End of the Wild Soul: Homo Lobotimus and the War for Your Mind

Share this post...

Submit to DiggSubmit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to StumbleuponSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedIn
Taming the Human Psyche:
Triumph of the Master Class?
by Judith H. Young, Ph.D.
A tame animal then is one that does the will of a master…the prime feature of tameness, obedience to a master ….[T]o tame the majority of mankind…could only be done be leaving untamed a minority….possessing the most superior qualities of all.
 
The only hope is to use our knowledge of biology…towards improving [mankind’s] nature…. [1] The Next Million Years, 1952, by Charles Galton Darwin (1887-1962)
 
 
The above words were those of a topmost British elitist who expounded the final rolling out of the New World Order long planned by the Anglo-American globalists, and hailed by President George H. W. Bush in 1991 as a “very real prospect,” now “coming into view.”
 
Recently coming into public view have been several proposals in the media for taming the human populace that many perceive would amount to “biological lobotomization.” The last time this language was so conspicuous in the public arena was when the BBC documentary The Century of the Self

characterized the engineering of mass consumerism and egocentrism, spearheaded by psychopathic genius Edward Bernays, as the creation of "lobotomized happiness machines."

Bernays later spearheaded the campaign for mass consumption of fluoride, which not only lowers IQ but also fosters docility (and was thus used in Nazi concentration camps and Soviet gulags).  Implementation of the new proposals touted in the media would surpass even fluoridation in their efficacy in altering the human psyche in ways that serve the agenda of a global tyranny. 
 
This is a tyranny that is scientific and technocratic, not only in its use of advances in biowarfare but also of state-of-the-art techniques in consensus management.  It is a tyranny envisaged by its self-chosen architects as a system encountering little or no resistance because the oppressed will have been reprogrammed to love their servitude.
 

The word ‘lobotomized’ was also used by New World Order investigative analyst Alan Watt in summarizing the game plan of the global power elite laid out in Charles Galton Darwin’s The Next Million Years:

      He says…on page 132 “Breeds are specialized for particular purposes, but the essence of masters is that they must not

       be specialized.”  Now, here’s your key to it.  He goes on to say in this book too, that the elite, the master race or master

       breed, must retain all their survival capabilities…because THEY WILL BE GUIDING THE WORLD AND THE FUTURE OF THE

       WORLD.   So …they will not lobotomize themselves.  They will have US all lobotomized to be domestic creatures who work

       happily for them. [2]

The recent proposals in the media include genetically altering the brain in a way that would diminish the survival instinct, adding the toxic metal and psychotropic drug lithium to the public water supply, and dramatically expanding the mind control of U.S. troops through the use of ultrasound to stimulate regions of the brain to control alertness, anxiety/stress, physical pain, and “behavioral reinforcement.” [3]  In this article I will spend most of my focus on the first proposal, as a large amount of detail is available on it, the blow back it has encountered is remarkable, and the ensuing “spin” tactics of the controlled media are educational. 

In essence, it has been presented to us as a vaccination for re-engineering the brain to overcome stress.  On August 2, 2010, the Daily Mail published an article titled “Jab that could put a stop to stress without slowing us down:” 

    

      Academics say they are close to developing the first vaccine for stress – a single jab that would help us relax

       without slowing down.  After 30 years of research into cures for stress, Dr. Robert Sapolsky, professor of neuro-

       science at Stanford University, believes it is possible to alter brain chemistry to create a state of focused calm. [4]

Under a photo in which models reassuringly portray a medical authority figure in a white coat and a beaming patient about to receive her injection, the Daily Mail article characterizes the significance of the stress vaccine as follows:  “The future: The cure for stress could be converted into a vaccine and means big changes for society” (author's emphasis).

  

The  article reports that  Sapolsky  “claims he is on the path to a genetically engineered formula that could

remove the need for relaxation therapies or prescription drugs.”  Based on 30 years of study of the process in which all mammals produce adrenal steroid hormones called glucocorticoids in response to a threat, Sopolsky has concluded that modern man produces them excessively--both in amount and in inability to turn them off:
 

      After early setbacks, the Stanford team has adapted a herpes virus to carry engineered “neuroprotective” genes deep into

      the brain to neutralize the rogue hormones before they can cause damage…to reduce the neural damage caused by stress….

