You've heard of African-Americans playing the 'race card', this is about warmonger states pulling the 'Terrorist Card'.
'Terrorist' - the word brings a vision to
the American mind, one crafted by news reports and comedians and movies
and TV shows. It is always an Arab guy with a turban. But the truth in
many cases is very different from most believe.
Nelson Mandela of the African National Congress - was
considered a terrorist by the U.S. and British governments all the way
into the 1990's. He is the ultimate victim/survivor of those who use the 'terrorist' label as a tool of war.
In this case the designation was assigned to a man who
had been imprisoned for two decades, fighting bitter, hardcore racism
that was as bold and blatant as any that ever came before it.
Mandela raised his arms and refused to relent to the terror inflicted on the Black population of South Africa. He fought back and the resistance claimed lives, as it should have.
The South African apartheid government's treatment of Blacks was based
on a system where people were considered 'separate but equal' and it is
amazing that such a blatantly racial system, with separate facilities
for races lasted until just a few years ago.
The president of the U.S. branded this unrelenting
champion for his own people as a terrorist, when Mandela is ten times
the man Ronald Reagan was, even in the movie actor's best moments of
self-deceiving white bread illusion.
The 'Terrorist Card'
We all know the saying, "Playing the race card".
Reagan loved to play the 'terrorist card'. After all, he was a raucous
bigot... a race war moron whose IQ must have been
very low. His
life goals beyond 'fighting Communism' were boosting power and putting
on a good show. He was elected because he breathed a fiery hate and his
legacy as a warmongering U.S. leader is a shameful part of our past.
As a side note, it is worth realizing that the year
Nancy Reagan launched her 'war on drugs', is the same year the
clandestine drugs-for-weapons program in Nicaragua was launched by
Ronald Reagan to raise money for a war between U.S. ally Iraq, and Iran.
The drugs flown into the U.S. flooded our streets and soon came the
'crack epidemic'. So the Reagan family is therefore responsible for
both the drug war, and the need for a drug war. I guess that's business in America.
And this man called Mandela, who brought real and true
liberty to the indigenous people of South Africa... was the terrorist?
It was inevitable that another dog was yapping "terrorist" around this
time too, echoing the same comments about the great leader Mandela, this
was the Prime Minister of Great Britain, Margaret Thatcher. That
windbag's country was squarely behind the whole damned colonial problem
in the first place. England is responsible for all of the world's most
disastrous politics that are the result of a centuries-long orgy of
power, all of it.
Sands of Time
England played the terrorist card because it didn't
understand why the people of Belfast and Northern Ireland were sick of
hundreds of years of brutal military occupation; having their government
run by the British, always being second-best as Irish Catholics next to
their English oppressors.
And Thatcher's own suffered greatly too, I have a hard
time imagining that it was easy for British soldiers to open fire on
people who were practically their neighbors. Our Photojournalist Dexter
Phoenix who grew up in South London, recalls his friend's fathers being
on duty in Northern Ireland and some didn't return. Oppression and
occupation are bad business.
Everyone has heard of the 'Great Potato Famine' of
Ireland, and I suppose people just figure it was some type of natural
occurrence, but that is not the case at all. As a land under British
military occupation, the fields of Northern Ireland were all very hearty
during these years, the reason there was a potato famine is because the
British were harvesting all of the food products for their colonial
wars in other parts of the world. That is how much value the
redcoats had for their Irish neighbors. How wrong the Brits were to
assume there would not someday be recourse.
A proud member of the Irish Republican Army, Bobby
Sands had to give his life in a hunger strike (some form of terrorism
that was) before Thatcher would relent or offer anything. Her heart was
as cold as a dripping block of ice, just like the lead of the bullets
fired into crowds of civilians in the 'troubled' area.
How any man or woman could not admire the acts of a
battered few like Sands and those men of the IRA who were imprisoned at
the end for so long, is beyond me.
