A few years ago Norman
Finkelstein established that Dershowitz is a plagiarist, but now
Dershowitz extends this infamous title - Now, he’s actually plagiarising
his own phantasmic fibs!
Just a week before Hanukah, fancying himself as a bit of a music
critic, Dershowitz described me as an ‘obscure saxophonist’. This was
amusing enough, but yesterday Dershowitz elaborated on his notion of
‘obscurity’. In an embarrassingly unimaginative and
vindictive article
he called Chicago University Professor of Philosophy Brian Leiter a
“relatively obscure professor of jurisprudence”.
For a native English
speaker (and a Harvard Professor) Dershowitz sure has a limited English
vocabulary.
Professor Leiter’s crime was obvious enough: he stood up for freedom
of expression and open debate. He defended Professor John Mearsheimer
who has endorsed ‘The Wandering Who’ and refused to bow to vile and
relentless Zionist pressure to withdraw his praise for the book.
To read Professor Leiter’s article click here.
Ethnic cleanser advocate Dershowitz writes:
“Without bothering
even to read Atzmon's book, Leiter pronounced that Atzmon's ‘positions
[do not mark him] as an anti-Semite [but rather as] cosmopolitan.’
Leiter also certified that Atzmon ‘does not deny the Holocaust or the
gas chambers.’ Had Leiter read the book, he could not have made either
statement.”
Dershowitz
sure has some chutzpah, since it’s actually he who didn’t read ‘The
Wandering Who’. If he had, he would have seen that in the book and in
all my writing I neither deny nor do I affirm any historical aspect of
the Holocaust, gas chambers or the Judeocide in general. Instead, I
insist that history cannot be sealed by laws. I also insist that
intellectual curiosity and our knowledge of the past cannot be vetted or
confined by anyone, let alone such morbid minds as that of Dershowitz
himself. Open society is about the openness to think freely and to
express those thoughts.
Dershowitz’ continues:
“Atzmon himself credits ‘a man who…was an
anti-Semite’ for ‘many of [his] insights’ and calls himself a
‘self-hating Jew’ who has contempt for ‘the Jew in me (him).’ If that's
not an admission of anti-Semitism, rather than ‘cosmopolitanism.’”
But is this really an ‘admission of antisemitism’? Let’s examine
Dershowitz’ intentionally lame, convoluted and misleading argument.
To
start with, the ‘Antisemite’ whom I indeed follow, is Otto Weininger,
one of the most influential intellects of pre- WWII Europe. But, it is
not Weininger’s alleged ‘antisemitism’ that I follow as I clearly note
in my book, but actually Weininger the genius philosopher. It is also
true that I am a ‘self hater’ and even a ‘proud self hater’ - an
intellectual position still legal in the West. It is also true that I
oppose the ‘Jew’ in me, but how does that make me into an antisemite? By
opposing the Jew in me, I oppose only an ideology.
Basically, I reject
all the symptoms Dershowitz and other Zionists manifest in every and
each of their relentless Judeo-centric hasbara campaigns i.e. supremacy,
duplicity, brutality, vindictivess, ignorance and arrogance.
Furthermore, I do not and cannot oppose or hate the ‘Semite’ in me. This is simply because there is
no such a quality in me. Unlike Dershowitz and his Zionists ilk, I do
not think in racial terms. I am honest enough to admit that I am no
‘Semite’ and that my ancestry lies not in Palestine. I am probably some
kind of Khazarian mongrel – as is Dershowitz and most European Jews.
Dershowitz continues, “Leiter went so far as to condemn those who
dared to criticize Mearsheimer for endorsing Atzmon's book, calling
their criticism ‘hysterical’ and not ‘advance[ing] honest intellectual
discourse.”
Professor Leiter is actually spot- on in here. Prophetically he
manages to describe Dershowitz’ tantrum - the Zionist advocate is
clearly hysterical as he tries desperately to block intellectual debate
and exchange. On numerous occasions I have invited Dershowitz for a
debate, but it seems the Zionist caricature would not or could not take
the risk. Dershowitz is evidently as much a coward as he is a loudmouth.
Towards the end of his rant as Dershowitz reaches his climax, Professor Leiter becomes just a category namely ‘the Leiters’. “The Leiters of the world”, says Dershowitz, “are an important part of the reason why anti-Semitic tropes are creeping back to legitimacy in academia.”
This has left me puzzled. What about the ‘remote’ possibility that it
is actually the Dershowitzes of the world who, by their misbehaviour and
by their support of the criminal Jewish State, are bringing shame and
even disaster, God forbid, on the Jews? I cannot understand how one of
America’s alleged ‘leading lawyers’ can fail to see that his shameless
behaviour may well be the root cause of the rapidly emerging anti-Jewish
feelings in America and beyond.
But it seems as if Professor Leiter, Professor Richard Falk,
Professor Mearsheimer and myself are not alone. According to
Zionist-parody Dershowitz, we are in a good company. Leading Republican
Candidate Ron Paul has also found his way into becoming a target for
Dershowitz’ impotent rage. Paul is accused of being affiliated with,
guess what, ‘anti semitism’ and ‘holocaust denial’.
http://youtu.be/GdDJvJJsVsU
For some reason, Dershowitz, one of the most despised Zionists ever,
seems to believe that he holds the moral high ground. “Shame on them!”
he proclaims referring to Professor Leiter and Ron Paul. Well,
Dershowitz must know quite a bit about shame - He sure brings a lot of
it on himself and on every Jew and Zionist foolish enough to associate
with him and his message.
To read a complete deconstruction of Dershowitz' lies click here.
To read the Dershowitz attack on Rep Ron Paul Professor Leiter and myself click
here.
