Some thoughts that OCCUPY my mind
When the Vietnam War became history, and the protest signs and the
bullhorns were put away, so too was the serious side of most protestors'
alienation and hostility toward the government. They returned, with
minimal resistance, to the restless pursuit of success, and the belief
that the choice facing the world was either "capitalist democracy" or
"communist dictatorship".
The war had been an aberration, was the
implicit verdict, a blemish on an otherwise humane American record. The
fear felt by the powers-that-be that society's fabric was unraveling
and that the Republic was hanging by a thread turned out to be little
more than media hype; it had been great copy.
I mention this to explain why I've been reluctant to jump with both
feet on the Occupy bandwagon. I first thought that if nothing else the
approaching winter would do them in; if not, it would be the demands of
their lives — they have to make some money at some point, attend classes
somewhere, lovers and friends and family they have to cater to
somewhere; lately I've been thinking it's the police that will do them
in, writing finis to their marvelous movement adventure — if you hold the system up to a mirror the system can go crazy.
But now I don't know.
Those young people, and the old ones as well,
keep surprising me, with their dedication and energy, their camaraderie
and courage, their optimism and innovation, their non-violence and their
keen awareness of the danger of being co-opted their focusing on the
economic institutions more than on the politicians or political parties.
There is also their splendid signs and slogans, walking from New York
to Washington, and not falling apart following the despicable police
destruction of the Occupy Wall Street encampment. They've given a
million young people other ideas about how to spend the rest of their
lives, and commandeered a remarkable amount of media space. The Washington Post
on several occasions has devoted full page or near-full page
sympathetic coverage. Occupy is being taken increasingly seriously by
virtually all media.
Yet, the 1960s and 70s were also a marvelous movement adventure — for
me as much as for anyone — but nothing actually changed in US foreign
policy as a result of our endless protests, many of which were also
innovative. American imperialism has continued to add to its brutal
record right up to this very moment. We can't even claim Vietnam as a
victory. Most people believe that the US lost the war. But by
destroying Vietnam to its core, by poisoning the earth, the water, the
air, and the gene pool for generations, Washington in fact achieved its
primary purpose: preventing the rise of what might have been a good
development option for Asia, an alternative to the capitalist model.
It has greatly helped Occupy's growth and survival that they have
seldom mentioned foreign policy. That's much more sensitive ground than
corporate abuse. Foreign policy gets into flag-waving, "our brave
boys" risking their lives, American exceptionalism, nationalism,
patriotism, loyalty, treason, terrorism, "anti-American", "conspiracy
theorist" ... all those emotional icons that mainstream America uses to
separate a Good American from one who ain't really one of us.
Foreign policy cannot be ignored permanently of course, if for no
other reason than that the nation's wealth that's wasted on war could be
used to pay for anything Occupy calls for ... or anything anyone calls for.
The education which Occupy has caused to be thrust upon the citizenry
— about corporate abuse and criminality, political corruption,
inequality, poverty, etc., virtually all unprosecuted — would be highly
significant if America were a democracy. But as it is, more and more
people can learn more and more about these matters, and get more and
more angry, but have nowhere to turn to, to effectuate meaningful
change. Money must be removed from the political process. Completely.
It is my favorite Latin expression: sine qua non — "without which, nothing".
USrael and Iran
There's no letup, is there? The preparation of the American mind,
the world mind, for the next gala performance of D&D — Death and
Destruction. The Bunker Buster bombs are now 30,000 pounds each one,
six times as heavy as the previous delightful model..
But the Masters of War still want to be loved; they need for you to
believe them when they say they have no choice, that Iran is the latest
threat to life as we know it, no time to waste.
The preparation of minds was just as fervent before the invasion of
Iraq in March 2003. And when it turned out that Iraq did not have any
kind of arsenal of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) ... well, our power
elite found other justifications for the invasion, and didn't look
back. Some berated Iraq: "Why didn't they tell us that? Did they want
us to bomb them?"