At the end of the day you have two types of human
beings in this world: those who will follow orders telling them to kill
and maim the innocent; they're the same as those who hide their faces
while their families and homes are destroyed, and the hearty few who
will never go down without a fight, never let you or anyone else
harm the women and the children as long as they have an ounce of blood
coursing through their veins.
Just like Reagan's words against the students in
Berkley who were fighting racism in San Francisco businesses in the
early 1960's when Reagan was the governor of California, Thatcher's
cruel statements about this brave hero of Belfast, Bobby Sands of the
IRA, were not missed and have not been forgotten.
The Balfour Burn
England is 100% behind the problems in Palestine today
with a 63-year old Zionist occupation (Israel) - it is totally illegal
under international law and nothing but a western-backed land grab.
Just
EXACTLY like South Africa, Israel maintains an apartheid
system with different laws for Jews and non-Jews, and even 'Jewish-only'
roads that all Christians and Muslims are banned from driving on.
A promise made to the Palestinians during World War One
by T.E. Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia) guaranteed the native Palestinian
Arabs 'autonomy' forever from English colonialism, if they would fight
with the British forces and defeat the Turkish forces, allies of
Germany, who occupied Jerusalem. They did, and yet within one year the
Balfour Declaration was drawn up in England officially serving as a road
map for the implementation of Israel on Palestinian land.
The people of Palestine, who live on land and in homes
that their families have owned for hundreds of consecutive years in some
cases, are still being pushed out, forced into homelessness by the
Israeli government. They have an assortment of excuses, none of which
are valid. In the end the Palestinians pay the price for the deeds of
Hitler, and yet they didn't have a single thing to do with the demise of
the Jews during the Holocaust.
The whole idea of Israel could have worked, but there were too many Jewish terrorist
groups like the Irgun and the Stern Gang murdering Palestinians and
routing them from their homes, creating the world's largest Diaspora
ever, creating a form of almost permanent resentment.
To this day, those in Palestine who fight back against
this onslaught of military and political treachery are deemed
'terrorists' and it is a false label.
Tamil Tigers
How about Sri Lanka? This is the land of the so-called
'terrorist' LTTE (Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam) or 'Tamil Tigers'
who frankly, were well-trained military fighters who time and time
again, gave the Sri Lankan Army a run for its money. Most of Sri Lanka
is Sinhalese Buddhist, whereas about 15% is Tamil. Tamils live in the
northern region of this island nation and are mostly Hindu, and partly
Christian.
Occupied by the British until 1948 just like Palestine,
The English during their occupation 'preferred' the Tamil people and as
a result, more Tamils held government jobs; they had better lives in
many cases. (This is the exact same problem that ultimately befell
Rwanda, where Hutus and Tutsis had major resentments over preferential
treatment that had been afforded during the British Colonial years.)
When the English pulled out of 'Ceylon' as Lanka was
called, the problems began. When Tamils watched the government slowly,
piece by piece, unweave the meaning of their culture, they objected.
For 30 years the Tamils followed a Gandhi-style
non-violent resistance which had worked (again against the British!) in
nearby India, but three decades of talk brought them nothing, so the
LTTE was formed and their main stated goal was the establishment of a
separate state for Tamils called Tamil Eelam. Is this such an
unreasonable demand? Their language had been removed from their own
school books, one law after another was eliminating their culture, it
was a tragedy worth avoiding.
When the Tamil Tigers became organized, some of their
elements did carry out suicide bomb attacks. This is the tool of the
poor militant, it is what people do when they can't afford jet fighters
to drop the bombs on the heads of people like the U.S., Israel, etc.
Of course to Americans and Brits and Israelis it is
apparently perfectly OK to kill innocent people via fighter jet bomb,
just not by suicide bomb. That is a preposterous way of thinking and it
has never gotten a society anywhere. Every type of occupier and
oppressor has been killed and suffered just like the people they
victimize, and they always will be as long as they are allowed to be
oppressors and occupiers in the first place. They often deserve what
they get, sooner or later man must realize that we are all equal and all
deserving of the same basic things required to live and remain safe
within our own communities and homes. Anyone who opposes this ideology
is part of the problem and the sooner their types are no longer taking
up space on this planet, the better.