      Last week, a Stanford University colleague…said:  “In humans this engineered virus would shortcircuit the neural feedback

      caused by stress, that lingering feeling of tension after a crisis has passed.  It would leave you fresher and ready to deal with

      another threat, so you can maintain your drive, but with more focused calm rather than bad temper and digestion.  This could

      change society.” [5]    

All but a handful of the 46 reader comments on the article, which were posted from the U.S., Britain, Western Europe, Australia, and Japan, expressed dire concern over the implications of such a vaccine. The   level of awareness and insight in these comments was impressive, showing a segment of the populace with critical faculties and discernment regarding the ways power has been exploited at its profound expense.  This is reflected in the following sample of words and phrases spread throughout the comments:
 

·        "Mind control"

·        "Mass biochemical lobotomy"

·        "Creation of a nation of zombies"

·        "Androids"

·        "Compliant drones"

·        "Couch potatoes and sheeple being put further into a robotic state"

·        "MK Ultra for the masses"

·        "Brave New World soma"

·        "Opiate of the masses"

·        "1984"

·        "Totalitarian New World order"

·        "Big Pharma scam"

·        "Playing God"
 
Several of the especially astute comments are given in full below:
 

·        “Having a live herpes virus eat away parts of my brain is not sounding like the optimal choice for me.  Anger is a necessary emotion, and I embrace it!  I am angry that we are being poisoned with lithium, arsenic, lead and fluoride in the water we drink.  I am angry that we are being diseased by the modified food we eat.  I am angry that we are being vaccinated with well known neurotoxins.  I am angry that the nightly news reports on American Idol, but says nothing of Codex Alimentarius.  I am angry that we are over-medicated, under-educated and sorely uninformed.  I am angry that we are producing a society of dumbed down, distracted people who don't realize that they, too, should be angry!”

·        “Are you stressed? Don't worry, just roll up your sleeve and take this shot.  We can override your body's natural defences which have served well for thousands of years.  After all, you have to get back on your tax-wheel until you’re 70!  We can't have dissent!!  We thought the fluoride and aspartame would work!  Never mind, just roll up your sleeve and go to sleep.”

·        “It's always presented as if they want the best for us.  Meanwhile this is how they'll create zombie-nation.  Result: an enslaved humanity who can't protest the wars, orchestrated terror attacks, planned financial crisis that the elite of this world create.”

·        "I am not going to put a herpes virus in my brain to stop me from feeling anxious.  I think it is important to work your way through your emotions in the healthy, natural way God intended!…My husband is now trying to fit zombie-proofing our house into the budget.”

·        “Will this wonder drug then prevent people being stressed by sexual abuse and trauma to the point where it will no longer be reported or dealt with by society?” 

·        “Wonderful!  We will be quite relaxed about being directed to the exit booths, so calm, so happy.”

·        “Stress is your body's way of telling you something is wrong.  Turn it off and people are far less likely to make the changes that were the underlying causes of the stress in the first place….I just think we're too reliant on the whole "pill for every ill" way of thinking, rather than addressing the root cause of problems these days.

·        "The brain's ability to produce stress hormones has allowed this species to survive through countless disasters, wars, diseases, etc.  Stress is a natural part of man's biological condition and taking it away would have severe consequences on humanity.  Then when I discovered that this herpes virus actually kills neurons (brain damage), it all started to make sense....This is about changing humanity."

·        "This is one of the scariest things I have heard in a long time.  A shot for stress.  Change the whole biology of your brain for stress….We have plenty of EXTREMELY successful methods to handle stress.  Plus, don't you think stress occurs in us for a reason? THIS IS PLAYING GOD TO THE EXTREME!"

·        "Wake up folks.  There's a war on for your MIND."
 