In actuality, before the US invasion high Iraqi officials had stated
clearly on repeated occasions that they had no such weapons. In August
2002, Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz told American newscaster
Dan Rather on CBS: "We do not possess any nuclear or biological or
chemical weapons."1
In December, Aziz stated to Ted Koppel on ABC: "The fact is that we
don't have weapons of mass destruction. We don't have chemical,
biological, or nuclear weaponry."2
Hussein himself told Rather in February 2003: "These missiles have
been destroyed. There are no missiles that are contrary to the
prescription of the United Nations [as to range] in Iraq. They are no
longer there."3
Moreover, Gen. Hussein Kamel, former head of Iraq's secret weapons
program, and a son-in-law of Saddam Hussein, told the UN in 1995 that
Iraq had destroyed its banned missiles and chemical and biological
weapons soon after the Persian Gulf War of 1991.4
There are yet other examples of Iraqi officials telling the world that the WMD were non-existent.
And if there were still any uncertainty remaining, last year Hans
Blix, former chief United Nations weapons inspector, who led a doomed
hunt for WMD in Iraq, told a British inquiry into the 2003 invasion that
those who were "100 percent certain there were weapons of mass
destruction" in Iraq turned out to have "less than zero percent
knowledge" of where the purported hidden caches might be. He testified
that he had warned British Prime Minister Tony Blair in a February 2003
meeting — as well as US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in separate
talks — that Hussein might have no weapons of mass destruction.5
Those of who you don't already have serious doubts about the American
mainstream media's knowledge and understanding of US foreign policy,
should consider this: Despite the two revelations on Dan Rather's CBS
programs, and the other revelations noted above, in January 2008 we find
CBS reporter Scott Pelley interviewing FBI agent George Piro, who had
interviewed Saddam Hussein before he was executed:
PELLEY: And what did he tell you about how his weapons of mass destruction had been destroyed?
PIRO: He told me that most of the WMD had been
destroyed by the U.N. inspectors in the '90s, and those that hadn't been
destroyed by the inspectors were unilaterally destroyed by Iraq.
PELLEY: He had ordered them destroyed?
PIRO: Yes.
PELLEY: So why keep the secret? Why put your nation at risk? Why put your own life at risk to maintain this charade?6
The United States and Israel are preparing to attack Iran because of
their alleged development of nuclear weapons, which Iran has denied on
many occasions. Of the Iraqis who warned the United States that it was
mistaken about the WMD — Saddam Hussein was executed, Tariq Aziz is
awaiting execution. Which Iranian officials is USrael going to hang
after their country is laid to waste?
Would it have mattered if the Bush administration had fully believed
Iraq when it said it had no WMD? Probably not. There is ample evidence
that Bush knew this to be the case, or at a minimum should have
seriously suspected it; the same applies to Tony Blair. Saddam Hussein
did not sufficiently appreciate just how psychopathic his two
adversaries were. Bush was determined to vanquish Iraq, for the sake of
Israel, for control of oil, and for expanding the empire with new
bases, though in the end most of this didn't work out as the empire
expected; for some odd reason, it seems that the Iraqi people resented
being bombed, invaded, occupied, demolished, and tortured.
But if Iran is in fact building nuclear weapons, we have to ask: Is
there some international law that says that the US, the UK, Russia,
China, Israel, France, Pakistan, and India are entitled to nuclear
weapons, but Iran is not? If the United States had known that the
Japanese had deliverable atomic bombs, would Hiroshima and Nagasaki have
been destroyed? Israeli military historian, Martin van Creveld, has
written: "The world has witnessed how the United States attacked Iraq
for, as it turned out, no reason at all. Had the Iranians not tried to
build nuclear weapons, they would be crazy."7
It can not be repeated too often: The secret to understanding US
foreign policy is that there is no secret. Principally, one must come
to the realization that the United States strives to dominate the world.
Once one understands that, much of the apparent confusion,
contradiction, and ambiguity surrounding Washington's policies fades
away. Examine a map: Iran sits directly between two of the United
States' great obsessions — Iraq and Afghanistan ... directly between two
of the world's greatest oil regions — the Persian Gulf and Caspian Sea
areas ... it's part of the encirclement of the two leading potential
threats to American world domination — Russia and China ... Tehran will
never be a client state or obedient poodle to Washington. How could any
good, self-respecting Washington imperialist resist such a target?
Bombs Away!