Iran
Let's stay with that late 40's period for just a moment
and visit a particular white elephant in the room, a peanut snorter
named 'greed'. This post-war period is when the British were ripping
off the Iranian government for oil, after WWII the British Anglo Iranian
Oil Company (BP today) refused to work with the people the oil belonged
to, year after year the Iranian government was unable to make the
British pay the agreed upon price for oil
When Iran talked about nationalizing its oil, its Prime
Minister was taken out in a coup by the CIA and British SAS and a
puppet leader, the Shah, was installed to serve U.S. and British oil
needs. It lasted until the Islamic Revolution of 1979.
Today the peaceful, advanced society existing in
ancient Persia, known as 'Iranians', are some of the world's brightest
minds; art science, history, Iran is a mecca. Yet the leaders are
considered 'terrorists' when in fact their country is nothing of the
sort, with no recent history of military aggression.
In my opinion religious government is a non-functional
idea. One of the only places it seems to work is Iran, an Islamic
Republic that has laws protecting its Jewish population. If that type
of thing can exist in reality, then I don't see it as a religious
government. I guess it just depends on how you look at it. Tolerance
and respect and equal rights are the key elements.
Hamas
Hamas is the elected political party in Gaza, and they
run the police, they carry out the region's politics, and they protect
Gazans as well as they can from Israeli attacks. Many of these are not
anything a person can avoid, and Israel
regularly kills innocent
people when attacking "suspected terrorists" and yet if one single
Israeli were killed by Hamas in a reverse scenario, they would
immediately cry "terrorists" and the western media would become like a
submarine crew in WWII, "terrorist"... "terrorist".
What nobody ever talks about, is how Hamas halted all
suicide bombing. The current media and press in the U.S. convinces
people that bombs are exploding all over Israel when in fact there isn't
a single one and rarely if ever, is.
Each time some rogue militant with an unguided rocket fires toward Israel, it brings a reprisal that is unimaginable. Israel always hits back more than a hundred times harder than it was hit.
Don't get me wrong, the bus bombs and suicide bombs
used to go off with regularity in Israel, but the trends have been
toward peaceful protest in recent years and that is 99% of the
'Palestinian Resistance' today, yet Israel offers no quarter, regularly
attacking peaceful, non-violent protests that take place on Friday
always in places like Bil'in. Israeli soldiers kill people for standing
in a protest, it is God-awful stuff.
Hamas is just as respectable as any government in the
Middle east and just as imperfect, the hate this group receives is a
mixed product, born in Israel from fear and racism, cowardice and hate.
Many Israelis, Zionists in particular, think they are more entitled to
life than other people, this isn't so.
Hez
We just had the anniversary of the Sabra-Shatila
Refugee Camp massacre past this week, our writer, Dr. Franklin Lamb
wrote about it from the very place that it happened, where he has lived
for many years off and on.
A Salem, Oregon lawyer who became an international
attorney, Franklin has worked on behalf of this battered population for
many years. This is where Hezbollah flag fly, it is Beirut, Lebanon.
The massacre of the Palestinians at Sabra-Shatila was
carried out by Lebanese Christian Druze militias, while the Israeli
forces who were working in cooperation with them, stood by and watched.
Truckloads of people, families, little kids; the Christians killed them
without a hint of mercy while their Jewish brethren stood by.
I know many Israeli soldiers were traumatized by this
terrible event, many didn't know or even believe what was taking place,
yet they too were part of it. There is an incredible animated film from
Israel called 'Waltz with Bashir' that tells the story from an Israeli
veteran's perspective. All the while, the Palestinians are the
'terrorists' while the Israeli Defence Forces and Druze soldiers were
the 'good guys'- A-OK by American standards.