The Daily Mail article was also picked up by CBS News—Health, and the stress vaccine work was covered by several other online venues that presented it in a positive way, notably a Wired Magazine article by contributing editor Jonas Lehrer entitled "Under Pressure: The Search for a Stress Vaccine."  Calling Sapolsky “one of the leading researchers on the science of stress,” Lehrer tells us that in 2003 “he decided to attack the condition head-on.“

      In 2003, he proposed a vaccinelike treatment that protects people against stress. It’s a hugely ambitious attempt to combat

     a societal scourge at the level of our DNA. Although years of work remain, Sapolsky now insists that, given the public health

     consequences, it’s time to take the problem seriously, to move our treatments beyond talk therapy and Valium. “Sometimes

     it’s not enough just to tell people, ‘Jeez, you should really learn to relax’,”  Sapolsky says. “If stress is half as bad for you as

     we currently think it is, then it’s time to stop treating the side effects. It’s time to go after stress itself”…. Sapolsky has [not]

     stopped thinking big thoughts. In fact, his main research project is absurdly ambitious: He wants to create a vaccinelike

     treatment for chronic stress, a genetic therapy that can prevent the struggles of life from wrecking brain and body.  [6]

The media exposure of Sapolsky’s stress vaccine research created a stir among concerned “infowarriors,” including a heated exchange with Jonas Lehrer in his Wired “Frontal Cortex” blogs.  The fracas stemmed in part from putative differences in interpretation of what Lehrer wrote about Sapolsky's work: Lehrer misleadingly claimed what “what my article discusses are possible treatments that, if we’re lucky, will one day be used to help prevent brain damage in stroke victims.”  But at root it stemmed from differing loyalties.  In Lehrer's worldview, 1) “we seem to squander ever more oxygen on worthless conversations about Obama’s  birth  certificate  and the North American Union”; 2) “if you can imagine the conspiracy theory, there is…a clan of fellow believers who share your peculiar obsession with fluoridated drinking water and the New World Order”; 3) fear that the government is putting lithium in the water is “angry ignorance” and is one of the “greatest hits of idiotic conspiracy theories”; and 4) the “psychology of conspiracy theory”  is marked by “the mental flaw” of cognitive dissonance. [7]

The controversy was instrumental in some extraordinary consciousness raising about the dangers of elitist efforts to re-engineer the human mind, including articles and videos by Alex Jones and his associates Paul Joseph Watson and Aaron Dykes. [8] Soon after, the dangerous implications of the stress vaccine were reaffirmed by renowned health and wellness educator Joseph Mercola, M.D. 

Dr. Mercola’s expert medical opinion is that “artificially manipulating stress hormones to create a state of ‘focused calm’--using a genetically engineered, herpes-containing vaccine that essentially short-circuits your brain's normal response to stress--is a risky proposition at best.” [9] He places Sapolsky’s work within the context of what he calls the “vaccine myth,” in reference to the dangers of vaccinations for communicable diseases--a subject currently at the forefront of public policy concerns as a result of heartbreaking consequences of the flu shots being aggressively promoted both here and abroad. He observes that stress is not a communicable infectious disease that would qualify for vaccination, but rather a natural response whose ill effects can be addressed effectively without the help of Big Pharma.  And he brings to mind the hidden agenda of the New World Order architects, who see the mind as the “final frontier” to be conquered by neuroscience, when he asks: “Will we soon be lining up to get vaccines to protect against sadness, anger, and anxiety too?  Perhaps we can develop a shot to make us virtually immune to any of the feelings that make us human!”

One of the comments on Dr. Mercola's article wisely notes that in lieu of a new stress vaccine we need to address some of the root causes of the new level of social anxiety.  This insight reflects the broader one that the modus operandi of the globalists has always been Problem / Reaction / Solution.  The problem in this instance is that they have relentlessly used carefully crafted advanced techniques to create stress on a level devastating to the average human, and their solution is to engineer consent to biochemical “emotional lobotomy.”  Dr. Mercola is “already wondering where they're going to find volunteers willing to have a modified herpes virus designed to travel deep into their brain injected into their bodies.  Then again, with the positive slant the media is placing on this latest vaccine concoction, they may very well have people ready and waiting.”

The dovetailing of the media coverage of the recent lithium proposals with the stress vaccine coverage has raised a fascinating question as to the hidden agenda of new globalist biochemical assaults.  Has the previous multi-faceted campaign designed to turn people into sheeple been so effective that a new “booster” or “piggy-back” is seen as holding promise for closure? Or, alternatively, has the historic worldwide awakening to the evils of the ruling class noted by Zbigniew Brzezinski--portending a shift in the balance of power between rulers and dissidents--necessitated an escalated effort to conquer the mass mind?

