However, the manner of his capture, trial and termination is beyond reproach for a nation, which swaggers about pretending to be a beacon of justice. Has justice been served? Or, was Saddam essentially â€œwhackedâ€ by one powerful crime family asserting its strength over a boastful, operator encroaching on forbidden turf. No offense Saddam. It was only business.
Control of â€œinterestsâ€ is paramount. Americaâ€™s one time friend and ally, Saddam Hussein, became dispensable when he ceased to uphold his part of the bargain. Saddamâ€™s failed war against another U.S. demon, Iran, his 1990 invasion into Kuwait threatening U.S. oil interests, and his alleged plot to kill former president George H. W. Bush, sealed the fate of â€œDonâ€ Hussein. He had to go. He had outlived his usefulness. It was in the best â€œinterestsâ€ of The Bush Dynasty. Today, the interests of the Bush clan take precedence over those of the U.S. With some media encouragement, Bush runs the US government like a â€œfamilyâ€ business.
After a decade of carefully executed demonizing, it was easy to sell a gullible U.S. public on the mission to remove Saddam. Never mind the fact that many of Saddamâ€™s shockingly oppressive murders of Iraqi citizens were sanctioned by the White House which chose to turn a blind eye as long as Saddam served â€œAmericanâ€ interests.
When he became less useful, Saddam was portrayed as â€œPublic Enemy Number One.â€ Overnight, Saddamâ€™s use of torture, Geneva Convention banned substances on his own people, and his possession of and intentions of using weapons of mass destruction were the biggest crimes against humanity. What changed? Hadnâ€™t those crimes always been heinous?
A good, old-fashioned war was convened, the â€œmissionâ€ was declared â€œaccomplished,â€ and the bad guy was captured, locked up and made to face â€œjustice.â€
The Pandoraâ€™s Box of chaos, long held tightly shut under Saddamâ€™s fist, popped open spilling out anarchy. Pity the fate of the â€œcoalition of the willing.â€
No WMDs were found, no rose petals were strewn on the path of the triumphant â€œliberators,â€ no democracy formed in Iraq and no one in Iraq believes they are safer today than they were before Bushâ€™s March 2003 invasion.
Saddam was subjected to a show trial more in keeping with â€œUncle Joeâ€ Stalin. Then the US military handed over â€œphysical controlâ€ of Saddam to the Iraqi government which entity proceeded in thirty minutes to lynch him. No blood on U.S. hands! What corrupt backdoor deals and secrets have been silenced with him? Weâ€™ll never know. Looks like someone thought it was best to play it safe and make sure Saddam, the rat, didnâ€™t squeal. The interests of The Dynasty must be protectedâ€¦ oil.
In a pathetic last minute attempt to stave off execution, Saddamâ€™s lawyers actually resorted to a desperate plea for mercy to the United States! Unbelievable. Had they not read the statistics on Texas executions during George W. Bushâ€™s tenure as governor? Was Georgeâ€™s reaction another mocking â€œplease donâ€™t kill me?â€ Not only does George talk to God but also he thinks he isâ€¦ the Old Testament God of vengeance. This is what is so revolting.
Bush has used the furor about the execution to distract the media from the real issue at hand: his plan to ignore the Iraq Study Group Report and to escalate the war. In the past Bush has used Saddam to justify a variety of crimes. Even the Hussein verdict date was â€œriggedâ€ to help Bushâ€™s party in the recent mid-term congressional elections. How will Bush function without Saddam? Go after Osama bin Laden?
Well, Saddam is gone. For Bush interests, Saddam dead may be more dangerous than Saddam alive. For the Sunni minority in Iraq, the memory of Saddam may become a rallying point. In the Guardian newspaper, Brian Brivati argues that Saddamâ€™s â€œdeath may well come to be a defining moment in which the terrorists are given their symbolic martyr to avenge. An evil genocidal dictator dies and, in death, perhaps becomes more powerful than he ever was in life.â€
Being the leader of Iraq has rather lost its charm. Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Kamel al-Maliki wants to depart the office as soon as possible. Would you want that job?
Eventually another version of Saddam Hussein will gain sufficient dictatorial control of Iraq to end the civil war through the exercise of another iron fist aided by popular, secular support. As long as American interests are protected, will Washington turn a blind eye to a new Iraqi dictatorâ€™s brio and send over yet another envoy eager to shake the hand of the ruler of the new regime? Most likely.
Ironically, that would be a happy ending to the Bush family adventures in Iraq. Less salubrious prospects such as a protracted Sunni-Shia fight to the death could spill over into and unsettle other Middle East countries. And that would be bad for business.
Meanwhile, woe to Americaâ€™s few remaining â€œfriends and alliesâ€ who fail to serve U.S. and Bush Family â€œinterests.â€
Elizabeth Gyllensvard contributed to and edited this story.