It makes me want to violently throw up in a bag. All
people who back Israel's violence make me sick, they are the devil's
servants and they only have dark wishes, nothing good at all that they
will ever spare for one not cut from the came racial and/or religious
cloth as them.
Conclusion
Ken, after he was cuffed, and cowardly Israeli soldiers beat him. He and another activist, Cormac O'Daley, were beaten repeatedly. |
Part of what incenses me about this 'terrorism' madness
is the way both Israel and the United States have used this label on a
dear friend of ours, Ken O'Keefe. A powerful activist and
Salem-News.com writer, Ken is the former U.S. Marine who was a key part of the human shield missions during the U.S. invasion of Iraq.
He and other western people traveled overland from
London to Iraq, and placed their bodies at key points in the threatened
country, defending Iraq's infrastructure in many cases. Power plants
and water facilities vital to the survival of the Iraqi people were
avoided, because George W. Bush didn't want to see western blood
mingling with Arab blood in his 'war against terror'.
Then in 2010, Ken was one of many journalists aboard the Turkish ship Mavi Marmara
that was attacked in open ocean waters by Israeli government terrorists
who murdered nine unarmed activists and journalists, wounding scores.
Ken personally disarmed two of the Israeli 'commandos' who attacked his
ship and then gave them medical treatment, and released the Israelis
unharmed.
For this act Ken (sparing the lives of Israeli soldiers
who were killing his friends) was called a "terrorist" and Israel,
which took Ken and all others aboard the ship as prisoners, and beat Ken
severely as the cowards they are, stated that Ken was going to "train
Hamas" which is absolutely bullshit. The game is so stupid, so lame.
The U.S. and its lap dog England have a well-deserved
terrible reputation in the world, both. I do believe that the UK is
faring better than the U.S. today by a long shot. There are realities
that England had been forced to realize and while the country is still
full of bad apples, it isn't an outright joke and nightmare like the
U.S. and Israel.
Don't get me wrong, all of the western countries are
operating like terrorists, they all practice state terrorism. I just
think that the blokes in the U.K. are figuring it out rapidly right now
and their proximity to the Middle east is a big influence.
Terrorists, they aren't necessarily who you think they are.
_________________________________________________________
Tim King: Salem-News.com Editor and Writer
Tim King has more than
twenty years of experience on the west coast as a television news
producer, photojournalist, reporter and assignment editor. In addition
to his role as a war correspondent, this Los Angeles native serves as
Salem-News.com's Executive News Editor. Tim spent the winter of 2006/07
covering the war in Afghanistan, and he was in Iraq over the summer of
2008, reporting from the war while embedded with both the U.S. Army and
the Marines. Tim is a former U.S. Marine.
Tim holds awards for reporting, photography, writing and editing, including the Silver Spoke Award by the National Coalition of Motorcyclists (2011), Excellence in Journalism Award by the Oregon Confederation of Motorcycle Clubs (2010), Oregon AP Award for Spot News Photographer of the Year (2004), First-place Electronic Media Award in Spot News, Las Vegas, (1998), Oregon AP Cooperation Award (1991); and several others including the 2005 Red Cross Good Neighborhood Award
for reporting. Tim has several years of experience in network
affiliate news TV stations, having worked as a reporter and photographer
at NBC, ABC and FOX stations in Arizona, Nevada and Oregon. Tim was a
member of the National Press Photographer's Association for several
years and is a current member of the Orange County Press Club.
Serving the community in
very real terms, Salem-News.com is the nation's only truly independent
high traffic news Website. As News Editor, Tim among other things, is
responsible for publishing the original content of 102 Salem-News.com
writers. He reminds viewers that emails are easily missed and urges
those trying to reach him, to please send a second email if the first
goes unanswered. You can write to Tim at this address: newsroom@salem-news.com