Main Menu

Death to Smoochie: Ruddy Good Show for Oz

Share this post...

Submit to DiggSubmit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to StumbleuponSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedIn
Kiss of Death
by John Nichols
President Bush recently traveled to Australia to thank conservative Prime Minister John Howard for making that country a member of the "coalition of the willing" U.S. allies in the occupation of Iraq.

Bush's trip was supposed to shore Howard up as national elections approached. Instead, the president planted what turned out to be a political kiss of death on his most willing accomplice.

When the votes from Down Under were counted Saturday, it was instantly clear that the vast majority of Australians are no longer willing to participate in the American president's misadventure in the Middle East.



[Republished at PFP with Agence Global permission.
For more on Howard's successor, see this article from the Bangkok Post]
 

A stunning and complete defeat of Australian Prime Minister John Howard reverberates globally, as the country votes in leadership that will take Australia's foreign policy away from George Bush's dominance.

 
 
Bush's "Australian poodle" is no longer in charge. In fact, Howard has been so thoroughly rejected that he's likely to be out of Australian politics altogether.


After a landslide shift to the left by the Australian electorate, Howard -- who was every bit as nasty and gaffe-prone as his pal Dick Cheney -- will be replaced by a left-leaning intellectual who was elected on a platform that promised to withdraw his country's troops from Iraq, and to develop a new foreign policy that will be more independent of the United States.


As in Spain, Italy, and a number of other former "coalition of the willing" countries, the Australian electorate has effectively voted the troops home. Australia has only about 500 troops in Iraq, but that contingent is one of the larger of the non-U.S. "coalition" forces left in the country.


Australia's abandonment of the Iraq project is not the only change that is coming to the country that had, under Howard's leadership, been the steadiest U.S. ally of the Bush era.


The new prime minister, Kevin Rudd, will adopt a radically different approach than his predecessor did when it comes to global warming. Where Howard was one of Bush's few allies in international debates about climate change, Rudd promises to sign the Kyoto Protocol and to make Australia a greener and more pleasant land. And He will be assisted by his Labour Party's pointman on environmental issues: Peter Garrett, the long-time lead singer of the rock band Midnight Oil, a veteran anti-nuclear weapons campaigner who left the stage to become a member of parliament.


So committed is Rudd to shifting his country's approach to climate change that the new prime minister is expected to lead Australia's delegation to the upcoming United Nations climate change conference in Bali.


Rudd is no radical. He's the mildest of socialists in what is today only a mildly socialist Labour Party. But compared to Howard, who followed the Bush line so slavishly, Rudd promises a welcome change of course for a nation that remains a significant player in the politics of the planet.


And Rudd has a mandate. After 11 years out of power, Labour went into last Saturday's election with a 16-seat deficit in the parliament. It now has a majority of at least 22 seats over Howard's right-wing Liberal party. Among many prominent Liberals headed for defeat was the prime minister himself, who acknowledged late Saturday that he was likely to become the first head of government to lose his own seat since 1929. And so it was.


To understand the scale of the rejection of Howard -- who has for 33 years represented the historically conservative seat for Bennelong in suburban Sydney -- imagine Bush losing in the Houston suburbs. Of course, recent surveys have consistently shown that a majority of Texans disapprove of the American president -- indeed, a July Survey USA poll found that 57 percent of the voters in Bush's home state object to his approach.


So, perhaps, the only difference between Australia and America is that there was an election in Australia Saturday. Had there been one in the U.S., it wouldn't have just been the poodle who was tossed out -- the master would have gone, too.




John Nichols is the Washington correspondent for The Nation magazine.

Copyright ©2007 The Nation

----------------
Released: 26 November 2007
Word Count: 631
----------------


For rights and permissions, contact:


This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., 1.336.686.9002 or 1.212.731.0757


Agence Global
www.agenceglobal.com   
1.212.731.0757 (main)
1.336.286.6606 (billing)
1.336.686.9002 (rights & permissions)


Agence Global is the exclusive syndication agency for The Nation, Le Monde diplomatique, as well as expert commentary by Richard Bulliet, Mark Hertsgaard, Rami G. Khouri, Peter Kwong,Tom Porteous, Patrick Seale and Immanuel Wallerstein.
 
 
 
 
 
 
-------------------
Released: 26 November 2007
Word Count: 631
Rights & Permissions Contact: Agence Global, 1.336.686.9002, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.  
-------------------

Share this post...

Submit to DiggSubmit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to StumbleuponSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedIn

Bottommenu