The way in which funds will continue to flow into profit-making pockets is to use this phrase â€œin harmâ€™s way.â€ The stock portfolio of every person using this phrase should be examined. Itâ€™s a convenient catch-22. â€œWe wonâ€™t cut off the funding as long as they are in harmâ€™s wayâ€ - and as long as they are being funded they will stay in harmâ€™s way â€“ â€œand as long as they are in harmâ€™s way we must continue funding andâ€¦.â€ One way or another somebody is making a killing.
The same verbal contortions were exercised over the word, â€œsurge.â€ Someone caught on and now the dueling nouns are surge vs. escalation. Surge has an interesting relationship to the word insurgent. The word surge is dead in the middle of the word insurgent.
An insurgent is another word for what? Terrorist? Patriot? Criminal? The bad guys? Yes â€“ the bad guys are major characters in the storybook world of harmâ€™s way.
The White House spokesman uses the term â€œthe bad guysâ€ often. All we need to know is that the bad guys are causing the harm that our guys are in the way of. So more money and more of our guys are needed to â€“ pacify? Quell? Kill? Obliterate?
The American soldiers love each other. They are brothers. They donâ€™t want to leave each other and they want revenge if a bad guy hurts one of them. Wives, mothers and fathers are proud of them. Lawmakers claim to worry about them every second of every day. The president will produce a photo op tear over the bravery of a soldier who threw himself on a hand grenade to save his friends. Itâ€™s all undeniably moving â€“ and infuriating
When a member of congress uses the phrase â€œas long as our men and women are in harmâ€™s wayâ€ it seems to ennoble him. Concern for the soldiers creates a collateral glow on the statesman.
But itâ€™s false. Unearned. Bogus. Because congress decided to let them be exclusively at the beck and call of the president the soldiers were in harmâ€™s way well before they landed in Iraq.
Bill C. Davis is a Playwright. www.billcdavis.com