With respect to the controversy regarding the proper interpretation of Sapolsky’s work, it is vital to turn to primary sources, rather than relying on brief mass media articles or even the more detailed exposition given by Wired Magazine’s Jonas Lehrer.  To ascertain the precise parameters of the work and draw our own conclusions about their ramifications we can examine Sapolsky’s own report to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), one of the funders of his team at Stanford. [10] Below is a summary of his NIH report, "Stress and Health: From Molecules to Societies."

At the molecular level, Sapolsky details efforts to explore “rational intervention” in the deleterious effects of stress on the human nervous system, including “gene therapy to save neurons from these effects.”  He begins with an exposition of glucocorticoid stress hormones (GCs) as a “double-edged sword:” on the one hand we would be dead without their mobilizing effects when  confronted  with a  threat such  as predatory lion, but on the other hand we secrete them “too often” for “too long” and for “purely psychogenic or psychosocial reasons.”   This results in what Sapolsky perceives as regular damage to our

nervous system, including killing and endangering neurons in the vital hippocampus region of the brain.

He reports that there is convincing evidence that the dynamic of GC damage and endangerment of hippocampus neurons in laboratory rats holds true for the primate brain as well.  In the stress cycle of both rats and humans, the GC dynamic is useful in cases such as predator lions, e.g., in diverting our energy to our thigh muscles to facilitate flight.  But in the case of stroke or other assaults to the brain such as seizures, it actually makes matters worse by exacerbating the brain’s sudden “energy crisis.” 

After working with several suboptimal approaches, the team’s research focus shifted to gene therapy that would act only during a stress situation or episode.  It was known that the herpes virus activates during stress, flaring up in correlation with situational stressors, such as bereavement or chemotherapy.  After Harvard researchers found that the virus is actually able to measure the levels of GC secretion and thus knows when one is stressed, Sapolsky’s team landed on a vector.  They chose the “neuroprotective” gene estrogen, and created an artificial gene that is half GC receptor and half estrogen receptor.  As a result of this “chimeric artificial receptor,” the brain would act as if responding to estrogen as well as to GCs, and GC production would thus be mitigated. This convinced them that they were “moving in the right direction…. now aware of the nuts and bolts of what goes wrong in a stress response [and]…beginning to design rational intervention, including gene therapy.”

When Sapolsky discusses the societal-level implications of this work, he makes the explosive statement that it holds potential for “gene therapy for psychiatric disorders.”  He explains this by stating that it was discovered that the herpes vector not only reduced the effects of stress in rats but also reduced the amount of fear and anxiety in their brains' amygdala, even to the point of creating behavioral changes: the rats became more apt to explore open spaces, which they would normally avoid as areas of potential danger. 

I perceive this component of Sapolsky’s presentation more than any other to lend credence to the profound concern his work created in the Daily Mail readers and in prominent educators.  The implications of his report of genetically engineered rats that seek out potentially dangerous situations they would otherwise avoid are mind boggling.  Equally disturbing is another report co-authored by Sapolsky and published in 2009 in Biological Psychiatry, “Disruption of fear memory through dual-hormone gene therapy.”  This work also involved a chimerical gene that “transduces GC signals into estrogenic ones” in laboratory rats.  It thereby significantly disrupted “long-term fear memory consolidation” and showed promise for “understanding the role of steroid hormones in the storage of traumatic memories.”  [11]

It is evident that examining the details of the Stanford team’s genetically modified gene research not only raises concerns about its implications for our instinctual and behavioral threat responses, but also for our retention of threat-related memories!  And it is important to bear in mind that what is presented to the public as university-level scientific research is only the tip of the iceberg of the far more advanced classified R&D underway at intelligence units and elitist think tanks such as Tavistock -- and of R&D at levels even above those.

There is indisputable ground for abhorrence and refusal of brain-altering vaccines derived from such research.  Indeed, there is justified public concern about the safety of vaccines of all types.  This concern stems from myriad sources, including many cases in which authorities have mandated vaccines and other agents, such as water fluoridation, that cause grievous harm such as seizures, brain damage, docility, infertility, paralysis and even death.  The potential for harm is ipso facto greater in countries in which health care is centrally controlled, which will increasingly include the U.S. if the infrastructure of ObamaCare unfolds as legislated.

