marine Mammal Protection Act. So salmon farms are
lethal to marine mammals.”

“Salmon farming kills communities,” said Mr. Staniford pointing to a
cigarette packet. “The graphic there is from a mass protest, one of the
largest mass rallies in BC history, the culmination of the ‘
Get Out Migration’
in May 2010 on the lawn of the Legislature.
Communities across British
Columbia, from up and down Vancouver Island, marched down the island
and on the final day walked over 30 km from Sidney to Victoria - and
gathered and demanded that the salmon farms get out.
They came from
communities across the province that are complaining that salmon farming
is sucking the life-blood out of their communities, killing wild
salmon, killing their clams beds, and causing social decay, the closure
of schools. First Nations talk about
genocide in relation to the decline of wild salmon – and relate that directly to salmon farming. There is a
class action lawsuit from communities in the Broughton Archipelago in relation to this.”
“There is peer-reviewed science
that shows that salmon farms kill wild baby salmon,” said Mr.
Staniford. “So that’s directly related to science which shows wherever
there are salmon farms around the world there is mortalities associated
with wild salmon and sea trout. Everywhere salmon farms operate they
spread sea lice which are killing wild baby salmon.”
“Salmon farming is licensed to kill,” said Mr. Staniford referring to a blog called ‘Licensed to Kill’.
“This is detailing in Scotland how the Scottish Government has issued
licences to kill over one thousand seals. And also here in British
Columbia, the BC salmon farmers and the companies operating here are
licensed to kill marine mammals, sea lions, and even on occasion
protected Steller sea lions which are protected by SARA (Species at Risk
Act). So they are licensed to kill.”
“Salmon farming kills birds, especially diving birds,” said Mr.
Staniford referring to another cigarette packet. “In Shetland in
Scotland, for example, a group found lots of eider ducks which had been
killed in the nets of salmon farms. It happens on a very regular basis
that birds will be killed. And then there is the indirect effects in
terms of salmon farming displacing wild salmon and the food chain
ecosystem effects in Norway, for example, because salmon farmers go out
and catch lots of wild fish, there’s less fish for the birds, the
seagulls, to eat. And also here in British Columbia the eagles are
starving and that’s another issue.”
“This is a
direct quote
from David Suzuki who said ‘I wouldn’t serve farmed salmon to my
children – it’s poison!’,” said Mr. Staniford referring to the ‘Salmon
Farming is Poison’ cigarette packet. “But it also relates to the
poisons, the toxins, the cancer-causing chemicals in farmed salmon and
the toxic and poisonous chemicals used on salmon farms, whether they are
the artificial colourings or the sea lice chemicals. There’s lots of
poisons associated with salmon farming and with the cancer-causing
chemicals in the flesh of farmed salmon – you could say that the product
is hazardous and poisonous.”
“Sadly, humans die on salmon farms and associated with salmon farming
operations around the world,” said Mr. Staniford pointing to the ‘Salmon
Farming Kills Workers’ cigarette packet. “Here in British Columbia
last year Marine Harvest was fined $75,000. There are over 50 dead
workers in Chile, for example, from 2005 to 2009. There are deaths in
Scotland – including from the plaintiff and other Norwegian companies.”
“Well, I think we’ve got to a stage now where salmon farming should
carry a warning,” said Mr. Staniford. “We’ve had the BBC documentary
ten years ago, ‘Warnings from the Wild’,
and that also included the dioxin and PCB research. I think salmon
farming – salmon farms – should carry a warning and the products that
they produce should carry health warning labels.”
“Salmon farming is spreading like a malignant cancer on our coast,” said
Mr. Staniford. “Cancer refers to multiple things. But literally,
cancer can refer to the cancer-causing chemicals. We’ve had extensive peer-reviewed evidence
on carcinogens in farmed salmon. But also the method of the spread of
cancer, the spread of infectious diseases. I have been campaigning to
remove salmon farms from migration routes, from the mouth of rivers.
And even the owner of Marine Harvest, John Fredriksen, has said they should be moved.
So the analogy would be like the cages are like cells – they are like
cancer cells at the mouths of rivers. So we need to rip out that
cancer. We need to not just use chemotherapeutants and chemicals to
kill diseases and parasites because of chemical resistance. We need to
tackle the root causes of the cancer not just treat the symptoms. So
that means removing salmon farms from our coast. And the phrase ‘cancer
on our coast’ is clearly to do with the coast. It goes to the issue of
the spread. Norwegian-owned salmon farms have spread since the 1960s.