American exceptionalism — A survey
The leaders of imperial powers have traditionally told themselves and
their citizens that their country was exceptional and that their
subjugation of a particular foreign land should be seen as a "civilizing
mission", a "liberation", "God's will", and of course bringing "freedom
and democracy" to the benighted and downtrodden. It is difficult to
kill large numbers of people without a claim to virtue. I wonder if
this sense of exceptionalism has been embedded anywhere more deeply than
in the United States, where it is drilled into every cell and ganglion
of American consciousness from kindergarten on. If we measure the
degree of indoctrination (I'll resist the temptation to use the word
"brainwashing") of a population as the gap between what the people
believe their government has done in the world and what the actual (very
sordid) facts are, the American people are clearly the most
indoctrinated people on the planet. The role of the American media is
of course indispensable to this process — Try naming a single American
daily newspaper or TV network that was unequivocally against
the US attacks on Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Panama, Grenada,
and Vietnam. Or even against any two of them. How about one? Which
of the mainstream media expressed real skepticism of The War on Terror
in its early years?
Overloaded with a sense of America's moral superiority, each year the
State Department judges the world, issuing reports evaluating the
behavior of all other nations, often accompanied by sanctions of one
kind or another. There are different reports rating how each lesser
nation has performed in the previous year in the areas of religious
freedom, human rights, the war on drugs, trafficking in persons, and
counterterrorism, as well as maintaining a list of international
"terrorist" groups. The criteria used in these reports are mainly
political, wherever applicable; Cuba, for example, is always listed as a
supporter of terrorism whereas anti-Castro exile groups in Florida,
which have committed literally hundreds of terrorist acts, are not
listed as terrorist groups.
- "The causes of the malady are not entirely clear but its
recurrence is one of the uniformities of history: power tends to confuse
itself with virtue and a great nation is peculiarly susceptible to the
idea that its power is a sign of God's favor, conferring upon it a
special responsibility for other nations — to make them richer and
happier and wiser, to remake them, that is, in its own shining image." —
Former US Senator William Fulbright, The Arrogance of Power (1966)
- "We Americans are the peculiar, chosen people –– the Israel of our
time; we bear the ark of the liberties of the world. ... God has
predestined, mankind expects, great things from our race; and great
things we feel in our souls." — Herman Melville, White-Jacket (1850)
- "God appointed America to save the world in any way that suits
America. God appointed Israel to be the nexus of America's Middle
Eastern policy and anyone who wants to mess with that idea is a)
anti-Semitic, b) anti-American, c) with the enemy, and d) a terrorist." — John le Carré, London Times, January 15, 2003
- "Neoconservatism ... traded upon the historic American myths of
innocence, exceptionalism, triumphalism and Manifest Destiny. It
offered a vision of what the United States should do with its unrivaled
global power. In its most rhetorically-seductive messianic versions, it
conflated the expansion of American power with the dream of universal
democracy. In all of this, it proclaimed that the maximal use of
American power was good for both America and the world." — Columbia
University Professor Gary Dorrien, The Christian Century magazine, January 22, 2007
- "To most of its citizens, America is exceptional, and it's only
natural that it should take exception to certain international
standards." — Michael Ignatieff, Washington Post columnist, Legal Affairs, May-June, 2002
-
Lieutenant Colonel Ralph Peters, US Army War College, 1997: "Our country is a force for good without precedent".
Thomas Barnett, US Naval War College: "The US military is a force for global good that ... has no equal." — The Guardian (London), December 27, 2005
-
John Bolton, future US ambassador to the United Nations, writing in
2000: Because of its unique status, the United States could not be
"legally bound" or constrained in any way by its international treaty
obligations. The U.S. needed to "be unashamed, unapologetic,
uncompromising American constitutional hegemonists," so that their
"senior decision makers" could be free to use force unilaterally.
Condoleezza Rice, future US Secretary of State, writing in 2000,
was equally contemptuous of international law. She claimed that in the
pursuit of its national security the United States no longer needed to
be guided by "notions of international law and norms" or "institutions
like the United Nations" because it was "on the right side of history."