Another concern is the possibility of vaccine delivery through stealth.  In addition to an array of stealth techniques already used, such as toxic aerial spraying and the sale of genetically altered food without informed consent, there are lesser known secretive delivery systems in the works.  These include pharmaceutically bioengineered crops that would contain concealed vaccines, and nanoparticles that would

release vaccines when they come in contact with human sweat after undisclosed dispersal (e.g., through the ventilation system of office buildings or public schools). [12]

In the final analysis, globalist biowarfare assaults are nothing more than the ultimate public policy out-comes of elitist planning that has been long underway for engineering a population to enjoy its servitude.  In his 1952 book The Impact of Science on Society, a core proponent and operative of the Anglo power elite, Bertrand Russell, wrote at length about powerful forms of social engineering for “creating a servile population, including vaccinations filled with mercury and other brain-damaging compounds.”  More generally, Russell expounded on various mechanisms -- including “diet, injections, and injunctions” -- to ensure that any serious criticism of the ruling elite would become psychologically impossible.  "Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them they are so.”  [13]  A similar confidence was expressed by fellow traveler Aldous Huxley, author of a very early fictionalized account of the scientific dictatorship, Brave New World (1932).  In a 1962 speech at the University of California at Berkeley, Huxley revealed that “we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably will always exist to get people to love their servitude:” 


          A number of techniques…[used in] Brave New World seem to be here already.  And there seems to be a  general

          movement in the direction of this kind of ultimate revolution, a method of control by which a people  can be made

          to enjoy a state of affairs by which any decent standard they ought not to enjoy.  [14]

But a statement by Russell promoting eugenics in the service of pathocrats has achieved the most notoriety: "Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species.  A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton." [15] 

This last statement has seized the attention of freedom lovers worried profoundly about the incremental

deterioration of human people into dumbed down "sheeple."  An alarming proportion of the human populace even in the United States appears to be steadily worsening in its "sheeple" nature, both in 1) its overall docility in the face of ever-increasing challenges to its well-being; and 2) its cognitive level.  A recent example of the former was the impassioned obsession with basketball icon LeBron James' decision to leave Ohio at the very time the New York Times and other major news media were reporting severe economic depression and other dangers, even in Ohio itself.  Examples of the latter, diminished cognitive level, were the many people interviewed in Jay Leno's July 4th "Jaywalking" who were ignorant of the very basics of Independence Day, including from what nation and in what year we had won our independence: even a college instructor answered that the year was 1922. [16] A more generalized example is recent statistical test score comparison studies, which show that American school children have fallen behind their counterparts even in third world countries. [17]

The ideology that drives the scientific tyranny agenda is one of presumed biological superiority and right to rule, claimed to be confirmed by the elites' success throughout history in accordance with the evolutionary principle of the “survival of the fittest.”   The disgusting worldview at play is blatant in the work of Maurice Strong, former Secretary General of the United Nations Committee for Environment and Development (UNCED) and employee of the Rockefeller and Rothschild trusts and projects.  Strong is widely regarded as the founding father of the modern environmental movement.  He was a key promoter of the Earth Summit in the early 1990s which pushed the theory of global warming.  He was also part of the Club of Rome cabal whose 1991 Report, “The First Global Revolution,” openly admitted the theory was a hoax aimed at promoting a New World Order.  At an UNCED meeting he headed in 1991, Strong distributed a manifesto of the Cobden Club Secretariat for World Order which included the following statement:

                                                                                   

      We are the living sponsors of the great Cecil Rhodes will of 1877, in which Rhodes devoted his fortune to:  “the extension

      of British rule throughout the world...the colonization by British subjects of the entire Continent of Africa, the Holy Land,

      the Valley of the Euphrates, the islands of Cyprus and Candia, the whole of South America, the islands of the Pacific not

      heretofore possessed by Great Britain, the whole of the Malay archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan, the ultimate  

      recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire....”

      We stand with Lord Milner's Credo.  We too are “British Race patriots” and our patriotism is “the speech, the tradition, the

      principles, the aspirations of the British Race.”   Do you fear to take this stand at the very last moment when this purpose

      can be realized?  Do you not see that failure now is to be pulled down by the billions of Lilliputians of lesser race who care

      little or nothing for the Anglo-Saxon system?  [18]

It is shattering to fully realize that psychopathic elites have long perceived humans as nothing more than Lilliputians or future domesticated animals that will love serving their masters. As I recently stated in "The Permanent  Dehumanizing  of  Humanity?"  [ www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=19878 ],

the most terrifying  aspect of the elites' agenda to diminish human nature is that they have succeeded alarmingly in reducing our capacity even to notice this agenda, let alone its enormous progress to date.  Humanity is in large part like someone with late-term cancer who is not even aware that he has it, let alone of the means by which he might eliminate it.