Infectious Salmon Anaemia has been spread by Norwegian salmon farming
companies since the 1980s around the world. It is like a cancer.”
“The chemicals that are used on salmon farms, most of them are designed
to kill sea lice,” said Mr. Staniford addressing the issue of ‘Salmon
Pharming’ in Cermaq’s ‘Amended Notice of Civil Claim.’
“Sea lice is a crustacean – it’s a member of the crustacean family. So
if you’re using a chemical to kill sea lice you are not just going to
kill sea lice on a farm if there’s lobsters or other crustaceans in the
area you’re going to have some fatalities. That’s going to be
collateral damage in the war on sea lice. There’s been numerous
examples over the years of salmon farming chemicals killing lobsters.”
For more background read ‘Silent Spring of the Sea’
“Salmon farming is morally reprehensible,” said Mr. Staniford. “It’s
immoral. Stealing wild fish from the mouths of hungry people in South
America and producing a product - an expensive product for sale that has
cancer-causing chemicals - and selling it as a healthy product, if
that’s not immoral and socially irresponsible, I don’t know what is.
It’s exactly like what the smoking industry have done to promote their
product.”
Read more via “Eastern Shore salmon farm proposal morally indefensible”
“That’s the picture of Darth Vader smoking,” said Mr. Staniford. “And
that relates to the MOD Squad where we saw the images. But the
parasite, the pathogen associated with the Black Death Plague – that
same pathogen is on salmon farms here in British Columbia and around the
world. In the bubonic plague it’s Yersinia pestis in rats. And in
salmon farms it’s Yersinia ruckeri. That goes to the spread of this
deathly disease. And a lot of the diseases on salmon farms are lethal
to farmed salmon.”
For more background read ‘Fish Farmageddon: The Infectious Salmon Aquacalypse’
“If you go to the famous Simon and Garfunkel song ‘Sound of Silence’, there’s a line in that which says ‘Silence like a cancer grows’,” said Mr. Staniford.
“And Martin Luther King says in one of his speeches says ‘hate spreads
like a cancer.’ So again, it’s the methaphor, it’s using cancer in that
context. Not just from a human health impact.....And we need to rip
out that cancer. We need to rip it out of the body of the world.”
“Cermaq and the industry, they’re not really interested in dialogue,”
said Mr. Staniford. “When they say they want to talk, that’s just a
euphemism. We want to talk to you if you want to bend to our view. So
they talk about having a dialogue. You’ve got to accommodate our
interests. And I don’t think – there’s no right way to do the wrong
thing here. So there’s no compromise when it comes to salmon farms.
You either have a salmon farm or you don’t.....We can’t have Atlantic
salmon farms here in British Columbia spreading infectious diseases.
Healthy wild Pacific salmon stocks are incompatible with disease-ridden
salmon farms. So we can’t have both. We need to choose what we want.
And I think – if consumers want to buy farmed salmon, they should be
advised that there’s health warning.”
“Yes, this is a PR war,” said Mr. Staniford. “In the Cohen Commission
there were documents saying that the government viewed this as a PR war. There’s a PR war brewing for the last 30 to 40 years....The public relations war
has escalated. I think this lawsuit is a microcosm of that war. You
are seeing it here in the conflict between this company and Norwegian
salmon farming companies trying to fight to defend their reputation.”
“It has a PR problem,” said Mr. Staniford. “Just look at the
advertising campaigns. If you think about products that use lots of
advertising, it’s a function of the fact that they have got a bit of a
problem. You don’t have to advertise a product – you don’t have to
promote an industry unless there’s public relations problems with that.
So the launch of ‘
BC Salmon Facts’ in January 2011 – in the
marketing magazines
it was described as a $1.5 million ad campaign – that just is
symptomatic of the fact that the industry has a big problem. And when
they came out with the
adverts, and one of the adverts we saw yesterday said farmed salmon is free of contaminants.”
[Download the advert above and others online here]
“That is so blatantly untrue that GAAIA felt obliged – a moral
imperative, a duty – to respond to that,” continued Mr. Staniford.
“Because that is just wrong.”
“And I think you’ve seen the adverts from Big Tobacco and smoking, a lot
of those ads from the 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s and even now in some
African countries, the tobacco advertising rules are much more lax. You
are seeing misleading adverts, and the salmon farming industry has
employed the same deceptive advertising. A
complaint to the Federal Trade Commission was in response to that in terms of the
pregnant woman. And I think the BC Salmon Farmers Association with their ‘
BC Salmon Facts’ campaign have made exactly the same mistake.”