— Z Magazine, July/August 2004
- "The president [George W. Bush] said he didn't want other
countries dictating terms or conditions for the war on terrorism. 'At
some point, we may be the only ones left. That's okay with me. We are
America'." — Washington Post, January 31, 2002
- "Reinhold Niebuhr got it right a half-century ago: What persists —
and promises no end of grief — is our conviction that Providence has
summoned America to tutor all of humankind on its pilgrimage to
perfection." — Andrew Bacevich, professor of international relations,
Boston University
- In commenting on Woodrow Wilson's moral lecturing of his European
colleagues at the Versailles peace table following the First World War,
Winston Churchill remarked that he found it hard to believe that the
European emigrants, who brought to America the virtues of the lands from
which they sprang, had left behind all their vices. — The World Crisis, Vol. V, The Aftermath, 1929
- "Behold a republic, gradually but surely becoming the supreme
moral factor to the world's progress and the accepted arbiter of the
world's disputes." — William Jennings Bryan, US Secretary of State under
Woodrow Wilson, In His Image (1922)
- Newsweek editor Michael Hirsch: "U.S. allies must accept
that some U.S. unilateralism is inevitable, even desirable. This mainly
involves accepting the reality of America's supreme might — and
truthfully, appreciating how historically lucky they are to be protected
by such a relatively benign power." — Foreign Affairs, November, 2002
- Colin Powell speaking before the Republican National Convention,
August 13, 1996: The United States is "a country that exists by the
grace of a divine providence."
- "The US media always has an underlying acceptance of the mythology
of American exceptionalism, that the US, in everything it does, is the
last best hope of humanity." — Rahul Mahajan, author of: The New Crusade: America's War on Terrorism, and Full Spectrum Dominance
- "The fundamental problem is that the Americans do not respect
anybody except themselves," said Col. Mir Jan, a spokesman for the
Afghan Defense Ministry. "They say, 'We are the God of the world,' and
they don't consult us." —Washington Post, August 3, 2002
- "If we have to use force, it is because we are America! We are
the indispensable nation. We stand tall. We see further into the
future." — Madeleine Albright, U.S. Secretary of State, 1998
People who like this sort of thing will find this the sort of thing they like.
To my dear readers in the United States and around the world — In the
spirit of the season, I wish each of you your choice of the following:
- Merry Christmas
- Happy Chanukah
- Joyous Eid
- Festive Kwanza
- Happy New Year
- Gleeful Occupy
- Erotic Pagan Rite
- Internet Virtual Holiday
- Heartwarming Satanic Sacrifice
- Devout Atheist Season's Greetings
- Possessed Laying-on-of-Hands Ceremony
- Really Neat Reincarnation with Auras and Crystals
And may your name never appear on a Homeland Security "No-fly list".
May you not vex a marginally literate high school graduate with a badge, a gun, and a can of pepper spray.
May your abuses at the hands of authority be only cruel, degrading
and inhuman, nothing that Mr. Obama or Mr. Cheney would call torture.
May you or your country never experience a NATO or US humanitarian intervention, liberation, or involuntary suicide.
May neither your labor movement nor your elections be supported by the National Endowment for Democracy.
May the depleted uranium, cluster bombs, white phosphorous, and
napalm which fall upon your land be as precisely guided and harmless as
the State Department says they are.
May you receive for Christmas a copy of "An arsonist's guide to the homes of Pentagon officials."
May you not fall sick in the United States without health insurance,
nor desire to go to an American university while being less than
wealthy.
May you re-discover what the poor in 18th century France discovered,
that rich people's heads can be mechanically separated from their
shoulders if they refuse to listen to reason.
May you be given the choice of euthanasia instead of having to watch Republican primary debates.
Notes
- CBS Evening News, August 20, 2002 ↩
- ABC Nightline, December 4, 2002 ↩
- 60 Minutes II, February 26, 2003 ↩
- Washington Post, March 1, 2003 ↩
- Associated Press, July 28, 2010 ↩
- 60 Minutes, January 27, 2008. See also: Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting [FAIR] Action Alert, February 1, 2008 ↩
- New York Times, August 21, 2004↩
–
William Blum is the author of:
- Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions Since World War 2
- Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower
- West-Bloc Dissident: A Cold War Memoir
- Freeing the World to Death: Essays on the American Empire
Portions of the books can be read, and signed copies purchased, at www.killinghope.org
Previous Anti-Empire Reports can be read at this website.
To add yourself to this mailing list simply send an email to bblum6 [at] aol.com
with "add" in the subject line. I'd like your name and city in the
message, but that's optional. I ask for your city only in case I'll be
speaking in your area.
(Or put "remove" in the subject line to do the opposite.)
Any part of this report may be disseminated without permission. I'd appreciate it if the website were mentioned.
Home