In a piercing insight of Alan Watt, we are the last sentient generation on the planet that can take action to stop the pathocrats who seek to lead us to our doom.  If we allow the elitists to succeed in fundamentally altering that sentience through their biowarfare programs, we will have permanently abdicated humanity's right to take its destiny into its own hands.

 
 
 

Judith H. Young, Ph.D., has a B.A. and an M.A. in Philosophy from Vassar College and Brown University respectively.  Her Ph.D. is in Political Science from Brandeis University.  Dr. Young has also studied psychology extensively at the postgraduate level.  In the 1960s she was a published think tank researcher in the areas of international politics, conflict resolution, and arms control.  In 1973-74 she taught International Politics at Mount Holyoke University in Massachusetts.

In the 1990s Dr. Young became a practitioner in the healing arts, including animal-assisted therapy and mind-body wellness.  She founded a nonprofit animal and nature center dedicated to promoting the healthy development of children and youth, which she directed from 1994-2004, and she published pieces in equine-assisted activities and eco-therapy. 

Dr. Young has resumed her earlier vocation of writer and educator in international politics, philosophy and psychology.  She is currently writing a book titled The Dark Night of the Collective Soul: Pain Tearing Through Us Like a Holocaust.

Web site: www.humanity-rising.com

 

Endnotes

1.  Darwin, Charles Galton, The Next Million Years, New York: Doubleday & Company, 1953, pp. 116, 117, 123, 208.  Charles Galton Darwin was the grandson of Charles Darwin.  He was a leading British physicist,

a member of the ultra elitist Royal Society, and, on the approach of World War II in 1938, the director of the National Physical Laboratory.  He spent much of the war years working on the Manhattan Project, coordinating the American, British, and Canadian efforts.  On his retirement, he turned his attention to

issues of human nature, genetics and eugenics, writing his conclusions in his 1953 book, The Next Million

Years.  Already a member of The British Eugenic Society, he served as President from 1953-1959.

Although written in oblique terms with much pseudo-moralism, reading between the lines reveals that his book is in fact a blueprint for the global tyranny that the highly inbred British eugenicists had been planning for generations.  See the source in footnote 2. for details of the multigenerational inbreeding of the Darwins, Galtons, Huxleys, and Keynes, all at the core of planning for a scientific tyranny with eugenics as its foundation.

2.  Watt, Alan, November 19, 2008 (#198) Alan Watt “Cutting Through the Matrix” LIVE on RBN:

http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.net/transcripts/Alan_Watt_CTTM_LIVEonRBN_198_Class_Arrogance_and_Darwinian_Agenda_Nov192008.html.  Alan is live on RBN Monday through Friday from 8:00-9:00 pm EST.  His website is www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com.

3.  Miller, Max, "#1: Drug Our Drinking Water," Big Think Dangerous Ideas [“August is the month of thinking dangerously: one new radical idea a day”], http://bigthink.com/ideas/21538; Ryan, Matt, "New York Times and Other Media Pushing for Drugging Water Supply," August 2, 2010, infowars.com, http://www.infowars.com/new-york-times-and-other-media-pushing-for-drugging-water-supply/; see also Nimmo, Kurt, "Fox News Covers Mass Drugging of Society with Lithium," December 16, 2009, infowars.com, http://www.infowars.com/fox-news-covers-mass-drugging-of-society-with-lithium/.

Tyler, Dr. William J, “Remote Control of Brain Activity Using Ultrasound,” Armed with Science, Septem- ber 1, 2010, http://science.dodlive.mil/2010/09/01/remote-control-of-brain-activity-using-ultrasound/; Dillow, Clay, “DARPA Wants to Install Transcranial Ultrasonic Mind Control Devices in Soldiers' Helmets:   Standard Issue Mind Control - DARPA wants ultrasound-enhanced helmets that allow soldiers to stimu-

late certain regions of their brains.,” PopSci,  September 9,  2010, http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-09/darpa-wants-mind-control-keep-soldiers-sharp-smart-and-safe.

