by Walter Brasch
The ressignation of Donald Rumsfeld doesn't change the problem of a President who is incompetent and malevolent, nor is it likely to bring about a significant change in the Iraq policy.
The forced resignation of Donald Rumsfeld the day after the midterm elections says as much about the Secretary of Defense as it does about the President of the United States.
Almost seven months before the elections, six retired generals, including two who commanded divisions in Iraq, called for Rumsfeldâ€™s resignation. In response, President Bush said that Rumsfeld was â€œdoing a fine job.â€
Two months before the midterm elections, Josh Bolten, the Presidentâ€™s chief of staff, told the Democratic leadership, who had demanded Rumsfeldâ€™s resignation, â€œWe strongly disagree.â€ By the Presidentâ€™s direction, he told the opposition party that Rumsfeld â€œis an honorable and able public servant [who] retains the full confidence of the President.â€
One week before the midterm elections, President Bush said that Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney â€œare doing fantastic jobs and I strongly support them.â€ Lying through his ever-present smirk, he said he planned to keep Rumsfeld until the end of his term; with Cheney, a constitutionally-elected politician, he had no choice. The only comment the President hadnâ€™t made the previous few weeks was, â€œRummy, youâ€™re doing a heckuva job.â€
In an unprecedented shift of editorial philosophy, the Army Times, Navy Times, Marine Times, and Air Force Times, private publications with a pro-military slant,all called for Rumsfeldâ€™s resignation:
â€œOne rosy reassurance after another has been handed down by President Bush, Vice President Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld: â€˜mission accomplished,â€™ the insurgency is â€˜in its last throes,â€™ and â€˜back off,â€™ we know what we're doing, are a few choice examples. . . .
â€œRumsfeld has lost credibility with the uniformed leadership, with the troops, with Congress and with the public at large. His strategy has failed, and his ability to lead is compromised. And although the blame for our failures in Iraq rests with the secretary, it will be the troops who bear its brunt.â€
As the thunder of an impending Democratic victory began to emerge, Republican candidates cut and ran from the Bushâ€“Cheneyâ€“Rumsfeldâ€“Gonzalesâ€“Rice Neocon Coalition. The Republicansâ€™ catharses were based not upon principle but upon their political survival. In both TV and newspaper ads, many even refused to label their party affiliation, hoping to sneak their re-election campaigns past a naive electorate that they hoped would believe the Republican Congress had nothing to do with the fiasco in Iraq nor the methodical dismantling of Constitutional freedoms at home
Extensive exit polling by several organizations revealed that as many as 60 percent of the electorate, by voting Democratic, had registered protest votes to the leadership of President Bush and the war in Iraq. Only one-third of the nation supported Cheney; the support for Rumsfeld was only slightly better.
The day after the midterm elections, with both houses of Congress about to be in Democratic control for the first time in 12 years, Donald Rumsfeld resigned. Andâ€”surprise!â€”the replacement was standing next to the President and his soon-to-be former secretary of defense.
President Bush praised Rumsfeld as â€œone of Americaâ€™s most skilled and capable national security leaders . . . a superb leader during a time of change [whose] service has made America stronger, and made America a safer nation.â€ Because of him, said President Bush, â€œthe world is more secure.â€ To the man who planned and executed the war in Iraq, the President said, â€œYou will be missed.â€
This was said about a secretary of defense who with the President and Vice-President lied to the people about the presence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and then made up stories about Saddam Husseinâ€™s alleged ties to al-Qaeda. This was a secretary of defense who boldly told the world that the United States planned to â€œshock and aweâ€ Iraq, who said he doubted the war would last six months, and who isolated Gen. Eric Shinseki, the Armyâ€™s chief of staff, who disagreed with his assessment of how many troops would be needed in Iraq. This was a secretary of defense who was furious when he heard about what happened at Abu Ghraib, but who had approved innumerable plans that paved the road to torture. This was a secretary of defense who once said, â€œItâ€™s easier to get into something than get out of it,â€ but had no viable plan for occupation nor did he tolerate senior military officers who pushed for such a plan. This was a secretary of defense who had vigorous disagreements with Secretary of State Colin Powell, who had been chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the first Gulf War. This was a secretary of defense who cautioned that Americans must not â€œdivide the world into â€˜themâ€™ and â€˜us,â€™â€ but like the rest of the Neocon Cabal believed, â€œIf youâ€™re not with us, youâ€™re for the terrorists.â€
But, this is also one of the brightest persons to have served in any Presidentâ€™s cabinet, a man who brought much-needed change to the Pentagon. His intelligence and arrogance were never greater than in how he deftly handled the media. When inept reporters asked inane questions, Rumsfeld shot right back at them, sometimes with sarcastic humor, avoiding the political niceties that other cabinet officers were burdened with. Soon, he began asking and then answering his own questions. Almost everything in Rumsfeldâ€™s past suggested unprecedented success. He received both academic and military scholarships to Princeton. Upon graduation, he became a Navy pilot, retiring as a captain after three years of active duty, followed by almost 30 years in the Ready Reserve and Standby Reserves. He had begun his public career as a Congressional administrative assistant, and was elected four times to Congress as a Republican from Illinois. His public service includes serving as counselor to President Nixon, and as director of the Office of Economic Opportunity and director of the Economic Stabilization Program. Nixon appointed him NATO ambassador, but the Presidentâ€™s resignation amid scandal led Rumsfeld to return to Washington, D.C., to become President Fordâ€™s chief of staff and, for two years, secretary of defense. Under President Ford, he was the youngest secretary of defense; under President Bush, he became the oldest person to serve in that position. After Jimmy Carter was inaugurated president in 1977, Rumsfeld left government and became one of the more successful business executives, earning honors from the pharmaceutical industry, the Wall Street Transcript, and Financial World as the nationâ€™s outstanding CEO.
George H.W. Bush had distrusted both Rumsfeld and Cheney; that was not the case with Bush the Younger who understood a political realityâ€”with Dick Cheney came Donald Rumsfeld; they had worked together, understood each other, and would be a formidable presence for the newly-elected and untested president. They, along with some of Bush the Elderâ€™s confidantes, would have power, while the new president was in presidential day care for much of his first term.
The six years Rumsfeld was with George W. Bush is how the nation will remember the former â€œboy wonder.â€ But, it isnâ€™t just Donald Rumsfeld who should carry the burden of the failure of this Administration in rushing into Iraq and then being trapped in a quagmire they created.
President Bush frequently refers to himself as a wartime president, embellishing the role of commander-in-chief. Josh Bolten told the Democratic leadership that Rumsfeld â€œhas pursued vigorously the Presidentâ€™s vision for a transformed U.S. militaryâ€ and has â€œplayed a lead role in forging and implementing many of the policiesâ€ in Iraq. The President said that his Secretary of Defense â€œhas been dedicated to his mission [and] loyal to his President.â€ Donald Rumsfeld once said, â€œIn the execution of Presidential decisions, work to be true to his views, in fact and tone.â€ He has done that. Donald Rumsfeldâ€™s resignation wonâ€™t solve the problems that his commander-in-chief createdâ€”either from indifference or incompetence, from naÃ¯vetÃ© or malevolence.
The people have finally spoken â€”
â€œBushie, youâ€™re doing a heckuva job.â€