 

4.  Quigley, Rachel, "Jab that could put a stop to stress without slowing us down," Mail Online/Health, August 2, 2010,     http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1299540/Jab-stop-stress-slowing-down.html

For a related technical paper, see Cheng MY, Sun G, Jin M, Zhao H, Steinberg GK, and Sapolsky RM, "Blocking glucocorticoid and enhancing estrogenic genomic signaling protects against cerebral ischemia," Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow Metabolism, 2009; 29 (1): 130-136.

5.  Ibid.

6.  Leher, Jonas, "Under Pressure: The Search for a Stress Vaccine," July 28, 2010:Wired Magazine August 2010 issue: The Future That Never Happened, www.wired.com/magazine/2010/07/ff_stress_cure/all/1.

  

7.  Wired Blog Posts:

·        Lehrer, Jonah, "The Brain Eating Vaccine Conspiracy," August 4, 2010,

          www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/08/the- brain-eating-vaccine-conspiracy/   

·        Lehrer, Jonah, "The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories,"  August 4, 2010,

          www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/08/the-psychology-of-conspiracy-theories

          Lehrer, Jonah, "The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories," August 4, 2010.

8.  Watson, Paul Joseph, "The Psychology of Conspiracy Denial," August 5, 2010, infowars.com, http://www.infowars.com/the-psychology-of-conspiracy-denial; Watson, Paul Joseph, "Brain Eating Vaccines: The Reality Behind the “Conspiracy Theory,” August 4, 2010, infowars.com; Dykes, Aaron, "‘Brain eating vaccines’ tops Google trends, fuels attack piece," August 4, 2010, infowars.com, http://www.infowars.com/%E2%80%98brain-eating-vaccines%E2%80%99-tops-google-trends-fuels-attack-piece/ 

The two Alex Jones videos are:

   1) "Establishment Media Pushes Brain Eating Vaccines," August 3, 2010, embedded in the above articles

        and also at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cm3PYZ0N7Dg&feature=bulletin; and

   2) "Scientific Dictatorship Wants Lobotomized, Subservient Public," August 3, 2010,

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bG9u8WNe6IM&feature=related.

9.  Mercola, Joseph, M.D., "Media Now Promoting Brain Eating Vaccines," August 24 2010, Mercola.com, http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/08/24/herpes-virus-use.

10. Sapolsky, Robert  Dr., "Stress and Health: From Molecules to Societies," October 28, 2009, the annual Florence S. Mahoney Lecture as part of the NIH Wednesday Afternoon Lecture Series, http://videocast.nih.gov/Summary.asp?File=15399

11. Rodrigues, SM, and Sapolsky, RM, "Disruption of fear memory through dual-hormone gene therapy:” Biological Psychiatry, 2009; 65 (5), pp.  441-44.

12. "Nobel laureate scientist defines future vaccines as 'food'" June 21, 2010, Expo 2010 Shanghai China, http://en.expo2010.cn/a/20100621/000003.htm; Adams, Mike, "Bill Gates funds covert vaccine nanotech-nology," Natural News, August 23, 2010, http://www.naturalnews.com/028887_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html

13. Russell, Bertrand, The Impact of Science on Society, (Routledge, 1985), p. 62.

14. Huxley, Aldous, “The Ultimate Revolution,” March 20, 1962 Berkeley Language Center - Speech Archive SA 0269: http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/Speech/VideoTest/audiofiles.html#huxley

15. Russell, The Impact of Science on Society, p.  63.

16. Leno, Jay, The Tonight Show, July 4 Jaywalking segment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkQ6XgXeNuY&feature=player_embedded.

17.  "International Test Scores: Poor U.S. Test Results Tied to Weak Curriculum," 4Choice, January 27, 2010, http://4brevard.com/choice/default.htm

18.  Hunt, George, May 1, 1992, Video providing statements by Strong, Edmund de Rothschild and other globalists, http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=898.  The same manifesto was distributed at the June 1992 Brazil UNCED Conference as an Initiative for an Eco-92 Earth Charter.  See: "In 1992 George Hunt Exposes Elitist Environmental SCAM," Daily Paul, http://www.dailypaul.com/node/119319

 

 

Share this post...

Submit to DiggSubmit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to StumbleuponSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedIn